Coupling coordination between environment, economy and tourism: A case study of China.

How to achieve the sustainable and coordinated development of the ecological environment, the economy and tourism has already received much attention. In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation index system of the ecological environment, the economy and tourism is established, and the coupling degrees and coordination degrees of the three subsystems of 31 provinces in China from 2003 to 2017 are calculated. The results show that the average coupling degree and average coordination degree have fluctuating upward trends during the period of 2003-2017. According to the spatial distribution of the coupling degrees and coordination degrees, the coastal provinces and Chongqing, with their high ecological environment pressure and good economic development, have low coupling and extremely high coordination levels. The vast central and western provinces with good ecological environment protection and economic backwardness have high coupling and low coordination development level. From the perspective of coordinated development, only seven of the western provinces and three middle-eastern provinces possess basic coordinated development of the ecological environment, the economy and tourism. The remaining 21 provinces are over-utilizing or sacrificing their ecological environments, among which eleven eastern provinces have an advanced economy or advanced tourism and five southwestern provinces with high tourism resource endowments have an advanced tourism.

1 Introduction

The rapid growth of China’s economy has led to serious environmental problems, and the deterioration of the ecological environment has further limited economic development [1-3]. With the continuous improvement of people’s living standards, tourism has become a fast-growing emerging industry, increasing from 0.49 trillion Yuan in 2003 to 5.40 trillion Yuan in 2017. The ecological environment provides the basic guarantee for the regional economy, and the environment is an important criterion for measuring the quality of a tourist area. The state of the ecological environment affects the tourism experience, and it also plays a role in limiting or boosting the speed and progress of tourism development [4]. In addition, changes in the ecological environment have strong counter-effects on tourism development, especially in terms of climate warming [5-6]. The impacts of economic and tourism development on the environment are both advantageous and disadvantageous. Rapid economic development and tourism development will have great negative effects on the environment, and at the same time, they may guide or accelerate the improvement of the quality of the ecological environment. How to coordinate the regional economy and tourism with ecological environment while vigorously developing the regional economy and tourism has become an important issue that needs to be studied and solved.

The relationship between ecology and economy has been the research hotspot of many scholars. Many theories and models have been proposed, such as environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) [7-9], coordinated development theory [10], economic-energy-environmental impact model [11], decoupling theory [12-14] and coupling model [15]. With the rapid development of tourism, some scholars have begun to explore the relationship between tourism, the environment and the economy, such as the relationship between tourism and ecological environment [16-23], the relationship between economic development and tourism [24-31], and interactive relationship between the environment, economy and tourism [32-36]. For example, Pang et al. found that the inbound tourism in eastern China has a significant impact on regional economic growth, and the growth of the inbound tourism in the eastern region is the Granger cause for the growth of its tertiary industry [25]. Petrosillo et al. [32] and Lacitignola et al. [33] constructed a model that reflects the relationship between environmental quality and economic society. Moreover, Wei et al. used mathematical concepts and tools to study the sustainable relationship between social ecosystems and regional tourism [34]. Wu et al. studied the causal relationship between international tourism revenue and economic growth in 11 provinces in eastern China [35]. Using a combination of several quantitative methods (including parameter analysis, fuzzy classification, regression analysis and gray correlation), Lu et al. evaluated the coordination development of the ecological environment, economic growth and the tourism industry at the provincial level and prefectural level of Gansu Province in China [36].

Coupling coordination theory can be used to describe the degree of interaction between two or more subsystems. The degree of coupling can describe the intensity of the interaction, while the degree of coordination reflects the intensity of cooperative development. The coupling coordination theory not only has the ability of comprehensive evaluation system, but also has intuitiveness and easy interpretation, therefore it has been widely used in empirical applications [37-46]. In recent years, some scholars have begun to study the coordination of ecological environment, the economy and the tourism industry using coupling coordination theory. For example, Yuan et al. applied a coordinated development model to study the coordination development of the regional environment, the economy and the tourism of western Hunan Province in China [47]. Zhou et al. measured the coupling degree of the economy, the ecological environment and the tourism industry for 11 provinces in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2002 to 2013 [48]. These studies illustrate the importance of the coupling and coordinated relationship of the ecological environment, the economy and the tourism industry. However, these studies are limited to a single province or a national region in static time and ignore spatial-temporal evolution analysis, or they consider the spatial-temporal evolution but the study area is limited to an economic region.

In this work, we attempt to explore the following two questions: 1) What is the coordination relationship between the ecological environment, the economic development level and the tourism industry on provincial scale? 2) What is the temporal and spatial evolution of this relationship? Therefore, we first established an index system of the ecological environment, economic development level and tourism industry, and then comprehensively evaluated the ecological environment, economic development level and tourism industry of 31 provinces in China from 2003 to 2017. Then a three-subsystem coupling coordination model is constructed. Finally, the spatial-temporal evolution analysis of the coordination relationship among three subsystems of 31 provinces in China is made.

