| Literature DB >> 35208619 |
Mihaela Roxana Popescu1,2, Alexandra Bouariu3, Anca Marina Ciobanu3,4, Nicolae Gică3,4, Anca Maria Panaitescu3,4.
Abstract
Pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are frequent and influence not only fetal outcomes but also the maternal cardiac function. GDM and HDP may act as a proxy for increased metabolic and cardiovascular risk later in life. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is a relatively new imaging technique that provides more sensitive assessment than conventional echocardiography of the maternal cardiac function. Recent research suggests that STE can be used during pregnancy and postpartum as a useful method of early detection of subclinical maternal cardiac changes related to pregnancy complications, such as GDM and HDP, and as an indicator for future maternal cardiovascular disorders. The aim of this review was to underline the current value of STE in the follow-up protocol of high-risk pregnant women, as a mean for pre- and postpartum monitoring. A review of the literature was conducted in the PubMed database to select relevant articles regarding the association of STE changes and HDP or GDM in the prenatal and postpartum maternal evaluations. Both GDM and HDP are associated with subtle myocardial changes in shape, size and function; these preclinical cardiac changes, often missed by conventional evaluation, can be detected using STE. Left ventricular global circumferential strain might be an important predictor of maternal cardiovascular disorders and might help to define a high-risk group that requires regular monitoring later in life and timely intervention.Entities:
Keywords: echocardiography; gestational diabetes; heart failure preserved ejection fraction; long-term cardiovascular disease; preeclampsia; speckle-tracking
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208619 PMCID: PMC8877943 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58020296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Figure 1M-Mode echocardiography of a healthy pregnant patient, in parasternal long-axis view showing left ventricular fractional shortening and ejection fraction–IVSd (interventricular septum thickness at diastole, LVIDd (left ventricle internal diameter during diastole), LVIDs (left ventricular internal diameter during systole, LVPWd (left ventricular posterior wall thickness during diastole, EDV (end diastole volume), ESV (end systole volume), EF (ejection fraction), FS (fractional shortening). Courtesy of Elias Cardiology Department.
Figure 2Tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography of a healthy pregnant patient in apical 4 chamber view, septal interogation–MV e’ Vel lat (mitral valve e wave velocity), MV a’ Vel lat (mitral valve a wave velocity), MV s’ Vel lat (mitral valve s wave velocity), E/E’ lat = relaxation ratio (E peak early mitral valve inflow velocity, E’ early mitral valve diastolic velocity). Courtesy of Elias Cardiology Department.
Figure 3Left ventricular function analysis in a pregnant patient, 4 chamber apical view. AS—apical septal, AL—apical lateral, ML—mid lateral, MS—mid septal, BL—basal lateral, BS—basal septal, EDV—end-diastolic volume, ESV—end-systolic volume, EF—ejection fraction.
Figure 4Echocardiography of a healthy pregnant patient showing circumferential left ventricle strain analysis (at the level of the papillary muscles) and speckle tracking analysis. GCPS_SAX-M-Global circumferential strain peak systolic middle left ventricle; GCPS_Avg-Average global circumferential strain; ES_Avg-Average End systolic time. Courtesy of the Fetal Medicine Foundation.
Studies assessing maternal cardiac function in gestational diabetes. DM 1-diabetes mellitus type 1, GDM-gestational diabetes mellitus, LV-left ventricle, STE-speckle tracking echocardiography. In bold, significant STE changes.
| Author, Year | Study Design | Population | Main Findings in Relation to STE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buddeberg BS et al. (2020) [ | prospective case-control study; at term (>37 weeks) | GDM = 40 |
|
| Schnettler WT et al. (2021) [ | retrospective cohort analysis; peri- and postpartum | GDM = 205 | No STE findings associated with GDM |
| Company Calabuig AM et al. (2021) [ | cross-sectional study; 26–40 weeks | GDM = 123 |
|
| Meera SJ et al. (2017) [ | retrospective cohort study | GDM = 18 |
|
| Aguilera J et al. (2020) [ | case-control study; 35–36 weeks’ | GDM = 73 |
|
| Sonaglioni A et al. (2021) [ | case-control study | GDM = 30 |
|
| Ando T et al. | retrospective cohort study; 2nd and 3rd trimester | Pregnancy complications (PE,GDM) = 74 | No STE changes specific associated to GDM |
| Airaksinen KE et al. (1986) [ | case-control study | DM1 = 17 | No GDM changes smaller LV in DM1 |
| Aguilera J et al. (2020) [ | cross-sectional study;third trimester | GDM = 161 |
|
| Appiah D et al. (2016) [ | retrospective cohort study | GDM = 64 | In GDM increased LV mass and impaired LV relaxation and systolic function |
| Lindley KJ et al. (2020) [ | retrospective case-control study | Pregnancy complications (PE) = 86 | No STE changes specific associated to GDM |
| Oliveira | case-control study | GDM = 21 |
|
| Gibbone E et al. (2021) [ | prospective observational study; 19–23 weeks’ | GDM = 199 |
|
| Schannwell CM et al. (2003) [ | case-control study | DM1 = 51 | No GDM; delayed relaxation at the beginning of pregnancy and developed a restrictive filling pattern in DM 1 |
| Freire CM et al. (2006) [ | case-control study | GDM = 13 | In GDM mild degree of diastolic abnormality |
| Ye X et al. (2021) [ | prospective observational study | GDM = 57 | In GDM expansion of the LA volume, a mirror of LV systolic function |
| Zakovicova E et al. (2014) [ | observational study | GDM = 31 | In GDM increased LV walls thicknesses |
| Pintaudi B et al. (2013) [ | case-control study | GDM = 55 | In GDM deteriorating cardiac diastolic function |
Bold indicates significant STE changes.