Literature DB >> 27742804

Influence of training intensity on adaptations in acid/base transport proteins, muscle buffer capacity, and repeated-sprint ability in active men.

Cian McGinley1, David J Bishop2,3.   

Abstract

McGinley C, Bishop DJ. Influence of training intensity on adaptations in acid/base transport proteins, muscle buffer capacity, and repeated-sprint ability in active men. J Appl Physiol 121: 1290-1305, 2016. First published October 14, 2016; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00630.2016-This study measured the adaptive response to exercise training for each of the acid-base transport protein families, including providing isoform-specific evidence for the monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)1/4 chaperone protein basigin and for the electrogenic sodium-bicarbonate cotransporter (NBCe)1. We investigated whether 4 wk of work-matched, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), performed either just above the lactate threshold (HIITΔ20; n = 8), or close to peak aerobic power (HIITΔ90; n = 8), influenced adaptations in acid-base transport protein abundance, nonbicarbonate muscle buffer capacity (βmin vitro), and exercise capacity in active men. Training intensity did not discriminate between adaptations for most proteins measured, with abundance of MCT1, sodium/hydrogen exchanger (NHE) 1, NBCe1, carbonic anhydrase (CA) II, and CAXIV increasing after 4 wk, whereas there was little change in CAIII and CAIV abundance. βmin vitro also did not change. However, MCT4 protein content only increased for HIITΔ20 [effect size (ES): 1.06, 90% confidence limits × / ÷ 0.77], whereas basigin protein content only increased for HIITΔ90 (ES: 1.49, × / ÷ 1.42). Repeated-sprint ability (5 × 6-s sprints; 24 s passive rest) improved similarly for both groups. Power at the lactate threshold only improved for HIITΔ20 (ES: 0.49; 90% confidence limits ± 0.38), whereas peak O2 uptake did not change for either group. Detraining was characterized by the loss of adaptations for all of the proteins measured and for repeated-sprint ability 6 wk after removing the stimulus of HIIT. In conclusion, 4 wk of HIIT induced improvements in each of the acid-base transport protein families, but, remarkably, a 40% difference in training intensity did not discriminate between most adaptations.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-intensity interval training; intracellular buffering; lactate transport; pH regulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27742804     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00630.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  10 in total

1.  Short Term High-Repetition Back Squat Protocol Does Not Improve 5-km Run Performance.

Authors:  Matthew J Barenie; Jordan T Domenick; Jason E Bennett; George G Schweitzer; Paulina Shetty; Edward P Weiss
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Physiological Adaptations to Hypoxic vs. Normoxic Training during Intermittent Living High.

Authors:  Stefan De Smet; Paul van Herpt; Gommaar D'Hulst; Ruud Van Thienen; Marc Van Leemputte; Peter Hespel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  The Effect of Beta-Alanine versus Alkaline Agent Supplementation Combined with Branched-Chain Amino Acids and Creatine Malate in Highly-Trained Sprinters and Endurance Athletes: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Study.

Authors:  Krzysztof Durkalec-Michalski; Krzysztof Kusy; Monika Ciekot-Sołtysiak; Jacek Zieliński
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Seven Weeks of Jump Training with Superimposed Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Does Not Affect the Physiological and Cellular Parameters of Endurance Performance in Amateur Soccer Players.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirtz; André Filipovic; Sebastian Gehlert; Markus de Marées; Thorsten Schiffer; Wilhelm Bloch; Lars Donath
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  HIIT Models in Addition to Training Load and Heart Rate Variability Are Related With Physiological and Performance Adaptations After 10-Weeks of Training in Young Futsal Players.

Authors:  Fernando de Souza Campos; Fernando Klitzke Borszcz; Lucinar Jupir Forner Flores; Lilian Keila Barazetti; Anderson Santiago Teixeira; Renan Felipe Hartmann Nunes; Luiz Guilherme Antonacci Guglielmo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-22

Review 6.  Effect of sodium bicarbonate contribution on energy metabolism during exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jorge Lorenzo Calvo; Huanteng Xu; Daniel Mon-López; Helios Pareja-Galeano; Sergio Lorenzo Jiménez
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Interpretation of exercise-induced changes in human skeletal muscle mRNA expression depends on the timing of the post-exercise biopsies.

Authors:  Jujiao Kuang; Cian McGinley; Matthew J-C Lee; Nicholas J Saner; Andrew Garnham; David J Bishop
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Plasma retinol-binding protein-4 and tumor necrosis factor-α are reduced in postmenopausal women after combination of different intensities of circuit resistance training and Zataria supplementation.

Authors:  Seyed Morteza Tayebi; Ayoub Saeidi; Mohamad Fashi; Seyed Pouya; Abedin Khosravi; Hossein Shirvani; Mehdi Ahmadian; Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman; Anthony C Hackney; Hassane Zouhal
Journal:  Sport Sci Health       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 9.  An overview of technical considerations when using quantitative real-time PCR analysis of gene expression in human exercise research.

Authors:  Jujiao Kuang; Xu Yan; Amanda J Genders; Cesare Granata; David J Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Time to Optimize Supplementation: Modifying Factors Influencing the Individual Responses to Extracellular Buffering Agents.

Authors:  André B Heibel; Pedro H L Perim; Luana F Oliveira; Lars R McNaughton; Bryan Saunders
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-05-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.