Literature DB >> 32042599

Hydroethanolic extract from Endopleura uchi (Huber) Cuatrecasas and its marker bergenin: Toxicological and pharmacokinetic studies in silico and in vivo on zebrafish.

Beatriz Martins de Sá Hyacienth1,2, Karyny Roberta Tavares Picanço1, Brenda Lorena Sánchez-Ortiz1,3, Luciane Barros Silva4, Arlindo César Matias Pereira1, Larissa Daniele Machado Góes1, Raphaelle Sousa Borges1, Rodrigo Cardoso Ataíde1, Cleydson Breno Rodrigues Dos Santos1,4, Helison de Oliveira Carvalho1, Gloria Melisa Gonzalez Anduaga3, Andrés Navarrete3, José Carlos Tavares Carvalho1,2.   

Abstract

Endopleura uchi, is used for the treatment of inflammatory disease and related to the female reproductive tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute toxicity of the Endopleura uchi stem bark hydroethanolic extract (EEu) in zebrafish, emphasizing the histopathological and biochemical parameters, as well as evaluating the in silico pharmacokinetic and toxicological parameters of the phytochemical/pharmacological marker, bergenin, as their metabolites. The animals were orally treated with EEu at a single dose of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg. the oral LD50 of the EEu higher to the dose of 3000 mg/kg. Behavioral, biochemical and histopathological changes were dose dependent. In silico pharmacokinetic predictions for bergenin and its metabolites showed moderate absorption in high human intestinal absorption (HIA) and Caco-2 models, reduced plasma protein binding, by low brain tissue binding and no P-glycoprotein (P-Gp) inhibition. Their metabolism is defined by the CYP450 enzyme, in addition to bergenin inhibition of CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and CYP2C19. In the bergenin and its metabolites in silico toxicity test it have been shown to cause carcinogenicity and a greater involvement of the bergenin with the CYP enzymes in the I and II hepatic and renal metabolism's phases was observed. It is possible to suggest that the histopathological damages are involved with the interaction of this major compound and its metabolites at the level of the cellular-biochemical mechanisms which involve the absorption, metabolization and excretion of these possible prodrug and drug.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; BBB, Brain-blood partition coefficient (C.brain/C.blood); Bergenin; Biotrasformation; EEu, Endopleura uchi stem bark hydroethanolic extract; Endopleura uchi; HAI, Index of Histopathological Changes; HBA, Hydrogen bonding acceptors; HBD, Hydrogen bonding donors; HIA, Human intestinal absorption; Hepatoxity; IAN, Regional Herbarium of the Eastern Amazonian Embrapa; MM, Molecular mass; Nephrotoxity; P-Gp, P-glycoprotein; PPB, Plasma protein binding; Toxicology; hERG, ether-a-go-related human gene

Year:  2020        PMID: 32042599      PMCID: PMC6997909          DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Rep        ISSN: 2214-7500


Introduction

Yellow uchi, scientifically known as Endopleura uchi, is a medicinal plant belonging to the family Humiriaceae. It is a species of the non-flooded forest, that presents high canopy and fruits very appreciated by the people, throughout the Brazilian Amazon [1]. The stem stumps are used in the form of tea, in traditional medicine for the treatment of arthritis, rheumatism, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus with a large registry of traditional use in pathologies directed to the female reproductive tract, such as inflammation and uterine infections and as abortive [2]; Shanley & Gaia, 1998. The medicinal plants are strategic sources with great importance for the discovery of new and effective agents with pharmacological effects [3]. However, popular and even traditional use is not enough to ethically validate natural products as effective and safe. In this sense, they are no different from another synthetic xenobiotic. Its recommendation or official authorization of its medicinal use must be based on experimental evidences, proving the safety of its use [4]. The bergenin is the major compound of the hydroethanolic extract of the stem barks of Endopleura uchi. Bergenin has been shown to have effects on osteoblastic cellular functions [5], as an immunomodulatory agent [6], effective in the treatment of acute lung injury [7], anxiolytic [8], antimalarial [9], antioxidante [10], anti-inflammatory agent [11,12] antinociceptive [13], antimicrobial [14] neuroprotective [15,16], anti-arthritic [17], hepatoprotective action [18] and anti-hepatotoxic [19]. It is also indicated as responsible, among the bioactive compounds of the extract, by the several biological activities reported. These results justify the growing interest in the study of this plant species. Zebrafish is an effective model to test in vivo activity of many chemical compounds. When compared to rodents, the toxicology of zebrafish is much less expensive and can be carried out rapidly in large numbers of compounds. It can be inserted early in the pre-clinical development, which justifies the acceptance of studies with this animal species, by drug regulatory agencies [20]. According to Ducharme et al. [21], zebrafish can be used to accurately predict acute toxicity compared to inhalation in rats, rabbit skin pathways and oral exposure routes in rats. In addition, tissue changes in organs such as gills, kidneys, liver and intestines, caused by toxic effects of substances, can be evaluated using zebrafish [22]. Driessen et al. [23] compared zebrafish embryos to models traditionally used in vivo (rats and mice) and in vitro (primary human hepatocytes and rats and mice hepatocytes) in the liver toxicity tests. The results showed that zebrafish is comparable to traditional models in identifying hepatotoxic activity. Similar results were observed for reproductive toxicity [21]. It is worth mentioning that the discovery of modern drugs is not only based on the pharmacological activities they can present, but it is also important to take into account the search for drugs with more favorable pharmacokinetic properties [24]. The evaluation of metabolic properties of a molecule can help to optimize the stability and consequently the in vivohalf-life and the risk-benefit ratio of a drug. There is great interest in the development of computational tools to predict drug metabolism due to restrictions to study the human metabolism of xenobiotic compounds [25]. Zebrafish is also noted as a suitable model for the study of systems pharmacology, combining high yield potential with high genetic homology to superior vertebrates [26]. Elisavet et al. [27] studied cadmium exposure in zebrafish and the results were supported by histopathological studies that concluded that differentiated responses, could be linked to hormesis phenomena. In this study, histopathology was used to support the biochemical and compotarmental parameters observed in animals exposed to EEu. It is important to note that this medicinal species is of great importance in traditional medicine, especially in the pan-Amazon region where it is widely used for the treatment of gynecological inflammatory processes. Therefore, despite the existence of phytochemical studies and some pharmacological studies, but it is of great relevance to carry out toxicology studies that can demonstrate the safety of the use of preparations based on this species, correlating with their main phytochemical and pharmacological markers. Based on these descriptions and the potential of the traditional use of EEu, this study aimed to evaluate its acute toxicity in zebrafish emphasizing the histopathological and biochemical parameters, as well as to evaluate the in silico pharmacokinetic and toxicological parameters of the phytochemical/pharmacological marker, bergenin, as well as its metabolites.

Material and methods

Collection and identification of botanical material

Endopleura uchi was collected in the Porto Grande City (N 0° 41′10.4″/ W 51° 29′39.8″, km 117, in the State of Amapá, Brazil. After identification of the botanical species, the samples were deposited in the Regional Herbarium of the Eastern Amazonian Embrapa IAN, under identification nº 196009.

Preparation of the extract

After harvesting the E. uchi stem bark, it was dissected in a circulating air heater at 40 °C, for 72 h and after, drying, crushed in a knife mill, thus obtaining the plant powder (1.632,87 g). Subsequently, this material was macerated in 70 % hydroethanolic solution, in a ratio of 1:5 at room temperature, for 10 days, under constant stirring. The macerate was then filtered and concentrated in a rotary evaporator at a temperature of 40 °C until complete evaporation of the solvent. The concentrated filtrate was subjected to lyophilization resulting in 2.65 % yield.

Analysis of EEu by HPLC-MS-MS

For EEu analysis was used an HPLC-MS system consisting of an Agilent 1100 Series HPLC and an Agilent 6410 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer. Ultra-High purity nitrogen was used as the drying gas. The sample was separated on a Zorbax SB-C18 column (5 μm, 4.5 X 150 mm; Agilent). The separation was achieved using water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B) as the mobile phase. The gradient employed went from 90:10 (A:B) to 10:90 (A:B) in 10 min with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Then, the gradient went from 10:90 (A:B) back to 90:10 (A:B) in 15.5 min using a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The system was operated at room temperature (20 °C). The detection was performed after electrospray ionization in negative ion mode. Dwell time was kept at 100 ms. The source temperature was kept at 650 °C, and the spray voltage was set at −4500 V. Ion source gas 1, ion source gas 2 and curtain gas were set at 45, 90 and 35, respectively. The MS-parameters were determined and optimized by post-column infusion of the compounds solution with a syringe pump. The ions were monitored for each molecule.

