| Literature DB >> 32041208 |
Xhevat Lumi1, Mina Mahnic1, Beáta Éva Petrovski2, Goran Petrovski3.
Abstract
: The present study investigated the functional and anatomical outcomes of idiopathic chronic macular hole (MH) surgery with different surgical approaches related to the chronicity and diameter of the MH. A comparative retrospective study between three groups of patients who underwent vitrectomy for long-duration MH (mean: 13.5 months) was conducted. In the first group of patients (G1 or IP), the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was systematically peeled; in the second group (G2 or IPEP), the ILM and epiretinal membrane (ERM) were peeled; and in the third group (G3 or IF), patients underwent inverted ILM flap technique surgery. Pre- and post-operative best corrected visual acuities (pre- and post-op BCVA) were studied. Macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were performed to measure the MH minimum and maximum diameter pre-operatively, as well as to confirm its post-op closure and evaluate the integrity of the ellipsoid zone (EZ). Fifty eyes of 48 patients (33 female and 15 male) were retrospectively evaluated. MH closure rate was 100% in IP group, 66.7% in IPEP, and 95.2% in IF group. All three groups had a statistically significant improvement of BCVA. EZ post-op was restored in 88.2% of the cases from G1, 41.6% from G2, and 23.8% from G3. No statistically significant relationship between the smaller or larger MH diameter and the visual acuity improvement was found. Patients with chronic MH and ERM have worse functional and anatomical outcomes after surgery. Treatment of chronic MHs without ERM results in a better closure rate with either an inverted ILM flap approach or systematic ILM peel.Entities:
Keywords: ellipsoid zone; macular hole; macular hole diameter; visual acuity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32041208 PMCID: PMC7073590 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Characteristics of the studied population.
| Groups | Eyes | Patients | Female Patients | Male Patients | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 17 (34.0) | 15 (31.2) | 9 (27.3) | 6 (40.0) | 68.8 ± 5.4 |
|
| 12 (24.0) | 12 (25.0) | 9 (27.3) | 3 (20.0) | 67.6 ± 7.0 |
|
| 21 (42.0) | 21 (43.8) | 15 (45.4) | 6 (40.0) | 69.8 ± 7.1 |
Groups: IP = internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling; IPEP = ILM and epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling; IF = inverted ILM flap technique; and N = number. Statistical analysis was performed using the One-Way ANOVA and χ2 tests.
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) characteristics of full thickness macular hole (FTMH).
| Groups | Smaller Diameter MH (µm) | Larger Diameter MH (µm) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 299.2 ± 151.6 | 806.0 ± 272.0 |
|
| 383.0 ± 149.4 | 903.2 ± 210.7 |
|
| 458.1 ± 130.8 | 950.6 ± 305.6 |
Statistically significant differences occurred in the smaller diameter macular hole (MH) between groups IP and IF (p = 0.004); 1 outlier (2828 µm) in the large diameter measurements of the MH in group IF was removed from the data analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the One-Way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test.
Functional and anatomical results with comparison of the visual acuity before and after surgery.
| Groups | BCVA Pre-op Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) | BCVA Post-op (logMAR) | Anatomic MH Closure N (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 17/17 (100.0%) | 0.001 |
|
| 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.3 | 8/12 (66.7%) | 0.0053 |
|
| 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.5 | 20/21 (95.2%) | 0.0002 |
Legend: BCVA pre-op = best corrected visual acuity before surgery; BCVA post-op = best corrected visual acuity after surgery; MH = macular hole; and N = number. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and the χ2-test.
Figure 1Relationship between pre- and post-op logMAR and groups (median, IQR, range). Legend: BCVA pre-op = best corrected visual acuity before surgery; BCVA post-op = best corrected visual acuity after surgery; logMAR = Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution; Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.
Distribution of patients according to the improvement in visual acuity and duration of the symptoms and closure status of the MH.
| (Pre-op)–(Post-op) logMAR Difference | (%) | MH Remained Open (Frequency (%)) | MH Closed (Frequency (%)) |
|---|---|---|---|
| <0 | 3 (6.0) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (4.4) |
| 0–0.2 | 10 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 8 (17.8) |
| 0.2–0.4 | 9 (18.0) | 1 (20.0) | 8 (17.8) |
| >0.4 | 28 (56.0) | 1 (20.0) | 27 (60.0) |
Legend: BCVA Pre-op = best corrected visual acuity before surgery; BCVA Post-op = best corrected visual acuity after surgery; and MH = macular hole. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher’s exact test.
Figure 2Relationship between pre- and post-op logMAR and closure of the macular hole (median, IQR, range). Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.
Relationship between difference MH diameters and change or improvement in visual acuity.
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 (33.3) | 2 (20.0) | 2 (22.2) | 6 (21.4) |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 2 (20.0) | 4 (44.4) | 10 (35.7) |
|
| 2 (66.7) | 6 (60.0) | 3 (33.3) | 12 (42.9) |
| ( | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 2 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) |
|
| 2 (100.0) | 5 (83.3) | 4 (66.7) | 17 (100.0) |
Legend: BCVA pre-op = best corrected visual acuity before surgery; BCVA post-op = best corrected visual acuity after surgery; MH = macular hole, µm: micrometer, and N: number. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher’s exact test.
Figure 3Representative OCT finding pre- and post-operatively for each of the three groups studied. IP group: (a) = pre-op OCT, and (b) = post-op OCT after ILM peeling; IPEP group: (c) = pre-op OCT, and (d) = post-op OCT after ERM + ILM peeling; IF group: (e) = pre-op OCT, and (f) = post-op OCT after inverted flap technique.
Post-op anatomical results.
| Groups | Integrity of Ellipsoid Zone (%) | Integrity of RPE (%) | Characteristics Post-op |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 88.2% | 100% | 5.9% (1/17) Irregularity of inner retinal layers |
|
| 41.6% | 100% | 8.3% (1/12) Subretinal fluid |
|
| 23.8% | 100% | 4.8% (1/21) Irregularity inner retinal layers |
Legend: RPE = retinal pigment epithelium; N = number. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ2-test.