Literature DB >> 15223087

Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.

Robert F Forman1, Dace Svikis, Ivan D Montoya, Jack Blaine.   

Abstract

Several instruments for diagnosing substance use disorders (SUD) have been developed, but to date none has emerged as the standard for community-based clinical studies. To select the most suitable SUD diagnostic instrument for its clinical trials, the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) implemented a procedure in which 36 university-based addiction researchers and 62 community-based addiction treatment providers evaluated and ranked five widely recognized diagnostic instruments: (1) the SUD section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID); (2) the SUD section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, 2nd ed. (CIDI-2); (3) the SUD section of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV Diagnosis (DIS-IV); (4) the Diagnostic Statistical Manual-IV Checklist (DSM-IV Checklist); and (5) the Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS). To assist the evaluation and ranking process, key characteristics of each instrument were presented in tabular and narrative formats. Participants ranked each instrument from 1 (most preferred) to 5 (least preferred). The SCID received the best overall mean score (2.24) followed by the CIDI-2 (2.59), DIS (2.94), DSM Checklist (3.40) and the SDSS (3.83). After discussing the pragmatic and scientific advantages and disadvantages of each instrument, the CTN Steering Committee selected the CIDI-2. The selection of the CIDI-2 standardizes the collection of diagnostic data and provides a common diagnostic tool for practitioners and clinical researchers in the CTN. Implications for practice/research collaboration and initiatives are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15223087      PMCID: PMC2668155          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  23 in total

1.  Concurrent and predictive validity of the Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS).

Authors:  G M Miele; K M Carpenter; M Smith Cockerham; K Dietz Trautman; J Blaine; D S Hasin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin for detection and monitoring of sustained heavy drinking. What have we learned? Where do we go from here?

Authors:  R F Anton
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 3.  Issues of validity in the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.

Authors:  R G Malgady; L H Rogler; W W Tryon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). II. Multisite test-retest reliability.

Authors:  J B Williams; M Gibbon; M B First; R L Spitzer; M Davies; J Borus; M J Howes; J Kane; H G Pope; B Rounsaville
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-08

5.  The CIDI and CIDI-substance abuse module (SAM): cross-cultural instruments for assessing DSM-III, DSM-III-R and ICD-10 criteria.

Authors:  L B Cottler
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1990

6.  The predictive validity of lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule diagnoses in the general population. A comparison with physician examiners.

Authors:  J E Helzer; E L Spitznagel; L McEvoy
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-12

7.  National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity.

Authors:  L N Robins; J E Helzer; J Croughan; K S Ratcliff
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1981-04

8.  A comparison of clinical and diagnostic interview schedule diagnoses. Physician reexamination of lay-interviewed cases in the general population.

Authors:  J E Helzer; L N Robins; L T McEvoy; E L Spitznagel; R K Stoltzman; A Farmer; I F Brockington
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1985-07

9.  The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures.

Authors:  L N Robins; J Wing; H U Wittchen; J E Helzer; T F Babor; J Burke; A Farmer; A Jablenski; R Pickens; D A Regier
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1988-12

Review 10.  Classification of alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Deborah Hasin
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2003
View more
  46 in total

1.  Treatment Outcomes of African American Buprenorphine Patients by Parole and Probation Status.

Authors:  Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Jan Gryczynski; Sharon M Kelly; Kevin E O'Grady; Jerome H Jaffe; Yngvild K Olsen; Robert P Schwartz
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2014-01

2.  Early adolescent psychopathology as a predictor of alcohol use disorders by young adulthood.

Authors:  Dustin Pardini; Helene Raskin White; Magda Stouthamer-Loeber
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Substance use and motivation: a longitudinal perspective.

Authors:  Rachael A Korcha; Douglas L Polcin; Jason C Bond; William M Lapp; Gantt Galloway
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes.

Authors:  Douglas L Polcin; Rachael A Korcha; Jason Bond; Gantt Galloway
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2010-03-29

5.  Respondent-driven sampling to recruit young adult non-medical users of pharmaceutical opioids: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Raminta Daniulaityte; Russel Falck; Linna Li; Ramzi W Nahhas; Robert G Carlson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Validity of brief screening instrument for adolescent tobacco, alcohol, and drug use.

Authors:  Sharon M Kelly; Jan Gryczynski; Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Arethusa Kirk; Kevin E O'Grady; Robert P Schwartz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Evaluating brief screeners to discriminate between drug use disorders in a sample of treatment-seeking adults.

Authors:  Li-Tzy Wu; Marvin S Swartz; Jeng-Jong Pan; Bruce Burchett; Paolo Mannelli; Chongming Yang; Dan G Blazer
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Comparison of opiate-primary treatment seekers with and without alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Bryan Hartzler; Dennis M Donovan; Zhen Huang
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2010-07-03

9.  Latent class analysis of non-opioid dependent illegal pharmaceutical opioid users in Ohio.

Authors:  Robert G Carlson; Ramzi W Nahhas; Raminta Daniulaityte; Silvia S Martins; Linna Li; Russel Falck
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 10.  Assessing addiction: concepts and instruments.

Authors:  Sharon Samet; Rachel Waxman; Mark Hatzenbuehler; Deborah S Hasin
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2007-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.