2 Index systems and methods

2.1 Index systems

To explore the coupling relationship between the ecological environment, the economic development level and the tourism industry in China, we construct an aggregated index system to evaluate the ecological environmental, economic and tourism effects using previously developed indexes [49-50]. The indexes are primarily selected according to the following criteria [40, 51]: (1) they are the most cited indexes; (2) they cover the components of the ecological environment, economy and tourism; and (3) they have good representativeness, availability and integrity. According to the relevant literature [36, 39–41, 44, 47, 52–57] and the availability of the data, we select 27 basic-class indexes for the three subsystems (Table 1). Among the 27 basic-class indexes, except for the five indexes that reflect the pressure of the ecological environment (which are A21, A22, A23, A24 and A25) and are negative indexes (the smaller the better), the other indexes are all positive indicators (the larger the better). The sample period of this study is from 2003 to 2017, and the data are obtained from the China Statistical Yearbook, China Tourism Statistical Yearbook, China Environmental Statistical Yearbook and China Regional Economic Statistical Yearbook from 2004 to 2018. The data sources can be found in the Data Availability section and S1 File.

Table 1

Indexes of three subsystems.

Subsystem	First-class index	Weight	Basic-class index	Weight
A. Ecological environment	A1. Ecological environment endowment	0.7866	A11. Wetland area per capita (m2)	0.8190
			A12. Forest cover rate (%)	0.1230
			A13. Green areas per capita (m2)	0.0580
	A2. Ecological environment pressure	0.0479	A21. Discharged volume of industrial SO2 (tons)	0.1864
			A22. Discharge of smoke and dust (tons)	0.2226
			A23. Discharge of waste water (tons)	0.1898
			A24. Discharge of ammonia nitrogen from waste water per capita (tons)	0.1898
			A25. Discharge of COD emissions from waste water per capita (tons)	0.2114
	A3. Ecological environment response	0.1655	A31. Soil erosion control area per capita (m2)	0.5643
			A32. Investment of pollution treatment per capita (Yuan)	0.4357
B. Economic development level	B1. Economic level	0.2543	B11. Per capita GDP (Yuan)	0.5763
			B12. Fixed asset investment per capita (10000 Yuan)	0.4237
	B2. Industrial structure	0.2565	B21. Proportion of secondary industry (%)	0.2429
			B22. Proportion of tertiary industry (%)	0.7571
	B3. Foreign trade	0.4892	B31. Import and export as a share of GDP (%)	0.6728
			B32. Foreign direct investment as a share of GDP (%)	0.3272
C. Tourism industry	C1. Dependency on tourism income	0.1755	C11. Dependency on domestic tourism (%)	0.2826
			C12. Dependency on inbound tourism (%)	0.7174
	C2. Tourist reception scale	0.2462	C21. Domestic travel density (%)	0.3849
			C22. Inbound travel density (%)	0.6151
	C3. Benefits of tourism industry	0.2087	C31. Benefits of travel agencies (10000 Yuan per person)	0.5877
			C32. Benefits of star hotels (10000 Yuan per person)	0.4123
	C4. Benefits of tourism employment	0.2199	C41. Occupational share of travel agency (%)	0.5516
			C42. Occupational share of star hotel (%)	0.4484
	C5. Tourist behavior	0.1497	C51. Consumption of domestic tourism per capita (Yuan/day)	0.1649
			C52. Consumption of inbound tourism per capita (dollar/day)	0.3536
			C53. Average stay of inbound tourism (day)	0.4815

Regarding the indexes of the ecological environment [36, 39–41, 47, 52–56], we attribute the ten basic-class indexes to three first-class indexes: the resource endowment and pressure and response of ecological environment. "Green land, forestland and wetland" are the main carriers of ecological environment construction in China, and so we choose A11, A12 and A13 as the indexes of the ecological environment resource endowment. Pollutant emissions directly affect the quality of the ecological environment, while soil erosion control and pollution control affect the current situation of improving the ecological environment. Therefore, we choose five kinds of pollutant emissions to form an index system for ecological environmental pressure and choose the soil erosion control area and the industrial pollution control investments to reflect the response of an area to an improved ecological environment.

Concerning the indexes of the economic development level [36, 47, 52–54, 57], we attribute the six basic-class indexes to three first-class indexes: the economic level, the industrial structure and foreign trade. The most direct index of the economic level is per capita GDP. The industrial structure is also an important index of regional economic development. The higher the proportions of secondary industry and tertiary industry are, the higher the economic development level. In addition, foreign trade is also an important pillar driving regional economic development.

Concerning the indexes of the tourism industry [36, 44, 47, 55], we attribute the eleven basic-class indexes to five first-class indexes: the dependency on tourism income, the tourist reception scale, the benefits of tourism industry, the benefits of tourism employment and the tourist behavior. For example, the impact of tourists on the local social culture and ecological environment are obvious, but the extent and scope of these impacts are closely related to the density of tourists. The greater the density is, the greater the impact. Therefore, we use the ratio of the number of domestic tourists and the number of inbound tourists to the number of local residents to measure the scale of tourism reception. The industrial effects and employment benefits of travel agencies and star hotels are also important indicators for measuring the tourism industry. It should be noted that the statistics of tourism enterprises were mainly travel agencies, hotels and other statistics before 2009. In 2010, the statistics of tourism enterprises were divided into travel agencies, star hotels and tourist attractions. For the consistency of the time series, only travel agencies and star hotels were selected.

