| Literature DB >> 21309618 |
Carsten Schleh1, Manuela Semmler-Behnke, Jens Lipka, Alexander Wenk, Stephanie Hirn, Martin Schäffler, Günter Schmid, Ulrich Simon, Wolfgang G Kreyling.
Abstract
It is of urgent need to identify the exact physico-chemical characteristics which allow maximum uptake and accumulation in secondary target organs of nanoparticulate drug delivery systems after oral ingestion. We administered radiolabelled gold nanoparticles in different sizes (1.4-200 nm) with negative surface charge and 2.8 nm nanoparticles with opposite surface charges by intra-oesophageal instillation into healthy adult female rats. The quantitative amount of the particles in organs, tissues and excrements was measured after 24 h by gamma-spectroscopy. The highest accumulation in secondary organs was mostly found for 1.4 nm particles; the negatively charged particles were accumulated mostly more than positively charged particles. Importantly, 18 nm particles show a higher accumulation in brain and heart compared to other sized particles. No general rule accumulation can be made so far. Therefore, specialized drug delivery systems via the oral route have to be individually designed, depending on the respective target organ.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21309618 PMCID: PMC3267526 DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2011.552811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanotoxicology ISSN: 1743-5390 Impact factor: 5.913
Characteristics of the applied 198Au NP suspensions.
| 1.4 nm | 5 nm | 18 nm | 80 nm | 200 nm | 2.8 nm Carboxyl | 2.8 nm Amine | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applied radioactivity [kBq] | 76.0 ± 33.3 | 130.2 ± 10.3 | 73.5 ± 2.3 | 297.1 ± 5.1 | 219.5 ± 2. | 21.8 ± 0.1 | 90.6 ± 5.8 |
| Applied mass [μg] | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 27.4 ± 2.2 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 19.9 ± 0.3 | 19.0 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 16.4 ± 1.1 |
| Applied number | 3.8 ± 1.7 × 1013 | 2.2 ± 0.2 × 1013 | 4.1 ± 0.1 × 1010 | 3.9 ± 0.1 × 109 | 3.8 ± 0.0 × 108 | 6.3 ± 0.2 × 1012 | 7.5 ± 0.5 × 1013 |
| Applied surface area [cm2] | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 17.3 ± 1.4 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 14.5 ± 1.0 |
Characteristics of the applied gold NPs.
| Core diameter [nm] | Hydrodynamic diameter [nm] | Polydispersity Index (Pdl) | Ligand (Charged surface group) | ζ-potential [mV] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4 | 2.9 | ND | TPPMS (SO3-) | -20.6 ± 0.5 |
| 5 | 12.1 | 0.19 | TPPMS (SO3-) | -21.1 ± 1.4 |
| 18 | 21 | 0.10 | TPPMS (SO3-) | -22.8 ± 3.1 |
| 80 | 85 | 0.12 | TPPMS (SO3-) | -22.3 ± 1.6 |
| 200 | 205 | 0.05 | TPPMS (SO3-) | -41.3 ± 4.5 |
| 2.8 | ND | ND | TGA (COO-) | Negative |
| 2.8 | ND | ND | CA (NH3+) | Positive |
As determined earlier (Tominaga et al. 1996);
DLS measurement using Malvern HPPS5001, Herrenberg, Germany;
DLS measurement using Malvern Zetasizer, Herrenberg, Germany. TPPMS, triphenylphosphine m-monosulfonate; TGA, thioglycolic acid (mercaptoacetic acid); CA, cysteamine (2-aminoethanethiol); ND, Not determined.
NP content in the gastro-intestinal tract (GIT).
| Particle retention [%] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Particle type | GIT with internal feces | Excreted feces | GIT+feces |
| 1.4 nm | 17.2 ± 4.0 | 82.4 ± 4.0 | 99.63 ± 0.10 |
| 5 nm | 74.1 ± 14.0 | 25.9 ± 14.0 | 99.95 ± 0.01 |
| 18 nm | 29.7 ± 6.7 | 70.3 ± 6.7 | 99.88 ± 0.02 |
| 80 nm | 22.3 ± 7.3 | 77.7 ± 7.3 | 99.97 ± 0.01 |
| 200 nm | 34.9 ± 7.1 | 65.1 ± 7.1 | 99.99 ± 0.00 |
| 2.8 nm COO- | 54.2 ± 4.5 | 45.3 ± 4.5 | 99.63 ± 0.02 |
| 2.8 nm NH3+ | 64.8 ± 11.8 | 35.0 ± 11.8 | 99.86 ± 0.02 |
NP content in the gastro-intestinal tract (including internal feces) and excreted feces after intra-oesophageal application in % of administered particle-amount.
Figure 1NP content which reached the circulation after intra-oesophageal application in % of administered particle-amount. Given is the mean ± standard error of the mean of four animals. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2NP content which accumulated in secondary organs, the remainder, as well as the urine after intra-oesophageal application in % of administered particle-amount. Given is the mean ± standard error of the mean of four animals. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; nd, not detected.
Figure 3NP content which reached the circulation after intra-oesophageal application in % of administered particle-amount. Given is the mean ± standard error of the mean of four animals. *p < 0.05 vs 1.4 nm; **p < 0.01 vs. 1.4 nm; ***p < 0.001 vs 1.4 nm.
Figure 4NP content which accumulated the blood (A), reticulo endothelial system (RES; liver plus spleen), (B), kidney (C), as well as urine (D) after intra-oesophageal application in % of administered particle-amount. Given is the mean ± standard error of the mean of four animals. *p < 0.05 vs 1.4 nm; **p < 0.01 vs. 1.4 nm; ***p < 0.001
Figure 5NP content which accumulated the heart (A), and brain (B) after intra-oesophageal application in % of administered particle-amount. Given is the mean ± standard error of the mean of four animals. #p < 0.05 vs. 18 nm; ##p < 0.01 vs. 18 nm; nd, not detected.
Figure 6NP content which accumulated in the remaining carcass after intra-oesophageal application in % of administered particle-amount. Given is the mean ± standard error of the mean of four animals. *p < 0.05 vs. 1.4 nm; **p < 0.01 vs. 1.4 nm; ***p < 0.001 vs. 1.4 nm.