Literature DB >> 32017987

Contribution of Surveillance Colonoscopy to Colorectal Cancer Prevention.

Paul F Pinsky1, Robert E Schoen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The contribution of surveillance colonoscopy, as opposed to that of initial colonoscopy examination, to prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) is uncertain. We estimated the preventive effect of surveillance colonoscopy by applying the recently developed metric of adenoma dwell time avoided needed to prevent 1 CRC case (DTA).
METHODS: We followed subjects in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial who underwent colonoscopies following positive findings from sigmoidoscopies (colonoscopy cohort, n = 15,935) for CRC incidence for 10 years. The number and timing of adenomas removed during surveillance were measured in a subset (n = 3492) of patients and extrapolated to the entire cohort to estimate the total avoided adenoma dwell time. A previously determined DTA value of 612 dwell years was applied to estimate the number of CRC cases prevented by surveillance. Proportional reduction in CRC was computed as CP/(CO+CP), where CO and CP are observed and estimated prevented cases, respectively.
RESULTS: In the colonoscopy cohort of the PLCO, 2882 subjects had advanced adenomas (AAs), 572 had 3 or more non-advanced adenomas (NAA3+), 4496 had 1-2 non-advanced adenomas (NAA1-2), and 7985 had no adenoma (NA). The mean number of subsequent colonoscopy examinations over 10 years were 1.80 for subjects with AAs, 1.63 for subjects with NAA3+, and 1.46 for subjects with NAA1-2. Average years of avoided adenoma dwell time per subject were 4.0 for subjects with AAs, 5.5 for subjects with NAA3+, and 2.4 for subjects with NAA1-2. There were 56 cases of CRC in subjects with AAs, 4 cases of CRC in subjects with NAA3+, and 33 cases of CRC in subjects with NAA1-2. Estimated proportional reductions in CRC incidence were 25.0% in subjects with AAs (95% CI, 16%-34%), 34.4% in subjects with NAA1-2 (95% CI, 25%-40%), and 30.4% overall (in subjects with AAs, NAA3+, or NAA1-2; 95% CI, 25%-40%). Absolute CRC incidence reductions were 7.1 per 10,000 PY in subjects with AAs and 4.1 per 10,000 PY in subjects with NAA1-2.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the recently developed metric of DTA, we estimated that surveillance colonoscopy in the PLCO colonoscopy cohort during 10 years of follow up prevented 30% of CRC cases. Because the methodology for estimation is indirect, the true effect is uncertain.
Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon Cancer; Progression; Screening; Tumor Precursor

Year:  2020        PMID: 32017987      PMCID: PMC7549191          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  22 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Robert E Schoen; Paul F Pinsky; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Timothy Church; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Robert Bresalier; Gerald L Andriole; Saundra S Buys; E David Crawford; Mona N Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Christine C Johnson; Douglas J Reding; Barbara O'Brien; Danielle M Carrick; Patrick Wright; Thomas L Riley; Mark P Purdue; Grant Izmirlian; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony B Miller; John K Gohagan; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Association of Colonoscopy Adenoma Findings With Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence.

Authors:  Benjamin Click; Paul F Pinsky; Tom Hickey; Maryam Doroudi; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Baseline Colonoscopy Findings Associated With 10-Year Outcomes in a Screening Cohort Undergoing Colonoscopy Surveillance.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Brian A Sullivan; Elizabeth R Hauser; Xuejun Qin; Laura W Musselwhite; Meghan C O'Leary; Thomas S Redding; Ashton N Madison; A Jasmine Bullard; Reana Thomas; Kellie J Sims; Christina D Williams; Terry Hyslop; David Weiss; Samir Gupta; Ziad F Gellad; Douglas J Robertson; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Robert E Schoen; Joel L Weissfeld; Timothy Church; Lance A Yokochi; V Paul Doria-Rose; Philip Prorok
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Early detection versus primary prevention in the PLCO flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial: Which has the greatest impact on mortality?

Authors:  Maryam Doroudi; Robert E Schoen; Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Number of Adenomas Removed and Colorectal Cancers Prevented in Randomized Trials of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Magnus Loberg; Carlo Senore; Kate Wooldrage; Wendy Atkin; Michael Bretthauer; Amanda J Cross; Geir Hoff; Oyvind Holme; Mette Kalager; Nereo Segnan; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Jover; Michael Bretthauer; Evelien Dekker; Øyvind Holme; Michal F Kaminski; Magnus Løberg; Ann G Zauber; Miguel A Hernán; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Annike Sunde; Eleanor McFadden; Antoni Castells; Jaroslaw Regula; Enrique Quintero; Maria Pellisé; Carlo Senore; Mette Kalager; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Louise Emilsson; David F Ransohoff; Geir Hoff; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  The Path to Cancer --Three Strikes and You're Out.

Authors:  Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Prognostic and Molecular Landscape of Autophagy-Related Long Noncoding RNA in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  YuanLin Sun; XueYuan Cao; YuChen Guo; Bin Liu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Cross-Talk Between m6A- and m5C-Related lncRNAs to Construct a Novel Signature and Predict the Immune Landscape of Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Wei Song; Jun Ren; Rensheng Xiang; Wenzheng Yuan; Tao Fu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Impact of Community Referral on Colonoscopy Quality Metrics in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Authors:  Vincent Petros; Erin Tsambikos; Mohammad Madhoun; William M Tierney
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Detection and Yield of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Adults with PTEN Hamartoma Tumour Syndrome.

Authors:  Meggie M C M Drissen; Janet R Vos; Dorien T J van der Biessen-van Beek; Rachel S van der Post; Iris D Nagtegaal; Mariëtte C A van Kouwen; Tanya M Bisseling; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Aspects of colorectal cancer screening, methods, age and gender.

Authors:  R Hultcrantz
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 8.989

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.