2.2 Data standardization

As seen from Table 1, the three subsystems considered in this study all contain multiple evaluation indexes. Since the units and magnitudes of each index are different, and each index has positive or negative effect on the system, these indexes cannot be directly used or compared. Therefore, it is necessary to standardize all indexes to eliminate the influence of units, magnitudes and types on subsystems. The standardized calculation formula that is adopted by this study is as follows: where x represents the sample value of the j-th index of the i-th research province at time t; J+ and J− represent the sets of positive and negative indexes, respectively; and respectively represent the minimum and maximum values of the given j-th index in all research provinces at time t. Obviously, the standardized is between 0 and 1. In addition, the research province here refers to 31 provinces in China, and the research period is from 2003 to 2017.

2.3 Comprehensive evaluation method

Before calculating the comprehensive evaluation values of the three subsystems, it is necessary to calculate the comprehensive evaluation values of the first-class indexes in each subsystem. Using the standardized data of the basic-class indexes and the appropriate weights, the comprehensive evaluation value of the first-class indexes can be calculated. It is very important to choose or set the weights when calculating the comprehensive values of the first-class indexes and that of the three subsystems. Due to the inevitable subjectivity of the subjective weighting method or expert weighting method, this paper adopts the entropy method as the objective weighting method to calculate the weight, which can avoid the defects of the subjective weighting method to some extent.

The comprehensive evaluation of the first-class indexes includes three steps: data standardization, weight calculation and comprehensive value calculation. The data standardization of the basic-class indexes is shown in section 2.2. The steps to obtain the weights of the basic-class indexes using the entropy method [39-40] are as follows: where S represents a set of basic-class indexes belonging to the given first-class index k, and p indicates the proportion of the basic-class index j that is subject to the first-class index k of the i-th province at time t. For example, for the ecological environment endowment, we should only consider three basic-class indexes: wetland area per capita, the forest cover rate and green areas per capita. e represents the information entropy of index j at time t. The constant δ is calculated by δ = 1/ln m and m is the number of samples. Then we have 0 ≤ e ≤ 1. w indicates the weight of index j at time t. The weight results of each basic-class index of the three subsystems from 2003 to 2017 can be found in the Data Availability section and S2 File. The column 5 of Table 1 give the average entropy weights of each basic-class index of the three subsystems.

After calculating the entropy weights of the basic-class indexes, the comprehensive evaluation values of each first-class index of the three subsystems are calculated as follows:

The comprehensive evaluation value of the three subsystems also includes three steps: data standardization, weight calculation, and comprehensive value calculation. Among them, the calculation steps and formulas of the data standardization and entropy weights are identical to those of the first-class indexes. The weight results of each first-class index of the three subsystems from 2003 to 2017 can be found in the Data Availability section and S2 File. The column 3 of Table 1 give the average entropy weight of each first-class index. The comprehensive evaluation formulas of the three subsystems are as follows. where, A = {A1, A2, A3}, B = {B1, B2, B3} and C = {C1, C2, C3, C4, C5} represent the sets of first-class indexes for the three subsystems, respectively. Uenvi,, Uecon, and U represent the comprehensive evaluation values of the ecological environment, the economic development level and the tourism industry subsystem of the i-th province at time t, respectively. and λ are the standardized evaluation value and the entropy weight of the first-class index k of the i-th province at time t, respectively.

2.4 Coupling coordination model

After calculating the comprehensive evaluation values of the three subsystems, we can calculate the comprehensive evaluation values of the whole system of 31 provinces in each period. The comprehensive evaluation value is also the comprehensive coordination index of the coupling coordination model, and the formula is as follows: where, , and are the standardized results of Uenvi,, Uecon, and U, respectively, and they satisfy wenvi, + wecon, + w = 1 and wenvi, + wecon, + w ≥ 0.

The above formula for calculating the comprehensive coordination index includes the determination of the weights wenvi,, wecon, and w. Some researchers believe that the importance of each subsystem is the same and thus set average weight; otherwise subjective weights are set (for example, the three weights can be set as 0.4, 0.4 and 0.2 respectively). We believe that average weights ignore the importance of different subsystems, and subjective weights make it difficult to compare the final results due to the subjectivity of the researchers or users. Therefore, the entropy method is adopted to calculate the weights of the three subsystems in each period. The weight results of the three subsystems in China from 2003 to 2017 can be found in the Data Availability section and S2 File. The average entropy weight of the tourism industry is approximately 0.2. The entropy weight of the economic development level fluctuates approximately 0.24, while that of the ecological environment fluctuates approximately 0.55. This shows that the importance of the three subsystems is not the same when considering the coupling and coordinated relationships of the whole system, especially when the role of the ecological environment in the whole system exceeds those of the economic development level and tourism industry.

The concept of the coupling degree comes from capacity coupling in physics, which refers to the dynamic relationship between subsystems that are interdependent and interact [40]. It reveals the phenomenon that multiple subsystems influence each other and even cooperate through various interactions. The mathematical formula of n subsystems, which describes the coupling degree, is as follows: where, U represents the comprehensive value of the i-th subsystem, and n represent the total number of subsystems. The larger that the value of the coupling degree C is, the better the coupling effect between subsystems is, and the more obvious the correlation effect is. It is not difficult to prove that the range of the coupling degree C(n > 2) that is mentioned above is within [0, 0.5] [54]. Therefore, for the case of the three subsystems considered in this paper, the specific form of the coupling degree calculation formula is as follows: where C represents the coupling degree of the i-th province at time t.

The coupling degree can reflect the strength of the interaction among subsystems, but it cannot reflect the overall coordination of large-scale systems. Therefore, the coordination index reflecting the comprehensive development level is introduced, and its calculation formula is as follows: where, D represent the coordination degree of the i-th province at time t.

