Literature DB >> 32030408

Investigation of 4D dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy: does fractional dose or number of arcs matter?

Takashi Shintani1, Mitsuhiro Nakamura1,2, Yukinori Matsuo1, Yuki Miyabe1, Nobutaka Mukumoto1, Takamasa Mitsuyoshi1, Yusuke Iizuka1, Takashi Mizowaki1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of fractional dose and the number of arcs on interplay effects when volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is used to treat lung tumors with large respiratory motions. A three (fractional dose of 4, 7.5 or 12.5 Gy) by two (number of arcs, one or two) VMAT plan was created for 10 lung cancer cases. The median 3D tumor motion was 17.9 mm (range: 8.2-27.2 mm). Ten phase-specific subplans were generated by calculating the dose on each respiratory phase computed tomography (CT) scan using temporally assigned VMAT arcs. We performed temporal assignment of VMAT arcs using respiratory information obtained from infrared markers placed on the abdomens of the patients during CT simulations. Each phase-specific dose distribution was deformed onto exhale phase CT scans using contour-based deformable image registration, and a 4D plan was created by dose accumulation. The gross tumor volume dose of each 4D plan (4D GTV dose) was compared with the internal target volume dose of the original plan (3D ITV dose). The near-minimum 4D GTV dose (D99%) was higher than the near-minimum 3D internal target volume (ITV) dose, whereas the near-maximum 4D GTV dose (D1%) was lower than the near-maximum 3D ITV dose. However, the difference was negligible, and thus the 4D GTV dose corresponded well with the 3D ITV dose, regardless of the fractional dose and number of arcs. Therefore, interplay effects were negligible in VMAT-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors with large respiratory motions.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIR; VMAT-based SBRT; interplay effect; lung

Year:  2020        PMID: 32030408      PMCID: PMC7246072          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  29 in total

1.  Management of the interplay effect when using dynamic MLC sequences to treat moving targets.

Authors:  Laurence E Court; Matthew Wagar; Dan Ionascu; Ross Berbeco; Lee Chin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for centrally located early stage non-small-cell lung cancer: what we have learned.

Authors:  Joe Y Chang; Andrea Bezjak; Françoise Mornex
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132.

Authors:  Kristy K Brock; Sasa Mutic; Todd R McNutt; Hua Li; Marc L Kessler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  ITV, mid-ventilation, gating or couch tracking - A comparison of respiratory motion-management techniques based on 4D dose calculations.

Authors:  Stefanie Ehrbar; Alexander Jöhl; Adrianna Tartas; Luisa Sabrina Stark; Oliver Riesterer; Stephan Klöck; Matthias Guckenberger; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  The long- and short-term variability of breathing induced tumor motion in lung and liver over the course of a radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer Dhont; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Manuela Burghelea; Kenneth Poels; Tom Depuydt; Robbe Van Den Begin; Cyril Jaudet; Christine Collen; Benedikt Engels; Truus Reynders; Marlies Boussaer; Thierry Gevaert; Mark De Ridder; Dirk Verellen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Investigating strategies to reduce toxicity in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for central lung tumors.

Authors:  Sashendra Senthi; Max Dahele; Ben J Slotman; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Experimentally studied dynamic dose interplay does not meaningfully affect target dose in VMAT SBRT lung treatments.

Authors:  Cassandra Stambaugh; Benjamin E Nelms; Thomas Dilling; Craig Stevens; Kujtim Latifi; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo Moros; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Prediction of chest wall toxicity from lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Kevin L Stephans; Toufik Djemil; Rahul D Tendulkar; Cliff G Robinson; Chandana A Reddy; Gregory M M Videtic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Quantification of interplay and gradient effects for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatments.

Authors:  Madelaine K Tyler
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Variation in accumulated dose of volumetric-modulated arc therapy for pancreatic cancer due to different beam starting phases.

Authors:  Makoto Sasaki; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Yoko Goto; Yoshitomo Ishihara; Manabu Nakata; Naozo Sugimoto; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

1.  Harmonization of dose prescription for lung stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Guillaume Beldjoudi; Fanny Bosson; Vivien Bernard; Lise-Marie Puel; Isabelle Martel-Lafay; Myriam Ayadi; Ronan Tanguy
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.