| Literature DB >> 35513459 |
Simon Mylius Rasmussen1, Thomas Nielsen2, Henrik Hager3,4, Lars Peter Schousboe5,4.
Abstract
The primary treatment of the common malignancy squamous cell carcinoma is surgical removal. In this process, sufficient tissue removal is balanced against unnecessary mutilation. We recently presented a remote photoplethysmography algorithm, which revealed significant differences between processed video recordings of cancer biopsy areas and surrounding tissue. The aim of this study was to investigate whether spatial analyses of photoplethysmography data correlate with post-excision pathological analyses and thus have potential to assist in tumour delineation. Based on high speed video recordings of 11 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, we examined different parameters derived from temporal remote photoplethysmography variations. Signal characteristics values in sites matching histological sections were compared with pathological measures. Values were ranked and statistically tested with a Kendall correlation analysis. A moderate, negative correlation was found between signal oscillations and the width and transversal area of squamous cell carcinoma in the frequencies below 1 Hz and specifically from 0.02 to 0.15 Hz. We have presented a correlation between frequency content and prevalence of cancer based on regular video recordings of squamous cell carcinoma. We believe this is supported by published findings on malignant melanoma. Our findings indicate that photoplethysmography can be used to distinguish SCC from healthy skin.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35513459 PMCID: PMC9072381 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10924-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
The results of Kendall correlation analysis. Compared: Signal characteristics vs. pathology measures. Width: Width of the digital section marking. Bandpass (Hz): Frequency spectrum analysed. Rho: Correlation coefficient. P: P-value.
| Compared | Width | Bandpass (Hz) | Rho | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flow vs. width | 2 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 3 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 3 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 4 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 4 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 5 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 5 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 6 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 6 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 7 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 8 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 9 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Flow vs. width | 10 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 1 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 1 | f<2 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 1 | f<5 | −0.36 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 2 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 2 | f<2 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 2 | f<5 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 3 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 3 | f<2 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 3 | f<5 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 8 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 8 | f<2 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 8 | f<5 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 9 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. width | 9 | f<5 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 1 | f<1 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 1 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 1 | f<5 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 2 | f<1 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 2 | f<2 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 2 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 3 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 3 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 3 | f<5 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 4 | f<1 | −0.38 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 4 | f<2 | −0.38 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 4 | f<5 | −0.38 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 5 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 5 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 5 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 6 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 6 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 6 | f<5 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 7 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 7 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 7 | f<5 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 8 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 8 | f<2 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 8 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 9 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 9 | f<2 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 9 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 10 | f<1 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 10 | f<2 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Phase shift vs. area | 10 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
| Standard deviation vs. area | 2 | f<1 | 0.34 | 0.01 |
Figure 1Example of chart based on the flow measure for the frequencies 0.02–0.08 Hz. Resection mask is shown with red dashed line.
Figure 2Example of chart based on the phase shift measure for the frequencies 0.02–0.08 Hz. Resection mask is shown with red dashed line.
Patient characteristics.
| Nr | Age | Gender | SCC location |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82 | Male | Scalp |
| 2 | 63 | Female | Upper arm |
| 3 | 53 | Female | Lower leg |
| 4 | 64 | Male | Scalp |
| 5 | 84 | Male | Finger |
| 6 | 89 | Male | Back of hand |
| 7 | 81 | Male | Temple |
| 8 | 89 | Female | Finger |
| 9 | 75 | Male | Lip |
| 10 | 85 | Male | Ear |
| 11 | 77 | Female | Scalp |
Signal variables in form of widths of the masks representing section cuts, the frequency bands used for band-pass filtering and the signal characteristics extracted.
| Mask widths in pixels | |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 |
Figure 3Diagram showing the acquisition of histological data in form of depth, width and area of the cancer tissue for each section cut for each biopsy.
Figure 4Diagram showing the acquisition of measured data, in form of extracting data from different widths of the digital section masks, band-pass filtering and extraction of the key signal characteristic.
Figure 5Diagram showing the correlation analysis between each combination of measured data and pathology data.