Experimental animals

Adult zebrafish (Danio rerio), a six-month-old AB wild-type of 3.7–4 cm long, weighing around 550 mg, were obtained from Acqua New Aquarium and Fish Ltda., located in Igarassu-PE, Brazil. After the arrival of the animals, they were kept for a period of quarantine and were maintained until the experiments were carried out on the Zebrafish Platform of the Laboratory of Research in Drugs, Biological Sciences and Health Department, Federal University of Amapá (UNIFAP), Brazil. The animals were kept in water under controlled conditions of temperature, feed and light/dark cycle, following the standards described by Souza et al. [28], Borges et al. [29]. This study was submitted and approved by the Committee on Ethics in Animal Use - CEAU of UNIFAP, receiving protocol number 003/2018.

Treatment groups and route of administration

After the acclimation period, the animals were randomly divided into a control group treated with saline solution and four groups treated at doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg from EEu. Each group was evaluated in three triplicates, each triplicate containing four animals, totalizing n = 12 animals/group. The animals were treated orally gavage as described by Borges et al. [29].

Determination of LD50

For the determination of the lethal dose (LD50), the animals were randomly collected and fasted for 24 h prior to the start of the experiments. Subsequently, they were administered orally at the doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg of EEU. After the gavage procedure, they were distributed in aquariums containing water from the system.

Behavioral analysis and mortality

Once the administration of each dose occurred, the behavior and mortality of the animals corresponding to each group were recorded at 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after oral administration. The behavioral parameters observed were those described by Souza et al. [28]. The changes in zebrafish behavior were classified into three stages: I (higher swimming activity and presence of tail tremors), II (circular swimming and loss of balance), and III (loss of motility, rest at the bottom and death). Mortality was monitored continuously, and fish were considered dead when operculum movement and response to mechanical stimulation could no longer be detected.

Biochemical analysis

For biochemical analysis, blood samples from the various groups, including treated groups (doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg) were collected after the animals were previously anesthetized. Then a diagonal incision was made with a steel blade between the caudal fin and the anal fin. Blood was collected with a 10 μl micropipette and stored in a eppendorf microtube. Serum collection was performed shortly after the blood was centrifuged for ten minutes with a rotation of 2000 rpm in a Benfer Macro Centrifuge BF 10,887. The alanine aminotransferase ALT and aspartate aminotransferase AST parameters were determined on Bio-Plus equipment Bio-200 using the AST/GOT Liquiform and ALT/GPT Liquiform enzyme kits according to manufacturer Labtest instructions, respectively After the procedures described above, the animals were euthanized according to the guidelines for animal euthanasia AVMA, [30].

Histopathological analysis

Preparation of organs

For the preparation of organs (intestine, liver, kidney and gills), they were stored in identified cassettes and immediately fixed in bouin solution. Then, decalcification was carried out in 7 % EDTA solution for 24 h, dehydration in solutions with increasing concentrations of ethyl alcohol, diaphanization in xylol for clarification and inclusion with paraffin. The sections were obtained with a thickness of 5 μm in a microtome (Rotary Microtome Cut 6062, Slee Medical, Germany) and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin following the technique described by Souza et al. [28]. The sections were analyzed under optical microscope (Olympus-micronal BX41) and photographed with digital camera ScopeImage 9.0 USB).

Assessment of histopathological changes

The analysis of the tissue alterations of the intestine, liver, kidney and gills were performed according to Souza et al. [28], Carvalho et al. [22] and Borges et al. [29]. The Index of Histopathological Changes (HAI) was calculated from the levels of tissue changes observed in gills, liver, kidney and intestine. Alterations were classified as levels I, II and III, and the HAI value indicated whether the organ was normal (0–10), moderately altered (11–20), moderate to severe (21–50) or containing severe irreversible changes (> 100) [31], Ringolin-Sá, 1999, [32]). Data on the total histological changes of the gills, kidneys, intestine and liver were calculated in relation to the total HAI values corresponding to each organ and expressed as a percentage.

Statistical analysis

The results obtained in the various analyzes were expressed as average ± average standard error (average ± ASE) of each experimental group. For the statistical analysis of the results of the experimental parameters of the histopathological study, one-way ANOVA test (Kruskal-Wallis) was used followed by Dunnett's test. For the analysis of the biochemical parameters, one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey post-hoc. Statistical analyzes were performed using the GraphPad Prism program (version 5.03). Results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

In silicostudy

Prediction of bergenin metabolism using Metatox and SMARTCyp software

The Metatox virtual platform, which uses algorithms to predict the possible sites of metabolism of a molecule, from phase 1 reactions (oxidation, reduction and hydroxylation) and phase 2 (conjugation) [33,34]. In the first step of the generation of metabolites, MetaTox calculated the estimation of the types of reactions that occurred with a substrate in its entirety. The values obtained for the metabolite probability of formation (PC) were estimated from the PR (probability "for the reaction to be real") - estimated the chance that this predicted class of reaction occurred in the experiment, PI (probability "for the reaction to be impossible") - estimated the chance that this predicted class of reaction did not occur in the experiment, T-estimated the chance that the considered atom was modified during the biotransformation reaction and, PF - estimated the chance that the atom considered was not modified during the considered biotransformation reaction [33,34]. The probability of the parent compound is equal to one, P0 = 1. The calculation of the probability of formation of the metabolite was performed by the following equation: Bergenin was submitted to an online server, the MetaTox (http://www.way2drug.com/mg/), through a two-dimensional drawing in a database of several thousand xenobiotic biotransformations observed in humans and experiments with cells and tissues. It included information on 15 classes of phase I and phase II reactions of xenobiotic metabolism. These reactions were used to identify the patterns of different transformations of the fragments database. In addition, the estimate of organ specific carcinogenicity and adverse effects for metabolites generated and parent compounds in MetaTox was added.

In silicoevaluation of the pharmacokinetic and toxicological parameters of bergenin and its metabolites

The online Protox server (http://tox.charite.de/protox_II/index.php site = compound_search_similarity) was used to obtain values for LD50, risk class, molecular mass (MM), hydrogen bonding acceptors (HBA), hydrogen bonding donors (HBD) and number of rotational bonds pertaining to bergenin and its metabolites. Another online server was also used, the PreADMET (https://preadmet.bmdrc.kr/), which predicted pharmacokinetic properties value: human intestinal absorption (HIA), cell penetrability in vitrousing the Caco-2 cell model, plasma protein binding (PPB (%), brain-blood partition coefficient BBB (C.brain/C.blood), interaction with P-glycoprotein (P-gp), CYP450, Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells PMDCK(nm/sec) and LogP, besides the predictions of toxicological properties as mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in rats and mice, development (using Medaka fish as a parameter) [35] and the risk of cardiac toxicity due to inhibition of the ether-a-go-related (hERG) human gene. Subsequently, the compounds were also evaluated using Derek software [36] to obtain additional data related to toxicity.

Results

EEu HPLC-MS-MS analysis

The major compound identified by HPLC-MS-MS in EEu, was the Bergenin (Fig. 1). This compound exposed the presence of a peak with retention time of 8.3 min and ion peak at m/z 328.27, which was consistent with the molecular formula C14H16O9. – which was identified as bergenin.
Fig. 1

TIC chromatogram of Endopleura uchi bark extract (EEu), HPLC/MS analysis and fragmentation pattern. Bergenin is the major compound of the extract.

TIC chromatogram of Endopleura uchi bark extract (EEu), HPLC/MS analysis and fragmentation pattern. Bergenin is the major compound of the extract. Oral treatment of the zebrafish groups with EEu at doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg was not able to cause deaths of the animals. The dose that received 3000 mg/kg (higher dose) induced only 8.3 % death in relation to the total number of animals in the group (Table 1). There were no deaths in the control group treated with saline solution. Therefore, the oral LD50 of the EEu higher to the dose of 3000 mg/kg.
Table 1

Quantity and percentage of animals killed after treatment with EEu orally at doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg in Zebrafish.

Dose mg/kgNumber of dead animalsPercentage
Control Group0/120 %
75 mg/kg0/120 %
500 mg/kg0/120 %
1.000 mg/kg0/120 %
3.000 mg/kg1/128.3 %

N = 12 animals/group.

Quantity and percentage of animals killed after treatment with EEu orally at doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg in Zebrafish. N = 12 animals/group. The animals’ behavior after exposure to EEu was classified into three stages (stage I, stage II and stage II). All groups were evaluated up to 48 h after exposure. Among the animals that received doses of 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg the presence of increased swimming activity (stage I) was observed only during the first hour after treatment. These data corroborate the behavior of the saline treated animals, regarding the control group. It is noteworthy that in the other hours these groups did not present behavioral changes (Table 2).
Table 2

Behavioral changes in different fields of observation after oral treatment with EEu at doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg in Zebrafish.

Behavioral ParametersD. rerio with behavioral parameter change per group
Control GroupEEu 75 mg/kgEEu 500 mg/kgEEu 1.000 mg/kgEEu 3.000 mg/kg
1 h
Stage IXXXXX
Stage IIXX
Stage III
3h
Stage IXX
Stage IIX
Stage III
6h
Stage I
Stage IIX
Stage IIIX
24 h
Estage I
Estage II
Estage III
48 h
Estage I
Estage II
Estage III

Stage I: increased swim activity, tail tremors; Stage II: Circular swimming movement, loss of posture; Stage III: death. (n = 12 animals/group).

