Literature DB >> 34788748

Fabrication of MSC-laden composites of hyaluronic acid hydrogels reinforced with MEW scaffolds for cartilage repair.

Jonathan H Galarraga1, Ryan C Locke2,3, Claire E Witherel1, Brendan D Stoeckl1,2,3, Miguel Castilho4,5, Robert L Mauck1,2,3, Jos Malda4,6, Riccardo Levato4,6, Jason A Burdick1.   

Abstract

Hydrogels are of interest in cartilage tissue engineering due to their ability to support the encapsulation and chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). However, features such as hydrogel crosslink density, which can influence nutrient transport, nascent matrix distribution, and the stability of constructs during and after implantation must be considered in hydrogel design. Here, we first demonstrate that more loosely crosslinked (i.e. softer, ∼2 kPa) norbornene-modified hyaluronic acid (NorHA) hydrogels support enhanced cartilage formation and maturation when compared to more densely crosslinked (i.e. stiffer, ∼6-60 kPa) hydrogels, with a >100-fold increase in compressive modulus after 56 d of culture. While soft NorHA hydrogels mature into neocartilage suitable for the repair of articular cartilage, their initial moduli are too low for handling and they do not exhibit the requisite stability needed to withstand the loading environments of articulating joints. To address this, we reinforced NorHA hydrogels with polycaprolactone (PCL) microfibers produced via melt-electrowriting (MEW). Importantly, composites fabricated with MEW meshes of 400µm spacing increased the moduli of soft NorHA hydrogels by ∼50-fold while preserving the chondrogenic potential of the hydrogels. There were minimal differences in chondrogenic gene expression and biochemical content (e.g. DNA, GAG, collagen) between hydrogels alone and composites, whereas the composites increased in compressive modulus to ∼350 kPa after 56 d of culture. Lastly, integration of composites with native tissue was assessedex vivo; MSC-laden composites implanted after 28 d of pre-culture exhibited increased integration strengths and contact areas compared to acellular composites. This approach has great potential towards the design of cell-laden implants that possess both initial mechanical integrity and the ability to support neocartilage formation and integration for cartilage repair.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cartilage; hydrogel; interfacial strength; melt-electrowriting; tissue integration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34788748      PMCID: PMC8943711          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac3acb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  53 in total

Review 1.  Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jingzhou Yang; Yu Shrike Zhang; Kan Yue; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Mediating human stem cell behaviour via defined fibrous architectures by melt electrospinning writing.

Authors:  Kian F Eichholz; David A Hoey
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 3.  Surgical treatments of cartilage defects of the knee: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Brian M Devitt; Stuart W Bell; Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller; Tim S Whitehead
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Metabolic Labeling to Probe the Spatiotemporal Accumulation of Matrix at the Chondrocyte-Hydrogel Interface.

Authors:  Claudia Loebel; Mi Y Kwon; Chao Wang; Lin Han; Robert L Mauck; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 18.808

5.  3D printing of fibre-reinforced cartilaginous templates for the regeneration of osteochondral defects.

Authors:  Susan Critchley; Eamon J Sheehy; Gráinne Cunniffe; Pedro Diaz-Payno; Simon F Carroll; Oju Jeon; Eben Alsberg; Pieter A J Brama; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Optical determination of anisotropic material properties of bovine articular cartilage in compression.

Authors:  Christopher C-B Wang; Nadeen O Chahine; Clark T Hung; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  An additive manufacturing-based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Joydip Kundu; Jin-Hyung Shim; Jinah Jang; Sung-Won Kim; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 8.  From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; Tomasz Jungst; Ruben G Scheuring; Torsten Blunk; Juergen Groll; Jos Malda
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 30.849

9.  Surface tension-assisted additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Héloïse Ragelle; Mark W Tibbitt; Shang-Yun Wu; Michael A Castillo; George Z Cheng; Sidharta P Gangadharan; Daniel G Anderson; Michael J Cima; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Simultaneous Micropatterning of Fibrous Meshes and Bioinks for the Fabrication of Living Tissue Constructs.

Authors:  Mylène de Ruijter; Alexandre Ribeiro; Inge Dokter; Miguel Castilho; Jos Malda
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 9.933

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  HYDRHA: Hydrogels of hyaluronic acid. New biomedical approaches in cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Maddalena Grieco; Ornella Ursini; Ilaria Elena Palamà; Giuseppe Gigli; Lorenzo Moroni; Barbara Cortese
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-10-08

2.  GelMA Hydrogel Reinforced with 3D Printed PEGT/PBT Scaffolds for Supporting Epigenetically-Activated Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells for Bone Repair.

Authors:  Kenny Man; Cesar Alcala; Naveen V Mekhileri; Khoon S Lim; Lin-Hua Jiang; Tim B F Woodfield; Xuebin B Yang
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-04-10

Review 3.  Hybprinting for musculoskeletal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jiannan Li; Carolyn Kim; Chi-Chun Pan; Aaron Babian; Elaine Lui; Jeffrey L Young; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Sungwoo Kim; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 4.  Photo-Crosslinkable Hydrogels for 3D Bioprinting in the Repair of Osteochondral Defects: A Review of Present Applications and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Gang Tan; Jing Xu; Qin Yu; Jieyu Zhang; Xuefeng Hu; Chenwei Sun; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 5.  Recent Developments and Current Applications of Organic Nanomaterials in Cartilage Repair.

Authors:  Zhanqi Wei; Ganlin Zhang; Qing Cao; Tianhao Zhao; Yixin Bian; Wei Zhu; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 6.  Recent advances in melt electro writing for tissue engineering for 3D printing of microporous scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sebastian Loewner; Sebastian Heene; Timo Baroth; Henrik Heymann; Fabian Cholewa; Holger Blume; Cornelia Blume
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 7.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting for Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Insights into Naturally-Derived Bioinks from Land and Marine Sources.

Authors:  Marta Anna Szychlinska; Fabio Bucchieri; Alberto Fucarino; Alfredo Ronca; Ugo D'Amora
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-08-12

8.  Soft substrates direct stem cell differentiation into the chondrogenic lineage without the use of growth factors.

Authors:  Tosca Roncada; Roxane Bonithon; Gordon Blunn; Marta Roldo
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 7.940

9.  Tethered TGF-β1 in a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Bioink for Bioprinting Cartilaginous Tissues.

Authors:  Julia Hauptstein; Leonard Forster; Ali Nadernezhad; Jürgen Groll; Jörg Teßmar; Torsten Blunk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.