After calculating the coupling and coordination degrees, the coupling level and coordination level can be divided into multiple categories according to their numerical value, and they are usually divided into four categories: low level, medium level, high level and extremely high level. Many scholars use subjective threshold values to classify the coupling level or coordination level. This method has two defects. One is that the decision-making basis of each decision-maker is different and the results are not comparable. In addition, when the calculated coupling or coordination degree shows an uneven distribution, the subjective division tends to cause classification anomalies or inaccuracies. This study does not quantitatively and subjectively divide the categories. Instead, it chooses the objective quartile method so that the coupling and coordination classifications are more objective. It also helps to divide the 31 provinces in China into four categories according to their coupling degrees and coordination degrees. In addition, this also satisfies the four categories of the coupling degree and coordination degree that were mentioned before.

3 Empirical results

3.1 Temporal characteristics of coupling and coordination degrees

After establishing the evaluation index system of the ecological environment-economic development level-tourism industry, the weights are calculated based on the entropy method. First, the comprehensive value of the first-class indexes is calculated by using the sample data of the basic-class indexes, and then the comprehensive values of the three subsystems are calculated by using the comprehensive value of the first-class indexes. Finally, the coupling degree and coordinating degree between the three subsystems are calculated according to the coupling degree formula and the coordination degree formula. Accordingly, the average values of the coupling and coordination degree of 31 provinces in China from 2003 to 2017 are analyzed. The final calculation results of coupling and coordination model from 2003 to 2017 are shown in S3 File.

As seen from Fig 1, the average coupling degree and coordination degree of the 31 provinces in China are between 0.858–0.883 and 0.286–0.324, respectively, both of which fluctuate upward and downward. In other words, as time passes, the interaction between the three subsystems increases, and the coordinated relationship improves. Other scholars have also conducted some related research. Zhou et al. analyzed the coordinated development of the Yangtze Economic Zone of China and the results showed that the coordination degree of the tourism-economy-ecological environment system experienced stable or fluctuant increases [52]. Jiang et al. analyzed the evolution of coordination degrees of the economy-resource-environment system and the results showed that the coupling degree and coordination degree of China have increased year by year in 2003–2014 [54]. Chen et al. analyzed the temporal and spatial evolution of the coupling coordination development of the tourism-ecological environment system and the results showed that the coupling degree and coordination degree steadily increased from 2007–2016 [55]. Those situations are basically consistent with the conclusions of this study.

Fig 1

Average values of the coupling and coordinating degree during 2003–2017.

With respect to the coupling degree, the coupling degree shows an upward trend over every five-year period of China. Because of the heavy snow in the south China in 2008 and the global financial crisis, the coupling degree in 2009 hit its obviously lowest point, which makes its interaction force poor.

With respect to coordination, during the tenth five-year plan period of China (2003–2005), the coordination effect of the three subsystems is not obvious, and the coordination value is the lowest. During the 11th and 12th five-year plan period (2006–2010 and 2011–2015, respectively), the coordination of the three subsystems continued to improve, reaching the highest coordination in 2013. Only in 2012 and 2015 did the coordination between the three subsystems hit a reduced turning point. During the 13th five-year plan period (2016–2017), the coordination of the three subsystems slows down, but it still shows an increasing trend.

3.2 Spatial distribution of coupling and coordination degrees

We calculate the coupling degree during the period from 2003–2017 and classify the coupling degree of each year according to the quartile method. The 31 provinces are classified into four types: namely, low level coupling, medium level coupling, high level coupling and extremely high level coupling. The first five figures in Fig 2 show the spatial distributions of the coupling degrees of the 31 provinces in the two years before and after the 10th, 11th, 12th and 13th five-year plan periods in China.

Fig 2

Coupling degree distribution of the 31 provinces in China at time 2003(a), 2005(b), 2010(c), 2015(d), 2017(e) and the average from 2003-2017(f).

It can be seen from Fig 2 that only Fujian Province changed from medium level coupling to extremely high coupling during the 10th five-year plan period (2003–2005), but Fujian Province changed from extremely high coupling to medium coupling during the 11th five-year plan period (2006–2010). During the 12th and 13th five-year plan periods (2011–2015 and 2016–2017, respectively), there are significant changes in the coupling levels of the two provinces. Shanxi and Henan fell from the extremely high level to medium level during the 12th five-year plan period. Shanxi and Shandong rose from medium level to extremely high level coupling during the 13th five-year plan period.

From the spatial distribution of the coupling degree in 2003, the four central and four western provinces, namely, Jilin, Jiangxi, Henan, Hunan, Guangxi, Sichuan, Shaanxi and Xinjiang have extremely high coupling degrees. In 2003, several provinces belong to the low coupling level of the comprehensive index of the three subsystems. Especially in Henan Province, the comprehensive evaluation index of the three subsystems was ranked the second from the bottom, while Jilin, Xinjiang and Jiangxi were ranked at the top. Most of the provinces with low coupling degrees are concentrated in Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Guangdong, which have good economic development and good tourism development but poor ecological environment. The provinces with low coupling degree also include Tibet, Guizhou, Yunnan and Qinghai, which have poor economic development or late tourism development.

