| Literature DB >> 32023362 |
Tobias Reiner1, Reza Sorbi1, Maike Müller1, Timo Nees1, Jan Philippe Kretzer2, Markus Rickert3, Babak Moradi1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the course of in vivo blood metal ion levels in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to investigate potential risk factors associated with metal ion release in these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Metal ions; Metal wear; Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32023362 PMCID: PMC7189061 DOI: 10.1111/os.12591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Surg ISSN: 1757-7853 Impact factor: 2.071
Figure 1The flowchart illustrates patient enrolment.
Metal ion measurements in μg/L at the different follow‐up intervals (n = 22)
| Pre‐operation (T0) | 6 weeks post‐op (T1) | 3 months post‐op (T2) | 6 months post‐op (T3) | 1 year post‐op (T4) |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 vs T1 | T0 vs T2 | T0 vs T3 | T0 vs T4 | ||||||
| Cobalt | 0.023 ± 0.04 | 0.110 ± 0.20 | 0.172 ± 0.16 | 0.060 ± 0.07 | 0.279 ± 0.14 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.006 (0.005–0.141) | 0.037 (0.005–0.896) | 0.105 (0.006–0.603) | 0.025 (0.005–0.229) | 0.243 (0.122–0.615) | |||||
| Chromium | 0.318 ± 0.28 | 0.255 ± 0.18 | 0.123 ± 0.15 | 0.167 ± 0.12 | 0.430 ± 0.49 | 0.384 |
|
| 0.353 |
| 0.251 (0.052–1.297) | 0.206 (0.022–0.671) | 0.069 (0.005–0.469) | 0.126 (0.056–0.486) | 0.268 (0.000–1.984) | |||||
| Molybdenum | 0.489 ± 0.26 | 0.545 ± 0.27 | 0.555 ± 0.59 | 0.451 ± 0.27 | 0.622 ± 0.45 | 0.327 | 0.534 | 0.598 | 0.190 |
| 0.421 (0.225–1.221) | 0.489 (0.244–1.479) | 0.404 (0.168–2.967) | 0.355 (0.174–1.164) | 0.456 (0.212–1.827) | |||||
| Titanium | 1.417 ± 1.37 | 1.831 ± 0.84 | 2.346 ± 1.03 | 1.177 ± 0.80 | 1.960 ± 0.98 | 0.244 |
| 0.549 | 0.133 |
| 1.077 (0.006–4.517) | 1.680 (0.797–3.142) | 2.446 (0.006–3.752) | 1.137 (0.006–4.058) | 1.837 (0.598–4.28) | |||||
Note: Data were expressed as mean, SD (upper row) and median, range (lower row). Analysis of variance for repeated measures (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni‐correction was used for comparison between the intervals. A P‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
American Knee Society score (AKSS) and the Oxford Knee score (OKS) as measured at the different follow‐up intervals (n = 24)
| Mean ± SD (Range) | Pre‐operation (T0) | 6 weeks post‐op (T1) | 3 months post‐op (T2) | 6 months post‐op (T3) | 1 year post‐op (T4) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 vs T1 | T0 vs T2 | T0 vs T3 | T0 vs T4 | ||||||
| Clinical (AKSS) | 32.5 ± 11.8 (13–55) | 70.6 ± 18.9 (32–92) | 78.3 ± 15 (37–99) | 82.6 ± 15.1 (28–95) | 84.8 ± 13.5 (30–100) |
|
|
|
|
| Functional (AKSS) | 41.7 ± 14.2 (5–80) | 45.8 ± 19.7 (15–90) | 64.8 ± 14.5 (35–90) | 74.4 ± 20.9 (15–100) | 78.6 ± 21.1 (15–100) | 0.394 |
|
|
|
| Oxford knee Score (OKS) | 18.9 ± 6.9 (9–34) | 31.3 ± 9 (7–44) | 33 ± 8.7 (7–44) | 39.1 ± 8 (6–48) | 39.7 ± 8.5 (5–40) |
|
|
|
|
Note: Data were expressed as mean, standard deviation (SD) and range. Analysis of variance for repeated measures (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni‐correction was used for comparison between the intervals. A P‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 2The radiograph shows the x‐ray images of the left knee of a 72‐year‐old female patient at 1‐year follow‐up demonstrating a well‐aligned implant position.