Literature DB >> 18829395

The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination.

Paul F Pinsky1, Robert E Schoen, Joel L Weissfeld, Timothy Church, Lance A Yokochi, V Paul Doria-Rose, Philip Prorok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Surveillance colonoscopy is recommended for subjects with a history of adenomas but there is limited information on the yield of surveillance.
METHODS: A sample of subjects in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial with abnormal flexible sigmoidoscopy and follow-up colonoscopy were queried about subsequent surveillance colonoscopy over a 10-year period. Medical records were obtained to verify procedure dates and histologic findings. Subjects with advanced adenomas, nonadvanced adenoma, nonadenomatous polyps, and no polyps at baseline were included.
RESULTS: At the first surveillance, 10.5% had advanced adenoma and 37% had any adenoma in the advanced adenoma group (n = 1057), compared with rates of 6.8% and 32% (nonadvanced adenoma: n = 765), 4.9% and 22% (nonadenomatous polyps: n = 658), and 3.1% and 16% (no polyps: n = 127) (P < .0001, linear trend test). Mean (SD) time intervals (years) from baseline colonoscopy to first surveillance were 3.4 (2.0) for advanced adenoma, 4.3 (2.0) for nonadvanced adenoma, 4.5 (2.0) for nonadenomatous polyps, and 4.7 (2.0) for no polyps. There were no increasing (or decreasing) trends in the observed rate of advanced adenoma or any adenoma with time to the initial surveillance examination in any baseline group. Among subjects with a second surveillance examination, adenoma findings at both baseline and first surveillance influenced the rates of advanced adenoma and any adenoma at second surveillance.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with baseline advanced adenomas are more likely to have recurrent advanced adenomas at initial surveillance. The lack of association between recurrence rates and time to surveillance suggests limitations in our understanding of the biology of adenoma development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18829395     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  35 in total

1.  Probability of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence based on the results of two previous colonoscopies.

Authors:  Hye Won Park; Seungbong Han; Ji Young Lee; Hye-Sook Chang; Jaewon Choe; Yunsik Choi; Hoonsub So; Dong-Hoon Yang; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.

Authors:  Yinglong Huang; Wei Gong; Bingzhong Su; Fachao Zhi; Side Liu; Yang Bai; Bo Jiang
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Risk of Advanced Adenoma, Colorectal Cancer, and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in People With Low-Risk Adenomas at Baseline Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Catherine Dubé; Mafo Yakubu; Bronwen R McCurdy; Andrea Lischka; Anna Koné; Meghan J Walker; Leslea Peirson; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Contribution of Surveillance Colonoscopy to Colorectal Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Amy B Knudsen; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Prospective investigation of body mass index, colorectal adenoma, and colorectal cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Sonja I Berndt; Amy Berrington de González; Helen G Coleman; Robert E Schoen; Richard B Hayes; Wen-Yi Huang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert E Schoen; Anthony Razzak; Kelly J Yu; Sonja I Berndt; Kevin Firl; Thomas L Riley; Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Using the results of a baseline and a surveillance colonoscopy to predict recurrent adenomas with high-risk characteristics.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Carol A Burke; H Gilbert Welch; Robert W Haile; Robert S Sandler; E Robert Greenberg; Dennis J Ahnen; Robert S Bresalier; Richard I Rothstein; Bernard Cole; Leila A Mott; John A Baron
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Findings on serial surveillance colonoscopy in patients with low-risk polyps on initial colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jocelyne Miller; Neil Mehta; Michael Feldman; Emma Furth; Gregory G Ginsberg; Yu-Xiao Yang; James D Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 10.  The yin and yang of vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling in neoplastic progression: operational networks and tissue-specific growth control.

Authors:  F C Campbell; Haibo Xu; M El-Tanani; P Crowe; V Bingham
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 5.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.