| Literature DB >> 32033450 |
Shengnan Chen1,2, Huiyan He1,2, Rongrong Zong1,2, Kaiwen Liu1,2, Miaomiao Yan1,2, Lei Xu1,2, Yutian Miao1,2.
Abstract
Urban lakes play an important role in drainage and water storage, regulating urban microclimate conditions, supplying groundwater, and meeting citizens' recreational needs. However, geographical patterns of algal communities associated with urban lakes from a large scale are still unclear. In the present work, the geographical variation of algal communities and water quality parameters in different urban lakes in China were determined. The water quality parameters were examined in the samples collected from north, central, south, and coastal economic zones in China. The results suggested that significant differences in water quality were observed among different geographical distribution of urban lakes. The highest total phosphorus (TP)(0.21 mg/L) and total nitrogen (TN) (3.84 mg/L) concentrations were found in XinHaiHu (XHH) lake, it also showed highest the nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N) (0.39 mg/L),total organic carbon(TOC) (9.77 mg/L), and COD Mn (9.01 mg/L) concentrations among all samples. Environmental and geographic factors also cause large differences in algal cell concentration in different urban lakes, which ranged from 4,700×104 to 247,800 ×104cell/L. Through light microscopy, 6 phyla were identified, which includes Chlorophyta, Bacillariophyta, Cyanophyta, Dinophyta, Euglenophyta, and Cryptophyta. Meanwhile, the heat map with the total 63 algal community composition at the genus level profile different urban lakes community structures are clearly distinguishable. Further analyses showed that the dominant genera were Limnothrixsp., Synedra sp., Cyclotella sp., Nephrocytium sp., Melosirasp., and Scenedesmussp. among all samples. The integrated network analysis indicated that the highly connected taxa (hub) were Fragilariasp.,Scenedesmus sp., and Stephanodiscus sp. The water quality parameters of NO3--N and NH4+-N had significant impacts on the structural composition of the algal community. Additionally, RDA further revealed distinct algal communities in the different urban lakes, and were influenced by NO2--N, Fe, and algal cell concentrations. In summary, these results demonstrate that the pattern of algal communities are highly correlated with geographic location and water quality on a large scale, and these results also give us further understanding of the complex algal communities and effectively managing eutrophication of urban lakes.Entities:
Keywords: algal bloom; algal community composition; geographical pattern; urban lakes
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32033450 PMCID: PMC7037785 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17031009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Geographical location of 16 urban lakes sampled in China.
The 16 urban lakes located in different areas of China.
| Urban Lakes | Provinces | Cities | Latitude | Longitude | Average Monthly Temperature (°C) | Surface Area(m2) | Urban Population | Built Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TieXi (TX) | Inner Mongolia | Ordos | 39°49′16″ N | 109°58′07″ E | 15.3 | 1.7 × 104 | 2.0 × 106 | 2005 |
| XinHaiHu (XHH) | Ningxia | Shizuishan | 38°59′32″ N | 106°24′22″ E | 16.7 | 2.0 × 107 | 7.9 × 105 | 2004 |
| JinJi (JJ) | Ningxia | Wuzhong | 37°56′10″ N | 106°08′36″ E | 17.3 | 2.0 × 108 | 1.3 × 106 | Qin and Han Dynasties |
| ChangLe (CL) | Shaanxi | Xi’an | 34°16′04″ N | 109°00′00″ E | 24.7 | 2.2 × 105 | 8.8 × 106 | 1956 |
| XiangShan (XS) | Henan | Xinyang | 31°34′27″ N | 114°55′00″ E | 26.0 | 1.1 × 107 | 6.4 × 106 | 1969 |
| AiXi (AX) | Jiangxi | Nanchang | 28°42′56″ N | 115°59′21″ E | 29.7 | 4.5 × 106 | 5.5 × 107 | 2007 |
| HuiLongShan (HLS) | Jiangsu | Zhenjiang | 32°09′24″ N | 119°27′07″ E | 22.0 | 1.3 × 107 | 3.1 × 106 | 1977 |
| GaoTie (GT) | Jiangsu | Changzhou | 31°51′21″ N | 119°58′07″ E | 26.3 | 1.0 × 105 | 3.8 × 106 | 2017 |
| JinSha (JS) | Zhejiang | Hangzhou | 30°18′52″ N | 120°20′00″ E | 28.3 | 3.1 × 104 | 9.2 × 106 | 2018 |
| XiLiu (XL) | Henan | Zhengzhou | 34°46′00″ N | 113°34′36″ E | 28.7 | 4.6 × 108 | 1.1 × 107 | 2012 |
| ZiZhuYuan (ZZY) | Beijing | Beijing | 39°56′48″ N | 116°19′04″ E | 23.3 | 1.9 × 105 | 2.2 × 107 | 1953 |
| GuiLong (GL) | Yunnan | Kunming | 25°04′10″ N | 102°42′53″ E | 24.0 | 1.6 × 105 | 6.7 × 106 | 2006 |
| ZhuZhai (ZZ) | Shanghai | Shanghai | 31°12′53″ N | 121°17′36″ E | 27.3 | 3.5 × 104 | 1.4 × 107 | 2004 |
| ZhongShan (ZS) | Shenzhen | Shenzhen | 31°13′27″ N | 121°25′23″ E | 33.3 | 3.5 × 104 | 1.1 × 107 | 2004 |
| West lake (WL) | Zhejiang | Hangzhou | 30°13′14″ N | 120°06′30″ E | 29.0 | 6.4 × 106 | 9.2 × 106 | Qin and Han Dynasties |
| Yunv (YN) | Sichuan | Mianyang | 31°29′54″ N | 104°44′14″ E | 25.3 | 2.4 × 105 | 5.4 × 106 | 1986 |
Quality parameters associated with 16 different geographically distributed urban lakes, China.