Behavioral changes in different fields of observation after oral treatment with EEu at doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg in Zebrafish. Stage I: increased swim activity, tail tremors; Stage II: Circular swimming movement, loss of posture; Stage III: death. (n = 12 animals/group). In relation to the animals treated with the dose of 1000 mg/kg, during the first hour after exposure to EEu, changes were observed such as increased swimming activity, tail tremors (stage I) and circular swimming movement characteristic of stage II behavioral change. Stage I changes were also noted in the third hour of analysis. After this period, the animals maintained their behavior unchanged until the end of the observation period (48 h) (Table 2). During the first and third hour after treatment with EEu at a dose of 3000 mg/kg, the animals presented behavioral changes of stage I (increased swimming activity and tail tremors) and stage II (circular swimming movement, loss of posture). In the sixth hour after treatment, there was persistence of the behavioral alterations of stage II and the appearance of alterations of stage III (Table 2), causing the death of 1 animal of the group (8.3 %) (Table 1). After this period, the animals recovered and remained stable during the 24 h and 48 h analyzes. It was observed the elevation of the enzymatic activities of both ALT and AST that occurred in a directly proportional doses. As for ALT, there was a significant increase in the groups treated with the highest doses (1000 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg) in relation to the control group (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc). There was also a significant increase in the group treated with the highest dose (3000 mg / kg) in the treated groups at doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg (Table 3) (p < 0.05, ANOVA one-way followed by post-hoc Tukey).
Table 3

Changes in AST and ALT enzymatic activity in zebrafish treated orally, with the control group and doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg.

OrgansControl75 mg/kg500 mg/kg1.000 mg/kg3.000 mg/kg
ALT39.0 ± 6.0075.5 ± 8.5080.0 ± 2.0096.0 ± 9.16a898.5 ± 7.50a,b,c,d
AST55.5 ± 7.50725 ± 613.0a824.0 ± 8.50a,b1231.0 ± 7.50a,b,c1268 ± 11.0a,b,c

Values represent the average ± E.P.M. The ANOVA test was applied, followed by the Tukey test. ap < 0.05 compared to the control group. bp < 0.05 compared to the 75 mg/kg dose. cp < 0.05 compared to a dose of 500 mg/kg. dp < 0.05 compared to a dose of 1.000 mg/kg.

Changes in AST and ALT enzymatic activity in zebrafish treated orally, with the control group and doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg. Values represent the average ± E.P.M. The ANOVA test was applied, followed by the Tukey test. ap < 0.05 compared to the control group. bp < 0.05 compared to the 75 mg/kg dose. cp < 0.05 compared to a dose of 500 mg/kg. dp < 0.05 compared to a dose of 1.000 mg/kg. In terms of AST activity, there was a significant increase in the groups treated with the doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg in relation to the control group. The groups treated at doses of 500 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg differed significantly from the group treated with the lowest dose (75 mg/kg). The groups treated with the 1000 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg doses differed significantly from the 500 mg/kg dose group (Table 3) (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc).

Evaluation of histopathological parameters

Intestine

Following histopathological analysis of the intestinal tissue, it was possible to observe several changes of levels I and II and absence of level III changes (necrosis) in the groups treated with the doses of 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg of EEu (Fig. 2B and C, respectively). Level I alterations were: dilation of the vessels present in the villi, detachment of the epithelial lining of the intestinal villi, villous atrophy, epithelial cell hypertrophy, goblet cell hyperplasia, stromal lymphocytic infiltration, reduction in lamina propria, vacuolization of enterocytes, leukocyte infiltration, shortening of lamina propria, cell degeneration and distancing of the lamina propria. The level II alterations were: displacement of the lamina propria, desquamation of the intestinal mucosa, partial fusion of villi and hemorrhage in the lamina propria. The dose of 500 mg/kg also showed degeneration in the villi as a level II alteration (Fig. 2C). Fig. 6 and Table 4 show that the HAI scores were 13.2 and 15.7 and the percentage of total alterations were 32.1 % and 38 %, respectively, showing that the organs remained moderately altered. The results did not differ significantly in relation to the control group.
Fig. 2

Longitudinal cross section of zebrafish intestine treated with different doses of EEu. A: Control showing GC goblet cells, EC enterocytes, V villi, L lamina propria, ML muscle layer; B: EEu 75 mg / kg showing HGC goblet cell hypertrophy, DEL epithelial lining detachment, VD vessel dilatation, LYI lymphocyte infiltration, DL displacement of lamina propria, CD cell degeneration, VA atrophy of villi; C: EEu 500 mg/kg showing HGC goblet cell hypertrophy, DEL epithelial lining detachment, VD vessel dilatation, LYI lymphocyte infiltration, DL displacement of lamina propria, CD cell degeneration, HEC hypertrophy of epithelial cell, RL reduction of the lamina propria; D: EEu 1000 mg/kg showing HGC goblet cell hypertrophy, DEL epithelial lining detachment, LYI lymphocyte infiltration, DL displacement lamina propria, CD cell degeneration, HEC epithelial cell hypertrophy, RL reduction of lamina propria, SLP shortening of the lamina propria, N necrosis, RV villi degeneration, EV enterocytes vacuolization; E: EEu 3.000 mg/kg showing LYI lymphocyte infiltration, CD cell degeneration, LI leukocyte infiltration, DML degeneration of muscle layer, RV villi degeneration, E edema, N necrosis, H hyperemia. Flushed with HE, magnification of 400 × .

Fig. 6

Average of the histopathological changes index HAI of the intestine, liver, kidney and gills of zebrafish after treatment with the EEu oral route, in triplicate at doses of 75 mg / kg, 500 mg / kg, 1000 mg / kg and 3000 mg / kg and the control group.

Table 4

Percentage of total histopathological changes presented in gills, liver, kidney and intestine of D. rerio after treatment with EEE at doses 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg.

OrgansControl75 mg/kg500 mg/kg1.000 mg/kg3.000 mg/kg
Intestine0 %32.1 %38 %73.9 %96.9 %
Liver0 %11.6 %21.3 %71.4 %92.4 %
Kidney0 %19.6 %24.7 %65.8 %99.1 %
Gill0 %10.3 %10.9 %53.1 %59.2 %

The percentage was determined on the number of animal per group (n = 12). According to Poleksic and MitrovicTutundzic (1994), Rigolin-Sá [84] and Takashima & Hibiya [85].

Longitudinal cross section of zebrafish intestine treated with different doses of EEu. A: Control showing GC goblet cells, EC enterocytes, V villi, L lamina propria, ML muscle layer; B: EEu 75 mg / kg showing HGC goblet cell hypertrophy, DEL epithelial lining detachment, VD vessel dilatation, LYI lymphocyte infiltration, DL displacement of lamina propria, CD cell degeneration, VA atrophy of villi; C: EEu 500 mg/kg showing HGC goblet cell hypertrophy, DEL epithelial lining detachment, VD vessel dilatation, LYI lymphocyte infiltration, DL displacement of lamina propria, CD cell degeneration, HEC hypertrophy of epithelial cell, RL reduction of the lamina propria; D: EEu 1000 mg/kg showing HGC goblet cell hypertrophy, DEL epithelial lining detachment, LYI lymphocyte infiltration, DL displacement lamina propria, CD cell degeneration, HEC epithelial cell hypertrophy, RL reduction of lamina propria, SLP shortening of the lamina propria, N necrosis, RV villi degeneration, EV enterocytes vacuolization; E: EEu 3.000 mg/kg showing LYI lymphocyte infiltration, CD cell degeneration, LI leukocyte infiltration, DML degeneration of muscle layer, RV villi degeneration, E edema, N necrosis, H hyperemia. Flushed with HE, magnification of 400 × . Percentage of total histopathological changes presented in gills, liver, kidney and intestine of D. rerio after treatment with EEE at doses 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg. The percentage was determined on the number of animal per group (n = 12). According to Poleksic and MitrovicTutundzic (1994), Rigolin-Sá [84] and Takashima & Hibiya [85]. In the intestines of the animals belonging to the 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg groups, in addition to the level I and II alterations, tissue necrosis (level III) was also identified (Fig. 2D and E). The HAI values were 30.5 and 40 (Fig. 6), respectively, showing that the alterations found influenced the normal functioning of these organs, since the organs were moderately to severely altered. Both groups showed a significant percentage of alterations in the intestinal tissue with 73.9 % and 96.9 %, respectively (Table 4). However, it should be noted that only the group treated with the highest dose (3000 mg/kg) differed significantly from the control group (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) followed by the Dunnett post hoc test). In the control group, no tissue changes were found, thus, the organ was characterized as normal (Fig. 2A).

