BACKGROUND: Multilevel lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) surgery in obese patients is problematic, with positioning and anaesthetic risks during posterior approaches, vascular and visceral complications during anterior approaches, and lack of access to L5/S1 during lateral approaches. Modified anterior LIF (ALIF) via an anterolateral retroperitoneal approach in the lateral decubitus position permits access to L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels without patient repositioning. This study reports our initial experience with this lateral ALIF in obese patients and describes modifications of existing lateral and anterior techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a prospectively maintained registry including the first 30 consecutive patients who underwent lateral ALIF. In all patients, supine ALIF was relatively contraindicated because of obesity or previous abdominal surgery. All patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2. Fusion was assessed by high-definition computed tomography. Patient-reported outcomes included visual analogue scale pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS). All patients underwent ≥2 years follow-up. RESULTS: At last follow-up (mean, 35.0 months) mean back pain improved 64%, leg pain improved 67%, ODI improved 54%, and PCS and MCS both improved 37% (P<0.05 versus preoperative for all). Mean BMI was unchanged postoperatively (P=0.83). Complications occurred in 7 (23%) patients: dysesthesia [2], retroperitoneal hematoma [2], radiculopathy [1], and subsidence [2]. Solid interbody fusion occurred in 19 (63%) patients at 12 months postoperatively and in 26 (87%) patients at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral ALIF enables L5/S1 anterior fusion in obese patients and permits multilevel fusion using a single position. Satisfactory clinical outcomes and complication rates are achieved despite unchanged BMI and 87% radiological fusion rates. Lateral ALIF appears to be a reasonable alternative to posterior, lateral, and supine-position anterior approaches for L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 interbody fusions. 2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Multilevel lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) surgery in obese patients is problematic, with positioning and anaesthetic risks during posterior approaches, vascular and visceral complications during anterior approaches, and lack of access to L5/S1 during lateral approaches. Modified anterior LIF (ALIF) via an anterolateral retroperitoneal approach in the lateral decubitus position permits access to L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels without patient repositioning. This study reports our initial experience with this lateral ALIF in obese patients and describes modifications of existing lateral and anterior techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a prospectively maintained registry including the first 30 consecutive patients who underwent lateral ALIF. In all patients, supine ALIF was relatively contraindicated because of obesity or previous abdominal surgery. All patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2. Fusion was assessed by high-definition computed tomography. Patient-reported outcomes included visual analogue scale pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS). All patients underwent ≥2 years follow-up. RESULTS: At last follow-up (mean, 35.0 months) mean back pain improved 64%, leg pain improved 67%, ODI improved 54%, and PCS and MCS both improved 37% (P<0.05 versus preoperative for all). Mean BMI was unchanged postoperatively (P=0.83). Complications occurred in 7 (23%) patients: dysesthesia [2], retroperitoneal hematoma [2], radiculopathy [1], and subsidence [2]. Solid interbody fusion occurred in 19 (63%) patients at 12 months postoperatively and in 26 (87%) patients at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral ALIF enables L5/S1 anterior fusion in obese patients and permits multilevel fusion using a single position. Satisfactory clinical outcomes and complication rates are achieved despite unchanged BMI and 87% radiological fusion rates. Lateral ALIF appears to be a reasonable alternative to posterior, lateral, and supine-position anterior approaches for L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 interbody fusions. 2019 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Philipp Schleicher; R Gerlach; B Schär; C M J Cain; W Achatz; R Pflugmacher; N P Haas; F Kandziora Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Timothy T Davis; Richard A Hynes; Daniel A Fung; Scott W Spann; Michael MacMillan; Brian Kwon; John Liu; Frank Acosta; Thomas E Drochner Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2014-09-12
Authors: Rafael De la Garza-Ramos; Mohamad Bydon; Nicholas B Abt; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ali Bydon; Ziya L Gokaslan; Bruce Rabin; Timothy F Witham Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Mladen Djurasovic; Kelly R Bratcher; Steven D Glassman; John R Dimar; Leah Y Carreon Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: C Faldini; F Barile; G Viroli; M Manzetti; M Ialuna; M Traversari; A Paolucci; A Rinaldi; G D'Antonio; A Ruffilli Journal: Musculoskelet Surg Date: 2022-08-09
Authors: Ghani Haider; Katherine E Wagner; Venita Chandra; Ivan Cheng; Martin N Stienen; Anand Veeravagu Journal: J Neurosurg Case Lessons Date: 2022-06-06
Authors: Mirza Pojskic; Benjamin Saβ; Benjamin Völlger; Christopher Nimsky; Barbara Carl Journal: Bosn J Basic Med Sci Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 3.363