| Literature DB >> 29673181 |
Yi Liu1, Jingjie Sun2, Yannong Gou3, Xiubin Sun4, Xiujun Li5, Zhongshang Yuan6, Lizhi Kong7, Fuzhong Xue8.
Abstract
Although there is growing evidence linking chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) hospital admissions to the exposure to ambient air pollution, the effect can vary depending on the local geography, pollution type, and pollution level. The number of large-scale multicity studies remains limited in China. This study aims to assess the short-term effects of ambient air pollution (PM2.5, PM10, SO₂, NO₂) on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospital admissions from 2015 to 2016, with a total of 216,159 records collected from 207 hospitals in 17 cities all over the Shandong province, east China. Generalized additive models and penalized splines were applied to study the data whilst controlling for confounding meteorological factors and long-term trends. The air pollution was analyzed with 0–6 day lag effects and the percentage change of hospital admissions was assessed for a 10-μg/m³ increase in the air pollution levels. We also examined the percentage changes for different age groups and gender, respectively. The results showed that air pollution was significantly associated with adverse health outcomes and stronger effects were observed for females. The air pollution health effects were also impacted by geographical factors such that the air pollution had weaker health effects in coastal cities.Entities:
Keywords: air pollution; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; generalized additive model; hospital admission; multicity analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29673181 PMCID: PMC5923816 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The locations of the 17 cities in the Shandong Province; the coastal cities are shown in the green color. The numbers represent the count of air quality monitoring stations in each city.
Descriptive statistics of the daily hospital admissions grouped by sex and age in the 17 cities of the Shandong province (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016).
| Caption | Total | Male | Female | ≥65 | <65 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | 11,103 | 5700 | 5403 | 8972 | 2131 |
| Dezhou | 6288 | 3134 | 3154 | 4780 | 1508 |
| Dongying | 4026 | 2299 | 1727 | 3320 | 706 |
| Heze | 16,055 | 11,007 | 5048 | 12,593 | 3462 |
| Jinan | 13,711 | 8383 | 5328 | 10,707 | 3004 |
| Jining | 19,493 | 12,884 | 6609 | 14,611 | 4882 |
| Laiwu | 2823 | 1800 | 1023 | 2227 | 596 |
| Liaocheng | 15,368 | 9632 | 5736 | 11,783 | 3585 |
| Linyi | 25,508 | 13,830 | 11,678 | 18,402 | 7106 |
| Qingdao | 15,797 | 9613 | 6184 | 11,695 | 4102 |
| Rizhao | 5675 | 3118 | 2557 | 4128 | 1547 |
| Taian | 10,752 | 7052 | 3700 | 7709 | 3043 |
| Weifang | 26,653 | 15,832 | 10,821 | 19,439 | 7214 |
| Weihai | 7210 | 4612 | 2598 | 4929 | 2281 |
| Yantai | 11,848 | 7738 | 4110 | 8785 | 3063 |
| Zaozhuang | 12,623 | 7896 | 4727 | 9537 | 3086 |
| Zibo | 11,025 | 6848 | 4177 | 8822 | 2203 |
| Total | 215,958 | 131,378 | 84,580 | 162,439 | 53,519 |
Descriptive statistics of the daily mean PM2.5 levels (μg/m3) in the 17 cities of the Shandong province (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016).
| Caption | Min | 25% | 50% | 75% | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | 7.7 | 42.2 | 65.4 | 96.0 | 336.7 | 75.1 |
| Dezhou | 5.8 | 42.0 | 67.6 | 98.6 | 307.1 | 79.4 |
| Dongying | 7.0 | 31.0 | 52.0 | 79.3 | 269.1 | 60.4 |
| Heze | 9.2 | 48.7 | 70.1 | 108.2 | 427.4 | 85.8 |
| Jinan | 13.3 | 45.0 | 63.5 | 95.3 | 382.1 | 76.0 |
| Jining | 11.8 | 42.9 | 60.8 | 93.1 | 366.1 | 74.1 |
| Laiwu | 16.1 | 45.7 | 68.9 | 101.2 | 323.6 | 80.8 |
| Liaocheng | 9.7 | 50.9 | 74.8 | 112.3 | 529.8 | 89.7 |
| Linyi | 11.2 | 34.4 | 56.2 | 89.3 | 345.0 | 71.5 |
| Qingdao | 7.7 | 23.6 | 37.2 | 57.9 | 308.4 | 46.4 |
| Rizhao | 4.8 | 24.0 | 40.4 | 66.0 | 279.3 | 52.3 |
| Taian | 12.1 | 37.6 | 55.1 | 81.9 | 346.2 | 67.0 |
| Weifang | 9.7 | 38.2 | 56.5 | 84.5 | 336.0 | 67.4 |
| Weihai | 2.3 | 19.0 | 27.9 | 46.2 | 232.3 | 35.3 |
| Yantai | 5.1 | 20.4 | 31.5 | 50.8 | 245.1 | 39.5 |
| Zaozhuang | 8.6 | 44.1 | 67.4 | 100.4 | 300.6 | 80.0 |
| Zibo | 16.0 | 42.9 | 61.1 | 86.8 | 335.8 | 70.7 |
Descriptive statistics of the daily mean PM10 levels (μg/m3) in the 17 cities of the Shandong province (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016).
