Ebru Şebnem Yılmaz1, Özkan Aslantaş2. 1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Art and Science, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, TR-31060 Hatay, Turkey. 2. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, TR-31060 Hatay, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nosocomial and community acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most encountered infections in the world. METHODS: This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility, phylogeny, and virulence genes of 153 Escherichia coli strains isolated from UTIs. Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to different classes of antimicrobials was determined by the VITEK-2 automated system. Presence of virulence genes and phylogenetic groups were investigated by PCR. RESULTS: Regarding susceptibility to antimicrobials, ampicillin resistance was most abundant (67.3%), followed by amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (50.9%); least abundant was resistance to amikacin (1.3%) and nitrofurantoin (1.3%). Multi drug resistance (MDR) was observed in 34.6% of the isolates, and all isolates were found to be susceptible to imipenem, meropenem and fosfomycine. The majority of the isolates belonged to the phylogenetic group B23 (35.9%), followed by A1 (20.9%), D1 (18.9%), D2 (12.4%), A0 (%5.9), B1 (3.9%) and B2 (1.9%). Among E. coli strains examined, 49% had iucD, 32.7% papE-F, 26.1% papC, 15% cnf2, 11.1% sfa, 7.8% cnf1, 1.3% afaE, 1.3% afaD, 1.3% hlyA, 0.7% f17a-A, 0.7% clpG and 0.7% eaeA genes. CONCLUSIONS: Our research demonstrated that virulence factors were distributed among different phylogroup/subgroups, which play a role in UTIs pathogenesis in humans. For this reason, complex and detailed studies are required to determine the relationship between virulence factors and specific E. coli strains that cause UTIs in humans.
INTRODUCTION: Nosocomial and community acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most encountered infections in the world. METHODS: This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility, phylogeny, and virulence genes of 153 Escherichia coli strains isolated from UTIs. Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to different classes of antimicrobials was determined by the VITEK-2 automated system. Presence of virulence genes and phylogenetic groups were investigated by PCR. RESULTS: Regarding susceptibility to antimicrobials, ampicillin resistance was most abundant (67.3%), followed by amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (50.9%); least abundant was resistance to amikacin (1.3%) and nitrofurantoin (1.3%). Multi drug resistance (MDR) was observed in 34.6% of the isolates, and all isolates were found to be susceptible to imipenem, meropenem and fosfomycine. The majority of the isolates belonged to the phylogenetic group B23 (35.9%), followed by A1 (20.9%), D1 (18.9%), D2 (12.4%), A0 (%5.9), B1 (3.9%) and B2 (1.9%). Among E. coli strains examined, 49% had iucD, 32.7% papE-F, 26.1% papC, 15% cnf2, 11.1% sfa, 7.8% cnf1, 1.3% afaE, 1.3% afaD, 1.3% hlyA, 0.7% f17a-A, 0.7% clpG and 0.7% eaeA genes. CONCLUSIONS: Our research demonstrated that virulence factors were distributed among different phylogroup/subgroups, which play a role in UTIs pathogenesis in humans. For this reason, complex and detailed studies are required to determine the relationship between virulence factors and specific E. coli strains that cause UTIs in humans.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common infections, affecting both
outpatients and inpatients worldwide
. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), classified as
Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), are one of the most
predominant causes of UTIs
. UPEC strains have several virulence factors which play an important role in
the pathogenesis of infections. These virulence factors include both structural
(fimbriae, pili, curli, flagella) and secreted (toxins, iron-acquisition)
systems
, are related to colonization and durability of bacteria in the urinary
system
. In addition, it has been shown that E. coli strains
causing UTIs have a higher prevalence rate of virulence genes than commensal
E. coli strains
.Based on three genetic marker, including chuA, yjaA
and DNA fragment TSPE4.C2, E. coli strains were mainly divided into
four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2 and D) by Clermont et al. (2000)
. Escobar-Páramo et al. (2004) further divided these phylogenetic groups into
subgroups according to presence or absence of the chuA,
yjaA genes and the DNA fragment TSPE4.C2 including A0, A1, B1,
B2, B23, D1, D2
. Previous phylogenetic analysis revealed that ExPEC strains causing UTIs
mainly belonged to phylogenetic groups B2 or D, but commensal strains predominantly
belonged to phylogenetic groups B1 or A
,
. Phylogenetic grouping of E. coli isolates is of importance
not only for understanding of E. coli populations, but also
elucidating the relationship between strains and disease.As observed in other bacterial pathogens, increasing antimicrobial resistance in
ExPEC strains poses a serious public health threat by decreasing available treatment
options for UTIs. Therefore, continuous surveillance of ExPEC strains for
antimicrobial susceptibility may provide useful information that will assist
physicians in administering effective UTI treatment
.Previously, there have been a few studies featuring virulence properties, antibiotic
resistance, and its relationship with phylogenetic groups among E.
