| Literature DB >> 22715392 |
Sari Peura1, Alexander Eiler, Minna Hiltunen, Hannu Nykänen, Marja Tiirola, Roger I Jones.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22715392 PMCID: PMC3371014 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Nutrient and DOC concentrations in the experiments.
DIN∶DIP ratios in the lake and in the amended nutrient treatments on day 0 of each experiment, n = 1 for all (A). Change in DOC concentration during experiments, n = 1 for day 0 and n = 4 for day 7 (B). Change in DIN concentration during experiments (C). Change in DIP concentration during experiments (D). In C-D the change is from day 0 to day 7 and n = 4. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 2Bacterial abundance (A) and phytoplankton biovolume (B) at the start and at the end of the experiments.
Note different Y-axis scales between the panels. In all panels n = 1 for day 0 and n = 4 for day 7. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Results from generalized linear models (GLM) relating the proportions of different phyla detected in the 454-pyrosequencing and LH-PCR datasets.
| Phyla | df | Slope | R2 | F | p |
|
| 21 | 1.24 | 0.78 | 77.06 | <0.001 |
|
| 21 | 1.16 | 0.69 | 48.98 | <0.001 |
|
| 21 | 0.96 | 0.65 | 42.52 | <0.001 |
Slopes, R2 indicating the regression coefficient, F statistics and the significance level p are shown.
Figure 3Overlaid non-metric multidimensional scaling plots from 454 pyrosequencing, LH-PCR and phytoplankton data.
All three datasets and experiments are overlaid in a single plot with different colours representing experiments (May: light blue, July: dark blue and September: pink) and different shapes representing datasets (A). In panels visualizing May (B), July (C) and September (D) experiments colours represent treatments as in legend and shapes represent datasets. Dissimilarities in community composition were estimated using Morisita-Horn distance metric. Stress values for each community (indicated with shapes) are specified in plots. In all plots • = 454 pyrosequencing, ▴ = LH-PCR and ▪ = phytoplankton.
Impact of treatment and experiment to betadispersion of bacterial and phytoplankton communities (upper two lines), and pairwise comparisons of betadispersion of experiments (lower three lines).
| Bacteria | phyto | |||
| Factors | F | p-value | F | p-value |
| Treatment | 1.125 | Ns. | 0.336 | Ns. |
| Experiment | 12.23 | <0.001 | 15.84 | <0.001 |
| May-July | Ns. | <0.05 | ||
| May-September | <0.001 | <0.05 | ||
| July-September | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Figure 4The mean number of OTUs (A), Pielou's evenness index (B) and Chao richness estimate (C) in experiments and treatments.
Error bars in (A) and (B) represent standard deviation and in (C) standard error.
Results from a permutational multivariate analysis of variance comparing the bacterial (LH-PCR) and phytoplankton communities among seasons (experiments) and after nutrient additions (treatments).
| LH-PCR | df | SS | MS | pseudo-F | p |
|
| 2 | 5.75 | 2.88 | 235.88 | <0.001 |
|
| 3 | 0.54 | 0.18 | 14.79 | <0.001 |
|
| 6 | 0.26 | 0.04 | 3.59 | <0.001 |
| May (Treatment) | 3 | 0.39 | 0.13 | 11.63 | <0.001 |
| July (Treatment) | 3 | 0.38 | 0.13 | 6.06 | <0.005 |
| September (Treatment) | 3 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 2.53 | Ns. |
Dissimilarities in community composition were estimated using Morisita-Horn distance metrics. The statistical significance was determined by Monte Carlo simulations (p-value from 10,000 permutations) and F-values.
Figure 5Heatmap visualizing the frequencies of OTUs with a barplot showing their proportions in the entire dataset.
Frequencies are given by relativizing OTUs against their maximum read number. The barplots show the actual abundance (% of all reads) of each OTU with logarithmic scale. Taxonomic affiliation of each OTU is given after the identification number.
Results from Kruskal-Wallis tests for experiment (seasonal) and treatment (nutrient addition) effects on the phylum distribution of Actinobacteria and Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria.
| Phyla | df | χ2 | p |
|
| |||
|
| 2 | 31.91 | <0.001 |
|
| 2 | 58.95 | <0.001 |
|
| 2 | 59.06 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
|
| 3 | 26.50 | <0.001 |
|
| 3 | 0.73 | ns |
|
| 3 | 5.33 | ns |
Figure 6Heatmap visualizing patterns in biovolumes of phytoplankton taxa with the barplots showing their relative contributions to the entire phytoplankton biovolume. Biovolumes were standardized by relativizing each taxon against its maximum biovolume.
The barplots show the actual biovolume (% of taxa) of each taxa in logarithmic scale. * = G. semen contributed 64 % of the whole phytoplankton biovolume in all experiments. To visualize the biovolumes of other taxa, this bar was truncated to same height with the second most abundant taxa, Pseudopedinella.