From the spatial distribution of the coupling degree in 2017, extremely high coupling values are still concentrated in the four central provinces and two eastern provinces with poor economic development and poor ecological environment. The provinces with extremely high coupling also include two western provinces that have poor economies and slow tourism but better ecological environments. These provinces include Jilin, Jiangxi, Hubei, Shanxi, Shandong, Hebei, Ningxia and Xinjiang. The provinces with low coupling degrees are mainly distributed in the three eastern provinces with good economic development and rapid tourism development but poor ecological environments, and three western provinces with median economic and tourism development, specifically Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Guangdong, Chongqing, Tibet and Qinghai.

To understand the coordinated relationship between subsystems, further analysis of the coordination degree is needed. Therefore, we calculate the coordination degrees of the 31 provinces from 2003 to 2017 and classify the coordination degree of each year according to the quartile method. The 31 provinces are classified into four types: low level coordination, medium level coordination, high level coordination and extremely high level coordination.

The first five figures in Fig 3 show the spatial distributions of the coordination degree of 31 provinces in the two years before and after the 10th, 11th, 12th and 13th five-year plan period in China. It can be seen from Fig 3 that only Xinjiang’s coordination level has significantly changed from high level to low level coordination and from low level to high level coordination in the 11th and 12th five-year plan periods respectively. In addition, during the four five-year plan periods, the coordination level of 13 provinces increased slightly, while the coordination level of 13 provinces decreased slightly.

Fig 3

Coordination degree distribution of 31 provinces in China at time 2003(a), 2005(b), 2010(c), 2015(d), 2017(e) and the average from 2003-2017(f).

From the coordination levels in 2003 and 2017, the extremely high level coordinated provinces are mainly in Beijing, Tianjin and Guangdong, which have rapid economic and tourism development but poor ecological environment, and Tibet and Qinghai, which have poor economic and tourism development but very good ecological environment. In addition, Zhejiang and Hainan in 2003 and Shanghai and Fujian in 2017 all have extremely high level coordination. Hebei, Anhui, Henan, Hunan and Guizhou, all of which have poor economic, tourism and ecological environment development, have low level coordination both in 2003 and in 2017. Shanxi, Sichuan, and Gansu have low coordination levels in 2003, while Jilin, Jiangxi, and Guangxi have low coordination level in 2017.

The distribution of the coordination degree in each province is subject to the comprehensive evaluation indexes and weights of the three subsystems. For example, the economic development levels and tourism industries of Beijing and Tianjin rank among the top five in the country, while their ecological environments rank relatively low. These two provinces have extremely high levels of coordination both in 2003 and 2017. Qinghai is a typical province with backward economic and tourism development but an excellent ecological environment. As the entropy weight of the ecological environment subsystem is approximately 0.55, Qinghai is also a province with extremely high coordination levels in 2003 and 2017.

From the last figures of Figs 2 and 3, we can see that the average coupling and coordination degrees of Guizhou, Gansu and Yunnan are relatively low, while the average coupling and coordination degrees of Heilongjiang and Shandong are relatively high. The coastal provinces, such as Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Fujian and Chongqing, with developed economies and high ecological environment pressure have relatively low level coupling but extremely high level coordination. Many provinces of central and western China with good ecological environment protection and economic backwardness have high level coupling and low level coordination. This is because a developed economy can promote the coordination level in economically developed provinces to a certain extent, but the scarcity of natural resource endowments, large number of inhabitants and large pollutant emissions cause the ecological environment to deteriorate, resulting in low level coupling. The underdeveloped economies decrease the coordination levels of central and western China, but the high natural resource endowments and the lower pollutant emissions lead to high scores for the ecological environment, which ultimately increases the coupling degree in these provinces. Other scholars also conducted some relevant studies. A representative example is Zhou’s researches. The coordination degree reached a high level to the east and a low level to the west of the Yangtze River Economic Zone [52], and the coordination degrees in the coastal provinces exceed those in the western and central provinces of China [53]. This corresponds with the results of this study.

3.3 Analysis of development type

Since the ecological environment has a great impact on economic development and tourism development, and the weight of the ecological environment exceeds the weights of the economy and tourism, most provinces in China have high level coupling but low level coordination or low level coupling but high level coordination. To further understand the reasons for the strong interaction but poor coordination or weak interaction but strong coordination among the three subsystems, the 31 provinces in China are further classified and analyzed.

From the perspective of ecological environment development, the economic development level and the tourism industry, the average comprehensive evaluation values of the three subsystems of the 31 provinces in China are compared, and the development of the 31 provinces can be classified into four basic types: (1) an advanced economy type with basic coordination between the economy, tourism and ecological environment; (2) an advanced tourism type with basic coordination between the economy, tourism and the ecological environment; (3) an advanced economy type with economic and tourism development beyond the bearing capacity of the ecological environment; and (4) an advanced tourism type with economic and tourism development beyond the bearing capacity of the ecological environment. In Fig 4, these four types are represented by advanced economy and basic coordination, advanced tourism and basic coordination, advanced economy but exceed ecological capacity and advanced tourism but exceed ecological capacity, respectively.

Fig 4

Development type of the 31 provinces in China.

It can be seen from Fig 4 that the provinces where the development of the ecological environment, economy and tourism system are basically coordinated are distributed in seven western provinces and three central provinces. Among them, Inner Mongolia, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Jilin and Jiangxi are in extensive economic development modes with imperfect tourism facilities and low tourism dependence. It is necessary to make full use of the good ecological environment and develop characteristic tourism products to accelerate tourism development. Heilongjiang, Tibet, Xinjiang and Shanxi should make full use of their frontier advantages and unique tourism resources, integrate their primary, secondary and tertiary industries and local culture, and give full play to the driving role of tourism.

