| Literature DB >> 32034184 |
Anton R Kiselev1,2,3, Ekaterina I Borovkova4, Vladimir A Shvartz5, Viktoriia V Skazkina4, Anatoly S Karavaev4,6, Mikhail D Prokhorov6, Artak Y Ispiryan5, Sergey A Mironov5, Olga L Bockeria5.
Abstract
We studied the properties of low-frequency (LF) heart rate variability (HRV) and photoplethysmographic waveform variability (PPGV) and their interaction under conditions where the hemodynamic connection between them is obviously absent, as well as the LF regulation of PPGV in the absence of heart function. The parameters of HRV and finger PPGV were evaluated in 10 patients during cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump cardiac surgery) with or without cardioplegia. The following spectral indices of PPGV and HRV were ertimated: the total spectral power (TP), the high-frequency (HF) and the LF ranges of TP in percents (HF% and LF%), and the LF/HF ratio. We assessed also the index S of synchronization between the LF oscillations in finger photoplethysmogram (PPG) and heart rate (HR) signals. The analysis of directional couplings was carried out using the methods of phase dynamics modeling. It is shown that the mechanisms leading to the occurrence of oscillations in the LF range of PPGV are independent of the mechanisms causing oscillations in the LF range of HRV. At the same time, the both above-mentioned LF oscillations retain their activity under conditions of artificial blood circulation and cardioplegia (the latter case applies only to LF oscillations in PPG). In artificial blood circulation, there was a coupling from the LF oscillations in PPG to those in HR, whereas the coupling in the opposite direction was absent. The coupling from the LF oscillations in PPG to those in HR has probably a neurogenic nature, whereas the opposite coupling has a hemodynamic nature (due to cardiac output).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32034184 PMCID: PMC7005763 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58196-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of the structure of couplings between the LF components in the signals of the systems of HR and vascular tone regulation in the normal state (a) and during cardiac surgery in CPB without cardioplegia (b) and under cardioplegia (c). Arrows indicate the directions of couplings. The dashed line is a hemodynamic coupling from HRV to BPV, the solid line indicates an autonomous regulatory influence from BPV to HRV and the thin line indicates an autonomous regulatory influence from HRV to BPV.
Figure 2PPG signal (a,d), RR intervals (b,e), and their Fourier power spectra (c,f) depicted by solid line for PPG and by dashed line for RR intervals. The dashed and solid horizontal lines in (c,f) correspond to the critical power value (p = 0.05), estimated from RR intervals and PPG signals, respectively. The upper line (a–c) corresponds to patient D with low amplitude of PPG and bottom line (d–f) corresponds to patient A with a distinguishable pulse wave under CPB.
Spectral components in HRV and PPGV in patients with and without cardioplegia.
| Patients | TPHRV | LF%HRV | HF%HRV | LF/HFHRV | LF%PPGV | HF% PPGV | LF/HFPPGV | S, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient A | 0.080 | 46 | 39 | 1.18 | 11 | 83 | 0.13 | 6 |
| Patient B | 0.042 | 20 | 73 | 0.27 | 49 | 44 | 1.11 | 26 |
| Patient C | 0.044 | 27 | 63 | 0.43 | 15 | 83 | 0.18 | 14 |
| Patient D | 0.041 | 33 | 54 | 0.61 | 36 | 61 | 0.59 | 12 |
| Patient E | 0.067 | 21 | 66 | 0.32 | 27 | 64 | 0.42 | 53 |
| M ± SD | 0.054 ± 0.018 | 30 ± 11 | 59 ± 13 | 0.56 ± 0.37 | 28 ± 15 | 67 ± 16 | 0.49 ± 0.40 | 22.2 ± 18.7 |
| Patient F | 24 | 71 | 0.34 | |||||
| Patient G | 36 | 57 | 0.63 | |||||
| Patient H | 27 | 70 | 0.38 | |||||
| Patient I | 47 | 42 | 1.13 | |||||
| Patient J | 63 | 23 | 2.70 | |||||
| M ± SD | 39 ± 16 | 53 ± 20 | 1.04 ± 0.98 | |||||
M ± SD, mean with standard deviation.
Intervals of time lags between the LF oscillations in PPG and HR in patients without cardioplegia.
| Patients | |
|---|---|
| Patient A | — |
| Patient B | 4.0–14.0 |
| Patient C | — |
| Patient D | 3.5–12.0 |
| Patient E | 5.0–14.0 |
Figure 3The results of the analysis of directional coupling between the HRV and PPGV signals for patient E at different values of time lags. (a) The strength of coupling from PPGV to HRV in the LF range; (b) the strength of coupling from HRV to PPGV in the LF range. Vertical lines indicate 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
Figure 4The results of the analysis of the coherence function C(f) for the HRV and PPGV signals in the LF and HF bands. C(f) is shown with solid line for patients D (a) and E (b). The 95% confidence interval is shown with dashed line.
Maximum statistically significant values (p = 0.05) of the coherence function C(f) for oscillations in the LF range of HRV and PPGV in patients without cardioplegia.
| Patients | |
|---|---|
| Patient A | 0.66 |
| Patient B | 0.32 |
| Patient C | 0.59 |
| Patient D | 0.52 |
| Patient E | 0.45 |
Figure 5PPG signal (a) and its Fourier power spectrum (b) for patient G under cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia.