Literature DB >> 36261457

An external validation study of the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), an interpretable machine learning-based triage score for the emergency department.

Jae Yong Yu1,2, Feng Xie3, Liu Nan3,4,5, Sunyoung Yoon1, Marcus Eng Hock Ong3,6, Yih Yng Ng2,7, Won Chul Cha8,9,10.   

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) are experiencing complex demands. An ED triage tool, the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), was previously developed using an interpretable machine learning framework. It achieved a good performance in the Singapore population. We aimed to externally validate the SERP in a Korean cohort for all ED patients and compare its performance with Korean triage acuity scale (KTAS). This retrospective cohort study included all adult ED patients of Samsung Medical Center from 2016 to 2020. The outcomes were 30-day and in-hospital mortality after the patients' ED visit. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to assess the performance of the SERP and other conventional scores, including KTAS. The study population included 285,523 ED visits, of which 53,541 were after the COVID-19 outbreak (2020). The whole cohort, in-hospital, and 30 days mortality rates were 1.60%, and 3.80%. The SERP achieved an AUROC of 0.821 and 0.803, outperforming KTAS of 0.679 and 0.729 for in-hospital and 30-day mortality, respectively. SERP was superior to other scores for in-hospital and 30-day mortality prediction in an external validation cohort. SERP is a generic, intuitive, and effective triage tool to stratify general patients who present to the emergency department.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261457      PMCID: PMC9580414          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22233-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  29 in total

1.  Alarm fatigue: a patient safety concern.

Authors:  Sue Sendelbach; Marjorie Funk
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine.

Authors:  Jianxing He; Sally L Baxter; Jie Xu; Jiming Xu; Xingtao Zhou; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Naser B Elkum; CarolAnne Barrett; Hisham Al-Omran
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2011-02-10

Review 4.  Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence.

Authors:  Nasim Farrohknia; Maaret Castrén; Anna Ehrenberg; Lars Lind; Sven Oredsson; Håkan Jonsson; Kjell Asplund; Katarina E Göransson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joany M Zachariasse; Vera van der Hagen; Nienke Seiger; Kevin Mackway-Jones; Mirjam van Veen; Henriette A Moll
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Christopher J Kelly; Alan Karthikesalingam; Mustafa Suleyman; Greg Corrado; Dominic King
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department.

Authors:  Jae Yong Yu; Gab Yong Jeong; Ok Soon Jeong; Dong Kyung Chang; Won Chul Cha
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2020-01-31

9.  A validation of machine learning-based risk scores in the prehospital setting.

Authors:  Douglas Spangler; Thomas Hermansson; David Smekal; Hans Blomberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.