The remaining 21 provinces in China are in states of development that sacrifice or over-utilize the ecological environment. Among them, eight of the eleven eastern provinces rely on the excessive consumption of ecological resources for economic development, and four of the five southwestern provinces over-use tourism resources, resulting in serious overloads of their ecological environments. The results of Zhou et al. show that the eastern coastal provinces have economic and tourism advantages, but their ecological environments are poorly protected. Although the economically weak western provinces have good ecological environment protection, their tourism is relatively backwards [53]. It is basically consistent with the results of this study.

4 Conclusions and policy recommendations

This study establishes a comprehensive evaluation index system of the ecological environments, the economic development levels and the tourism industries of 31 provinces in China. The entropy method is used to calculate the weights, and the coupling coordination model is used to analyze the coupling and coordinated relationships of the three subsystems of 31 provinces.

From the perspective of the provincial coupling degrees at the beginning and the end of the study periods, the changes in the coupling degrees in most provinces is not obvious. The high coupling provinces are mainly in the central and western provinces where the economic and tourism development are backward or the ecological environment is poor. The low coupling provinces are mainly distributed in the eastern and western provinces where the economic development is rapid and the tourism industry is good while the ecological environment is poor.

From the perspective of the provincial coordination degrees at the beginning and the end of the study period, Beijing, Tianjin, and Guangdong, which have good economic development and rapid tourism development but poor ecological environments, have extremely high level coordination. Tibet and Qinghai, which have backward or poor economic and tourism development but very good ecological environments, also have extremely high level coordination. Hebei, Anhui, Henan, Hunan and Guizhou provinces with poor economic, tourism and ecological environment development are all low level coordination provinces.

From the perspective of the average coupling and coordination degrees, the average coupling and coordination degrees of Guizhou, Gansu and Yunnan are relatively low, while those of Heilongjiang and Shandong are extremely high. Chongqing and the coastal provinces with high ecological environment pressure but good economic development have low coupling degree and extremely high coordination degrees. The vast central and western provinces with good ecological environment protection and economic backwardness have high coupling degrees and low coordination degrees.

According to the comprehensive evaluation index of the subsystems, the economies and tourism industries of all eleven eastern provinces exceeded the carrying threshold of the ecological environment. Five eastern provinces and five southwestern provinces are over-reliant on the ecological environment for tourism development, resulting in the economic and tourism development exceeding the threshold of the ecological environment. The economic and tourism development in most western provinces and a few central provinces are basically coordinated with the ecological environments.

At the national level, we need to focus on promoting the development of high-quality tourism in the central and western provinces of China. For example, in Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, Heilongjiang and Xinjiang, where the economy, tourism and ecological environment are basically in harmony with the backward development of tourism. We should make full use of the high-quality tourism resources and good ecological environment to further improve the tourism infrastructure and the tourism reception capacity. Xinjiang should build the core area of the Silk Road, Ningxia should build a good inland open economic pilot area, Heilongjiang should develop border tourism and international tourism by speeding up the improvement of railway corridors and regional railway network to Russia. Five southwestern provinces should make good use of high-endowment tourism resources and develop excellent tourism resource products while protecting the ecological environment. Chongqing should develop an important support model for the western provinces of China. Guangxi should make good use of the opportunity of the Belt and Road Initiative and develop the economic and tourism cooperation with the southwest and central and southern provinces. Yunnan should make good use of the new plateau of Greater Mekong Subregional Economic Cooperation and built the radiation center of South Asia and Southeast Asia. Eleven eastern provinces are developing rapidly in economy and tourism. We should pay more attention to protecting the ecological environment and developing high-quality tourism products.

Origin data of three subsystems of 31 provinces in China from 2003 to 2017.

(RAR)

Click here for additional data file.

All weight results calculated by entropy method.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

The final calculation results of coupling and coordination model.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

14 Oct 2019

PONE-D-19-27598

Coupling coordination analysis of environment, economy and tourism：A case study of China

PLOS ONE

Dear Pro. wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Nov 28 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Bing Xue, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Our editorial staff has assessed your submission, and we have concerns about the grammar, usage, and overall readability of the manuscript.  We therefore request that you revise the text to fix the grammatical errors and improve the overall readability of the text before we send it for review. We suggest you have a fluent, preferably native, English-language speaker thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar.

If you do not know anyone who can do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) and enter referral code PLOS15 for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services. If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

•    The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

•    A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

•    A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

Please note that PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts and that one of our criteria for publication is that articles must be presented in an intelligible fashion and written in clear, correct, and unambiguous English (http://www.plosone.org/static/publication#language). If the language is not sufficiently improved, we may have no choice but to reject the manuscript without review.

3. We note that  Figure(s) 3,4,& 5 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a) You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [#] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b)  If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

4.  Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

This is an interesting paper, however, some major revisions are required before it was considered for going to external review.

1. I think that the authors have not adequately described their analysis in this original manuscript, for example, how the authors obtained datasets, any parameters used, and please keep in mind that, if any existing datasets were used for testing, it should have enough details for another researcher to reproduce the findings. A data-source should be presented in the context or as a supp. file.

