Neil K Taunk1, Jung Hun Oh2, Amita Shukla-Dave2, Kathryn Beal1, Behroze Vachha3, Andrei Holodny3, Vaios Hatzoglou3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Neuroradiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
Background: Imaging criteria to evaluate the response of brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the early posttreatment period remains a crucial unmet need. The aim of this study is to correlate early (within 12 wk) posttreatment perfusion MRI changes with long-term outcomes after treatment of lung cancer brain metastases with SRS. Methods: Pre- and posttreatment perfusion MRI scans were obtained in patients treated with SRS for intact non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases. Time-dependent leakage (Ktrans), blood plasma volume (Vp), and extracellular extravascular volume (Ve) were calculated for each lesion. Patients were followed longitudinally with serial MRI until death, progression, or intervention (whole brain radiation or surgery). Results: We included 53 lesions treated with SRS from 41 total patients. Median follow-up after treatment was 11 months. Actuarial local control at one year was 85%. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant difference (P = 0.032) in posttreatment Ktrans SD between patients with progressive disease (mean = 0.0317) and without progressive disease (mean = 0.0219). A posttreatment Ktrans SD cutoff value of 0.017 was highly sensitive (89%) for predicting progressive disease and no progressive disease. Early posttreatment volume change was not associated with outcome (P = 0.941). Conclusion: Posttreatment Ktrans SD may be used as an early posttreatment imaging biomarker to help predict long-term response of lung cancer brain metastases to SRS. This can help identify patients who will ultimately fail SRS and allow for timelier adjustment in treatment approach. These data should be prospectively validated in larger patient cohorts and other histologies.
Background: Imaging criteria to evaluate the response of brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the early posttreatment period remains a crucial unmet need. The aim of this study is to correlate early (within 12 wk) posttreatment perfusion MRI changes with long-term outcomes after treatment of lung cancer brain metastases with SRS. Methods: Pre- and posttreatment perfusion MRI scans were obtained in patients treated with SRS for intact non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases. Time-dependent leakage (Ktrans), blood plasma volume (Vp), and extracellular extravascular volume (Ve) were calculated for each lesion. Patients were followed longitudinally with serial MRI until death, progression, or intervention (whole brain radiation or surgery). Results: We included 53 lesions treated with SRS from 41 total patients. Median follow-up after treatment was 11 months. Actuarial local control at one year was 85%. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant difference (P = 0.032) in posttreatment Ktrans SD between patients with progressive disease (mean = 0.0317) and without progressive disease (mean = 0.0219). A posttreatment Ktrans SD cutoff value of 0.017 was highly sensitive (89%) for predicting progressive disease and no progressive disease. Early posttreatment volume change was not associated with outcome (P = 0.941). Conclusion: Posttreatment Ktrans SD may be used as an early posttreatment imaging biomarker to help predict long-term response of lung cancer brain metastases to SRS. This can help identify patients who will ultimately fail SRS and allow for timelier adjustment in treatment approach. These data should be prospectively validated in larger patient cohorts and other histologies.
Authors: Minesh P Mehta; May N Tsao; Timothy J Whelan; David E Morris; James A Hayman; John C Flickinger; Michael Mills; C Leland Rogers; Luis Souhami Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Taofeek K Owonikoko; Jack Arbiser; Amelia Zelnak; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; Adam M Robin; Steven N Kalkanis; Timothy G Whitsett; Bodour Salhia; Nhan L Tran; Timothy Ryken; Michael K Moore; Kathleen M Egan; Jeffrey J Olson Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Andrew E Sloan; Faith G Davis; Fawn D Vigneau; Ping Lai; Raymond E Sawaya Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: G M Conte; L Altabella; A Castellano; V Cuccarini; A Bizzi; M Grimaldi; A Costa; M Caulo; A Falini; N Anzalone Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Timothy J Kaufmann; Marion Smits; Jerrold Boxerman; Raymond Huang; Daniel P Barboriak; Michael Weller; Caroline Chung; Christina Tsien; Paul D Brown; Lalitha Shankar; Evanthia Galanis; Elizabeth Gerstner; Martin J van den Bent; Terry C Burns; Ian F Parney; Gavin Dunn; Priscilla K Brastianos; Nancy U Lin; Patrick Y Wen; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Martin Kocher; Garry Ceccon; Jan-Michael Werner; Anna Brunn; Martina Deckert; Whitney B Pope; Riccardo Soffietti; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Weller; Jörg C Tonn; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Hecong Qin; Vickie Zhang; Robert A Bok; Romelyn Delos Santos; J Adam Cunha; I-Chow Hsu; Justin Delos Santos Bs; Jessie E Lee; Subramaniam Sukumar; Peder E Z Larson; Daniel B Vigneron; David M Wilson; Renuka Sriram; John Kurhanewicz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 7.038