| Literature DB >> 32050556 |
Kristin Kräker1,2,3,4,5, Till Schütte3,4,5,6, Jamie O'Driscoll7,8,9, Anna Birukov5,10, Olga Patey7,8,11, Florian Herse1,2,3,4, Dominik N Müller1,2,3,4,5, Basky Thilaganathan7,8, Nadine Haase1,2,3,4,5, Ralf Dechend1,3,4,5,12.
Abstract
Several studies have shown that women with a preeclamptic pregnancy exhibit an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are unknown. Animal models are essential to investigate the causes of this increased risk and have the ability to assess possible preventive and therapeutic interventions. Using the latest technologies such as speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), it is feasible to map subclinical changes in cardiac diastolic and systolic function as well as structural changes of the maternal heart. The aim of this work is to compare cardiovascular changes in an established transgenic rat model with preeclampsia-like pregnancies with findings from human preeclamptic pregnancies by STE. The same algorithms were used to evaluate and compare the changes in echoes of human and rodents. Parameters of functionality such as global longitudinal strain (animal -23.54 ± 1.82% vs. -13.79 ± 0.57%, human -20.60 ± 0.47% vs. -15.45 ± 1.55%) as well as indications of morphological changes such as relative wall thickness (animal 0.20 ± 0.01 vs. 0.25 ± 0.01, human 0.34 ± 0.01 vs. 0.40 ± 0.02) are significantly altered in both species after preeclamptic pregnancies. Thus, the described rat model simulates the human situation quite well and is a valuable tool for future investigations regarding cardiovascular changes. STE is a unique technique that can be applied in animal models and humans with a high potential to uncover cardiovascular maladaptation and subtle pathologies.Entities:
Keywords: animal models of human disease; cardiovascular dysfunction; preeclampsia; pregnancy; speckle tracking echocardiography
Year: 2020 PMID: 32050556 PMCID: PMC7037420 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21031162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Formerly preeclamptic women and rats from a transgenic animal model were characterized postpartum regarding cardiac alterations in function and structure. Early onset preeclamptic women showed a lower gestational age than controls but were matched on scanning time after delivery.
Figure 2The transgenic rat model simulates cardiac alterations of a human preeclamptic pregnancy. Global longitudinal strain (A) and global longitudinal strain rate (B) were decreased after preeclampsia (PE). Global radial strain (C) and the corresponding strain rate (D) were not altered after PE. Global circumferential strain (E) and global circumferential strain rate (F) were reduced in the post-PE animals but not in the human cohort. Ejection fraction was reduced in animals and showed the same trend in the human PE data (G). Stroke volume (H), cardiac output (I), end-diastolic (J), and end-systolic volume (K) were not altered in either species after PE. Left ventricle (LV) posterior wall (L) and relative wall thickness (M) were increased due to PE in both species. LV mass (N) was only increased in the post-PE animals. LV end-diastolic diameter (O) was unaltered. Heart rate was higher in PE animals and showed increasing trends in humans (P). Mean values ± SEM, unpaired students t-test, ns. Non-significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Relative values of post-preeclamptic changes in the animal model and in the human situation. Controls of each species were normalized to one. Grey line = controls, purple line = PE human, red line = PE animal; PE preeclampsia.
Figure 4Intraobserver comparison. In analyses of animal data, there was an excellent correlation between the two repeated evaluations of ejection fraction, r = 0.97, p < 0.0001 (A), and global longitudinal strain, r = 0.98, p < 0.0001 (B) within one observer. The excellent agreement between the two evaluations was substantiated in the corresponding Bland–Altman plots, which showed only a marginal bias, mean difference (95% CI for limits of agreement) 0.75 (4.50 to −3.00) for ejection fraction (C) and −0.50 (1.30 to −2.31) for global longitudinal strain (D). In human data analyses, there was likewise an excellent intraobserver correlation regarding measurements of ejection fraction, r = 0.94, p < 0.0001 (E), and global longitudinal strain, r = 0.98, p < 0.0001 (F). Only minor bias was seen in the corresponding Bland–Altman plots: 0.44 (4.48 to −3.61) for repeated evaluation of human ejection fraction (G) and −0.11 (1.36 to −1.58) for global longitudinal strain (H). EF = ejection fraction, GLS = global longitudinal strain.
Figure 5Interobserver comparison. In analysis by two experts, variability comparison showed moderate to strong correlation between the assessments for animal EF (A) and GLS (B) with a moderate bias, as shown in the Bland–Altman plots, mean difference (95% CI for limits of agreement) of 1.56 (−4.96 to 8.09) for animal EF (C) and −1.01 (−9.30 to 7.28) for animal GLS (D). A moderate to strong correlation was also shown between the assessments of the two observers for human EF (E) and GLS (F) with a moderate bias, as shown in the Bland–Altman plots, mean difference of −4.50 (−12.27 to 3.27) for human EF (G) and −1.08 (−5.79 to 3.64) for human GLS (H).
Maternal data of human cohort. Cases and controls are matched in age, body mass index (BMI), and scan time after delivery. Preeclamptic women show lower gestational age of delivery. Data given as mean ± SEM.
| Control ( | Preeclamptic ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 36.3 ± 1.71 | 35.0 ± 1.45 | 0.5860 |
| Weight (kg) | 70.9 ± 5.2 | 77.8 ± 7.3 | 0.4569 |
| Height (m) | 1.7 ± 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 0.2014 |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 25.1 ± 1.58 | 28.8 ± 2.17 | 0.1870 |
| Gestational age of delivery (weeks) | 40.4 ± 0.60 | 31.5 ± 1.49 | <0.0001 |
| Scan after delivery (weeks) | 45.5 ± 5.45 | 49.8 ± 3.34 | 0.5169 |