Liver

The control group did not present alterations in the hepatic tissue, remaining normal (Fig. 3A). In relation to the groups treated with doses of 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg, the most frequent alterations were the loss and atypia of the cellular contour, loss or atypia of the nuclear contour and intense cytoplasmic vacuolization (level I changes). Regarding to the level II changes, they presented hyperemia and nuclear degeneration as common alterations. However, the group treated with the 500 mg/kg dose also presented nuclear atrophy, cytoplasmic degeneration and cellular disruption (Fig. 3B and C, respectively). The HAI values were 5.5 and 10.1 (Fig. 6), respectively, showing that the alterations found did not influence the normal functioning of these organs. The percentages of total alterations were 11.6 % and 21.3 %, respectively, of total changes (Table 4).
Fig. 3

Longitudinal cross section of zebrafish liver treated with different doses of EEu. A: Control showing H Hepatocyte, S Sinusoid, G glycogen; B: EEu 75 mg / kg showing ICV intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, LCC loss of cell contour, LNC loss of nuclear contour, ND nuclear degeneration, HY hyperemia, NV nuclear vacuolization; C: EEu 500 mg/kg showing ICV intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, LCC loss of cell contour, LNC loss of nuclear contour, ND nuclear degeneration, HY hyperemia, CED cytoplasmic degeneration, IVV increase in vessel volume; D: EEu 1000 mg / kg showing HY hyperemia, NV nuclear vacuolization, IVV increased vessel volume, N necrosis, NA nuclear atrophy, ICV intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, CR cell rupture, GD glycogen decrease. E: EEu 3000 mg/kg showing BCD bile canaliculi degeneration, ICV intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, NV nuclear vacuolization IVV increased vessel volume HY hyperemia, NA: nuclear atrophy, CR cell rupture, GD glycogen decrease, N necrosis. Flushed with HE, magnification of 400 × .

Longitudinal cross section of zebrafish liver treated with different doses of EEu. A: Control showing H Hepatocyte, S Sinusoid, G glycogen; B: EEu 75 mg / kg showing ICV intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, LCC loss of cell contour, LNC loss of nuclear contour, ND nuclear degeneration, HY hyperemia, NV nuclear vacuolization; C: EEu 500 mg/kg showing ICV intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, LCC loss of cell contour, LNC loss of nuclear contour, ND nuclear degeneration, HY hyperemia, CED cytoplasmic degeneration, IVV increase in vessel volume; D: EEu 1000 mg / kg showing HY hyperemia, NV nuclear vacuolization, IVV increased vessel volume, N necrosis, NA nuclear atrophy, ICV intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, CR cell rupture, GD glycogen decrease. E: EEu 3000 mg/kg showing BCD bile canaliculi degeneration, ICV intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, NV nuclear vacuolization IVV increased vessel volume HY hyperemia, NA: nuclear atrophy, CR cell rupture, GD glycogen decrease, N necrosis. Flushed with HE, magnification of 400 × . The most frequent tissue changes in the 1000 mg/kg dose group were loss of cell atypia, nuclear contour loss or atypia, intense cytoplasmic vacuolization, and nuclear vacuolation (level I changes). Level II changes were nuclear atrophy, cytoplasmic degeneration, nuclear degeneration, and hyperemia. It also presented necrosis as a level III alteration (Fig. 3D). The HAI of this group was 34 (Fig. 6), indicating that the organ had moderate to severe changes, with a percentage of 71.4 % of total alterations (Table 4). In contrast, the group treated with the 3.000 mg/kg dose also presented changes at levels I, II and III (Fig. 3E). However, the HAI (44) was higher, differing significantly from the control group (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) followed by Dunnett's post hoc test) (Fig. 6). The percentage of total alterations of 92.4 % was also high, with a value of almost 100 % in relation to the total liver changes (Table 4).

Kidney

In the histopathological evaluation of the kidney, the control group remained as a normal organ (Fig. 4A). The groups treated with the doses of 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg showed changes of level I (tubular cell hypertrophy, tubular disorganization, increase of the Bowman's capsule and decrease in the relative frequency of glomeruli), and level II (tubular degeneration, cytoplasmic degeneration of tubular cells, nuclear degeneration of tubular cells, hyperemia and rupture of blood vessels) (Fig. 4B and C, respectively). Fig. 6 shows that the HAI scores were 9.9 and 12.5 demonstrating that the organ remained normal and moderately altered, respectively. The percentage of total changes was 19.6 % and 24.7 %, respectively, of total changes (Table 4). The group treated with the dose of 1.000 mg/kg presented the organ with moderate to severe changes (Fig. 4D), since the HAI was 33.2 (Fig. 6) and a percentage of 65.8 % (Table 4). Differently from the doses of 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg in this group, the presence of necrosis in the organ, a level III change, was observed. Level I changes were mild tubular hyaline degeneration, tubular disorganization, glomerular disorganization, increased Bowman's capsule space, and dilation of the glomerular capillaries. Level II changes were: tubular degeneration, glomerular degeneration, cytoplasmic degeneration of tubular cells, nuclear degeneration of tubular cells, hyperemia and rupture of blood vessels.
Fig. 4

Longitudinal cross section of zebrafish kidney treated with different doses of EEu. A: Control showing RT renal tubules, HT hematopoietic tissue; B: EEu 75 mg/kg showing TD tubular degeneration, DRFG decreased relative frequency of glomeruli, CDTC cytoplasmic degeneration of tubular cells, NDTC nuclear degeneration of tubular cells, H hyperemia, TDO tubal disorganization; C: EEu 500 mg/kg showing TD tubular degeneration, DRFG decreased relative frequency of glomeruli, CDTC cytoplasmic degeneration of tubular cells, NDTC nuclear degeneration of tubular cells, H hyperemia, TDO tubal disorganization; D: EE 1000 mg/kg showing TD tubular degeneration, CDTC cytoplasmic degeneration of tubular cells, NDTC nuclear degeneration of tubular cells, H hyperemia, N necrosis, HDTC hyaline degeneration of tubular cells; E: EEu 3000 mg/kg showing TD tubular degeneration, H: hyperemia, N necrosis, HTC tubular cell hypertrophy, GDO glomerular disorganization, TO tubular obstruction, VR vessel rupture, TDO tubular disorganization, DSBCA decrease space in Bowman's capsule. Flushed with HE, magnification of 400 × .

Longitudinal cross section of zebrafish kidney treated with different doses of EEu. A: Control showing RT renal tubules, HT hematopoietic tissue; B: EEu 75 mg/kg showing TD tubular degeneration, DRFG decreased relative frequency of glomeruli, CDTC cytoplasmic degeneration of tubular cells, NDTC nuclear degeneration of tubular cells, H hyperemia, TDO tubal disorganization; C: EEu 500 mg/kg showing TD tubular degeneration, DRFG decreased relative frequency of glomeruli, CDTC cytoplasmic degeneration of tubular cells, NDTC nuclear degeneration of tubular cells, H hyperemia, TDO tubal disorganization; D: EE 1000 mg/kg showing TD tubular degeneration, CDTC cytoplasmic degeneration of tubular cells, NDTC nuclear degeneration of tubular cells, H hyperemia, N necrosis, HDTC hyaline degeneration of tubular cells; E: EEu 3000 mg/kg showing TD tubular degeneration, H: hyperemia, N necrosis, HTC tubular cell hypertrophy, GDO glomerular disorganization, TO tubular obstruction, VR vessel rupture, TDO tubular disorganization, DSBCA decrease space in Bowman's capsule. Flushed with HE, magnification of 400 × . The renal tissue of the group treated with the highest dose 3000 mg / kg had moderate to severe changes Fig. 4E), differing significantly from the control group (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) followed by Dunnett's post hoc test.). The HAI was 50.0 and the percentage of changes in the renal tissue was expressive, with a value of 99.1 %, showing that this organ was already quite compromised (Fig. 6 and Table 4, respectively). This group, besides presenting all changes of level I, II and III in relation to the 1000 mg/kg group, also presented other changes of level I (atypical cellular contour, tubular cell hypertrophy, tubular obstruction, tubular lumen enlargement and decrease in the relative frequency of glomeruli) and II (severe tubular hyaline degeneration, presence of lymphoid tissue in Bowman's capsule and blood vessels’ dilation).

