| Literature DB >> 32041143 |
Gerard Vales1, Satu Suhonen1, Kirsi M Siivola1, Kai M Savolainen1, Julia Catalán1,2, Hannu Norppa1.
Abstract
Several studies suggested that gold nanoparticles (NPs) could be genotoxic in vitro and in vivo. However, gold NPs currently produced present a wide range of sizes and functionalization, which could affect their interactions with the environment or with biological structures and, thus, modify their toxic effects. In this study, we investigated the role of surface charge in determining the genotoxic potential of gold NPs, as measured by the induction of DNA damage (comet assay) and chromosomal damage (micronucleus assay) in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells. The cellular uptake of gold NPs was assessed by hyperspectral imaging. Two core sizes (~5 nm and ~20 nm) and three functionalizations representing negative (carboxylate), positive (ammonium), and neutral (poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)ylated) surface charges were examined. Cationic ammonium gold NPs were clearly more cytotoxic than their anionic and neutral counterparts, but genotoxicity was not simply dependent on functionalization or size, since DNA damage was induced by 20-nm ammonium and PEGylated gold NPs, while micronucleus induction was increased by 5-nm ammonium and 20-nm PEGylated gold NPs. The 5-nm carboxylated gold NPs were not genotoxic, and evidence on the genotoxicity of the 20-nm carboxylated gold NPs was restricted to a positive result at the lowest dose in the micronucleus assay. When interpreting the results, it has to be taken into account that cytotoxicity limited the doses available for the ammonium-functionalized gold NPs and that gold NPs were earlier described to interfere with the comet assay procedure, possibly resulting in a false positive result. In conclusion, our findings show that the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold NPs are clearly enhanced by positive surface charge, but neither functionalization nor size can single-handedly account for the genotoxic effects of the gold NPs.Entities:
Keywords: BEAS-2B; DNA damage; cellular uptake; functionalization; genotoxicity; gold nanoparticle; hyperspectral microscopy; in vitro; micronucleus; particle size
Year: 2020 PMID: 32041143 PMCID: PMC7075117 DOI: 10.3390/nano10020271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Number of living cells relative (%) to untreated control cultures after treatment of BEAS-2B cells with gold nanoparticles (core diameter: ~5 nm (a) or ~20 nm (b)) for 24 or 48 h. Dead cells were identified by trypan blue staining. The symbols represent means ± SD.
Figure 2DNA damage expressed as tail intensity (% DNA in tail) in BEAS-2B cells after a 24-h treatment with gold nanoparticles (core diameter: ~5 nm (a) or ~20 nm (b)). Treatment is expressed as the antilog of Log2 of the dose. Here, 100 µM H2O2 was used as a positive control (C+; symbols on the right show results from the experiments carried out). The symbols represent means ± SD. Statistical significance in comparison with control cultures (one-way ANOVA): * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3Micronucleus frequency in binucleated (BN) BEAS-2B cells after a 48-h treatment with gold nanoparticles (core diameter: ~5 nm (a) or ~20 nm (b)). Treatment is expressed as the antilog of Log2 of the dose. Mitomycin C (150 ng/mL) was used as a positive control (C+; symbol on the right). The symbols represent means ± SD. Statistical significance in comparison with control cultures (Fisher’s exact test, two-tailed): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4Hyperspectral image analysis of BEAS-2B cells after a 48-h treatment with 5 µg/mL gold nanoparticles (NPs). (a) Representative images of cells exposed to ~5-nm-core carboxylated, ~5-nm-core poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)ylated, ~20-nm-core carboxylated, or ~20-nm-core PEGylated gold NPs. (b) Dark-field view of several cells exposed to ~5-nm- or ~20-nm-core ammonium-functionalized gold NPs.
Figure 5Percentage of BEAS-2B cells covered by gold nanoparticles (NPs) after a 48-h treatment with 5 µg/mL carboxylated and PEGylated gold NPs. In total, 15 cells were analyzed per treatment. The p-values are in comparison with untreated cultures or 5-nm carboxylated gold NPs (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn post hoc test): * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.