coli associated with UTIs in Turkey
-
. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine the
antimicrobial susceptibility, phylogeny, and virulence genes of E.
coli isolated from patients admitted to Hatay State Hospital with UTI
complaint.
METHODS
E. coli strains were isolated from urine samples collected from
patients admitted to Antakya State Hospital with complaint of UTI between January
and June 2014. Isolates were included in the study when a pure culture containing
> 105 cfu/ml was acquired. The isolates were identified with
conventional biochemical tests
(Gram staining, oxidase, IMVIC), and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) targeting E. coli specific 16S rRNA
.Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates were performed using an automated method
(VITEK®2 BioMérieux). Susceptibility to 17 antimicrobials including
ampicillin, amikacin, amoxycillin-clavulanic acid, cefazolin, cefepime, cefoxitin,
ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem,
nitrofurantoin, norfloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and
piperacillin-tazobactam was tested using a Gram Negative Susceptibility card
(AST-N325). The isolates showing resistance to three or more antimicrobials from
different classes of antimicrobials were categorized as multi drug resistant
(MDR).Bacterial genomic DNA was acquired by boil extraction method
. Phylogenetic grouping of the isolates was determined using multiplex
PCR
. The identification of phylogenetic groups and subgroups (A0, A1, B1, B2,
B23, D1, D2) were determined based on presence or absence of the
chuA, yjaA genes and the DNA fragment TspE4-C2
as previously described by Escobar-Páramo et al
.The frequency of virulence genes (papC, papE-F,
sfa/focDE, cnf1, iucD, hlyA,
afa D-8, afa E-8, clpG,
cnf2, f17A, f17a-A,
f17b-A, f17c-A, f17d-A,
stx1, stx2, and eaeA) were
investigated using PCR protocols
,
-
.Statistical differences among phylogenetic groups/subgroups, virulence genes, and
antimicrobial susceptibility results were determined using Pearson’s chi-square
test. SPSS 14.01 was used for statistical analysis. In all statistical analyses a
level of significance of 0.05 was adopted.
RESULTS
A total of 153 strains isolated from patient urine specimens were identified as
E. coli based on standard biochemical tests and PCR
amplification of the targeted 16S rRNA (Figure
1).
FIGURE 1:
PCR amplification of E. coli specific 16S rRNA gene
(401 bp).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that all isolates were susceptible to
imipenem, meropenem and fosfomycine. Various rates of resistance to ampicillin
(67.3%, n=103), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (50.9%; n=78), cefazolin (45.1%, n=69),
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (45.1%, n=69), cefuroxime (38.65%, n=59), ceftriaxone
(36.6%, n=56), ciprofloxacin (35.9%, n=55), cefepime (35.9%, n=55), cefoxitin (5.2%,
n=8), norfloxacin (32.7%, n=50), gentamicin (20.9%, n=36),
tazobactam-ticarbenicillin (19.6%; n=30), amikacin (1.3%, n=2) and nitrofurantoin
(1.3%, n=2) were observed (Figure 2). MDR was
observed in 34.6% (n=53) of the isolates. Forty (26.1%) isolates were found to be
susceptible to all antimicrobials tested. There were no statistically significant
differences among MDR, non-MDR, and susceptible isolates among phylogenetic
groups/subgroups (P>0.672).