| Urban Lakes | pH | TN | NO3--N | NO2--N | NH4+-N | TP | COD Mn | Fe | Mn | TOC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/L) | ||||||||||
| TieXi (TX) | 9.30 ± 0.24a | 0.44 ± 0.06l | 0.07 ± 0.01ef | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.03 ± 0.00j | 0.01 ± 0.00h | 5.79 ± 0.87c | 0.03 ± 0.00bcd | 0.01 ± 0.00bc | 5.74 ± 0.28bc |
| XinHaiHu (XHH) | 8.48 ± 0.06b | 3.84 ± 0.33a | 0.39 ± 0.09a | 0.04 ± 0.03a | 0.30 ± 0.05c | 0.21 ± 0.01a | 9.01 ± 0.31a | 0.02 ± 0.00de | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 9.77 ± 0.71a |
| JinJi (JJ) | 8.04 ± 0.14de | 0.85 ± 0.26gh | 0.06 ± 0.01fg | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.15 ± 0.07ef | 0.05 ± 0.00cd | 5.08 ± 0.10de | 0.04 ± 0.01bc | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 5.69 ± 0.56d |
| ChangLe (CL) | 7.72 ± 0.43de | 0.57 ± 0.11jk | 0.04 ± 0.01fg | 0.04 ± 0.01a | 0.10 ± 0.00ghi | 0.06 ± 0.00b | 4.70 ± 1.44f | 0.04 ± 0.01a | 0.00 ± 0.00c | 1.09 ± 0.20f |
| XiangShan (XS) | 7.45 ± 0.04gh | 1.02 ± 0.07g | 0.16 ± 0.03c | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.01 ± 0.00j | 0.02 ± 0.00g | 3.60 ± 0.25f | 0.02 ± 0.00ef | 0.01 ± 0.00ab | 4.07 ± 0.55d |
| AiXi (AX) | 7.40 ± 0.09gh | 0.57 ± 0.16ij | 0.12 ± 0.03d | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.13 ± 0.07e | 0.03 ± 0.01f | 5.13 ± 0.86cd | 0.04 ± 0.012ab | 0.01 ± 0.002a | 5.61 ± 0.17bc |
| HuiLongShan (HLS) | 7.88 ± 0.10def | 0.52 ± 0.02f | 0.06 ± 0.01fg | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.07 ± 0.01f | 0.03 ± 0.01cd | 4.43 ± 0.18ef | 0.02 ± 0.00de | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 4.66 ± 0.59b |
| GaoTie (GT) | 8.20 ± 0.19bc | 0.35 ± 0.11kl | 0.04 ± 0.02fg | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.07 ± 0.01i | 0.05 ± 0.01ef | 4.21 ± 0.11f | 0.02 ± 0.00ef | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 3.78 ± 0.54a |
| JinSha (JS) | 8.15 ± 0.19cd | 2.08 ± 0.22m | 0.04 ± 0.00fg | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.15 ± 0.03hi | 0.05 ± 0.01cd | 4.35 ± 0.80f | 0.02 ± 0.01ef | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 9.33 ± 0.45a |
| XiLiu (XL) | 7.79 ± 0.02ef | 0.77 ± 0.10b | 0.37 ± 0.06g | 0.04 ± 0.01a | 0.41 ± 0.01f | 0.05 ± 0.01cd | 4.42 ± 0.30ef | 0.02 ± 0.00de | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 3.34 ± 0.19b |
| ZiZhuYuan (ZZY) | 7.95 ± 0.02de | 0.32 ± 0.03hi | 0.22 ± 0.03a | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.11 ± 0.01b | 0.05 ± 0.01cd | 5.67 ± 0.80c | 0.01 ± 0.01ef | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 3.17 ± 0.62e |
| GuiLong (GL) | 7.27 ± 0.27hi | 1.23 ± 0.40m | 0.19 ± 0.23b | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.16 ± 0.03gh | 0.05 ± 0.00d | 6.23 ± 1.12cd | 0.02 ± 0.01ced | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 5.77 ± 0.26b |
| ZhuZhai (ZZ) | 7.28 ± 0.30i | 0.70 ± 0.06ij | 0.13 ± 0.05de | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.01 ± 0.00j | 0.03 ± 0.01ef | 8.35 ± 0.10a | 0.01 ± 0.00efg | 0.01 ± 0.002a | 4.76 ± 0.14d |
