Literature DB >> 32043947

Deep Learning for Automatic Calcium Scoring in CT: Validation Using Multiple Cardiac CT and Chest CT Protocols.

Sanne G M van Velzen1, Nikolas Lessmann1, Birgitta K Velthuis1, Ingrid E M Bank1, Desiree H J G van den Bongard1, Tim Leiner1, Pim A de Jong1, Wouter B Veldhuis1, Adolfo Correa1, James G Terry1, John Jeffrey Carr1, Max A Viergever1, Helena M Verkooijen1, Ivana Išgum1.   

Abstract

Background Although several deep learning (DL) calcium scoring methods have achieved excellent performance for specific CT protocols, their performance in a range of CT examination types is unknown. Purpose To evaluate the performance of a DL method for automatic calcium scoring across a wide range of CT examination types and to investigate whether the method can adapt to different types of CT examinations when representative images are added to the existing training data set. Materials and Methods The study included 7240 participants who underwent various types of nonenhanced CT examinations that included the heart: coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring CT, diagnostic CT of the chest, PET attenuation correction CT, radiation therapy treatment planning CT, CAC screening CT, and low-dose CT of the chest. CAC and thoracic aorta calcification (TAC) were quantified using a convolutional neural network trained with (a) 1181 low-dose chest CT examinations (baseline), (b) a small set of examinations of the respective type supplemented to the baseline (data specific), and (c) a combination of examinations of all available types (combined). Supplemental training sets contained 199-568 CT images depending on the calcium burden of each population. The DL algorithm performance was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between DL and manual (Agatston) CAC and (volume) TAC scoring and with linearly weighted κ values for cardiovascular risk categories (Agatston score; cardiovascular disease risk categories: 0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, >400). Results At baseline, the DL algorithm yielded ICCs of 0.79-0.97 for CAC and 0.66-0.98 for TAC across the range of different types of CT examinations. ICCs improved to 0.84-0.99 (CAC) and 0.92-0.99 (TAC) for CT protocol-specific training and to 0.85-0.99 (CAC) and 0.96-0.99 (TAC) for combined training. For assignment of cardiovascular disease risk category, the κ value for all test CT scans was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89, 0.91) for the baseline training. It increased to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.93) for both data-specific and combined training. Conclusion A deep learning calcium scoring algorithm for quantification of coronary and thoracic calcium was robust, despite substantial differences in CT protocol and variations in subject population. Augmenting the algorithm training with CT protocol-specific images further improved algorithm performance. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Vannier in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32043947      PMCID: PMC7106943          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  32 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcium can predict all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events on low-dose CT screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Jacobs; Martijn J A Gondrie; Yolanda van der Graaf; Harry J de Koning; Ivana Isgum; Bram van Ginneken; Willem P T M Mali
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Toward resolution of cardiovascular health disparities in African Americans: design and methods of the Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Herman A Taylor; James G Wilson; Daniel W Jones; Daniel F Sarpong; Asoka Srinivasan; Robert J Garrison; Cheryl Nelson; Sharon B Wyatt
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Automated aortic calcium scoring on low-dose chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Ivana Isgum; Annemarieke Rutten; Mathias Prokop; Marius Staring; Stefan Klein; Josien P W Pluim; Max A Viergever; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge.

Authors:  Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Alberto Traverso; Thomas de Bel; Moira S N Berens; Cas van den Bogaard; Piergiorgio Cerello; Hao Chen; Qi Dou; Maria Evelina Fantacci; Bram Geurts; Robbert van der Gugten; Pheng Ann Heng; Bart Jansen; Michael M J de Kaste; Valentin Kotov; Jack Yu-Hung Lin; Jeroen T M C Manders; Alexander Sóñora-Mengana; Juan Carlos García-Naranjo; Evgenia Papavasileiou; Mathias Prokop; Marco Saletta; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Ernst T Scholten; Luuk Scholten; Miranda M Snoeren; Ernesto Lopez Torres; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Nicole Walasek; Guido C A Zuidhof; Bram van Ginneken; Colin Jacobs
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Relationships of thoracic aortic wall calcification to cardiovascular risk factors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Junichiro Takasu; Ronit Katz; Khurram Nasir; J Jeffrey Carr; Nathan Wong; Robert Detrano; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Detection of coronary calcifications from computed tomography scans for automated risk assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ivana Isgum; Annemarieke Rutten; Mathias Prokop; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Automatic determination of cardiovascular risk by CT attenuation correction maps in Rb-82 PET/CT.