Phylogenetic grouping and subgrouping was determined as follows: 55 (35.9%) isolates
belonged to group B23, 32 (20.9%) belonged to group A1, 29 (18.9%)
belonged to D1, 19 (12.4%) belonged to D2, 9 (5.9 %) belonged to A0, 6 (3.9 % )
belonged to B1, and 3 (1.9 %) belonged to B2 (Figure
3).
FIGURE 3:
Phylogenetic groups determined among E. coli
isolates.
Of the 153 E. coli isolates, 109 (71.2%) isolates carried at least
one virulence gene. Distribution of virulence genes was detected as
iucD (49%, n=75), papE-F (32.7%, n=50),
papC (26.1%, n=40), cnf2 (15%, n=23),
sfa (11.1%, n=17), cnf1 (7.8%, n=12),
afaE (1.3%, n=2), afaD (1.3%, n=2),
hlyA (1.3%, n=2), f17a-A (0.7%, n=1),
clpG (0.7%, n=1) and eaeA (0.7%, n=1),
respectively. In addition, 26 different virulence gene profiles were observed among
the isolates. Distribution of virulence gene profiles based on phylogenetic
groups/subgroups among the isolates were given in Table 1. Statistically significant differences were observed between the
phylogenetic groups and the isolates with and without the virulence gene
(P<0.001).
TABLE 1:
Distribution of virulence gene profiles according to phylogenetic
group/subgroups among E. coli isolates.
Virulence Genes
Phylogenetic Group/Subgroup
A0
A1
B1
B2
B23
D1
D2
iucD, papC,
cnf1, papE-F,
sfa, cnf2
1
1
papC, papE-F,
cnf-1, cnf2, sfa
4
iucD, papC,
papE-F, cnf1,
cnf2
1
iucD, f17a-A,
afaD, afaE
1
papC, papE-F,
cnf2, sfa
3
iucD, cnf-1,
cnf2, sfa
1
eaeA, papC,
papE-F
1
iucD, papC,
papE-F
1
7
10
1
iucD, papC,
sfa
1
iucD, afaD,
afaE
1
cnf-1, cnf2,
sfa
3
papC, sfa,
cnf2
1
papC, papE-F
1
2
1
1
iucD, papE-F
3
1
5
iucD, cnf2
1
iucD, papC
2
papE-F, sfa
1
sfa, cnf2
1
clpG, hlyA
1
cnf2, hlyA
1
cnf2
1
3
1
iucD
7
1
24
2
3
papE-F
3
2
f17A
1
papC
1
cnf-1
1
Negative
7
14
2
3
7
11
Total
9
32
6
3
55
29
19
DISCUSSION
Determination of antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of E.
