| Literature DB >> 32041121 |
Giulio Gabrieli1, Marc H Bornstein2,3, Nanmathi Manian4, Gianluca Esposito1,5,6.
Abstract
Postpartum Depression (PPD), a condition that affects up to 15% of mothers in high-income countries, reduces attention to the needs of the child and is among the first causes of infanticide. PPD is usually identified using self-report measures and therefore it is possible that mothers are unwilling to report PPD because of a social desirability bias. Previous studies have highlighted the presence of significant differences in the acoustical properties of the vocalizations of infants of depressed and healthy mothers, suggesting that the mothers' behavior can induce changes in infants' vocalizations. In this study, cry episodes of infants (N = 56, 157.4 days ± 8.5, 62% firstborn) of depressed (N = 29) and non-depressed (N = 27) mothers (mean age = 31.1 years ± 3.9) are analyzed to investigate the possibility that a cloud-based machine learning model can identify PPD in mothers from the acoustical properties of their infants' vocalizations. Acoustic features (fundamental frequency, first four formants, and intensity) are first extracted from recordings of crying infants, then cloud-based artificial intelligence models are employed to identify maternal depression versus non-depression from estimated features. The trained model shows that commonly adopted acoustical features can be successfully used to identify postpartum depressed mothers with high accuracy (89.5%).Entities:
Keywords: acoustic analysis; infant cry; postpartum depression
Year: 2020 PMID: 32041121 PMCID: PMC7071351 DOI: 10.3390/bs10020055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-328X
Figure 1Summary of the steps employed in the development of the model for the diagnosis of Postpartum Depression (PPD) from infants’ cry vocalizations.
Google’s AutoML Model Evaluation Metrics.
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| AUC PR | 0.954 |
| AUC ROC | 0.969 |
| Logarithmic Loss | 0.250 |
| Accuracy | 89.5% |
| Precision | 90.4% |
| True positive rate (Recall) | 88.8% |
| False positive rate | 0.090 |
Google’s AutoML Model Confusion Matrix.
| Predicted Label | ||
|---|---|---|
| True Label | False | True |
| False | 88% | 12% |
| True | 9% | 91% |