Gills

In the histopathological study of the gills, the control group treated with saline did not present histopathological alterations (Fig. 5A). The HAI value was zero and the percentage of tissue changes was also zero (Fig. 6 and Table 4, respectively). The group treated with the dose of 75 mg/kg of EEu presented level I changes (epithelial cell dislocation, partial fusion of the secondary lamellae, complete fusion of some secondary lamellae, dilation of the capillaries, derangement of the capillaries and vascular congestion) and only a level II change, in this case, epithelial rupture (Fig. 5B). The HAI value was 6.6 (Fig. 6), indicating that the organ remained normal, with a percentage of 10.3 % of the total alterations (Table 4).
Fig. 5

Longitudinal cross-section of zebrafish gills treated with different doses of EEu. A: Control showing EC epithelial cell, PC cell pillar, CVS: central venous sinus, PL primary lamella, SL secondary lamella; B: EEu 75 mg/kg showing DEC epithelial tissue displacement, ER epithelial rupture, VC vascular congestion, VD vascular dilatation; C: EEu 500 mg/kg showing DEC displacement of epithelial cells, CCL presence of chloride cells on secondary lamellae, ER epithelial rupture, ECH epithelial cell hyperplasia, PFSL partial fusion of secondary lamellae, CD cell degeneration, VD vascular dilatation; D: EEu 1000 mg/kg showing DEC displacement of epithelial tissue, ER epithelial rupture, ECH epithelial cell hyperplasia, PFSL partial fusion of secondary lamellae, CDO capillaries disorganization, A aneurysm, VC vascular congestion, N necrosis; E: EEu 3000 mg/kg showing DEC displacement of epithelial tissue, ER: epithelial rupture, CFSL complete fusion of secondary lamellae, CDO capillaries disorganization, A aneurysm, VC vascular congestion, VD vascular dilatation, N necrosis. Flushed with HE, magnification of 400 × .

Longitudinal cross-section of zebrafish gills treated with different doses of EEu. A: Control showing EC epithelial cell, PC cell pillar, CVS: central venous sinus, PL primary lamella, SL secondary lamella; B: EEu 75 mg/kg showing DEC epithelial tissue displacement, ER epithelial rupture, VC vascular congestion, VD vascular dilatation; C: EEu 500 mg/kg showing DEC displacement of epithelial cells, CCL presence of chloride cells on secondary lamellae, ER epithelial rupture, ECH epithelial cell hyperplasia, PFSL partial fusion of secondary lamellae, CD cell degeneration, VD vascular dilatation; D: EEu 1000 mg/kg showing DEC displacement of epithelial tissue, ER epithelial rupture, ECH epithelial cell hyperplasia, PFSL partial fusion of secondary lamellae, CDO capillaries disorganization, A aneurysm, VC vascular congestion, N necrosis; E: EEu 3000 mg/kg showing DEC displacement of epithelial tissue, ER: epithelial rupture, CFSL complete fusion of secondary lamellae, CDO capillaries disorganization, A aneurysm, VC vascular congestion, VD vascular dilatation, N necrosis. Flushed with HE, magnification of 400 × . Average of the histopathological changes index HAI of the intestine, liver, kidney and gills of zebrafish after treatment with the EEu oral route, in triplicate at doses of 75 mg / kg, 500 mg / kg, 1000 mg / kg and 3000 mg / kg and the control group. In the group treated with the 500 mg/kg dose, epithelial cell displacement, epithelial cell hyperplasia at the base of the secondary lamellae, partial melting of the secondary lamellae, presence of chloride cells in the secondary lamellae, dilation of the capillaries, disarrangement of the capillaries and vascular congestion, such changes correspond to changes in level I. However, it presented two level II alterations, such as epithelial rupture and complete fusion of all secondary lamellae (Fig. 5C). The HAI value was 7.0 (Fig. 6), showing that in this group this organ also remained normal, with a value of 10.9 % of the total alterations (Table 4). Treatment at doses of 1.000 mg/kg and 3.000 mg/kg were able to cause changes in gill tissue at levels I, II and III (necrosis) (Fig. 5D and E), different from the doses of 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg which did not show level III changes. The HAI of these groups were 34 and 37.9 (Fig. 6), indicating that these organs had moderate to severe changes, corresponding to a percentage of 53.1 % and 59.2 %, respectively, of the total alterations (Table 4). However, only the highest dose (3000 mg/kg) differed significantly from the control group (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) followed by Dunnett's post hoc test).

Prediction of bergenin metabolism using Metatox and SMARTCyp software

Fig. 7 shows the bergenin metabolites predicted by the MetaTox software and the reactions to form them.
Fig. 7

Prediction in the Metatox of Bergenin and its metabolites and their respective chemical reactions.

Prediction in the Metatox of Bergenin and its metabolites and their respective chemical reactions. The metabolic chemical reactions predicted by the CYP450 enzyme (Fig. 7) included phase I reactions such as hydrogenation and dehydrogenation and phase II reactions such as O-glucuronidation, O-dealkylation, methylation and O-sulfation. According to Table 5, the metabolite M1 showed O-glucuronidation reaction with the probability of occurrence of 0.9885. The M3 metabolite presented the O-dealkylation reaction, with a reaction probability of 0.9878. The metabolite M6, presented O-sulfation reaction, with probability of 0.9719. Methylation, hydrogenation and dehydrogenation were predicted to occur in metabolites M8, M12 and M15, respectively, with the probability of 0.9594, 0.9402 and 0.8670 to occurr.
Table 5

Probable metabolites of Bergenin, chemical reactions and probable value of the reaction occur.

Phase TypeChemical reactionProbability (PR)
M1Phase II Biotransformation ReactionO-Glucuronidation*0,9885
M3O-Dealkylation0,9878
M6M8O-Sulfation*Methylation*0,9719
0,9594
M12Phase I Biotransformation Reaction (Reduction)Hydrogenation0,9402
M15Phase II Biotransformation Reaction I (Oxidation)Dehydrogenation0,8670

Glucuronidation, sulfation, and methylation reactions involve activated or "high energy" cofactors, as reported by [83].

Probable metabolites of Bergenin, chemical reactions and probable value of the reaction occur. Glucuronidation, sulfation, and methylation reactions involve activated or "high energy" cofactors, as reported by [83].

In silico evaluation of pharmacokinetic and toxicological parameters of bergenin and its metabolites

The results showed that bergenin follows the Lipinski rule or "rule of five," since logP, molecular mass (MM), hydrogen bonding acceptors (HBA), hydrogen bonding donors (HBD) were : -0.7805 (logP≤5), 326.3 (MM ≤ 500), 8 (HBA ≤ 10) and 0 (HBD ≤ 5), respectively (Table 6). Metabolites M3, M5, M8, M12, M15 and M16 also conformed to this rule (Table 6).
Table 6

Application of the Lipinski rule for bergenin and its metabolites.

Compound NameLogPMMHBAHBDNº of rotable bonds
Bergenin−0.7805326.3802
M1−2.5495502.421405
M2−0.7251312.270141
M3−1.0473296.27701
M4−2.2030502.421405
M5−0.6418340.33803
M6−0.8324406.361104
M7−2.7436502.421405
M8−0.8358340.33803
M9−2.2517502.421405
M10−0.3421406.361104
M11−2.2517502.421405
M12−0.7722328.31802
M13−1.0264406.361104
M14−0.3908406.361104
M15−0.6088324.28802
M16−0.5413324.28882
M17−0.3908406.361104
Application of the Lipinski rule for bergenin and its metabolites. Human intestinal absorption (HIA) and cell penetrability in vitrousing the Caco-2 cell model were used to describe intestinal absorption, in addition to bergenin, the five M3, M5, M8, M15 and M16 metabolites were moderately absorbed (30 % Caco-2, bergenin and 14 of its metabolites (M1-M5, M7-M9, M11-M13 and M15-M17) presented values corresponding to average permeability (4–70 nm/s) and three metabolites (M6, M10 and M14) showed low permeability for Caco-2 (<4 nm/s) (Table 7).
Table 7

Predictions of pharmacokinetics parameters from the bergenin and its metabolites.

Pharmacokinetics Parameters
Compound NameAbsorptionDistributionExcretion
IHA (%)Caco-2PPB (%)BBB (C.brain/C.blood)P-gp InhibitionPMDCK(nm/sec)
Bergenin39.130720.213237.12030.0945Non0.8770
M13.057215.063527.41180.0290Non0.4115
M223.493219.992940.24620.0537Non0.7157
M344.443616.691841.34940.0807Non0.6497
M43.049015.832430.03010.0586Non1.2137
M557.843220.509838.11980.0361Non1.1729
M618.97400.880340.67500.0093Non0.4233
M73.057310.888727.70340.0272Non0.3955
M857.844818.956638.16240.3599Non1.1729
M93.049111.357330.35020.0683Non0.4787
M1018.92320.852340.97970.0098Non0.4084
M113.049116.808530.24720.0430Non0.7886
M1229.335820.194035.52940.0576Non0.8318
M1318.974410.319242.68030.0609Non0.6379
M1418.92372.112746.26910.0099Non0.4002
M1547.897520.228739.13000.4987Non0.9387
M1647.897620.228737.88600.5137Non0.8922
M1718.92374.623839.23780.0571Non0.6897
Predictions of pharmacokinetics parameters from the bergenin and its metabolites. In relation to the distribution properties, the following parameters were used: plasma protein binding (PPB (%)), brain/blood partition coefficient BBB (C.brain/C.blood) and interaction with P-glycoprotein (P-gp). In this study, the calculated PPB values ranged from 27.70 % to 46.26 %. Thus, bergenin and all its metabolites (M1-M17) were classified as weakly bound to plasma proteins (PPB < 90 %) (Table 7). Based on the Cbrain/Cblood ratio, in general, all chemicals fall into three categories: high absorption to the central nervous system (CNS) (Cbrain/Cblood value greater than 2.0), medium absorption to CNS (Cbrain/Cblood between 2.0 and 0.1) and low absorption at the CNS (Cbrain/Cblood value less than 0.1) [37]. Thus, the ratio between Cbrain / Cblood suggests low uptake to CNS for bergenin and all of its metabolites (M1-M17) (Table 7). The in silico study revealed that bergenin and its metabolites are not inhibitors of P-gp. In terms of metabolism, bergenin demonstrated a scenario of inhibition for CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 (Table 8). All metabolites (M1-M17) were able to inhibit CYP2C9. Metabolites M1-M5, M7, M9-M12 and M14-M17 were shown to be inhibitors of CYP3A4. However, only the metabolites M6, M10, M13 and M14 proved to be substrates for CYP3A4. Metabolites M2-M5, M8, M10-M12 and M14-M16 have been shown to be candidates for CYP2C19 inhibitors. Bergenin and its metabolites were not able to inhibit CYP2D6 (inhibition and substrate) (Table 8).
Table 8

Metabolic (Phase I) characteristics from the bergenin and its metabolites.

