Literature DB >> 34342179

3D Printing of Microgel Scaffolds with Tunable Void Fraction to Promote Cell Infiltration.

Alexis J Seymour1, Sungchul Shin2, Sarah C Heilshorn2.   

Abstract

Granular, microgel-based materials have garnered interest as promising tissue engineering scaffolds due to their inherent porosity, which can promote cell infiltration. Adapting these materials for 3D bioprinting, while maintaining sufficient void space to enable cell migration, can be challenging, since the rheological properties that determine printability are strongly influenced by microgel packing and void fraction. In this work, a strategy is proposed to decouple printability and void fraction by blending UV-crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) microgels with sacrificial gelatin microgels to form composite inks. It is observed that inks with an apparent viscosity greater than ≈100 Pa s (corresponding to microgel concentrations ≥5 wt%) have rheological properties that enable extrusion-based printing of multilayered structures in air. By altering the ratio of GelMA to sacrificial gelatin microgels, while holding total concentration constant at 6 wt%, a family of GelMA:gelatin microgel inks is created that allows for tuning of void fraction from 0.20 to 0.57. Furthermore, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) seeded onto printed constructs are observed to migrate into granular inks in a void fraction-dependent manner. Thus, the family of microgel inks holds promise for use in 3D printing and tissue engineering applications that rely upon cell infiltration.
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; cell infiltration; endothelial cells; gelatin methacryloyl; microgels; sacrificial inks; void fractions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34342179      PMCID: PMC8612872          DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202100644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater        ISSN: 2192-2640            Impact factor:   11.092


  53 in total

1.  Click by Click Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Scaffolds.

Authors:  Nicole J Darling; Weixian Xi; Elias Sideris; Alexa R Anderson; Cassie Pong; S Thomas Carmichael; Tatiana Segura
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 9.933

2.  Direct 3D Printing of Shear-Thinning Hydrogels into Self-Healing Hydrogels.

Authors:  Christopher B Highley; Christopher B Rodell; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Mature vessel networks in engineered tissue promote graft-host anastomosis and prevent graft thrombosis.

Authors:  Shahar Ben-Shaul; Shira Landau; Uri Merdler; Shulamit Levenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability.

Authors:  Jooyoung Lee; Seung Ja Oh; Sang Hyun An; Wan-Doo Kim; Sang-Heon Kim
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 5.  3D Printing in Suspension Baths: Keeping the Promises of Bioprinting Afloat.

Authors:  Andrew McCormack; Christopher B Highley; Nicholas R Leslie; Ferry P W Melchels
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Diffusion limits of an in vitro thick prevascularized tissue.

Authors:  Craig K Griffith; Cheryl Miller; Richard C A Sainson; Jay W Calvert; Noo Li Jeon; Christopher C W Hughes; Steven C George
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

7.  3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart.

Authors:  A Lee; A R Hudson; D J Shiwarski; J W Tashman; T J Hinton; S Yerneni; J M Bliley; P G Campbell; A W Feinberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  3D Bioprinting using UNIversal Orthogonal Network (UNION) Bioinks.

Authors:  Sarah M Hull; Christopher D Lindsay; Lucia G Brunel; Daniel J Shiwarski; Joshua W Tashman; Julien G Roth; David Myung; Adam W Feinberg; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 18.808

9.  Biodegradable scaffold with built-in vasculature for organ-on-a-chip engineering and direct surgical anastomosis.

Authors:  Boyang Zhang; Miles Montgomery; M Dean Chamberlain; Shinichiro Ogawa; Anastasia Korolj; Aric Pahnke; Laura A Wells; Stéphane Massé; Jihye Kim; Lewis Reis; Abdul Momen; Sara S Nunes; Aaron R Wheeler; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar; Gordon Keller; Michael V Sefton; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 10.  A pore way to heal and regenerate: 21st century thinking on biocompatibility.

Authors:  Buddy D Ratner
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2016-02-18
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Bioprinted microvasculature: progressing from structure to function.

Authors:  Alexis J Seymour; Ashley D Westerfield; Vincent C Cornelius; Mark A Skylar-Scott; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Nucleic Acid Delivery from Granular Hydrogels.

Authors:  Evan Kurt; Tatiana Segura
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  3D Bioprinting of Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Improved Biological Functionality.

Authors:  Sarah M Hull; Lucia G Brunel; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  4D Printing of Extrudable and Degradable Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Microgel Scaffolds for Multidimensional Cell Culture.

Authors:  Connor E Miksch; Nathaniel P Skillin; Bruce E Kirkpatrick; Grace K Hach; Varsha V Rao; Timothy J White; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 15.153

5.  Simultaneous One-Pot Interpenetrating Network Formation to Expand 3D Processing Capabilities.

Authors:  Abhishek P Dhand; Matthew D Davidson; Jonathan H Galarraga; Taimoor H Qazi; Ryan C Locke; Robert L Mauck; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 32.086

6.  Sticking Together: Injectable Granular Hydrogels with Increased Functionality via Dynamic Covalent Inter-Particle Crosslinking.

Authors:  Victoria G Muir; Taimoor H Qazi; Shoshana Weintraub; Bryan O Torres Maldonado; Paulo E Arratia; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 15.153

Review 7.  Application Status of Sacrificial Biomaterials in 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Siyu Liu; Tianlin Wang; Shenglong Li; Xiaohong Wang
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.967

8.  Nanoengineered myogenic scaffolds for skeletal muscle tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jacob P Quint; Mohamadmahdi Samandari; Laleh Abbasi; Evelyn Mollocana; Chiara Rinoldi; Azadeh Mostafavi; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Generalizing hydrogel microparticles into a new class of bioinks for extrusion bioprinting.

Authors:  Shangjing Xin; Kaivalya A Deo; Jing Dai; Navaneeth Krishna Rajeeva Pandian; David Chimene; Robert M Moebius; Abhishek Jain; Arum Han; Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Daniel L Alge
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Frozen bean curd-inspired xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix with triple pretreatment approach of freeze-thaw, laser drilling and ADSCs pre-culture for promoting early vascularization and integration.

Authors:  Xing Huang; Zhu Zhu; Lin Lu; Rui Jin; Di Sun; Xusong Luo
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.