| Caption | Min | 25% | 50% | 75% | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | 13.4 | 70.6 | 107.7 | 157.1 | 486.9 | 121.1 |
| Dezhou | 9.0 | 81.7 | 122.4 | 177.2 | 584.3 | 138.0 |
| Dongying | 15.9 | 61.6 | 94.0 | 142.8 | 546.6 | 108.6 |
| Heze | 13.7 | 88.7 | 125.8 | 184.6 | 549.5 | 143.6 |
| Jinan | 21.1 | 91.3 | 125.0 | 176.1 | 600.3 | 141.9 |
| Jining | 9.0 | 75.8 | 105.9 | 155.1 | 589.2 | 123.4 |
| Laiwu | 12.1 | 83.3 | 120.0 | 159.0 | 471.6 | 129.6 |
| Liaocheng | 10.4 | 97.2 | 132.9 | 186.4 | 577.9 | 151.0 |
| Linyi | 19.2 | 73.2 | 117.4 | 170.9 | 499.5 | 134.2 |
| Qingdao | 19.6 | 51.8 | 72.9 | 107.0 | 454.7 | 86.2 |
| Rizhao | 8.5 | 45.6 | 73.8 | 117.9 | 414.7 | 89.5 |
| Taian | 14.1 | 71.9 | 105.1 | 146.1 | 486.1 | 117.8 |
| Weifang | 27.8 | 84.2 | 113.9 | 162.3 | 460.8 | 128.0 |
| Weihai | 8.7 | 37.8 | 51.6 | 78.5 | 464.5 | 64.3 |
| Yantai | 13.6 | 40.2 | 57.1 | 83.9 | 369.4 | 67.0 |
| Zaozhuang | 23.1 | 90.3 | 129.9 | 178.8 | 542.6 | 142.4 |
| Zibo | 18.7 | 80.4 | 117.5 | 154.3 | 489.4 | 125.6 |
Descriptive statistics of the daily mean SO2 levels (μg/m3) in the 17 cities of the Shandong province (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016).
| Caption | Min | 25% | 50% | 75% | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | 6.2 | 24.3 | 38.7 | 60.3 | 248.5 | 46.2 |
| Dezhou | 3.4 | 18.7 | 28.1 | 42.7 | 181.2 | 35.0 |
| Dongying | 3.0 | 24.1 | 37.3 | 56.1 | 196.0 | 43.4 |
| Heze | 9.7 | 23.1 | 32.8 | 46.7 | 135.4 | 36.9 |
| Jinan | 8.2 | 20.5 | 31.1 | 49.7 | 185.2 | 39.3 |
| Jining | 9.2 | 29.0 | 42.5 | 63.9 | 166.4 | 49.1 |
| Laiwu | 2.4 | 27.8 | 43.1 | 64.2 | 217.5 | 51.1 |
| Liaocheng | 3.7 | 20.0 | 31.1 | 47.0 | 123.4 | 35.9 |
| Linyi | 3.2 | 14.2 | 26.5 | 42.5 | 139.0 | 32.3 |
| Qingdao | 5.0 | 15.2 | 20.1 | 27.6 | 130.3 | 24.0 |
| Rizhao | 4.3 | 10.7 | 16.0 | 24.6 | 110.0 | 20.2 |
| Taian | 7.4 | 21.5 | 32.1 | 47.9 | 149.9 | 37.7 |
| Weifang | 6.7 | 18.8 | 29.1 | 50.0 | 213.3 | 38.9 |
| Weihai | 1.2 | 9.1 | 12.8 | 17.8 | 92.5 | 15.4 |
| Yantai | 3.6 | 11.4 | 16.8 | 25.5 | 77.3 | 20.1 |
| Zaozhuang | 10.4 | 25.8 | 40.8 | 57.6 | 136.0 | 44.1 |
| Zibo | 7.0 | 36.9 | 55.5 | 74.6 | 208.2 | 60.8 |
Descriptive statistics of the daily mean NO2 levels (μg/m3) in the 17 cities of the Shandong province (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016).
