Literature DB >> 32031645

Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality of Adults at Time of Admission.

Nathan Brajer1,2, Brian Cozzi1,3, Michael Gao1, Marshall Nichols1, Mike Revoir1, Suresh Balu1,2, Joseph Futoma3,4, Jonathan Bae5, Noppon Setji5, Adrian Hernandez2,5, Mark Sendak1.   

Abstract

Importance: The ability to accurately predict in-hospital mortality for patients at the time of admission could improve clinical and operational decision-making and outcomes. Few of the machine learning models that have been developed to predict in-hospital death are both broadly applicable to all adult patients across a health system and readily implementable. Similarly, few have been implemented, and none have been evaluated prospectively and externally validated.
Objectives: To prospectively and externally validate a machine learning model that predicts in-hospital mortality for all adult patients at the time of hospital admission and to design the model using commonly available electronic health record data and accessible computational methods. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, electronic health record data from a total of 43 180 hospitalizations representing 31 003 unique adult patients admitted to a quaternary academic hospital (hospital A) from October 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015, formed a training and validation cohort. The model was further validated in additional cohorts spanning from March 1, 2018, to August 31, 2018, using 16 122 hospitalizations representing 13 094 unique adult patients admitted to hospital A, 6586 hospitalizations representing 5613 unique adult patients admitted to hospital B, and 4086 hospitalizations representing 3428 unique adult patients admitted to hospital C. The model was integrated into the production electronic health record system and prospectively validated on a cohort of 5273 hospitalizations representing 4525 unique adult patients admitted to hospital A between February 14, 2019, and April 15, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. Model performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the precision recall curve.
Results: A total of 75 247 hospital admissions (median [interquartile range] patient age, 59.5 [29.0] years; 45.9% involving male patients) were included in the study. The in-hospital mortality rates for the training validation; retrospective validations at hospitals A, B, and C; and prospective validation cohorts were 3.0%, 2.7%, 1.8%, 2.1%, and 1.6%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.87), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.89), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90), respectively. The area under the precision recall curves were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.25-0.37), 0.17 (95% CI, 0.13-0.22), 0.22 (95% CI, 0.14-0.31), 0.13 (95% CI, 0.08-0.21), and 0.14 (95% CI, 0.09-0.21), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Prospective and multisite retrospective evaluations of a machine learning model demonstrated good discrimination of in-hospital mortality for adult patients at the time of admission. The data elements, methods, and patient selection make the model implementable at a system level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32031645     DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  21 in total

Review 1.  Data Science Trends Relevant to Nursing Practice: A Rapid Review of the 2020 Literature.

Authors:  Brian J Douthit; Rachel L Walden; Kenrick Cato; Cynthia P Coviak; Christopher Cruz; Fabio D'Agostino; Thompson Forbes; Grace Gao; Theresa A Kapetanovic; Mikyoung A Lee; Lisiane Pruinelli; Mary A Schultz; Ann Wieben; Alvin D Jeffery
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Clinician perspectives on machine learning prognostic algorithms in the routine care of patients with cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ravi B Parikh; Christopher R Manz; Maria N Nelson; Chalanda N Evans; Susan H Regli; Nina O'Connor; Lynn M Schuchter; Lawrence N Shulman; Mitesh S Patel; Joanna Paladino; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Zhixiao Xu; Kun Guo; Weiwei Chu; Jingwen Lou; Chengshui Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-29

4.  An external validation study of the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), an interpretable machine learning-based triage score for the emergency department.

Authors:  Jae Yong Yu; Feng Xie; Liu Nan; Sunyoung Yoon; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Yih Yng Ng; Won Chul Cha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Dynamic Mortality Risk Predictions for Children in ICUs: Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Eduardo A Trujillo Rivera; James M Chamberlain; Anita K Patel; Hiroki Morizono; Julia A Heneghan; Murray M Pollack
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.971

6.  Palliative Care Exposure Relative to Predicted Risk of Six-Month Mortality in Hospitalized Adults.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Henry J Domenico; Sreenivasa R Balla; Daniel W Byrne; Jennifer G Whisenant; Marcella C Woods; Barbara J Martin; Mohana B Karlekar; Marc L Bennett
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.576

7.  Use of deep learning to develop continuous-risk models for adverse event prediction from electronic health records.

Authors:  Christopher Nielson; Martin G Seneviratne; Joseph R Ledsam; Shakir Mohamed; Nenad Tomašev; Natalie Harris; Sebastien Baur; Anne Mottram; Xavier Glorot; Jack W Rae; Michal Zielinski; Harry Askham; Andre Saraiva; Valerio Magliulo; Clemens Meyer; Suman Ravuri; Ivan Protsyuk; Alistair Connell; Cían O Hughes; Alan Karthikesalingam; Julien Cornebise; Hugh Montgomery; Geraint Rees; Chris Laing; Clifton R Baker; Thomas F Osborne; Ruth Reeves; Demis Hassabis; Dominic King; Mustafa Suleyman; Trevor Back
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Machine Learning Models for Predicting Neonatal Mortality: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cheyenne Mangold; Sarah Zoretic; Keerthi Thallapureddy; Axel Moreira; Kevin Chorath; Alvaro Moreira
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Use of Multiprognostic Index Domain Scores, Clinical Data, and Machine Learning to Improve 12-Month Mortality Risk Prediction in Older Hospitalized Patients: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Richard John Woodman; Kimberley Bryant; Michael J Sorich; Alberto Pilotto; Arduino Aleksander Mangoni
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Development, implementation, and prospective validation of a model to predict 60-day end-of-life in hospitalized adults upon admission at three sites.

Authors:  Vincent J Major; Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.