2. References are not sufficient. At least, please add some relevant references in the first Paragraph of the introduction section. And a literature review is suggested to be added.

3. The language should be improved.

4. Policy implications should be considered as a solid section before the conclusions.

5. Please try your best to concentrate your findings from the modelling analysis, and add some discussions by such as comparative analysis with the external outcomes from other scholars.

6. I'd like to see the revision.

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

16 Nov 2019

Q1. I think that the authors have not adequately described their analysis in this original manuscript, for example, how the authors obtained datasets, any parameters used, and please keep in mind that, if any existing datasets were used for testing, it should have enough details for another researcher to reproduce the findings. A data-source should be presented in the context or as a supp. file.

Answer: We made a detailed description of the selection of data sources and indicators in the revised version, and added the datasets as an attachment to the revised version.

Q2. References are not sufficient. At least, please add some relevant references in the first Paragraph of the introduction section. And a literature review is suggested to be added.

Answer: We have added references and literature reviews to the introduction.

Q3. The language should be improved.

Answer: We have employed the AJE (http://learn.aje.com) to thoroughly copyedit this manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar.

Q4. Policy implications should be considered as a solid section before the conclusions.

Answer: We rewrote the policy recommendations and placed them separately in Section 3.4.

Q5. Please try your best to concentrate your findings from the modelling analysis, and add some discussions by such as comparative analysis with the external outcomes from other scholars.

Answer: We have added some comparative discussions with other literature results in the empirical analysis section.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

18 Dec 2019

PONE-D-19-27598R1

Coupling coordination between environment, economy and tourism：A case study of China

PLOS ONE

Dear Pro. wang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Feb 01 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Bing Xue, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This paper used a comprehensive evaluation index system to evaluate ecological environment, economy and tourism subsystems and then applied coupling degrees and coordination degrees to calculate the relationships between them. Overall, the topic of this research is interesting and draws readers great attention. However, it still suffers little drawbacks. I would like to offer my concerns, which I hope can help to improve the quality of the paper. They are as follows.

1. The introduction part is not sufficient. Especially, the contribution is unclear enough. Hence, the authors should rewrite it.

2. Table 1 needs to be improved. For Table 2,3, and 4, the authors had better convert them to figures in a bid to improve the readability.

3. Policy recommendations should be moved to the end. Besides, it should be rewritten based on the conclusions.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript adopted a coupling coordination model to analyze the relationship between ecological environment, economy and tourism in China’s provinces during 2003-2017. However, it could not be published in its current form.

First, the research contributions are not clear. A potential innovation in this manuscript is its consideration of using coupling model to analysis the relationship between environment, economy and tourism within China. previous papers have included this development and its application in understanding China’s coordination development between economy and tourism and environment. If there is no innovation in the method, what is your most important contribution?

Second, you can refer to some more professional research to standardize the expression, for instance, coupling coordination degree or coordination degree? Tourism is an integral part of the economy, thus, Is it feasible to use “coupling” to describe the relationship between tourism industry and economy.

Third, the manuscript contains statements that are too hard to understand. It's almost like the author(s) had run out of steam at this stage and as the reader, I must say that I felt relieved to have completed the marathon! Specific comments with regard to grammar, flow and basic expression are too numerous to mention. Assistance with writing skills and grammar is needed through an independent third party - someone who knows little about the technical content but can assist with these shortcomings. The paper falls short of being a professionally written management article.

Four, It needs a major rewrite and rethink to eliminate redundant material and unrelated debate and discussion. For example, the sentence in lines 28-30, page 1; the last sentence in 3.4, page 15, etc.

The results are not clearly presented, for example, especial spatial distribution pattern of coupling coordination development for the 31 provinces.

Some technical erros: “they have good representativeness, understanding, availability, integrity and dissemination”(lines 3-4, page 4), pay attention to “understanding”

“are negative indexes (the larger the better), the other indexes are all positive indicators (the smaller the better)”((lines 3-4, page 4), for positive indicators, It should be “the larger the better”

Section 3.4 contains statements that are just far too basic and obvious. Policy recommendations are not targeted, they should be given on the basis of your results specifically.

Reviewer #3: The paper under review studies coordinated development of the ecological environment, the economy and tourism of China from 2003 to 2017. It constructs the comprehensive evaluation index system and uses the coupling coordination model to study the coupling and development of the three subsystems.

1. Line 7 of the first Paragraph in Section 1: “The impact and pressure of this extensive economic development has (should be have) led to…”. There exists an inappropriate tense.

2. Line 1 of the second Paragraph in Section 1: “…, much literature has studied the interaction …”. There exists an inappropriate tense.

3. Lines 1, 2 & 3 of the last Paragraph in Section 1: “…, whether the ecological environment can be coordinated with economic and tourism development has become a problem that many scholars and government departments need to study.”. The narrative here should be improved.

4. The first Section of the paper does not significantly explain what contributions it has made. It is suggested that the main contributions of the paper be listed in the last Paragraph of Section 1.

5. The entropy weighting results of the three subsystems in Section 2.4 are not the focus of the paper. It is recommended to replace Table 1 with a concise language narrative.

6. The results in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 are relatively thorough, but the results expressed in tabular form are worse than the graphical representation. It is recommended to replace Tables 2, 3 and 4 with the corresponding graphical representation.

