Literature DB >> 35235051

Anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and patient-related considerations for ALIF, anterior-to-psoas, and transpsoas LLIF approaches.

Aaron J Buckland1, Kimberly Ashayeri2, Carlos Leon1, Ivan Cheng3, J Alex Thomas4, Brett Braly5, Brian Kwon6, Leon Eisen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Circumferential (AP) lumbar fusion surgery is an effective treatment for degenerative and deformity conditions of the spine. The lateral decubitus position allows for simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior aspects of the spine, enabling instrumentation of both columns without the need for patient repositioning. This paper seeks to outline the anatomical and patient-related considerations in anterior column reconstruction of the lumbar spine from L1-S1 in the lateral decubitus position.
METHODS: We detail the anatomic considerations of the lateral ALIF, transpsoas, and anterior-to-psoas surgical approaches from surgeon experience and comprehensive literature review.
RESULTS: Single-position AP surgery allows simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior column and may combine ALIF, LLIF, and minimally invasive posterior instrumentation techniques from L1-S1 without patient repositioning. Careful history, physical examination, and imaging review optimize safety and efficacy of lateral ALIF or LLIF surgery. An excellent understanding of patient spinal and abdominal anatomy is necessary. Each approach has relative advantages and disadvantages according to the disc level, skeletal, vascular, and psoas anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS: A development of a framework to analyze these factors will result in improved patient outcomes and a reduction in complications for lateral ALIF, transpsoas, and anterior-to-psoas surgeries.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior to psoas (ATP)/OLIF; Circumferential fusion; Lateral ALIF; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Single-position lumbar fusion; Transpsoas/XLIF

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35235051     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07127-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  47 in total

1.  Comparison of perioperative parameters and complications observed in the anterior exposure of the lumbar spine by a spine surgeon with and without the assistance of an access surgeon.

Authors:  Micah W Smith; Kevin A Rahn; Robert M Shugart; Christopher D Belschner; Kary S Stout; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance.

Authors:  Patrick C Hsieh; Tyler R Koski; Brian A O'Shaughnessy; Patrick Sugrue; Sean Salehi; Stephen Ondra; John C Liu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-10

Review 3.  Potential and Limitations of Neural Decompression in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gernot Lang; Moritz Perrech; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Ibrahim Hussain; Brenton Pennicooke; Farah Maryam; Mauricio J Avila; Roger Härtl
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Indirect foraminal decompression after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Monish M Maharaj; Kevin Phan; Manil Lakshan Abeygunasekara; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Microscopic anterior foraminal decompression combined with anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Sang-Ha Shin; Won-Gyu Choi; Byeong-Wook Hwang; Yi-Sheng Tsang; Ewy-Ryong Chung; Hyeong-Chang Lee; Sang-Jin Lee; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Kimberly Ashayeri; Carlos Leon; Jordan Manning; Leon Eisen; Mark Medley; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; J Alex Thomas
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Indirect decompression of lumbar stenosis with transpsoas interbody cages and percutaneous posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Antonio E Castellvi; Thomas W Nienke; German A Marulanda; Ryan D Murtagh; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The effect of vascular approach surgeons on perioperative complications in lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusions.

Authors:  Jordan Manning; Erik Wang; Christopher Varlotta; Dainn Woo; Ethan Ayres; Leon Eisen; John Bendo; Jeffrey Goldstein; Jeffrey Spivak; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Peter G Passias; Aaron J Buckland
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Quantitative analysis of indirect decompression in extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior spinal fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nomura; Akihisa Yamashita; Tetsuya Watanabe; Kenzo Shirasawa
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

10.  MRI measurement of neuroforaminal dimension at the index and supradjacent levels after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective study.

Authors:  Woojin Cho; Mark J Sokolowski; Amir A Mehbod; Francis Denis; Timothy A Garvey; John Perl; Ensor E Transfeldt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.