| Literature DB >> 32041305 |
Ayman H Kamel1, Samar Ezzat1,2, Mona A Ahmed2, Abd El-Galil E Amr3,4, Abdulrahman A Almehizia3, Mohamed A Al-Omar3.
Abstract
Potentiometric sensors have a great influence on the determination of most various compounds in their matrices. Therefore, efficient and new sensors were introduced to measure sodium Deoxycholate (NaDC) as a bile acid salt. These sensors are based on NaDC imprinted polymer (MIP) as sensory element. The MIP beads were synthesized using thermal polymerization pathway, in which acrylamide (AAm), ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), NaDC, and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) were used as the functional monomer, cross-linker, template, and initiator, respectively. The proposed sensors were fabricated using a coated screen-printed platform and the sensing membrane was modified by single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) as an ion-to-electron transducer. The sensors exhibited high sensitivity that reached 4.7 × 10-5 M of near-Nernestian slope (-60.1 ± 0.9 mV/decade, r2 = 0.999 (n= 5)). In addition, the sensors revealed high selectivity, long lifetime, high potential stability, and conductivity that ensure reproducible and accurate results over a long time. MIP characterization was performed using Fourier Transform-Infrared (FT-IR) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Regarding the interaction of NaDC with serum albumin (SA), albumin is determined in human serum samples as human serum albumin (HSA), which was collected from different volunteers of different ages and gender.Entities:
Keywords: human serum albumin (HSA); molecular imprinted polymer (MIP); screen-printed ion selective electrodes; single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs); sodium deoxycholate (NaDC)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32041305 PMCID: PMC7072443 DOI: 10.3390/biom10020251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Structure of Sodium deoxycholate (NaDC).
Figure 2Fourier Transform-Infrared (FT-IR) spectra for (a) NaDC, (b) NaDC/MIP, (c) washed MIP and (d) NIP beads.
Figure 3SEM images of (a) MIP and (b) NIP beads.
Potentiometric characteristics of the proposed sensors.
| Sensor No. | MIP, mg | DOP, mg | Aliquat, mg | PVC, mg | Slope, mV/decade | Detection Limit, M | Correlation Coefficient, r2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 102 | 4 | 58 | −32.6 ± 0.7 | 3.5 × 10−3 | 0.997 |
| 2 | 5 | 102 | - | 58 | −41.6 ± 1.5 | 3.1 × 10−4 | 0.996 |
| 3 | 5 | 102 | 4 | 58 | −47.1 ± 1.2 | 2.5 × 10−4 | 0.999 |
| 4 | 10 | 102 | 4 | 58 | −48.8 ± 2.1 | 2.0 × 10−4 | 0.999 |
| 5 | 20 | 102 | 4 | 58 | −50.3 ± 1.4 | 7.5 × 10−5 | 0.997 |
| 6 | 30 | 102 | 4 | 58 | −60.1 ± 0.9 | 4.7 × 10−5 | 0.999 |
| 7 | 35 | 102 | 4 | 58 | −51.2 ± 0.1 | 1.0 × 10−4 | 0.998 |
Figure 4Potentiometric response curves obtained screen-printed ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) integrated with (A) MIP and (B) NIP.
Figure 5Life-span of the proposed deoxycholate membrane based sensor.
Figure 6Water-layer tests for NaDC–ISE with and without single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) as the solid contact.
Figure 7Chronopotentiometry for NaDC/MIP–ISEs with (a) and without (b) SWCNTs as a solid contact material.
Figure 8Impedance for NaDC/MIP–ISEs with and without SWCNTs as a solid contact material.
Potentiometric selectivity coefficients, Log Kpot of the proposed screen-printed ISEs.
| Interfering Ion | * Log Kpotx,y |
|---|---|
| Cl− | −2.5 ± 0.7 |
| SO4−2 | −3.2 ± 0.8 |
| NO3− | −3.2 ± 0.3 |
| PO43− | −1.9 ± 0.7 |
| Glucose | −3.5 ± 0.2 |
| CH3COO− | −2.2 ± 0.1 |
| C2O42− | −1.7 ± 0.6 |
| Cholesterol | −2.7 ± 0.3 |
| Creatinine | −3.6 ± 0.4 |
| Urate | −1.9 ± 0.5 |
* Mean of three measurements.
Figure 9The dynamic potentiometric responses of screen-printed platform towards human serum albumin (HSA) and NaDC at pH = 9.2. The inset shows the measuring calibration plot for HSA.
Application of the proposed sensor to the determination of albumin in the human blood serum.
| Gender | Age | Human Serum Albumin (HSA) g/dL * | Bias % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed Method ISE | Reference Method [ | |||
|
| 1–15 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 9.5 |
| 15–20 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 8.9 | |
| 25–40 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 9.8 | |
| 45–60 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 8.8 | |
|
| 1–15 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 8.2 |
| 15–20 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 10.0 | |
| 25–40 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 10.0 | |
| 45–60 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 8.9 | |
* Average of six measurements.