Authors:  Ivana Išgum; Bob D de Vos; Jelmer M Wolterink; Damini Dey; Daniel S Berman; Mathieu Rubeaux; Tim Leiner; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Association of Coronary Artery Calcium in Adults Aged 32 to 46 Years With Incident Coronary Heart Disease and Death.

Authors:  John Jeffrey Carr; David R Jacobs; James G Terry; Christina M Shay; Stephen Sidney; Kiang Liu; Pamela J Schreiner; Cora E Lewis; James M Shikany; Jared P Reis; David C Goff
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Diagnostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Cardiovascular Disease in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Jung Hye Sung; Joseph Yeboah; Jae Eun Lee; Che L Smith; James G Terry; Mario Sims; Tandaw Samdarshi; Solomon Musani; Ervin Fox; Yaorong Ge; James G Wilson; Herman A Taylor; J Jeffery Carr
Journal:  Br J Med Med Res       Date:  2015-09-21
View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging for Risk Stratification in Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Andrew Lin; Márton Kolossváry; Manish Motwani; Ivana Išgum; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-02-25

2.  Application of a deep learning algorithm to calcium scoring in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Pieter van der Bijl; Jan Stassen; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Coronary artery calcifications on breast cancer radiotherapy planning CT scans and cardiovascular risk: What do patients want to know?

Authors:  Roxanne Gal; Madelijn L Gregorowitsch; Marleen J Emaus; Erwin LA Blezer; Femke van der Leij; Sanne Gm van Velzen; Julia J van Tol-Geerdink; Ivana Išgum; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev       Date:  2021-10-30

4.  Automated cardiovascular risk categorization through AI-driven coronary calcium quantification in cardiac PET acquired attenuation correction CT.

Authors:  S G M van Velzen; M M Dobrolinska; P Knaapen; R L M van Herten; R Jukema; I Danad; R H J A Slart; M J W Greuter; I Išgum
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Automatic coronary artery calcium scoring on routine chest computed tomography (CT): comparison of a deep learning algorithm and a dedicated calcium scoring CT.

Authors:  Cheng Xu; Heng Guo; Minfeng Xu; Miao Duan; Ming Wang; Peijun Liu; Xinyi Luo; Zhengyu Jin; Hui Liu; Yining Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-05

6.  Generative models for reproducible coronary calcium scoring.

Authors:  Sanne G M van Velzen; Bob D de Vos; Julia M H Noothout; Helena M Verkooijen; Max A Viergever; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-31

7.  Identification of Risk of Cardiovascular Disease by Automatic Quantification of Coronary Artery Calcifications on Radiotherapy Planning CT Scans in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Roxanne Gal; Sanne G M van Velzen; Maartje J Hooning; Marleen J Emaus; Femke van der Leij; Madelijn L Gregorowitsch; Erwin L A Blezer; Sofie A M Gernaat; Nikolas Lessmann; Margriet G A Sattler; Tim Leiner; Pim A de Jong; Arco J Teske; Janneke Verloop; Joan J Penninkhof; Ilonca Vaartjes; Hanneke Meijer; Julia J van Tol-Geerdink; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Desirée H J G van den Bongard; Ivana Išgum; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular CT: Current status and future implications.

Authors:  Andrew Lin; Márton Kolossváry; Manish Motwani; Ivana Išgum; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 9.  Machine Learning and the Future of Cardiovascular Care: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Giorgio Quer; Ramy Arnaout; Michael Henne; Rima Arnaout
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Prediction of Coronary Calcification and Stenosis: Role of Radiomics From Low-Dose CT.

Authors:  Fatemeh Homayounieh; Pingkun Yan; Subba R Digumarthy; Uwe Kruger; Ge Wang; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.