Literature DB >> 3203464

Perceptions of appearance and speech by adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate and by their parents.

R P Strauss1, H Broder, R W Helms.   

Abstract

This study surveyed 102 patients with cleft lip, cleft palate, or cleft lip and cleft palate (ages 13 to 19) and their parents to assess satisfaction with appearance, speech ability, and intelligibility. The data were based upon standardized interviews conducted at a cleft palate treatment center, using simple questions with high face validity. Surgical experience was high among this sample, as reflected by the finding that the majority of patients (55.7%) had had three or more operations on the face or mouth. Patient ratings of facial appearance showed that most patients were very pleased (59.3%) or moderately pleased (13.2%); others were somewhat (18.7%) or very (8.8%) disappointed. Many parents indicated that their children expressed occasional (22.0%) or frequent (27.5%) concerns about appearance. Nearly all patients (91.9%) felt that their operations had accomplished what they expected, though some of the cleft lip patients (35.7%) and their parents (43.9%) were less than very pleased with the appearance of the lip. When asked how pleased they were with the way they presently talked, most patients (69.1%) were very pleased, though some disappointment was expressed. Although often pleased with their current speech status, many patients rated themselves as only moderately understandable (19.1%) or as not understandable (8.5%). No significant gender effects were found in satisfaction, appearance, or speech ratings. There were no significant differences found between parent and child ratings. The findings indicate that at a center delivering team-based cleft palate care, both adolescent patients and their parents have considerable concerns about appearance and speech results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3203464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate J        ISSN: 0009-8701


  10 in total

1.  Reliability and validity testing for the Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Reduced (COHIP-SF 19).

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Lacey Sischo
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.821

2.  Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Self-Rated Speech in Children With Existing Fistulas in Mid-Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Ross E Long; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Barry H Grayson; Roberto Flores; Hillary L Broder
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2015-10-05

Review 3.  Neuropsychological, behavioral, and academic sequelae of cleft: early developmental, school age, and adolescent/young adult outcomes.

Authors:  Lynn C Richman; Thomasin E McCoy; Amy L Conrad; Peg C Nopoulos
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-09-09

4.  Shared Surgical Decision Making and Youth Resilience Correlates of Satisfaction With Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Todd Edwards; Caroline Ruta; Claudia Crilly Bellucci; Cassandra L Aspirnall; Ronald P Strauss; Tari D Topolski; Nichola J Rumsey; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Psychological issues in cleft lip and cleft palate.

Authors:  Avinash De Sousa; Shibani Devare; Jyoti Ghanshani
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-04

6.  Interdisciplinary craniofacial teams compared with individual providers: is orofacial cleft care more comprehensive and do parents perceive better outcomes?

Authors:  April A Austin; Charlotte M Druschel; Margaret C Tyler; Paul A Romitti; Imara I West; Peter C Damiano; James M Robbins; Whitney Burnett
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-01

7.  Psychosocial acceptance of cleft patients: has something changed?

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Karsten Winter; Dirk Halama; Christian Wirtz; Vedat Yildirim; Nattapong Sirintawat; Sirintawat Nattapong
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-28

8.  Demographic characteristics, care, and outcomes for children with oral clefts in three states using participants from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Peter Damiano; Margaret Tyler; Paul A Romitti; Charlotte Druschel; April A Austin; Whitney Burnett; Sara Kizelnik-Freilich; James M Robbins
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2009-06-29

9.  Dentofacial self-perception and social perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Esthetic, Functional, and Everyday Life Assessment of Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Despina A Papamanou; Marina Karamolegkou; Domna Dorotheou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.