| Caption | Min | 25% | 50% | 75% | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | 7.8 | 24.3 | 35.2 | 49.1 | 124.4 | 38.9 |
| Dezhou | 5.7 | 23.6 | 32.2 | 43.7 | 117.7 | 35.9 |
| Dongying | 2.7 | 19.4 | 30.5 | 44.9 | 103.1 | 34.0 |
| Heze | 5.8 | 25.5 | 34.3 | 46.5 | 102.4 | 37.6 |
| Jinan | 10.9 | 31.3 | 42.5 | 57.7 | 155.1 | 45.9 |
| Jining | 8.0 | 29.2 | 40.6 | 53.6 | 106.2 | 42.9 |
| Laiwu | 8.2 | 31.9 | 44.4 | 58.6 | 116.1 | 47.0 |
| Liaocheng | 4.6 | 27.5 | 38.0 | 50.2 | 115.8 | 41.4 |
| Linyi | 8.5 | 29.6 | 41.9 | 57.2 | 125.7 | 45.1 |
| Qingdao | 7.1 | 21.6 | 30.8 | 41.1 | 107.0 | 32.7 |
| Rizhao | 3.9 | 19.5 | 30.6 | 44.1 | 98.2 | 33.1 |
| Taian | 7.5 | 28.4 | 38.9 | 49.4 | 107.5 | 40.3 |
| Weifang | 8.7 | 22.6 | 31.9 | 44.1 | 96.5 | 35.0 |
| Weihai | 3.8 | 13.5 | 19.7 | 27.9 | 92.7 | 22.1 |
| Yantai | 8.0 | 20.7 | 29.1 | 39.8 | 84.6 | 31.8 |
| Zaozhuang | 8.9 | 21.7 | 29.2 | 38.8 | 101.4 | 31.4 |
| Zibo | 13.7 | 38.7 | 48.8 | 58.3 | 102.4 | 49.7 |
Descriptive statistics of the daily mean temperature (°C) in the 17 cities of the Shandong province (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016).
| Caption | Min | 25% | 50% | 75% | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | −15.3 | 3.8 | 16.1 | 23.3 | 31.7 | 13.9 |
| Dezhou | −14.3 | 3.6 | 15.4 | 22.9 | 31.8 | 13.5 |
| Dongying | −13.2 | 3.9 | 16.5 | 24.0 | 32.6 | 14.4 |
| Heze | −9.2 | 5.8 | 16.4 | 23.3 | 31.3 | 14.7 |
| Jinan | −12.4 | 6.0 | 17.4 | 24.2 | 33.0 | 15.3 |
| Jining | −10.7 | 4.8 | 16.2 | 23.4 | 32.5 | 14.5 |
| Laiwu | −13.1 | 4.0 | 15.7 | 22.6 | 32.0 | 13.7 |
| Liaocheng | −10.9 | 5.2 | 16.4 | 23.5 | 31.5 | 14.5 |
| Linyi | −11.7 | 5.5 | 16.6 | 23.7 | 32.5 | 14.8 |
| Qingdao | −11.5 | 5.5 | 15.0 | 21.9 | 29.4 | 13.8 |
| Rizhao | −11.4 | 5.7 | 14.9 | 22.2 | 31.4 | 14.1 |
| Taian | −22.8 | −1.6 | 8.4 | 14.8 | 22.7 | 6.7 |
| Weifang | −13.0 | 4.5 | 16.3 | 23.6 | 33.2 | 14.3 |
| Weihai | −11.8 | 4.9 | 14.9 | 22.5 | 30.6 | 13.8 |
| Yantai | −11.9 | 3.7 | 15.0 | 22.6 | 31.4 | 13.3 |
| Zaozhuang | −11.0 | 5.8 | 16.4 | 23.4 | 32.2 | 14.7 |
| Zibo | −13.1 | 5.2 | 17.3 | 23.9 | 32.9 | 14.9 |
Descriptive statistics of the daily mean relative humidity (%) in the 17 cities of the Shandong province (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016).