Metabolism
Compound NamePhase I – Cytochrome P450 (CYP450)
2C19 (Inhibition)2C9 (Inhibition)2D6 (Inhibition)2D6 (substrate)3A4 (Inhibition)3A4 (substrate)
BergeninInhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M1NonInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M2InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorInhibitor
M3InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M4InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M5InhibitorInhibitorNonNonNonWeakly
M6NonInhibitorNonNonNonSubstrate
M7NonInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M8InhibitorInhibitorNonNonNonWeakly
M9NonInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M10InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorSubstrate
M11InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M12InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M13NonInhibitorNonNonNonSubstrate
M14InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorSubstrate
M15InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M16InhibitorInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
M17NonInhibitorNonNonInhibitorWeakly
Metabolic (Phase I) characteristics from the bergenin and its metabolites. Concerning to renal clearance, bergenin and all metabolites had low permeability in the PMDCK system (nm/sec) (<4nn/sec). No compound showed high or medium permeability (>70nn/sec and 4-70nn/sec, respectively) (Table 7). The results concerning the predictions of the toxicological properties (mutagenicity and carcinogenicity) of bergenin and its metabolites, are described in Table 9. The mutagenicity predictions were evaluated using the Ames test, while in the carcinogenicity rats and mice were used as animal model. Only the metabolites M6, M10, M13, M14, M16 and M17 showed mutagenic predictions, whereas the compound bergenin, and the metabolites M1-M5, M7-M9, M11, M12 and M15 showed non-mutagenic predictions. With respect to the carcinogenicity test in mice and rats, bergenin and all metabolites (M1-M17) were predicted to be negative, showing that there is evidence of carcinogenic activity (Table 9).
Table 9

Predictions of toxicity parameters from the bergenin and its metabolites.

Compound NameMutagenicity (Ames test)Carcinogenicity
hERG (inhibition)Medaka
Carcino_MouseCarcino_Rat
Bergeninnon-mutagennegativenegativelow_risk10.3546
M1non-mutagennegativenegativeambiguous95.0245
M2non-mutagennegativenegativelow_risk13.5837
M3non-mutagennegativenegativelow_risk10.1477
M4non-mutagennegativenegativeambiguous144.5310
M5non-mutagennegativenegativelow_risk7.5648
M6mutagennegativenegativelow_risk8.4673
M7non-mutagennegativenegativeambiguous103.5850
M8non-mutagennegativenegativelow_risk7.3608
M9non-mutagennegativenegativeambiguous176.5060
M10mutagennegativenegativelow_risk6.1800
M11non-mutagennegativenegativeambiguous201.8730
M12non-mutagennegativenegativelow_risk15.2790
M13mutagennegativenegativelow_risk8.5193
M14mutagennegativenegativelow_risk5.2069
M15non-mutagennegativenegativelow_risk7.6870
M16mutagennegativenegativelow_risk8.7887
M17mutagennegativenegativelow_risk5.4330
Predictions of toxicity parameters from the bergenin and its metabolites. As shown in Table 9, bergenin and 13 metabolites (M2, M3, M5, M6, M8, M10 and M12-M17) showed a low probability of being hERG type K+ channel blockers. No metabolite had a high and medium probability of causing this effect. Five metabolites (M1, M4, M7, M9 and M11) were classified as ambiguous. In addition, in the evaluation of toxicity in marine organisms, no compounds were found to be very toxic (<1 mg/L), 9 metabolites (M5, M6, M8, M10 and M13-M17) were toxic (1−10 mg/L), while bergenin and four metabolites (M1-M3 and M12) were found to be harmful (between 10−100 mg/L), the metabolites M4, M7, M9 and M11 were classified as non-toxic (> 100 mg/L) in development (Medaka) (Table 9). Table 10 shows that bergenin had an LD50 of 290 mg/kg and it was in level III of toxicity class. The metabolites presented LD50 ranging from 100 mg/kg to 1500 mg/kg and most were classified as level III risk, except for metabolites M8 and M15, which were classified as level IV.
Table 10

Toxicity prediction from the bergenin and its metabolites.

Compound NameLD50Toxicity Class
Bergenin290 mg/kgIII
M1100 mg/kgIII
M2290 mg/kgIII
M3290 mg/kgIII
M4215 mg/kgIII
M5290 mg/kgIII
M6290 mg/kgIII
M7100 mg/kgIII
M81500 mg/kgIV
M9215 mg/kgIII
M10290 mg/kgIII
M11215 mg/kgIII
M12215 mg/kgIII
M13215 mg/kgIII
M14290 mg/kgIII
M151.500 mg/kgIV
M16290 mg/kgIII
M17290 mg/kgIII
Toxicity prediction from the bergenin and its metabolites. Additional toxicological data for bergenin and its 17 metabolites tested using the Derek software are shown in Table 11. Bergenin did not present any toxicological warnings to humans, rats and mice. The M3 metabolite showed a probability of causing damage to human chromosomes (in vitro) and rodents (mice and rats) inducing molecular structural alterations due to the presence of the catechol pharmacophore group. The M4 metabolite showed toxicity to the skin sensitivity in rodents (rats and mice), possibly due to the presence of the Resorcinol group or precursor. The metabolites M7 and M14 also presented skin sensibility in rodents, however, due to the presence of Catechol or precursor.
Table 11

Toxicity results given by the software Derek.

Compound NameToxicity Prediction Alert (Lhasa prediction)Toxicophoric GroupToxicity Alert
Bergenin
M3Chromosome damage in vitro in humanCatecholPlausible
Chromosome damage in vitro in mouse
Chromosome damage in vitro in rat
M4Skin sensitisation in mouseResorcinol or precursorPlausible
Skin sensitisation in rat
M7Skin sensitisation in mouseCatechol or precursorPlausible
Skin sensitisation in rat
M14Skin sensitisation in mouseCatechol or precursorPlausible
Skin sensitisation in rat
Toxicity results given by the software Derek.

