Literature DB >> 19285379

Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio.

Ajay Malviya1, Elizabeth A Lingard, Atul Malik, Russell Bowman, James P Holland.   

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the factors affecting range of flexion after hip resurfacing. A total of 82 cases, operated by a single surgeon, were assessed at a mean of 43 months. The Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis for the acetabular cup software was used to measure socket orientation. Range of flexion had a moderate positive correlation with cup anteversion (R = 0.26, P = .017), weak but significant negative correlation with neck diameter (R = -0.23, P = .042), and none with anterior femoral head-neck offset. Using multivariate analysis that adjusted for age, sex, cup anteversion and inclination, head-neck offset ratio, head-neck ratio, and neck diameter, the only significant correlate of flexion was cup anteversion (P = .017). Care should be taken during cup placement to allow adequate anteversion to be maintained in Birmingham hip resurfacing because this can affect flexion range of motion. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19285379     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Antti Paakkala; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Chi-Lung Chen; Sara Low; Wei-Ming Lin; Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu; Fabio R Orozco; Alvin C Ong; Zachary D Post
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-19

3.  Effects of design parameters of total hip components on the impingement angle and determination of the preferred liner skirt shape with an adequate oscillation angle.

Authors:  Hsiao-Che Lin; Wei-Min Chi; Ying-Jui Ho; Jian-Horng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  [Cement-free and cemented Excia hip shaft prosthesis: comparison of intermediate term results].

Authors:  C Urschel; M Döring; W Strecker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.

Authors:  Md Quamar Azam; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Sukesh Rao Sankineani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Kinematic radiography of the hip joint after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroki Kawashima; Yoshitomo Kajino; Tamon Kabata; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Shigeru Sanada; Katsuhiro Ichikawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-05-20

7.  Effects of ball head diameter and stem neck shape in range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A simulation study.

Authors:  Tsutomu Higashi; Nobuhiro Kaku; Shouhei Noda; Tomonori Tabata; Hiroaki Tagomori; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11

8.  Differences in hip morphology between the sexes in patients undergoing hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Henry D Atkinson; Karanjeev S Johal; Charles Willis-Owen; Steven Zadow; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Taper junction failure in large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings.

Authors:  D J Langton; R Sidaginamale; J K Lord; A V F Nargol; T J Joyce
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.