| Caption | Min | 25% | 50% | 75% | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | 25 | 51 | 64 | 77 | 98 | 63.7 |
| Dezhou | 26 | 57 | 70 | 82 | 100 | 69.3 |
| Dongying | 23 | 49 | 62 | 73 | 98 | 61.7 |
| Heze | 30 | 60 | 71 | 83 | 98 | 70.2 |
| Jinan | 19 | 42 | 55 | 72 | 100 | 57.4 |
| Jining | 32 | 61 | 73 | 82 | 100 | 70.9 |
| Laiwu | 23 | 49 | 63 | 77 | 97 | 62.3 |
| Liaocheng | 24 | 54 | 67 | 79 | 98 | 66.2 |
| Linyi | 24 | 53 | 68 | 78 | 99 | 65.5 |
| Qingdao | 21 | 57 | 72 | 83 | 100 | 69.6 |
| Rizhao | 22 | 55 | 72 | 85 | 99 | 69.1 |
| Taian | 7 | 45 | 67 | 87.5 | 100 | 65.9 |
| Weifang | 24 | 51 | 64 | 74 | 96 | 62.6 |
| Weihai | 18 | 52 | 64 | 76 | 97 | 63.1 |
| Yantai | 22 | 54 | 66 | 76 | 96 | 64.2 |
| Zaozhuang | 28 | 63 | 75 | 83 | 98 | 72.9 |
| Zibo | 20 | 44 | 57 | 72 | 98 | 58 |
Descriptive statistics of the daily mean wind speed (m/s) in the 17 cities of the Shandong province (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016).
| Caption | Min | 25% | 50% | 75% | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 6.4 | 2.1 |
| Dezhou | 0.3 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 7.2 | 2.4 |
| Dongying | 0.5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 5.4 | 2.2 |
| Heze | 0.4 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 6.3 | 2.3 |
| Jinan | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 6.4 | 2.3 |
| Jining | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 1.5 |
| Laiwu | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 5.7 | 1.7 |
| Liaocheng | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 7.5 | 2.0 |
| Linyi | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 1.6 |
| Qingdao | 1.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 8.4 | 3.2 |
| Rizhao | 0.8 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 11.3 | 3.1 |
| Taian | 1.0 | 4.1 | 5.9 | 7.7 | 20.5 | 6.2 |
| Weifang | 0.2 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 5.9 | 2.0 |
| Weihai | 0.5 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 9.6 | 3.4 |
| Yantai | 0.7 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 3.8 | 8.7 | 3.0 |
| Zaozhuang | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 6.0 | 1.8 |
| Zibo | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 7.3 | 2.2 |
Figure 2The daily maximum air pollution levels in the 17 cities of the Shandong Province.
The percentage change in the relative risk of the total COPD hospitalizations and its 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10-μg/m3 increase in air pollutants in the 17 cities of the Shandong province, where * indicates statistically significant estimates (p < 0.05).