Discussion

The phytochemical analysis indicates bergenin as the major compound (Fig. 1), which is in accordance with other studies [11,38] reporting bergenin as the major compound of this plant. Among the detrimental side effects caused by medicinal plants are hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenic and abortive effects [39]. For instance, some plant species reported to have a nephrotoxic or hepatoxic effect are Piper methysticum [40,41], Cayaponia tayuya [42], and Symphytum officinale L. [39]. In the acute oral toxicity test in zebrafish, no death was observed until 48 h of analysis after treatment with doses of 75 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, and 1000 mg/kg, and even with doses up to 3000 mg/kg was determine the oral LD50 of the EEu higher to the dose of 3000 mg/kg. Hence, the extract of Endopleura uchi (per oral) can be considered nontoxic up this concentration [43]. These results are in accordance with Politi et al. [44], who evaluated the toxicity of Endopleura uchi powdered barks extract in mice and reported that up to 2000 mg/kg the extract caused no signs of toxicity or death (Table 1). However, in this mentioned study was not evaluated injury at the histopathological or biochemical levels, like in the present study. The analysis of behavioral parameters is essential to understand the physiological aspects of the animal subjected to the toxicity test [45]. According to Carvalho et al. [22], the organs of zebrafish have a different sensibility to toxic agents, which together with its homology toward humans, is considered an ideal model to perform toxicity tests. The observation of behavioral changes may indicate that the animal is in contact with a foreign substance [22]. The behaviors are classified in three stages (I, II, and II). The excitability is one of the first changes observed when the animal is exposed to a xenobiotic compound, which can culminate in loss of posture, fall to the bottom of the tank, and eventually, death. In this study was observed during the first hour in animals treated with doses of 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg, an increase of swimming activity, a stage II behavioral alteration (Table 2). It is important to observe, however, that this behavioral alteration was also observed in the control group. As stated by Borges et al. [29], this may be due to the stress of the animal caused by the oral treatment since in the next hours no other behavioral alterations were observed. Animals treated with doses of 1000 mg/kg and 3000 had stage II behavioral alterations for a more extended period compared to the previous doses (Table 2). Also, the group treated with the highest dose (3000 mg/kg) had stage III alterations, evidencing that the higher doses caused a higher imbalance in the animals’ homeostasis. Other studies report behavioral changes after exposure to a range of compounds [22,28,29,46]. In this study, it should be considered that a drug to be clinically useful, must have a dosage schedule that usually involves the administration of several doses in the acute, subchronic, or chronic treatment phase. Therefore, the exploitation of single-dose toxicity cannot override effects that can arise with the administration of multiple doses over some time. However, one must evaluate the responses found, mainly those of histopathological level, with a single dose in the acute treatment phase. The gastrointestinal absorption is a significant aspect influencing the bioavailability of orally consumed drugs. Considering that the movement of a molecule through the body is affected by its diffusion, several molecular properties can influence the passive absorption of a drug [47]. Hence, a molecule should be in accordance with the Lipinski Rules to be a good drug candidate – that is, log P not higher than 5, molecular mass lower than 500, number of hydrogen bond acceptors lower or equal to 10, and number of hydrogen bond donors lower or equal to 5. Molecules that do not follow more than one of these rules may probably have poor bioavailability. In this study, bergenin and the metabolites M3, M5, M8, M12, M15, and M16 (Table 6) are in accordance with the rules, suggesting that these compounds are probably the most suitable as potential drugs. Through in silico analysis, the pharmacokinetic profile of bergenin and its compounds were evaluated. Bergenin and the metabolites M3, M5, M8, M15, and M16 had the best values of intestinal absorption (HIA), meaning that they are moderately absorbed (Table 7). Caco-2 are cells derived from the human carcinoma and are often used to test drugs intestinal absorption of orally consumed drugs [48,49]. In this study, the in silico prediction of bergenin and its metabolites are of medium permeability, as shown in Table 7. This is in accordance with Qin et al. [50], who reported that the oral absorption of bergenin is limited in vitro (Caco-2 cells) and in vivo (rats), and the main route of absorption is passive diffusion. The intestinal toxicity is essential since the gastrointestinal mucosa is the first barrier in which an orally consumed xenobiotic compound pass through [51]. The exposure of the gastrointestinal tract to toxic xenobiotic compounds can damage its mucosa and impair the cellular development, and hence, its physiology and function [22]. According to Ryu et al. [51], the zebrafish is a promising animal to evaluate the intestinal toxicity and can even replace the rat model or the in vitro Caco-2 cells. Wang et al. [52] highlight the main similarities between the zebrafish intestine with the human’s, among them are the genes responsible for the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids transport, and energy generation. Also, the absorption is performed by column-shaped enterocytes, which are the most abundant cells in the intestinal epithelium. There is also the occurrence of goblet cells, the second most frequent type in this epithelium (Menke et al., 2011). As previously mentioned, bergenin and its metabolites are moderately absorbed, increasing the period of contact between this compound with the intestine. This can explain the occurrence of enterocytes vacuolization – very frequent in animals treated with doses of 1000 and 3000 mg/kg – since the intestine is one of the organs accountable for biotransformation, and the local toxicity of the enterocytes can damage its structure [53]. The occurrence of cellular degeneration and necrosis in the highest doses (1000 and 3000 mg/kg) can explain the increased leukocytes infiltration in the mucosal layer since those alterations manage to attract inflammatory cells to trigger the inflammatory process (Jungueira & Carneiro, 2013). In all groups treated with EEu was observed alterations in the lamina propria; however, the alterations were higher as the doses increased. Overall, animals treated with doses of 75 and 500 mg/kg had fewer histological changes while animals treated with doses of 1000 and 3000 mg/kg had moderate to severe histological changes (73.9 % and 96.9 % of tissue alteration, respectively; Table 4). The liver of zebrafish has several cell types parallel with those from mammals; this organ is accountable of bile production, neutralization and elimination of toxic compounds [46,54]. In zebrafish, the parenchyma is homogenous, and the hepatocytes are arranged circularly around a network of sinusoids leading to the central vessel [55]. These hepatocytes are the most abundant cells, and like in superior vertebrates, they store lipids, glycogen, and iron [46,54]. The groups treated with EEu at 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg had few hepatocytes changes, hyperemia, and vessel changes, the doses of 500 mg/kg also had increased vessels relative volume. Hyperemia is a mechanism to increase the blood flow to the liver, increase the release of nutrients and oxygen to a stressed area, preventing hypoxia [22,29]. The doses of 75, 500, 1000, and 3000 mg/kg resulted in intense cytoplasmic vacuolization. This was also reported by Simonato et al. [56] in fishes exposed to pollutants such as petroleum. In the doses of 1000 and 3000 mg/kg had increased frequency of level II tissue changes and occurrence of level III tissue changes, evidencing the vulnerability of hepatic cells as the treatment dose increase. The group treated with EEu at 1000 mg/kg had more severe tissue changes in the hepatocytes compared to the groups treated with the doses 75 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg. Moreover, the group treated with 3000 mg/kg had moderate to severe tissue changes, and the organ was highly injured, and could negatively impact the animals’ homeostasis compared to the control group. Due to the results from the liver histopathology, we further assessed the enzymes ALT and AST, indicators of liver damage. As shown in Table 3, a significant increase in these enzymes activity was detected caused by the treatment with EEu. Overall, the results of histopathology and enzymatic activity show that the treatment could damage the liver proportionately to the dose, especially for 1000 and 3000 mg/kg. The toxicity from EEu could be, in part, due to the products of the compounds metabolism at these concentrations. The major compound, bergenin, can be transformed by the cytochrome P450 into metabolites with toxic activity in the hepatocytes, accountable for the tissue injury at these concentrations. The in silico assays shows the metabolite M1 is formed in a phase II biotransformation reaction, glucuronidation (Fig. 7), which is one of the major routes of xenobiotics transformation in mammals [57]. M3, in turn, is formed by O-dealkylation [33,34]; both M1 and M3 have hepatotoxicity as an adverse effect, which is in accordance with the ALT and AST results (Table 3). It is worth noticing that bergenin was predicted to inhibit two of the major CYPs involved in the drug's metabolism from the human liver: CYP2C9 and CYP3A4. All the metabolites were CYP2C9 inhibitors, and the majority were CYP3A4 inhibitors (Table 8). These results are in accordance with Dong et al. [58], who evaluated the effects of bergenin in the eight principal isoforms of CYP450 in human hepatic microsomes and reported that bergenin managed to inhibit the activities of CYP3A4, 2E1, and 2C9. Hence, we suggest that the histopathological changes (also AST and ALT activity, evidenced by changes of these hepatic biomarkers [59]) observed in this study are due to the CYP-inhibitor activity of bergenin. In fact, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can be caused not only by the drug itself but also by its metabolites [60,61]. Moreover, these results together suggest that bergenin, the main phytochemical compound of EEu, should not be consumed concomitantly with drugs dependent on the mentioned CYPs due to its inhibition. The main function of the kidney in freshwater teleosts is to eliminate the vast quantities of water that enter through their gills. It is also the primary organ accountable to eliminate drugs and their metabolites [46,62]. In this study, few tubule alterations were found in animals treated with doses of 75 and 500 mg/kg; however, in animals treated with 1000 and 3000 mg/kg, the alterations were higher. Just like in the gills, liver, and intestine, the tissue changes found in the kidney were dependent on the dose of EEu. According to Meletti [63], the majority of kidney tubules changes are found in a specific group of cells, the epithelial cells, and could eventually lead to necrosis, as observed in the groups treated at 1000 and 3000 mg/kg. The treatment with EEu at 3000 mg/kg produced all vessel alterations in this organ. Hyperemia was also observed in animals treated with the lowest doses, however, in the kidney of animals treated at 3000 mg/kg this alteration was more severe, which could negatively impact the normal function of the organ. Other tissue changes were observed in all the groups treated with EEu, such as increased space around the Bowman capsule, decreased Bowman capsule, and decreased frequency of glomeruli. According to Meletti [63], these alterations are associated with others such as glomerular degeneration, dilated vessels, and hyperemia; all of them observed in this study. The metabolism and depuration of drugs rely mostly – if not all – on the liver, with a lesser contribution of the kidney (Kathleen et al., 2013). It is possible, however, that the histopathological changes found in the kidneys are also due to the metabolites predicted in silico. For instance, M15 is formed through a phase I reaction (dehydrogenation, Fig. 8) by the cytochrome P450 [[64], [65], [66]], in this reaction, a single bond is transformed into a double bond where a hydroxyl group is turned into a carbonyl [57] (Fig. 8), and the products of this reaction may have nephrotoxicity as a side effect. Moreover, the products of O-dealkylation (a phase II reaction, Fig. 8), such as the metabolite M3 also can be nephrotoxic [33,34].
Fig. 8

Example of dehydrogenation reaction catalyzed by the cytochrome P450.

