OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a smartphone application (app) to monitor longitudinal electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) on patient satisfaction and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted a 6-month randomized controlled trial of care coordination along with an app (intervention) versus care coordination alone (control) in 191 RA patients. Participants in the intervention group were prompted to provide information daily using ePROs. In both the intervention and control groups, a care coordinator contacted participants at 6 and 18 weeks to assess for flares. The main outcome measures were the global satisfaction score from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), the score from the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) Questionnaire, and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score. RESULTS: Groups were similar at baseline. The median TSQM score at 6 months was 83.3 in both groups, and the median PEPPI score at 6 months was 50 in both groups. The median CDAI score at 6 months was 8 in the intervention group versus 10 in the control group. No statistically significant group differences in the medians of TSQM, PEPPI, or CDAI scores at 6 months were detected. Of the 67 intervention participants who completed the exit survey, 90% rated their likelihood of recommending the app as ≥7 of 10. Of the 11 physicians who completed the exit survey, 73% agreed/strongly agreed that they wanted to continue offering the app to patients. CONCLUSION: A mobile app designed to collect ePRO data on RA symptoms did not significantly improve patient satisfaction or disease activity compared to care coordination alone. However, both patients and physicians reported positive experiences with the app.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a smartphone application (app) to monitor longitudinal electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) on patient satisfaction and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted a 6-month randomized controlled trial of care coordination along with an app (intervention) versus care coordination alone (control) in 191 RA patients. Participants in the intervention group were prompted to provide information daily using ePROs. In both the intervention and control groups, a care coordinator contacted participants at 6 and 18 weeks to assess for flares. The main outcome measures were the global satisfaction score from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), the score from the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) Questionnaire, and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score. RESULTS: Groups were similar at baseline. The median TSQM score at 6 months was 83.3 in both groups, and the median PEPPI score at 6 months was 50 in both groups. The median CDAI score at 6 months was 8 in the intervention group versus 10 in the control group. No statistically significant group differences in the medians of TSQM, PEPPI, or CDAI scores at 6 months were detected. Of the 67 intervention participants who completed the exit survey, 90% rated their likelihood of recommending the app as ≥7 of 10. Of the 11 physicians who completed the exit survey, 73% agreed/strongly agreed that they wanted to continue offering the app to patients. CONCLUSION: A mobile app designed to collect ePRO data on RA symptoms did not significantly improve patient satisfaction or disease activity compared to care coordination alone. However, both patients and physicians reported positive experiences with the app.
Authors: J R Curtis; S Yang; L Chen; J E Pope; E C Keystone; B Haraoui; G Boire; J C Thorne; D Tin; C A Hitchon; C O Bingham; V P Bykerk Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Piet L C M van Riel; Rixt M Zuidema; Carine Vogel; Sanne A A Rongen-van Dartel Journal: Rheum Dis Clin North Am Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.670
Authors: Maria J Santana; Lotte Haverman; Kate Absolom; Elena Takeuchi; David Feeny; Martha Grootenhuis; Galina Velikova Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Kelly Gavigan; W Benjamin Nowell; Mylene S Serna; Jeffrey L Stark; Mohamed Yassine; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Mark J Atkinson; Anusha Sinha; Steven L Hass; Shoshana S Colman; Ritesh N Kumar; Meryl Brod; Clayton R Rowland Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2004-02-26 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Katie L Druce; Lis Cordingley; Vicky Short; Susan Moore; Bruce Hellman; Ben James; Mark Lunt; Simon D Kyle; Will G Dixon; John McBeth Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Robert S Rudin; Sofia Perez; Jorge A Rodriguez; Jessica Sousa; Savanna Plombon; Adriana Arcia; Dinah Foer; David W Bates; Anuj K Dalal Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-10-12 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Dmytro Fedkov; Andrea Berghofen; Christel Weiss; Christine Peine; Felix Lang; Johannes Knitza; Sebastian Kuhn; Bernhard K Krämer; Jan Leipe Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 3.580