| City | PM2.5 | Lag | PM10 | Lag | SO2 | Lag | NO2 | Lag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | −0.541 (−1.23, 0.153) | 0 | 0.172 (−0.202, 0.548) | 3 | 1.374 (0.383, 2.356) * | 5 | 1.168 (−0.555, 2.921) | 3 |
| Dezhou | 0.895 (0.312, 1.474) * | 2 | 0.481 (0.095, 0.865) * | 2 | 1.427 (0.089, 2.970) * | 0 | 3.515 (1.394, 5.590) * | 2 |
| Dongying | −0.69 (−1.604, 0.232) | 3 | −0.305 (−0.902, 0.294) | 3 | 2.787 (0.926, 4.612) * | 0 | 3.316 (0.573, 5.984) * | 0 |
| Heze | 0.279 (−0.203, 0.764) | 1 | 0.357 (0.022, 0.694) * | 3 | 2.558 (1.186, 3.948) * | 2 | 1.534 (−0.301, 3.402) | 3 |
| Jinan | 0.501 (0.003, 1.018) * | 4 | 0.332 (0.008, 0.658) * | 4 | 1.405 (0.203, 2.621) * | 3 | 1.583 (−0.025, 3.218) | 0 |
| Jining | 0.729 (0.232, 1.229) * | 2 | 0.605 (0.285, 0.925) * | 2 | 1.713 (0.734, 2.701) * | 4 | 1.164 (−0.309, 2.659) | 4 |
| Laiwu | 0.978 (0.105, 1.858) * | 3 | 1.099 (0.458, 1.743) * | 3 | 1.530 (−0.132, 3.219) | 2 | 2.233 (−0.427, 4.965) | 2 |
| Liaocheng | 0.388 (−0.053, 0.830) | 0 | 0.262 (−0.052, 0.576) | 0 | 1.217 (0.036, 2.485) * | 3 | 1.697 (0.247, 3.126) * | 5 |
| Linyi | 0.501 (0.081, 0.922) * | 1 | 0.372 (0.099, 0.646) * | 1 | 2.276 (1.234, 3.328) * | 2 | 0.599 (−0.511, 1.721) | 2 |
| Qingdao | 0.536 (−0.111, 1.188) | 0 | 0.388 (−0.064, 0.843) | 0 | 3.164 (1.302, 5.059) * | 0 | 2.824 (1.004, 4.677) * | 0 |
| Rizhao | 0.635 (−0.179, 1.455) | 2 | 0.510 (−0.065, 1.088) | 3 | 1.916 (−0.772, 4.677) | 4 | 1.187 (−1.447, 3.890) | 0 |
| Taian | 0.561 (0.004, 1.140) * | 2 | 0.314 (0.018, 0.678) * | 3 | 1.490 (0.167, 2.830) * | 2 | −1.501 (−3.191, 0.218) | 5 |
| Weifang | 0.448 (0.007, 0.890) * | 2 | 0.406 (0.109, 0.704) * | 5 | 0.656 (−0.156, 1.475) | 2 | 1.245 (−0.052, 2.559) | 2 |
| Weihai | −0.667 (−1.907, 0.590) | 0 | 0.254 (−0.361, 0.873) | 2 | −1.717 (−5.102, 1.789) | 0 | −1.756 (−4.111, 0.657) | 2 |
| Yantai | 0.658 (−0.120, 1.442) | 5 | 0.470 (−0.069, 1.012) | 2 | 1.768 (−0.357, 3.938) | 2 | 0.765 (−0.948, 2.508) | 2 |
| Zaozhuang | 0.904 (0.256, 1.555) * | 1 | 0.542 (0.103, 0.983) * | 1 | 1.484 (0.015, 2.973) * | 5 | 3.013 (0.596, 5.488) * | 6 |
| Zibo | 0.480 (−0.102, 1.066) | 3 | −0.189 (−0.567, 0.190) | 4 | 1.210 (0.375, 2.052) * | 3 | 1.602 (0.130, 3.053) * | 6 |
Figure 3The percentage change in the relative risk of the total COPD hospitalizations per 10-μg/m3 increase in air pollution levels in the 17 cities of the Shandong province.
Figure 4A forest plot of the percentage change in the relative risk of the total COPD hospitalizations with a 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10-μg/m3 increase in the air pollution levels in the 17 cities of the Shandong province.
Percentage changes of the relative risk of male COPD hospitalizations and their 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10-μg/m3 increase in air pollutants in the 17 cities of the Shandong province, where * indicates statistically significant estimates (p < 0.05).