| ZhongShan (ZS) | 7.45 ± 0.03gh | 1.37 ± 0.04e | 0.05 ± 0.02fg | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.25 ± 0.00d | 0.05 ± 0.00cd | 7.1 ± 0.27b | 0.02 ± 0.00ef | 0.01 ± 0.002a | 4.31 ± 0.41e |
| West Lake (WL) | 7.94 ± 0.04de | 1.05 ± 0.47d | 0.15 ± 0.03cd | 0.01 ± 0.00b | 0.11 ± 0.01g | 0.04 ± 0.00e | 4.41 ± 0.81f | 0.00 ± 0.00fg | 0.01 ± 0.000a | 2.82 ± 0.49e |
| YuNv (YN) | 7.61 ± 0.05fg | 2.08 ± 0.10c | 0.11 ± 0.01de | 0.10 ± 0.00b | 0.50 ± 0.04a | 0.06 ± 0.01b | 8.33 ± 0.08a | 0.00 ± 0.00g | 0.01 ± 0.002a | 5.59 ± 0.86b |
| One-way ANOVA | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Values shown as means and standard deviations (n = 3). Different capital letter represents statistical significance. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 represent statistical significance using one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test.
Figure 2Algal cell concentration of 16 different urban lakes in October 2018. Bars with different upper letters are significantly different at 0.01 levels. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3).
Figure 3Circos representation of algal community at phyla level. The bands in the same urban lakes with different colors demonstratethe source of different phyla. (A) Chlorophyta, (B) Bacillariophyta, (C) Cyanophyta, (D) Dinophyta, (E) Euglenophyta, (F) Cryptophyta. The data were visualized via Circos software (http://circos.ca/).
Figure 4Heat map profile showing the algal community at the genus level in 16 different urban lakes. Green colors indicate lower abundance, red colors indicate higher abundance. GL, GT, JS, HLS, TX, AX, CL, JJ, XS, WL, ZS, ZZ, XL, ZZY, YN, and XHH represent GuiLong, GaoTie, JinSha, HuiLongShan, TieXi, AiXi, ChangLe, JinJi, XiangShan, WestLake, ZhongShan, ZhuZhai, XiLiu, ZiZhuYuan, YuNv, and XinHaiHu urban lakes, respectively.
Figure 5Microscopic images of typical algae in 16 different urban lakes.
Figure 6Network analysis revealing the modular associations between algal communities and environmental factors from 16 different urban lake samples. A connection stands for a strong (Spar CC |r| > 0.6) and significant (p-value < 0.05) correlation. The nodes are colored according to modularity class. The size of each node represents value of betweenness centrality.
The networks properties of algal communities at genus level.
| Parameters | Number |
|---|---|
| Avg. weighted degree | 0.548 |
| Network diameter | 7 |
| Graph density | 0.057 |
| Modularity | 1.446 |
| Connected components | 6 |
| Avg. clustering coefficient | 0.209 |
| Avg. path length | 3.231 |
| Nodes | 62 |
| Edges | 108 |
Figure 7Redundancy analysis (RDA) of water algal communities in 16 geographically distributed urban lakes. Red triangles represent sampling points. For algal community, RDA1 explained 27.7% and RDA2 explained 15.5% of the total variance. The factors of the water quality data are represented by arrows (TN = total nitrogen; TP = total phosphorus; TOC = total organic carbon). Water quality parameters that significantly correlated with algal community diversity are shown.