Literature DB >> 18561668

Management of the interplay effect when using dynamic MLC sequences to treat moving targets.

Laurence E Court1, Matthew Wagar, Dan Ionascu, Ross Berbeco, Lee Chin.   

Abstract

Interplay between organ motion and leaf motion has been shown to generally have a small dosimetric impact for most clinical intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments. However, it has also been shown that for some MLC sequences there can be large daily variations in the delivered dose, depending on details of patient motion or the number of fractions. This study investigates guidelines for dynamic MLC sequences that will keep daily dose variations due to the interplay between organ motion and leaf motion within 10%. Dose distributions for a range of MLC separations (0.2-5.0 cm) and displacements between adjacent MLCs (0-1.5 cm) were exported from ECLIPSE to purpose-written software, which simulated the dose distribution delivered to a moving target. Target motion parallel and perpendicular to the MLC motion was investigated for a range of amplitudes (0.5-4.0 cm), periods (1.5-10 s), and MLC speeds (0.1-3.0 cm/s) with target motions modeled as sin. Results were confirmed experimentally by measuring the dose delivered to an ion chamber array in a moving phantom for different MLC sequences. The simulation results were used to identify MLC sequences that kept dose variations within 10% compared to the dose delivered with no motion. The maximum allowable MLC speed, when target motion is parallel to the MLC motion, was found to be a simple function of target period and MLC separation. When the target motion is perpendicular to MLC motion, the maximum allowable MLC speed can be described as a function of MLC separation and the displacement of adjacent MLCs. These guidelines were successfully applied to two-dimensional motion, and a simple program was written to import MLC sequence files and evaluate whether the maximum daily dose discrepancy caused by the interplay effect will be larger than 10%. This software was experimentally evaluated, and found to conservatively predict whether a given MLC sequence could give large daily dose discrepancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18561668     DOI: 10.1118/1.2896083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  15 in total

Review 1.  Robustness Analysis for External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans: Describing Uncertainty Scenarios and Reporting Their Dosimetric Consequences.

Authors:  Adam D Yock; Radhe Mohan; Stella Flampouri; Walter Bosch; Paige A Taylor; David Gladstone; Siyong Kim; Jason Sohn; Robert Wallace; Ying Xiao; Jeff Buchsbaum
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-15

2.  Effectiveness of robust optimization in volumetric modulated arc therapy using 6 and 10 MV flattening filter-free beam therapy planning for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy with a breath-hold technique.

Authors:  Hideharu Miura; Shuichi Ozawa; Yoshiko Doi; Minoru Nakao; Katsumaro Kubo; Masahiko Kenjo; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Investigation of 4D dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy: does fractional dose or number of arcs matter?

Authors:  Takashi Shintani; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Yukinori Matsuo; Yuki Miyabe; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Takamasa Mitsuyoshi; Yusuke Iizuka; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Extension of the NCAT phantom for the investigation of intra-fraction respiratory motion in IMRT using 4D Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Ross McGurk; Joao Seco; Marco Riboldi; John Wolfgang; Paul Segars; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Comparison of Toxicity Between Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Diane C Ling; Clayton B Hess; Allen M Chen; Megan E Daly
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.785

6.  Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Using Spot-Scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) Therapy: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Lewei Zhao; An Qin; Inga Grills; Rohan Deraniyagala; Craig Stevens; Sheng Zhang; Di Yan; Xiaoqiang Li; Xuanfeng Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for hypofractionated radiotherapy of breast cancer: a treatment planning study.

Authors:  Alexander Venjakob; Michael Oertel; Dominik Alexander Hering; Christos Moustakis; Uwe Haverkamp; Hans Theodor Eich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Is IMRT Superior or Inferior to 3DCRT in Radiotherapy for NSCLC? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xingsheng Hu; Wenwu He; Shimin Wen; Xuqin Feng; Xi Fu; Yusong Liu; Ke Pu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of inhomogeneity correction factors for 6 MV flattening filter-free beams with brass compensators.

Authors:  Joshua Robinson; Daniel Opp; Geoffrey Zhang; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  A margin-based analysis of the dosimetric impact of motion on step-and-shoot IMRT lung plans.

Authors:  Benjamin J Waghorn; Amish P Shah; Justin M Rineer; Katja M Langen; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.