| Caption | PM2.5 | PM10 | SO2 | NO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | −0.512 (−1.24, 0.221) | −0.301 (−0.892, 0.294) | −1.149 (−2.420, 0.139) | −1.540 (−3.690, 0.658) |
| Dezhou | 0.807 (0.051, 1.557) * | 0.612 (0.105, 1.117) * | 1.824 (−0.278, 3.969) | 3.467 (0.689, 6.167) * |
| Dongying | −0.681 (−1.834, 0.485) | −0.369 (−1.130, 0.398) | 2.142 (0.204, 4.118) * | −1.422 (−4.223, 1.460) |
| Heze | 0.199 (−0.355, 0.755) | 0.315 (−0.067, 0.700) | 2.407 (0.834, 4.004) * | −1.230 (−3.470, 1.062) |
| Jinan | 0.533 (−0.097, 1.167) | 0.373 (−0.017, 0.764) | 1.167 (−0.279, 2.633) | 1.939 (0.052, 3.924) * |
| Jining | 0.754 (0.182, 1.330) * | 0.624 (0.257, 0.993) * | 1.796 (0.666, 2.938) * | 1.652 (−0.781, 4.145) |
| Laiwu | 0.989 (−0.099, 2.090) | 0.650 (−0.143, 1.450) | 1.989 (−0.01, 4.029) | 3.134 (−0.101, 6.474) |
| Liaocheng | 0.492 (−0.030, 1.016) | −0.247 (−0.619, 0.127) | 1.235 (−0.256, 2.747) | −1.928 (−3.946, 0.133) |
| Linyi | 0.628 (0.141, 1.118) * | 0.404 (0.088, 0.722) * | 2.033 (0.817, 3.263) * | 0.752 (−0.535, 2.056) |
| Qingdao | 0.425 (−0.291, 1.146) | 0.391 (−0.076, 0.859) | 2.933 (0.609, 5.311) * | 2.715 (0.481, 4.998) * |
| Rizhao | 0.631 (−0.608, 1.886) | 0.574 (−0.329, 1.485) | 2.840 (−0.614, 6.413) | 2.175 (−1.222, 5.689) |
| Taian | 0.716 (−0.035, 1.473) | 0.271 (−0.165, 0.709) | 1.448 (−0.171, 3.094) | 0.851 (−1.346, 3.096) |
| Weifang | 0.414 (−0.097, 0.929) | 0.360 (0.016, 0.706) * | 0.612 (−0.299, 1.532) | 0.744 (−0.755, 2.266) |
| Weihai | 0.282 (−1.049, 1.631) | −0.165 (−0.914, 0.590) | −1.844 (−5.290, 1.727) | −2.375 (−5.177, 0.510) |
| Yantai | 0.732 (−0.185, 1.657) | 0.538 (−0.092, 1.173) | 2.216 (−0.314, 4.809) | 1.011 (−0.993, 3.056) |
| Zaozhuang | 0.747 (0.041, 1.457) * | 0.501 (0.026, 0.979) * | 1.279 (−0.346, 2.931) | 2.034 (−0.571, 4.707) |
| Zibo | 0.627 (−0.084, 1.343) | 0.329 (−0.200, 0.862) | 1.050 (0.027, 2.082) * | 1.096 (−1.001, 3.238) |
Percentage changes of the relative risk of female COPD hospitalizations and their 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10-μg/m3 increase in air pollutants in the 17 cities of the Shandong province, where * indicates statistically significant estimates (p < 0.05).
| Caption | PM2.5 | PM10 | SO2 | NO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | −0.796 (−1.723, 0.140) | 0.390 (−0.112, 0.895) | 1.616 (0.273, 2.978) * | 2.889 (0.542, 5.291) * |
| Dezhou | 1.033 (0.265, 1.795) * | 0.641 (0.139, 1.140) * | 2.196 (0.211, 4.220) * | 3.981 (1.204, 6.680) * |
| Dongying | −1.328 (−2.664, 0.027) | −0.321 (−1.186, 0.551) | 3.681 (1.000, 6.290) * | 4.568 (1.312, 7.716) * |
| Heze | 0.897 (0.120, 1.679) * | 0.753 (0.206, 1.303) * | 2.667 (0.609, 4.767) * | 3.086 (0.461, 5.779) * |
| Jinan | 1.132 (0.452, 1.818) * | 0.528 (0.087, 0.971) * | 1.840 (0.264, 3.440) * | 1.969 (0.099, 3.745) * |
| Jining | 0.773 (0.067, 1.485) * | 0.617 (0.161, 1.075) * | 2.025 (0.619, 3.450) * | 1.804 (0.105, 3.531) * |
| Laiwu | 1.826 (0.442, 3.229) * | 1.916 (0.893, 2.950) * | 2.819 (0.147, 5.564) * | 4.186 (−0.074, 8.628) |
| Liaocheng | −0.325 (−0.845, 0.198) | 0.373 (0.004, 0.743) * | 1.228 (−0.551, 3.040) | 2.082 (0.361, 3.772) * |
| Linyi | 0.672 (0.202, 1.144) * | 0.426 (0.119, 0.734) * | 2.551 (1.291, 3.827) * | 1.669 (0.037, 3.326) * |
| Qingdao | 0.767 (−0.147, 1.689) | 0.561 (−0.079, 1.205) | 3.501 (0.930, 6.137) * | 2.798 (0.207, 5.456) * |
