| Literature DB >> 32023829 |
Yi Liu1, Jingjie Sun2, Yannong Gou2, Xiubin Sun1, Dandan Zhang1, Fuzhong Xue1.
Abstract
There has been an increasing number of clinical and epidemiologic research projects providing supporting evidence that short-term exposure to ambient air pollution contributes to the exacerbation of cardiovascular disease. However, few studies consider measurement error and spatial effects in the estimate of underlying air pollution levels, and less is known about the influence of baseline air pollution levels on cardiovascular disease. We used hospital admissions data for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) collected from an inland, heavily polluted city and a coastal city in Shandong Province, China. Bayesian spatio-temporal models were applied to obtain the underlying pollution level in each city, then generalized additive models were adopted to assess the health effects. The total cardiovascular disease hospitalizations were significantly increased in the inland city by 0.401% (0.029, 0.775), 0.316% (0.086, 0.547), 0.903% (0.252, 1.559), and 2.647% (1.607, 3.697) per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and NO2, respectively. The total cardiovascular diseases hospitalizations were increased by 6.568% (3.636, 9.584) per 10μg/m3 increase in the level of NO2. Although the air pollution overall had a more significant adverse impact on cardiovascular disease hospital admissions in the heavily polluted inland city, the short-term increases in air pollution levels in the less polluted coastal areas led to excessive exacerbations of cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian statistics; China; air pollution; cardiovascular disease; spatio-temporal models
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32023829 PMCID: PMC7038089 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The location of Jinan and Weihai in the Shandong Province; the two cities are shown in blue. The numbers represent the number of air quality monitoring stations in each city.
The daily hospital admissions grouped by sex, age, and sub-disease in the cities of Jinan and Weihai (from 1st January, 2014 to 31st December, 2016).
| City | Hospitalization (Cases/Per Day) | Min | P25 | P50 | P75 | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 8 | 195 | 291 | 346 | 580 | |
| Male | 5 | 106 | 158 | 191 | 308 | |
| Jinan | Female | 3 | 89 | 131 | 157 | 274 |
| ≥65 | 3 | 103 | 148 | 180 | 361 | |
| <65 | 5 | 92 | 138 | 169 | 296 | |
| Total | 1 | 67 | 80 | 96 | 200 | |
| Male | 0 | 37 | 45 | 54 | 113 | |
| Weihai | Female | 1 | 29 | 36 | 43 | 89 |
| ≥65 | 0 | 37 | 45 | 54 | 109 | |
| <65 | 1 | 28 | 35 | 44 | 104 |
Figure 2A boxplot of daily mean air pollution levels in Jinan and Weihai.
Figure 3A boxplot of meteorological factors in Jinan and Weihai.
Figure 4A plot of the percentage change in the relative risk of the total cardiovascular diseases hospitalizations with a 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10 μg/m3 increase in the air pollution levels, in the cities of Jinan and Weihai.
The percentage change in the relative risk of the total cardiovascular disease hospitalizations with a 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10 μg/m3 increase in the air pollution levels estimated from multipollutant models, where * indicates statistically significant estimates (p < 0.05).
