Literature DB >> 25216400

Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study.

Timothy T Davis1, Richard A Hynes, Daniel A Fung, Scott W Spann, Michael MacMillan, Brian Kwon, John Liu, Frank Acosta, Thomas E Drochner.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Access to the intervertebral discs from L2-S1 in one surgical position can be challenging. The transpsoas minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach is preferred by many surgeons, but this approach poses potential risk to neural structures of the lumbar plexus as they course through the psoas. The lumbar plexus and iliac crest often restrict the L4-5 disc access, and the L5-S1 level has not been a viable option from a direct lateral approach. The purpose of the present study was to investigate an MIS oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral disc space in cadaveric specimens while keeping the specimens in a lateral decubitus position with minimal disruption of the psoas and lumbar plexus.
METHODS: Twenty fresh-frozen full-torso cadaveric specimens were dissected, and an oblique anatomical corridor to access the L2-S1 discs was examined. Measurements were taken in a static state and with mild retraction of the psoas. The access corridor was defined at L2-5 as the left lateral border of the aorta (or iliac artery) and the anterior medial border of the psoas. The L5-S1 corridor of access was defined transversely from the midsagittal line of the inferior endplate of L-5 to the medial border of the left common iliac vessel and vertically to the first vascular structure that crosses midline.
RESULTS: The mean access corridor diameters in the static state and with mild psoas retraction, respectively, were as follows: at L2-3, 18.60 mm and 25.50 mm; at L3-4, 19.25 mm and 27.05 mm; and at L4-5, 15.00 mm and 24.45 mm. The L5-S1 corridor mean values were 14.75 mm transversely, from midline to the left common iliac vessel and 23.85 mm from the inferior endplate of L-5 cephalad to the first midline vessel.
CONCLUSIONS: The oblique corridor allows access to the L2-S1 discs while keeping the patient in a lateral decubitus position without a break in the table. Minimal psoas retraction without significant tendon disruption allowed for a generous corridor to the disc space. The L5-S1 disc space can be accessed from an oblique angle consistently with gentle retraction of the iliac vessels. This study supports the potential of an MIS oblique retroperitoneal approach to the L2-S1 discs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AP = anteroposterior; BMI = body mass index; MIS = minimally invasive surgical; OLIF = oblique lumbar interbody fusion; anatomy; lateral access; lumbar interbody fusion; oblique access; psoas

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25216400     DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  46 in total

1.  Perioperative Complications in 255 Patients Who Underwent Lateral Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LaLIF) Surgery.

Authors:  Jiaming Cui; Xingyu Guo; Zhaomin Zheng; Hui Liu; Hua Wang; Zemin Li; Jianru Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer; Christoph Zandanell; Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Extreme lateral interbody fusion. Indication, surgical technique, outcomes and specific complications].

Authors:  Markus Quante; Henry Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Does the hip positioning matter for oblique lumbar interbody fusion approach? A morphometric study.

Authors:  Kaissar Farah; Henri-Arthur Leroy; Melodie-Anne Karnoub; Louis Obled; Stephane Fuentes; Richard Assaker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Endoscope-assisted oblique lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of cauda equina syndrome: a technical note.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Ji-Hoon Seong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique.

Authors:  Zhong-You Zeng; Zhao-Wan Xu; Deng-Wei He; Xing Zhao; Wei-Hu Ma; Wen-Fei Ni; Yong-Xing Song; Jian-Qiao Zhang; Wei Yu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Zhi-Jie Zhou; Nan-Jian Xu; Wen-Jian Huang; Zhi-Chao Hu; Ai-Lian Wu; Jian-Fei Ji; Jian-Fu Han; Shun-Wu Fan; Feng-Dong Zhao; Hui Jin; Fei Pei; Shi-Yang Fan; De-Xiu Sui
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Relation of lumbar sympathetic chain to the open corridor of retroperitoneal oblique approach to lumbar spine: an MRI study.

Authors:  A Mahatthanatrakul; T Itthipanichpong; C Ratanakornphan; N Numkarunarunrote; W Singhatanadgige; W Yingsakmongkol; W Limthongkul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  A new "keyhole" approach for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion: the perinavel approach-technical note and literature review.

Authors:  R Bassani; A M Querenghi; R Cecchinato; C Morselli; G Casero; D Gavino; S Brock; C Ferlinghetti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Haocheng Xu; Bo Yin; Hongyue Tao; Shuo Yang; Chi Sun; Yitao Wang; Jun Yin; Minghao Shao; Hongli Wang; Xinlei Xia; Xiaosheng Ma; Feizhou Lu; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Minimally invasive anterior oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF).

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.