| Rizhao | 0.774 (−0.285, 1.844) | 0.535 (−0.234, 1.310) | −3.286 (−6.891, 0.458) | −1.864 (−4.632, 0.984) |
| Taian | 1.030 (0.197, 1.871) * | 0.575 (0.007, 1.147) * | 2.444 (0.500, 4.426) * | 2.703 (0.215, 5.129) * |
| Weifang | 0.713 (0.101, 1.329) * | 0.561 (0.147, 0.977) * | 1.071 (0.018, 2.135) * | 1.944 (0.231, 3.687) * |
| Weihai | −1.775 (−3.721, 0.211) | 0.625 (−0.353, 1.613) | 4.056 (−0.496, 8.816) | −2.327 (−6.040, 1.534) |
| Yantai | 1.719 (0.549, 2.903) * | 1.121 (0.283, 1.967) * | 4.304 (0.952, 7.767) * | −1.751 (−4.356, 0.925) |
| Zaozhuang | 1.071 (0.213, 1.937) * | 0.712 (0.134, 1.292) * | 2.570 (0.517, 4.666) * | 4.861 (1.480, 8.354) * |
| Zibo | −0.782 (−1.624, 0.066) | −0.450 (−0.993, 0.096) | 1.398 (0.203, 2.607) * | 2.180 (−0.320, 4.742) |
Percentage changes of the relative risk of COPD hospitalizations for patients aged over 65 years and their 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10-μg/m3 increase in air pollutants in the 17 cities of the Shandong province, where * indicates statistically significant estimates (p < 0.05).
| Caption | PM2.5 | PM10 | SO2 | NO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | −0.691 (−1.447, 0.071) | −0.409 (−0.914, 0.099) | 1.185 (0.100, 2.259) * | 1.256 (−0.624, 3.173) |
| Dezhou | 1.065 (0.425, 1.701) * | 0.569 (0.144, 0.992) * | 1.659 (0.019, 3.272) * | 4.125 (1.805, 6.390) * |
| Dongying | −0.714 (−1.695, 0.278) | 0.400 (−0.276, 1.08) | 2.548 (0.545, 4.510) * | 2.723 (0.333, 5.056) * |
| Heze | 0.606 (0.119, 1.09) * | 0.419 (0.064, 0.776) * | 2.891 (1.439, 4.363) * | 2.389 (0.448, 4.367) * |
| Jinan | 0.728 (0.157, 1.295) * | 0.348 (0.001, 0.697) * | 1.347 (0.064, 2.646) * | 1.843 (0.120, 3.596) * |
| Jining | 0.620 (0.062, 1.182) * | 0.646 (0.303, 0.991) * | 1.711 (0.654, 2.779) * | 1.723 (−0.134, 3.614) |
| Laiwu | 0.927 (−0.082, 1.946) | 1.135 (0.394, 1.881) * | 2.030 (0.124, 3.972) * | 2.619 (−0.460, 5.793) |
| Liaocheng | 0.416 (−0.053, 0.887) | −0.239 (−0.522, 0.046) | 1.250 (−0.103, 2.621) | 2.063 (0.502, 3.598) * |
| Linyi | 0.476 (0.017, 0.938) * | 0.351 (0.051, 0.652) * | 2.365 (1.222, 3.520) * | 0.930 (−0.536, 2.417) |
| Qingdao | 0.655 (−0.078, 1.393) | 0.504 (−0.008, 1.018) | 3.186 (1.065, 5.352) * | 3.218 (1.150, 5.330) * |
| Rizhao | −0.532 (−1.490, 0.435) | 0.449 (−0.196, 1.098) | 2.163 (−0.845, 5.262) | −1.107 (−3.428, 1.270) |
| Taian | 0.785 (0.148, 1.426) * | 0.431 (0.002, 0.865) * | 1.805 (0.325, 3.307) * | 1.498 (−0.448, 3.482) |
| Weifang | 0.463 (−0.105, 1.035) | 0.388 (0.043, 0.734) * | 0.559 (−0.325, 1.451) | −1.100 (−2.478, 0.299) |
| Weihai | −0.565 (−1.997, 0.887) | 0.218 (−0.493, 0.933) | −2.280 (−6.180, 1.782) | −1.765 (−4.492, 1.040) |
| Yantai | 0.573 (−0.304, 1.456) | 0.669 (0.050, 1.291) * | 1.995 (−0.389, 4.436) | −1.428 (−3.290, 0.470) |
| Zaozhuang | 0.847 (0.148, 1.55) * | 0.484 (0.009, 0.961) * | 1.766 (0.181, 3.377) * | 3.761 (1.148, 6.442) * |
| Zibo | 0.583 (−0.097, 1.267) | 0.346 (−0.092, 0.787) | 1.044 (0.126, 1.971) * | 1.137 (−0.543, 2.845) |
Percentage changes of the relative risk of COPD hospitalizations for patients aged under 65 years and their 95% confidence interval (CI) per 10-μg/m3 increase in air pollutants in the 17 cities of the Shandong province, where * indicates statistically significant estimates (p < 0.05).
