| Literature DB >> 32041672 |
Wei Huan Fang1,2, Xu Dong Li1, Hui Zhu3, Fei Miao4, Xiao Hua Qian5, Zi Lai Pan2, Xiao Zhu Lin6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between the lymph node status and preoperative computed tomography images texture features in pancreatic cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Computer-assisted image processing; Metastases; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Texture analysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32041672 PMCID: PMC7011565 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-0296-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Imaging ISSN: 1470-7330 Impact factor: 3.909
Fig. 1Illustration of flow diagram of included patients
Fig. 2Illustration of drawing the region of interest (ROI) by MaZda software 77 years old male, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreatic tail (green ROI), without lymph node (LN) metastases, axial virtual monochromatic (VMC) CT images at 65 k electron voltage (keV) on late arterial phase with 5 mm slice thickness (a, b). 53 years old male, PDAC in the pancreatic head (red ROI), with 1/25 metastatic LN, axial VMC CT images at 60 keV on portal venous phase with 1.25 mm slice thickness (c, d)
Comparison of demographic features and tumor size between lymph node metastases positive versus negative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (155 cases)
| Lymph node metastases positive( | Lymph node metastases negative( | Comparison between two groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender(male/female) | 46/26 | 59/24 | Chi-square = 0.614 | 0.433 |
| Age(mean ± standard deviation), years | 63.3 ± 9.5 | 64.2 ± 9.8 | t = 0.613 | 0.541 |
| Tumor size(Median[quartile 1, quartile 3]), cm | 3.0(2.5, 4.0) | 3.0(2.5, 4.0) | U = 2803 | 0.503 |
Abbreviation: n number of cases, t independent samples t test, U Mann-Whitney test
Texture features with significant difference obtained from virtual monochromatic CT images between lymph node metastases positive and negative groups of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (155 cases)
| Image subset | Texture feature | N+(n = 72) | N-(n = 83) | U/t | AUC(95% CI) | Cutoff value | +LR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.25 mm-AP-60 keV | WavEnLH_s-2b | 244 (208, 313) | 294 (242, 352) | 2209 | 0.005 | 0.630(0.549–0.706) | 0.005 | 270 | 2.08 |
| 1.25 mm-PVP-60 keV | S(5,-5)SumAverga | 62.5 ± 2.0 | 63.4 ± 2.1 | 2.657 | 0.009 | 0.619(0.538–0.696) | 0.009 | 63.3 | 1.45 |
| S(4,-4)SumAverga | 62.5 ± 1.8 | 63.2 ± 1.9 | 2.303 | 0.023 | 0.600(0.518–0.677) | 0.029 | 63.7 | 1.31 | |
| S(4,4)SumAverga | 62.4 ± 1.8 | 63.0 ± 1.8 | 2.019 | 0.045 | 0.589(0.500–0.679) | 0.052 | NA | NA | |
| S(4,0)SumAverga | 62.7 ± 1.4 | 63.2 ± 1.6 | 1.995 | 0.048 | 0.594(0.512–0.672) | 0.040 | 63.4 | 1.41 | |
| S(3,3)SumAverga | 62.6 ± 1.6 | 63.2 ± 1.6 | 2.283 | 0.024 | 0.607(0.525–0.684) | 0.019 | 62.6 | 1.67 | |
| S(2,2)SumAverga | 62.9 ± 1.3 | 63.4 ± 1.3 | 2.216 | 0.028 | 0.615(0.534–0.692) | 0.012 | 63.1 | 1.64 | |
| S(1,1)SumAverga | 63.5 ± 0.8 | 63.7 ± 0.9 | 2.021 | 0.045 | 0.608(0.526–0.685) | 0.019 | 63.6 | 1.60 | |
| 5 mm-AP-65 keV | 135dr_LngREmpha | 1.24 ± 0.06 | 1.22 ± 0.06 | −2.133 | 0.035 | 0.608(0.526–0.685) | 0.019 | 1.23 | 1.57 |
| S(4,-4)SumOfSqsa | 100 ± 7 | 97 ± 9 | −2.218 | 0.028 | 0.573(0.484–0.663) | 0.110 | NA | NA | |
| 135dr_Fractiona | 0.929 ± 0.016 | 0.934 ± 0.015 | 2.088 | 0.038 | 0.612(0.530–0.689) | 0.015 | 0.934 | 1.58 | |
| 5 mm-PVP-65 keV | S(5,-5)SumAvergb | 62.2(61.1, 63.4) | 62.8(61.1, 64.6) | 2429 | 0.045 | 0.594(0.512–0.672) | 0.041 | 63.0 | 1.36 |
| S(4,4)SumAverga | 62.0 ± 1.8 | 62.6 ± 2.1 | 2.047 | 0.042 | 0.571(0.481–0.661) | 0.121 | NA | NA |
aData are mean ± standard deviation, independent samples t-test was used
bData are median (quartile 1, quartile 3), Mann-Whitney test was used
Abbreviation: AP late arterial phase, AUC area under receiver operator characteristic curve, CI confidence interval, keV kilo electron voltage, +LR positive likelihood ratio, n number of cases, N+ lymph node metastasis positive, N- lymph node metastasis negative, NA not applicable, PVP portal venous phase, SD standard deviation, t independent samples t-test, U Mann-Whitney test; 1.25 mm/5 mm, slice thickness of the CT images analysed
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of wavelet transform based feature WavEnLH_s-2 (area under ROC curve = 0.630, 95% confidence interval 0.549 to 0.706) from the virtual monochromatic CT image at 60 k electron voltage (keV) on late arterial phase with 1.25 mm slice thickness for differentiating lymph node metastases positive and negative groups of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (155 cases)
Fig. 4Correlations of ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes (LNR) with run-length matrix based features 135dr_LngREmph (a) and 135dr_Fraction (b) from virtual monochromatic CT images at 65 k electron voltage (keV) on late arterial phase (AP) with 5 mm slice thickness in the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients (155 cases), analyzed using the non-parametric Spearman’s correlation coefficients method