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Single pollutant | 0.401 (0.029, 0.775) * | Single pollutant | 0.316 (0.086, 0.547) * | Single pollutant | 0.903 (0.252, 1.559) * | Single pollutant | 2.647 (1.607, 3.697) * |
| +PM10 | −0.279 (−1.106, 0.555) | +PM2.5 | 0.472 (−0.045, 0.992) | +PM2.5 | 0.889 (0.156, 1.628) * | + PM2.5 | 3.164 (1.835, 4.509) * |
| +SO2 | 0.360 (−0.057, 0.778) | +SO2 | 0.307 (0.050, 0.565) * | +PM10 | 0.859 (0.115, 1.609) * | + PM10 | 3.018 (1.631, 4.423) * |
| +NO2 | −0.295 (−0.764, 0.177) | +NO2 | −0.124 (−0.429, 0.183) | +NO2 | 0.298 (−0.584, 1.188) | + SO2 | 3.879 (2.483, 5.295) * |
| +All | −0.342 (−1.181, 0.504) | +All | 0.071 (−0.475, 0.620) | +All | 0.316 (−0.568, 1.208) | +All | 4.229 (2.564, 5.922) * |
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Single pollutant | 0.161 (−0.356, 0.680) | Single pollutant | 0.143 (−0.210, 0.497) | Single pollutant | 2.149 (−0.031, 4.377) | Single pollutant | 6.568 (3.636, 9.584) * |
| +PM10 | −0.001 (−0.808, 0.812) | +PM2.5 | 0.144 (−0.409, 0.699) | +PM2.5 | 3.580 (0.472, 6.785) * | +PM2.5 | 9.606 (5.887, 13.456) * |
| +SO2 | −0.239 (−0.949, 0.477) | +SO2 | −0.021 (−0.447, 0.407) | + PM10 | 2.875 (0.264, 5.554) * | +PM10 | 8.453 (5.048, 11.970) * |
| +NO2 | −0.536 (−1.204, 0.136) | +NO2 | −0.167 (−0.582, 0.249) | +NO2 | −1.980 (−4.767, 0.887) * | +SO2 | 8.415 (4.448, 12.532) * |
| +All | −0.654 (−1.597, 0.298) | +All | 0.098 (−0.457, 0.656) | +All | 0.035 (−3.277, 3.460) | +All | 9.648 (5.518, 13.940) * |
The changes in the relative risk of cardiovascular disease hospitalizations for patients by gender and age, and their 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10 μg/m3 increase in air pollutants in Jinan and Weihai, where * indicates statistically significant estimates (p < 0.05).
| Jinan | Weihai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pollutant | Class | Estimate | Lag | Estimate | Lag |
| PM2.5 | Male | 0.404 (0.009, 0.801) * | 0 | −0.419 (−0.992, 0.157) | 2 |
| Female | 0.398 (0.013, 0.783) * | 0 | −0.420 (−1.010, 0.174) | 3 | |
| ≥65 | 0.323 (−0.056, 0.704) | 0 | 0.660 (0.109, 1.214) * | 5 | |
| <65 | 0.485 (0.074, 0.899) * | 0 | −0.577 (−1.198, 0.048) | 3 | |
| PM10 | Male | 0.308 (0.063, 0.553) * | 0 | 0.119 (−0.260, 0.499) | 3 |
| Female | 0.326 (0.088, 0.565) * | 0 | 0.283 (−0.138, 0.706) | 1 | |
| ≥65 | 0.279 (0.045, 0.514) * | 0 | 0.306 (−0.068, 0.682) | 5 | |
| <65 | 0.356 (0.100, 0.612) * | 0 | −0.257 (−0.684, 0.172) | 4 | |
| SO2 | Male | 0.749 (0.058, 1.445) * | 1 | 2.859 (0.340, 5.441) * | 0 |
| Female | 1.089 (0.415, 1.768) * | 1 | 1.281 (−1.292, 3.921) | 0 | |
| ≥65 | 0.709 (0.041, 1.381) * | 1 | 2.438 (0.344, 4.576) * | 5 | |
| <65 | 1.116 (0.398, 1.839) * | 1 | 1.924 (−0.807, 4.730) | 0 | |
| NO2 | Male | 2.516 (1.414, 3.630) * | 0 | 7.419 (4.031, 10.918) * | 0 |
| Female | 2.803 (1.725, 3.892) * | 0 | 5.535 (2.070, 9.119) * | 0 | |
| ≥65 | 2.284 (1.225, 3.355) * | 0 | 7.612 (4.321, 11.006) * | 0 | |
| <65 | 3.033 (1.880, 4.199) * | 0 | 5.236 (1.591, 9.011) * | 0 | |