| Literature DB >> 32027653 |
Laurel A Kluber1,2, Eric R Johnston1,2, Samantha A Allen1,2, J Nicholas Hendershot1,2, Paul J Hanson2,3, Christopher W Schadt1,2,4.
Abstract
Peatlands play outsized roles in the global carbon cycle. Despite occupying a rather small fraction of the terrestrial biosphere (~3%), these ecosystems account for roughly one third of the global soil carbon pool. This carbon is largely comprised of undecomposed deposits of plant material (peat) that may be meters thick. The fate of this deep carbon stockpile with ongoing and future climate change is thus of great interest and has large potential to induce positive feedback to climate warming. Recent in situ warming of an ombrotrophic peatland indicated that the deep peat microbial communities and decomposition rates were resistant to elevated temperatures. In this experiment, we sought to understand how nutrient and pH limitations may interact with temperature to limit microbial activity and community composition. Anaerobic microcosms of peat collected from 1.5 to 2 meters in depth were incubated at 6°C and 15°C with elevated pH, nitrogen (NH4Cl), and/or phosphorus (KH2PO4) in a full factorial design. The production of CO2 and CH4 was significantly greater in microcosms incubated at 15°C, although the structure of the microbial community did not differ between the two temperatures. Increasing the pH from ~3.5 to ~5.5 altered microbial community structure, however increases in CH4 production were non-significant. Contrary to expectations, N and P additions did not increase CO2 and CH4 production, indicating that nutrient availability was not a primary constraint in microbial decomposition of deep peat. Our findings indicate that temperature is a key factor limiting the decomposition of deep peat, however other factors such as the availability of O2 or alternative electron donors and high concentrations of phenolic compounds, may also exert constraints. Continued experimental peat warming studies will be necessary to assess if the deep peat carbon bank is susceptible to increased temperatures over the longer time scales.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32027653 PMCID: PMC7004313 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Cumulative production of CO (left) and CH (right) in peat microcosms incubated at at 6 (bottom) and 15°C (top). Nutrient addition treatments are coded by color and the elevated pH treatment is represented by dashed lines.
Fig 2Bacterial, Archaeal, and methanogen abundance measured by qPCR after 70 days of microcosm incubations.
Bacterial and archaeal population sizes were determined by quantifying 16S rRNA gene copies and methanogens were assessed by quantifying mcrA gene copies. pH adjustment treatments are shown in grey, and unadjusted treatments are shown in white. Abundance is presented as gene copies per g dry peat.
Fig 3Weighted and unweighted UniFrac PCoA ordinations of microcosm microbial communities.
Each point represents an individual microcosm. Color, shape, and fill are used to code for by nutrient addition, transect (origin location), and pH treatment, respectively. Ordinations include samples from both temperature treatments and time points (not denoted) as they did not significantly differ.
Fig 4Alpha diversity metrics of microcosm communities after 70 day incubations.
pH adjustment treatments are shown in grey, while unadjusted treatments are shown in white. Treatments incubated at 6 and 15°C were not significantly different and are combined for simplicity, thus each bar represents 6 microcosms.
Mean percent relative abundance (and standard deviation) of dominant microbial phyla and Proteobacteria classes after 70 day anaerobic incubation.
Data represent combined values for 6 and 15°C temperature treatments as temperature had little effect on overall microbial community composition and Bacteroidetes was the only taxa to have significant temperature response (p = 0.04). Asterisks denote significant difference from the control samples (no addition, ambient pH) determined by Tukey adjusted p-values denoted as ***, **, and * for p = 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively.
| Ambient pH | Elevated pH | Ambient pH | Elevated pH | Ambient pH | Elevated pH | Ambient pH | Elevated pH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crenarchaeota | 3.12 (2.06) | 2.25 (1.28) | 3.12 (2.05) | 2.54 (1.77) | 3.17 (2.36) | 1.87 (0.98) | 2.80 (1.27) | 1.59 (0.83) |
| Acidobacteria | 19.01 (4.29) | 21.7 (4.86) | 16.1 (2.74) | 10.1 (3.04)** | 16.0 (2.21) | 8.39 (4.01)*** | 20.3 (3.10) | 18.6 (5.36) |
| Actinobacteria | 0.54 (0.14) | 0.38 (0.05) | 0.81 (0.27) | 3.59 (6.69) | 0.75 (0.23) | 2.16 (2.66) | 0.61 (0.16) | 0.33 (0.12) |
| Bacteroidetes | 7.74 (1.70) | 7.56 (1.11) | 6.84 (1.05) | 2.86 (1.15)** | 7.63 (1.73) | 4.04 (2.56)* | 7.50 (2.78) | 6.25 (2.53) |
| Chloroflexi | 1.61 (1.04) | 1.30 (0.70) | 2.43 (1.19) | 1.32 (0.95) | 2.70 (1.21) | 1.01 (0.45) | 1.57 (0.90) | 0.93 (0.45) |
| Fibrobacteres | 1.09 (0.64) | 1.53 (0.77) | 1.91 (0.58) | 0.85 (0.35) | 2.01 (0.59) | 0.62 (0.38) | 1.47 (0.75) | 1.00 (0.91) |
| Firmicutes | 6.23 (3.34) | 6.26 (5.55) | 6.22 (1.32) | 2.95 (1.27) | 5.68 (1.53) | 2.63 (2.39) | 4.15 (1.41) | 6.70 (4.17) |
| Proteobacteria | 53.5 (7.03) | 53.8 (5.91) | 53.3 (5.74) | 71.5 (7.90)** | 52.4 (8.44) | 75.8 (9.42)*** | 54.4 (3.33) | 60.8 (10.4) |
| Alpha | 7.66 (2.37) | 7.15 (2.75) | 6.78 (1.75) | 3.08 (1.05) | 8.50 (3.47) | 4.41 (4.60) | 9.14 (2.21) | 7.03 (5.00) |
| Beta | 35.9 (10.0) | 37.7 (6.67) | 34.8 (8.17) | 16.8 (6.45)* | 32.5 (11.5) | 17.9 (11.4) | 35.0(5.52) | 34.2 (14.5) |
| Delta | 7.61 (4.13) | 6.78 (1.53) | 7.13 (2.99) | 4.25 (2.16) | 7.36 (3.18) | 3.86 (2.37) | 7.10 (3.15) | 6.27 (4.41) |
| Gamma | 2.34 (1.78) | 2.21 (0.95) | 4.68 (2.25) | 47.4 (17.8)*** | 4.05 (0.63) | 49.6 (25.8)*** | 3.17 (1.81) | 13.3 (25.3) |
| Verrucomicrobia | 3.28 (1.12) | 2.24 (0.88) | 4.12 (1.39) | 1.73 (0.94) | 3.84 (1.29) | 1.43 (0.84) | 3.09 (1.09) | 1.67 (0.68) |