Literature DB >> 32021013

Effects of ball head diameter and stem neck shape in range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A simulation study.

Tsutomu Higashi1, Nobuhiro Kaku2, Shouhei Noda2, Tomonori Tabata2, Hiroaki Tagomori2, Hiroshi Tsumura2.   

Abstract

Simulations using three-dimensional computer-aided design were performed with the various conditions to research the movement distance of the ball head and total range of motion until impingement and dislocation (ROM(t)) which involved in joint stability. Although a large ball head increases the entire ROM(t) and oscillation angle, it decreases stability transitioning from impingement to dislocation. Conversely, though large neck diameter increases the simulated stability from impingement to dislocation, it reduces the ROM(t) and oscillation angle. ROM(t) decreases with change in neck shape and is greatly affected by the presence of osteophytes, even if the head-neck ratio remains the same.
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ball head size; CAD, computer-aided design; Cup size; Dislocation; Hip prosthesis design; Impingement; Movement distance; Osteophyte height; ROM(i-d), ROM from impingement to dislocation; ROM(t), total range of motion until dislocation; ROM, range of motion until dislocation; Range of motion; Stem neck diameter; Stem neck shape; THA, total hip arthroplasty; Total hip arthroplasty; rROM, the ratio of the ROM from impingement to dislocation in total ROM until dislocation = ROM(i-d)/ ROM(t)

Year:  2019        PMID: 32021013      PMCID: PMC6994771          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  15 in total

1.  Increased range of motion to impingement with large head total hip arthroplasty: point of diminishing returns.

Authors:  Gregory G Klingenstein; Alyssa M Yeager; Joseph D Lipman; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes.

Authors:  Brian R Burroughs; Brian Hallstrom; Gregory J Golladay; Daniel Hoeffel; William H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Akinobu Matsushita; Yasuharu Nakashima; Seiya Jingushi; Takuaki Yamamoto; Akio Kuraoka; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio.

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; Elizabeth A Lingard; Atul Malik; Russell Bowman; James P Holland
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Range of motion in a modular femoral stem system with a variety of neck options.

Authors:  Sanaz Hariri; Sungwook Chun; James B Cowan; Charles Bragdon; Henrik Malchau; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?

Authors:  Gianluca Cinotti; Niccolò Lucioli; Andrea Malagoli; Carlo Calderoli; Ferdinando Cassese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion.

Authors:  Adam Bunn; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mathematical formulae to calculate the theoretical range of motion of prosthetic hip implants with non-circular neck geometry.

Authors:  Peter Ellison
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.617

9.  Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Edward McPherson; Jeffrey D Jackson; Jill A Erickson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Jean Yves Lazennec; Frederic Khiami; Yves Catonné
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Femoral stem neck geometry determines hip range of motion shape : a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Aidin Eslam Pour; Jean Yves Lazennec; Kunj P Patel; Manan P Anjaria; Paul Edgar Beaulé; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.853

2.  Optimal combined anteversion range for obtaining a wider range of motion without prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a three-dimensional analysis study.

Authors:  Ryo Hidaka; Kenta Matsuda; Masaki Nakamura; Shigeru Nakamura; Hirotaka Kawano
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.