Literature DB >> 29167275

Residual Convolutional Neural Network for the Determination of IDH Status in Low- and High-Grade Gliomas from MR Imaging.

Ken Chang1, Harrison X Bai2, Hao Zhou3, Chang Su4, Wenya Linda Bi5, Ena Agbodza2, Vasileios K Kavouridis6, Joeky T Senders6, Alessandro Boaro6, Andrew Beers1, Biqi Zhang7, Alexandra Capellini7, Weihua Liao8, Qin Shen9, Xuejun Li10, Bo Xiao3, Jane Cryan11, Shakti Ramkissoon11, Lori Ramkissoon11, Keith Ligon11, Patrick Y Wen12, Ranjit S Bindra4, John Woo2, Omar Arnaout6, Elizabeth R Gerstner13, Paul J Zhang14, Bruce R Rosen1, Li Yang15, Raymond Y Huang16, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer17.   

Abstract

Purpose: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in glioma patients confer longer survival and may guide treatment decision making. We aimed to predict the IDH status of gliomas from MR imaging by applying a residual convolutional neural network to preoperative radiographic data.Experimental Design: Preoperative imaging was acquired for 201 patients from the Hospital of University of Pennsylvania (HUP), 157 patients from Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH), and 138 patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. We trained a residual convolutional neural network for each MR sequence (FLAIR, T2, T1 precontrast, and T1 postcontrast) and built a predictive model from the outputs. To increase the size of the training set and prevent overfitting, we augmented the training set images by introducing random rotations, translations, flips, shearing, and zooming.
Results: With our neural network model, we achieved IDH prediction accuracies of 82.8% (AUC = 0.90), 83.0% (AUC = 0.93), and 85.7% (AUC = 0.94) within training, validation, and testing sets, respectively. When age at diagnosis was incorporated into the model, the training, validation, and testing accuracies increased to 87.3% (AUC = 0.93), 87.6% (AUC = 0.95), and 89.1% (AUC = 0.95), respectively.Conclusions: We developed a deep learning technique to noninvasively predict IDH genotype in grade II-IV glioma using conventional MR imaging using a multi-institutional data set. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1073-81. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29167275      PMCID: PMC6051535          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  46 in total

1.  MR Imaging-Based Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme: Estimation of IDH1 Mutation Status.

Authors:  K Yamashita; A Hiwatashi; O Togao; K Kikuchi; R Hatae; K Yoshimoto; M Mizoguchi; S O Suzuki; T Yoshiura; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  The evolving molecular genetics of low-grade glioma.

Authors:  Sriram Venneti; Jason T Huse
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutant R132H sensitizes glioma cells to BCNU-induced oxidative stress and cell death.

Authors:  Isabelle Vanessa Mohrenz; Patrick Antonietti; Stefan Pusch; David Capper; Jörg Balss; Sophia Voigt; Susanne Weissert; Alicia Mukrowsky; Jan Frank; Christian Senft; Volker Seifert; Andreas von Deimling; Donat Kögel
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 17.088

6.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python.

Authors:  Krzysztof Gorgolewski; Christopher D Burns; Cindee Madison; Dav Clark; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Michael L Waskom; Satrajit S Ghosh
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 4.081

Review 8.  Management of low-grade glioma.

Authors:  Nader Pouratian; David Schiff
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 9.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas.

Authors:  William A Flavahan; Yotam Drier; Brian B Liau; Shawn M Gillespie; Andrew S Venteicher; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; Mario L Suvà; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  95 in total

1.  Multi-Institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Authors:  Micah J Sheller; G Anthony Reina; Brandon Edwards; Jason Martin; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2019-01-26

Review 2.  Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Knut Liestøl; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Precision oncology in the era of radiogenomics: the case of D-2HG as an imaging biomarker for mutant IDH gliomas.

Authors:  Ovidiu C Andronesi
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Gliosarcoma: a clinical and radiological analysis of 48 cases.

Authors:  Xiaoping Yi; Hang Cao; Haiyun Tang; Guanghui Gong; Zhongliang Hu; Weihua Liao; Lunquan Sun; Bihong T Chen; Xuejun Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Imaging-Based Algorithm for the Local Grading of Glioma.

Authors:  E D H Gates; J S Lin; J S Weinberg; S S Prabhu; J Hamilton; J D Hazle; G N Fuller; V Baladandayuthapani; D T Fuentes; D Schellingerhout
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Diagnosis of thyroid cancer using deep convolutional neural network models applied to sonographic images: a retrospective, multicohort, diagnostic study.

Authors:  Xiangchun Li; Sheng Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Xi Wei; Yi Pan; Jing Zhao; Xiaojie Xin; Chunxin Qin; Xiaoqing Wang; Jianxin Li; Fan Yang; Yanhui Zhao; Meng Yang; Qinghua Wang; Zhiming Zheng; Xiangqian Zheng; Xiangming Yang; Christopher T Whitlow; Metin Nafi Gurcan; Lun Zhang; Xudong Wang; Boris C Pasche; Ming Gao; Wei Zhang; Kexin Chen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Y W Lui; P D Chang; G Zaharchuk; D P Barboriak; A E Flanders; M Wintermark; C P Hess; C G Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Imaging biomarkers for brain metastases: more than meets the eye.

Authors:  Sanjay Aneja; Antonio Omuro
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence radiogenomics for advancing precision and effectiveness in oncologic care (Review).

Authors:  Eleftherios Trivizakis; Georgios Z Papadakis; Ioannis Souglakos; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Lefteris Koumakis; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristidis Tsatsakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Kostas Marias
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.650

10.  Neuroimaging-Based Classification Algorithm for Predicting 1p/19q-Codeletion Status in IDH-Mutant Lower Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  P P Batchala; T J E Muttikkal; J H Donahue; J T Patrie; D Schiff; C E Fadul; E K Mrachek; M-B Lopes; R Jain; S H Patel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.