Example of dehydrogenation reaction catalyzed by the cytochrome P450. The in silico results indicates that bergenin and all of its metabolites have a low permeability in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney cells (PMDCK) (Table 7), then, it is reasonable to assume that these compounds may affect the glomerular filtration and renal clearance. Considering that these cells have morphological and physiological aspects similar to the cells from the mammals’ collector and distal tubules (Collares-Buzato et al., 2002), it is possible that the tissue changes found in the kidneys from animals treated with the highest doses (1000 and 3000 mg/kg) are a result of this low permeability of bergenin and its metabolites. The gills of zebrafish are formed by four bilateral gill arches. One of the first tissue alterations observed in this tissue when exposed to toxic compounds is the displacement of epithelial cells. In this study, all the doses (75, 500, 1000, and 3000 mg/kg) could induce this tissue alteration related to the animal physiological adaptation. However, along with the fusion of lamellae (found in all the groups as well), these tissue changes are reversible. In the gills of animals treated with EEu at 500, 1000 and 3000 mg/kg was observed hyperplasia of the epithelial cells; this tissue alteration is a mechanism of defense but can eventually hamper the respiration [28,67]. Lamellae blood vessels alteration is a level I tissue alteration and was observed in all groups, however, only in the groups treated at 1000 and 3000 mg/kg was observed lamellae aneurysm (a level II tissue change), which is indicative of pillar cells death. The pillar cells, found in the secondary filaments, have an essential role in the maintenance of blood flow in this organ [46]. The highest doses (1000 and 3000 mg/kg) could also induce cell degeneration and necrosis (level II and III alterations, respectively), which are related to loss of function in the gill tissue [29]. Necrosis is an unplanned death of cells (unlike apoptosis) that can be induced by chemical compounds; these necrotic cells swell, their membrane dilates and finally, the cells break open, letting its content in the extracellular space [54]. In general, the doses of 1000 and 3000 mg/kg did not induce death (except for one fish treated at 3000 mg/kg) up to 48 h of observation. However, for a more extended observation period, it is possible that all of these fish would eventually die due to necrosis of the gills. It is worth noticing that the drug was orally administered, and hence, it reached the gills from the circulation, not from the exterior of the fish. The Plasma Protein Binding (PPB), is a necessary parameter to predict the efficacy and toxicity of a drug [68]. The in silico prediction of bergenin and its metabolites were classified as weakly connected to plasma proteins (Table 7). Drugs with such low affinity to bind to albumin are limited to circulate through the tissues and reach the site of action. However, this property does not prevent the drug from performing its activity because free molecules are needed to exert their pharmacological activity [69]. On the other hand, a study performed by Zhang et al. [70] about bergenin and the human serum albumin (HAS) reported that bergenin could connect to this molecule through hydrophobic interaction in microemulsions. According to Schinkel et al. [71], the passage of drugs into the brain can lead to adverse side effects in the CNS. The in silico results indicates that bergenin and all of its metabolites have low absorption in the blood-brain barrier, and are consequently inactive in the CNS (Table 7). Hence, the behavioral alterations observed are probably not due to the treatment effects in the CNS. P-glycoproteins (P-GP) are membrane proteins accountable to remove potential cytotoxic compounds from the cells and can ultimately, make the cells resistant to certain drugs [71]. However, the in silico results indicates that bergenin and its metabolites do not interact with P-GPs (Table 7). In the in silico toxicological analysis, bergenin and its metabolites were assessed for potential mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Assess mutagenic activity is essential to screen safer drugs for treatment [72]; in this study, bergenin and most of its metabolites (M1-M5, M7-M9, M11, M12, and M5) were not predicted to be mutagenic (Table 9). As for the carcinogenic activity, bergenin and all of its metabolites were predicted to be carcinogenic in mice and rats (Table 9). Assess the mechanism in which these molecules could induce cancer is essential considering that bergenin is indicated for several therapeutic uses. The metabolism prediction of bergenin had phase I and II biotransformation reactions, for instance, in the metabolites M3, M6, M8, M12, and M15. The occurrence of these reactions forming these molecules could be carcinogenic (Fig. 7), corroborating the previous result. This carcinogenic activity would be induced over the hematopoietic system and pituitary gland of female mice; vascular system, stomach and kidney of male rats; and kidney of male mice [33,34]. Bergenin and the metabolites M1-M3 and M12 were predicted to be harmful in the development of medaka fish (Table 9). As for the interaction with hERG-type K+ channels (Table 9), neither bergenin or its metabolites were predicted to act as blockers. These channels are essential during the repolarization of the cardiac action potential [73]. The in silico results suggest an LD50 of 290 mg/kg (Table 10), however, this is not in accordance with the in vivo results reported by Nazir et al. [17], where bergenin had LD50 superior to 2000 mg/kg in mice, and also in this study, where the LD50 could not be determined in the tested doses in zebrafish. Also, in the Derek server, bergenin was not predicted to have toxicological risks, but the presence of some toxic chemical groups should be considered such as catechol and resorcinol in the metabolites M3, M4, M7, and M14 (Table 11); these groups can induce chromosome damages in human and rodents, and also affect skin sensibility [[74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82]]. This was the first study assessing in vivo the acute toxicity of EEu, with an emphasis in biochemical parameters and histopathology of the intestine, gills, liver, and kidney. Further analysis in silico was performed on bergenin, the major compound, and its metabolites. Despite the relevant potential of bergenin for therapeutic uses, more toxicological studies are needed for this molecule.

Conclusion

The effects of orally administered EEu was evaluated in zebrafish using different doses, and overall, the extract had minimal toxicity in low doses, in accordance with other reports, while in higher doses only tissue alterations were observed, mainly in the liver and intestine. In in silico analysis, bergenin was predicted to interact with CYP enzymes of phase I and II biotransformation reactions, and the histological changes found in these tissues, corroborated by biochemical markers, could be due to the action bergenin metabolites at these concentrations. Based on this study, it is concluded that potential drugs candidates using active principles of this plant should consider the doses administered since, in higher doses, tissue and biochemical changes were observed that could impair the organ physiology.

Authorship contributions

Participated in research design: BMSH, BLSO, CBRS, AN and JCTC. Conducted experiments: BMSH, KRTP, LBS, RSB, RCA, HOC and GMGA. Performed data analysis: ACMP and BMSH. Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: BMSH, AN and JCTC.

Financial support

This work was supported in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil CAPES – PROCAD Amazonia 88887.20054-2018-00.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  56 in total

1.  Oral characteristics of bergenin and the effect of absorption enhancers in situ, in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xuan Qin; Fang Yuan; Dan Zhou; Yuan Huang
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  2010

2.  Determination of drug plasma protein binding by solid phase microextraction.

Authors:  Florin Marcel Musteata; Janusz Pawliszyn; Mark G Qian; Jing-Tao Wu; Gerald T Miwa
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure; the DEREK system.

Authors:  D M Sanderson; C G Earnshaw
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database.

Authors:  M T Cronin; D A Basketter
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 5.  Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Antianxiety activity guided isolation and characterization of bergenin from Caesalpinia digyna Rottler roots.

Authors:  Jitender Singh; Ashwani Kumar; Anupam Sharma
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 4.360

7.  Neuroprotective effects of bergenin in Alzheimer's disease: Investigation through molecular docking, in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Priyal Barai; Nisith Raval; Sanjeev Acharya; Ankit Borisa; Hardik Bhatt; Niyati Acharya
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Comparative antioxidant and antiplasmodial activities of 11-O-galloylbergenin and bergenin isolated from Bergenia ligulata.

Authors:  G Uddin; A Sadat; B S Siddiqui
Journal:  Trop Biomed       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.623

9.  Sensitization potency of some phenolic compounds--with special emphasis on the relationship between chemical structure and allergenicity.

Authors:  M Itoh
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.005

10.  Causes, clinical features, and outcomes from a prospective study of drug-induced liver injury in the United States.

Authors:  Naga Chalasani; Robert J Fontana; Herbert L Bonkovsky; Paul B Watkins; Timothy Davern; Jose Serrano; Hongqiu Yang; James Rochon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  2 in total

1.  Chromatographic profile, in silico and in vivo study of the pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of major constituent present in kefir, the kefiran.

Authors:  Susy Érika de Lima Barros; Henrique Barros de Lima; Leandra Karoline Alves Gonçalves; Lenir Cabral Correia; Maiara de Fátima de Brito Brito; Mariana Pegrucci Barcelos; Guilherme Martins Silva; Carlos Henrique Tomich de Paula da Silva; Rafael Garrett da Costa; Rodrigo Alves Soares Cruz; José Carlos Tavares Carvalho; Lorane Izabel da Silva Hage-Melim
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.680

2.  Acute oral toxicity assessment of ethanolic extracts of Antidesma bunius (L.) Spreng fruits in mice.

Authors:  Maria Nilda M Muñoz; Urdujah G Alvarado; Jerica Isabel L Reyes; Kozo Watanabe
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-06-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.