coli strains isolated from UTIs are of importance, especially in
hospitalized patients, allowing physicians to provide alternative treatment options,
reducing the risk of complications, and optimizing ongoing infection control
programs
. Because UTIs are often treated empirically by physicians, it is therefore
necessary to understand the epidemiological data related to agents causing infection
in order to improve patient outcomes
.Increased antimicrobial resistance rates, particularly for beta-lactams,
sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, third generation cephalosporins, and
fluoroquinolones, has led to challenges in clinical practice
. In this study, nearly half of the isolates were resistant to the majority
of the tested antimicrobials, with 34.6% of the strains demonstrating MDR, which is
in agreement with previous studies conducted in different regions of Turkey
,
. In accordance with the results of the study, 67.3%, 50.9%, 45.1%, 45.1%,
38.7%, 36.6%, 35.9%, 35.9%, and 32.7% were resistant to ampicillin,
amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefazolin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefuroxime,
ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, cefepime, and norfloxacin, respectively, which are the
first-line therapeutic agents used for UTI treatment
,
. These resistance rates may be explained by the frequent prescription of
these antimicrobials in empirical treatment of UTIs.UPEC strains have numerous virulence factors that enable bacteria to colonize the
urinary tract and overcome various host defense mechanisms
,
. In this study, 28.8% of the isolates were negative for examined genes. On
the other hand, 71.2% of the isolates were positive for at least one of the
virulence genes examined. Of these virulence factors, adhesion molecules have an
important role in the promotion of colonization, invasion, and replication within
uroepithelial cells
. In this study, the most prevalent adhesion genes were
papE-F (32.7%, n:50) and papC (26.1%, n: 40),
followed by sfa (11.1%, n:17), afaE (1.3%, n:2),
and afaD (1.3%, n:2), respectively. Presence of P fimbria is well
documented to be associated with pyelonephritis and cystitis
. In a study conducted by Munkhdelger et al. (2017), the frequency of
fimH, papC, papGII,
afa/draBC,
sfa/focDE and papGIII was
89.9%, 20.3%, 17.6%, 15.5%, 8.8% and 1.4%
. In another study conducted in Brazil, Tiba et al. (2008) reported frequency
of the virulence genes fimH, papC,
sfa, and afa to be 97.5%, 32.7%, 27.8%, and
6.2%, respectively
. In Mexico, Paniagua-Contreras et al. (2015) found the prevalence of
fim, pap and papGII as 61.3%,
24.7%, and 21.1%, respectively
. The sfa gene was found in twelve (70.6 %) of the isolates
together with pap genes. Shetty et al. (2014) explained that
co-existence of these two genes are due to their localization on the same
pathogenicity island of UPEC strains
. In addition, most of the isolates carried multiple adhesion genes,
indicating that the isolates had the ability to adhere to the urinary tract and
subsequently cause infection. It has been reported that ExPEC strains mainly belong
to groups B2 and D, and have higher virulence genes in relation with isolates
considered to be commensal, which belong to the phylogenetic groups A and B1
,
. Similarly, the phylogenetic groups D1 (29, 18.9%) and B23 (55,
35.9%) were the most common among the isolates carrying virulence genes in the
study. In a study carried out in Mexico, Miranda-Estrada et al. (2017) reported that
the majority of the isolates belonged to group B2 (60%) and harbored a high number
of virulence factors
. A similar result was reported in Pakistan by Bashir et al. (2012), who
found 50% of UPEC isolates belong to group B2, and to a lesser extent, groups A1 and
B1 (19%)
. Lee et al. (2015) also reported high prevalence of virulence factors in
groups B2 (79.31%) and D (15.51%), followed by groups A (3.44%) and B1 (1.72%) in
South Korea
. On the other hand, in this study, 26.8% and 3.9% of the isolates were found
to belong to the commensal groups A and D. Our results confirmed this hypothesis not
only in ExPEC strains, but also in the commensal E. coli strains
that can cause UTIs
,
. In addition, Duriez et al. (2001) suggested that the distribution of B1, A
and D groups in each population can vary according to various factors
(geographic/climatic conditions, dietary factors, the use of antibiotics, host
genetic factors) and commensal strains can acquire virulence factors and become
potentially pathogenic
.In conclusion, various rates of resistance and virulence factors were determined
among the isolates. Therefore, monitoring of E. coli isolates
should be performed for the effective treatment of UTIs. The results of the study
also revealed that E. coli isolates from UTIs belong to different
phylogroups/subgroups (mainly B23), and harbor single or various
virulence gene combinations. For this reason, more detailed studies are needed to
determine the relationship between virulence traits and certain E.
coli clones that cause UTIs in humans.
Authors: A V Shetty; S H Kumar; M Shekar; A K Shetty; I Karunasagar; I Karunasagar Journal: Indian J Med Microbiol Date: 2014 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.985