Literature DB >> 19748006

Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.

X Li1, C Yu, H Wu, K Daniel, D Hu, L Xia, C Pan, A Xu, J Hu, L Wang, W Peng, F Li.   

Abstract

AIM: To prospectively compare the accuracy of three-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (3D FIESTA) sequences with that of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled (3D SPGR) in the diagnosis of knee articular cartilage lesions, using arthroscopy as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight knees in 54 patients (age range 21-82 years; mean 36 years) were prospectively evaluated by using sagittal 3D FIESTA and sagittal fat-suppressed 3D SPGR sequences. Articular cartilage lesions were graded on MRI and during arthroscopy with a modified Noyes scoring system. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were assessed. Interobserver agreement was determined with kappa statistics.
RESULTS: The performance of 3D FIESTA sequences (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 80, 94, and 92%, respectively, for reader 1 and 76, 94, and 90%, respectively, for reader 2) was similar to that of fat-suppressed 3D SPGR sequences (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 82, 92, and 90%, respectively, for reader 1 and 82, 90, and 88%, respectively, for reader 2) in the detection of knee articular cartilage lesions. The interobserver agreement varied from fair to good to excellent (kappa values from 0.43-0.83).
CONCLUSION: 3D FIESTA has good diagnostic performance, comparable with fat-suppressed 3D SPGR in evaluating knee cartilage lesions, and it can be incorporated into routine knee MRI protocols due to the short acquisition time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19748006     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

Review 1.  The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for identification of early and advanced knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carmen E Quatman; Carolyn M Hettrich; Laura C Schmitt; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging is able to detect patellofemoral focal cartilage injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; André Vinha; Cristina Valente; Renato Andrade; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  Resolution-dependent influences of compressed sensing in quantitative T2 mapping of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Farid Badar; Yang Xia
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Axial-Oblique Versus Standard Axial 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Trochlear Cartilage Lesions: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Tyler R Cram; Justin J Mitchell; Andrew G Geeslin; Carly A Lockard; Eric K Fitzcharles; Grant J Dornan
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-09

5.  MR imaging features of gadofluorine-labeled matrix-associated stem cell implants in cartilage defects.

Authors:  Hossein Nejadnik; Tobias D Henning; Thuy Do; Elizabeth J Sutton; Frederick Baehner; Andrew Horvai; Barbara Sennino; Donald McDonald; Reinhard Meier; Bernd Misselwitz; Thomas M Link; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.