Literature DB >> 23238914

Texture analysis in assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in breast cancer.

Arfan Ahmed1, Peter Gibbs, Martin Pickles, Lindsay Turnbull.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)-based textural analysis in predicting response to chemotherapy in a cohort of breast cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 100 patients were scanned on a 3.0T HDx scanner immediately prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment. A software application to use texture features based on co-occurrence matrices was developed. Texture analysis was performed on precontrast and 1-5 minutes postcontrast data. Patients were categorized according to their chemotherapeutic response: partial responders corresponding to a decrease in tumor diameter over 50% (40) and nonresponders corresponding to a decrease of less than 50% (4). Data were also split based on factors that influence response: triple receptor negative phenotype (TNBC) (22) vs. non-TNBC (49); node negative (45) vs. node positive (46); and biopsy grade 1 or 2 (38) vs. biopsy grade 3 (55).
RESULTS: Parameters f2 (contrast), f4 (variance), f10 (difference in variance), f6 (sum average), f7 (sum variance), f8 (sum entropy), f15 (cluster shade), and f16 (cluster prominence) showed significant differences between responders and partial responders of chemotherapy. Differences were mainly seen at 1-3 minutes postcontrast administration. No significant differences were found precontrast administration. Node +ve, high grade, and TNBC are associated with poorer prognosis and appear to be more heterogeneous in appearance according to texture analysis.
CONCLUSION: This work highlights that textural differences between groups (based on response, nodal status, and triple negative groupings) are apparent and appear to be most evident 1-3 minutes postcontrast administration. The fact that significant differences for certain texture parameters and groupings are consistently observed is encouraging.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haralick co-occurrence matrices; MRI contrast enhancement; breast cancer chemotherapy prediction; computer science informatics; image processing; texture analysis software

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23238914     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  70 in total

1.  Pre-treatment magnetic resonance-based texture features as potential imaging biomarkers for predicting event free survival in anal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Arnaud Hocquelet; Thibaut Auriac; Cynthia Perier; Clarisse Dromain; Marie Meyer; Jean-Baptiste Pinaquy; Alban Denys; Hervé Trillaud; Baudouin Denis De Senneville; Véronique Vendrely
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

3.  Assessing treatment response in triple-negative breast cancer from quantitative image analysis in perfusion magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Sadhika Malladi; Daniela Lee; Adrien Depeursinge; Melinda Telli; Jafi Lipson; Daniel Golden; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-11-02

4.  MRI texture analysis predicts p53 status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Dang; J T Lysack; T Wu; T W Matthews; S P Chandarana; N T Brockton; P Bose; G Bansal; H Cheng; J R Mitchell; J C Dort
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  The role of texture analysis in imaging as an outcome predictor and potential tool in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  S Alobaidli; S McQuaid; C South; V Prakash; P Evans; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  A clinical-radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lung metastasis in colorectal cancer patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  TingDan Hu; ShengPing Wang; Lv Huang; JiaZhou Wang; DeBing Shi; Yuan Li; Tong Tong; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Characterizing and eliminating errors in enhancement and subtraction artifacts in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: Chemical shift artifact of the third kind.

Authors:  Jamal J Derakhshan; Elizabeth S McDonald; Evan S Siegelman; Mitchell D Schnall; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging.

Authors:  E Sala; E Mema; Y Himoto; H Veeraraghavan; J D Brenton; A Snyder; B Weigelt; H A Vargas
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Breast cancer subtype intertumor heterogeneity: MRI-based features predict results of a genomic assay.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Sutton; Jung Hun Oh; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for pretreatment prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI texture features.

Authors:  Valentina Giannini; Simone Mazzetti; Agnese Marmo; Filippo Montemurro; Daniele Regge; Laura Martincich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.