| Caption | PM2.5 | PM10 | SO2 | NO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binzhou | −0.988 (−2.092, 0.128) | −0.635 (−1.369, 0.104) | 2.391 (0.395, 4.347) * | 3.063 (−0.921, 7.207) |
| Dezhou | 1.395 (0.320, 2.458) * | 1.103 (0.390, 1.810) * | 2.134 (−0.595, 4.938) | 5.770 (2.022, 9.374) * |
| Dongying | −1.874 (−4.052, 0.352) | −0.785 (−2.115, 0.562) | −2.630 (−6.456, 1.352) | −4.267 (−9.071, 0.791) |
| Heze | 0.465 (−0.496, 1.434) | 0.425 (−0.178, 1.032) | 1.804 (−0.725, 4.397) | −3.105 (−6.244, 0.140) |
| Jinan | 0.671 (−0.216, 1.566) | 0.460 (−0.102, 1.025) | 1.400 (−0.683, 3.527) | −1.546 (−3.882, 0.847) |
| Jining | 1.227 (0.419, 2.041) * | 0.641 (0.117, 1.167) * | 2.033 (0.429, 3.661) * | −1.926 (−4.304, 0.512) |
| Laiwu | 1.492 (−0.193, 3.205) | 1.011 (−0.222, 2.259) | 3.206 (0.461, 6.027) * | 7.241 (1.718, 13.064) * |
| Liaocheng | 0.602 (−0.028, 1.236) | 0.400 (−0.105, 0.908) | 1.790 (−0.442, 4.071) | −0.933 (−3.473, 1.674) |
| Linyi | 0.934 (0.340, 1.532) * | 0.476 (0.061, 0.893) * | 2.054 (0.468, 3.666) * | 1.806 (0.140, 3.501) * |
| Qingdao | −0.924 (−1.994, 0.157) | −0.316 (−1.030, 0.403) | 2.965 (−0.340, 6.380) | 2.849 (0.144, 5.480) * |
| Rizhao | 0.854 (−0.850, 2.587) | 0.754 (−0.216, 1.733) | 2.222 (−2.557, 7.235) | 2.463 (−1.233, 6.297) |
| Taian | 0.852 (−0.181, 1.896) | −0.413 (−1.034, 0.212) | 1.710 (−0.516, 3.985) | −1.951 (−4.626, 0.800) |
| Weifang | 0.915 (0.226, 1.608) * | 0.711 (0.244, 1.181) * | −1.502 (−3.008, 0.027) | 2.676 (0.610, 4.785) * |
| Weihai | −0.718 (−2.688, 1.291) | 0.703 (−0.297, 1.713) | 1.144 (−3.569, 6.087) | −2.033 (−5.888, 1.980) |
| Yantai | 2.192 (0.843, 3.558) * | 1.584 (0.656, 2.521) * | 5.282 (1.384, 9.330) * | 2.677 (−0.473, 5.926) |
| Zaozhuang | 1.073 (0.006, 2.151) * | 0.750 (0.034, 1.471) * | 1.681 (−0.791, 4.213) | 2.202 (−1.837, 6.406) |
| Zibo | −0.994 (−2.180, 0.207) | −0.780 (−1.591, 0.037) | 1.606 (−0.108, 3.348) | −2.753 (−5.729, 0.318) |