7. The conclusions of Section 4 are too much and too long. It is recommended to reduce the length and express the main conclusions of the paper in a clear and concise language.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Submitted filename: Comments to PONE-D-19-27598_R1.docx

Click here for additional data file.

8 Jan 2020

Dear Reviewers:

Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript entitled “ Coupling coordination between environment, economy and tourism：A case study of China” (No.: PONE-D-19-27598R1). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as follows.

Responds to the reviewer’s comments:

Reviewer #1:

1.The introduction part is not sufficient. Especially, the contribution is unclear enough. Hence, the authors should rewrite it.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have rewritten the introduction in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 27-85).

2.Table 1 needs to be improved. For Table 2,3, and 4, the authors had better convert them to figures in a bid to improve the readability.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have improved the Table 1 in the ‘Manuscript’. The Table 2, 3, and 4 have been converted to the Figure 2, 3, and 4 in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 286-288, 345-347, 401-402).

3. Policy recommendations should be moved to the end. Besides, it should be rewritten based on the conclusions.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have rewritten the policy recommendations based on the conclusions and moved the policy recommendations to the end in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 435-451).

Reviewer #2:

1. the research contributions are not clear. A potential innovation in this manuscript is its consideration of using coupling model to analysis the relationship between environment, economy and tourism within China. previous papers have included this development and its application in understanding China’s coordination development between economy and tourism and environment. If there is no innovation in the method, what is your most important contribution?

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We are sorry that the innovations of the paper was not clear in the original manuscript. The innovations of the paper includes two parts:1)Previous studies mainly focused on single province in China, the studies based on large scale are lack; 2)there are fewer studies to analyze the spatial changes of China’s coordination development between environment and economy and tourism, and the paper makes up for this gap (Lines 72-85).

2. you can refer to some more professional research to standardize the expression, for instance, coupling coordination degree or coordination degree? Tourism is an integral part of the economy, thus, Is it feasible to use “coupling” to describe the relationship between tourism industry and economy.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We refer to the references by Sheng et al.(2009), Yuan et al.(2014) and Zhou et al.(2016a, 2016b, 2016c), all of which use coupling coordination to study the relationship between tourism industry and the economy. We believe that it is feasible to use “coupling coordination” to describe the relationship between tourism industry and economy.

These references are as follows:

[1] Sheng Y C, Zhong Z P. Study on the Coupling Coordinative Degree between Tourism Industry and Regional Economy: A Case Study of Hunan Province. Tourism Tribune. 2009; 24(8): 23-29.

[2] Yuan Y, Jin M, Ren J, Hu M, Ren P. The dynamic coordinated development of a regional environment-tourism-economy system: A case study from western Hunan province, China. Sustainability. 2014; 6(8): 5231-5251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6085231

[3] Zhou C, Feng X G, Tang R. Analysis and forecast of coupling coordination development among the regional economy-ecological environment-tourism industry: A case study of provinces along the Yangtze economic zone. Economic Geography. 2016a; 36: 186-193.

[4] Zhou C, Feng X G, Tang R. Analysis and forecast of coupling coordination development among the regional economy-ecological environment-tourism industry - A case study of provinces along the Yangtze Economic Zone. Economic Geography. 2016b; 36(3): 186–193.

[5] Zhou C, Jin C, Zhao B, Zhang F. The provincial difference of coupling coordinative development of regional economy-ecology-tourism. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment. 2016c; 30(7):203-208.

3. the manuscript contains statements that are too hard to understand. It's almost like the author(s) had run out of steam at this stage and as the reader, I must say that I felt relieved to have completed the marathon! Specific comments with regard to grammar, flow and basic expression are too numerous to mention. Assistance with writing skills and grammar is needed through an independent third party - someone who knows little about the technical content but can assist with these shortcomings. The paper falls short of being a professionally written management article.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. This manuscript has been revised in the English format. Before we submitted the original manuscript, Dr. Yan Dan has helped us revise the English format. She received her doctorate degree from Wageningen University, and her English level reached the native language level. Before we submitted the manuscript, we employed American Journal Experts (AJE) to revise the English format. The editing certificate is as follows.

4. It needs a major rewrite and rethink to eliminate redundant material and unrelated debate and discussion. For example, the sentence in lines 28-30, page 1; the last sentence in 3.4, page 15, etc.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have rewritten the introduction in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 27-85). And we have rewritten the policy recommendations based on the conclusions and moved the policy recommendations to the end in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 435-451).

5.The results are not clearly presented, for example, especial spatial distribution pattern of coupling coordination development for the 31 provinces.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have converted The Table 2,3, and 4 to the Figure 2,3, and 4 in the ‘Manuscript’(Lines 286-288, 345-347, 401-402) and analyzed the spatial distribution pattern of coupling coordination development for the 31 provinces.

6.Some technical erros: “they have good representativeness, understanding, availability, integrity and dissemination”(lines 3-4, page 4), pay attention to “understanding” “are negative indexes (the larger the better), the other indexes are all positive indicators (the smaller the better)”((lines 3-4, page 4), for positive indicators, It should be “the larger the better”

Response: Thank you very much for reviewers’ suggestions. We have corrected the sentence in the ‘manuscript’ (Lines 97 & 98).

7.Section 3.4 contains statements that are just far too basic and obvious. Policy recommendations are not targeted, they should be given on the basis of your results specifically.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have rewritten the policy recommendations based on the conclusions and moved the policy recommendations to the end in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 435-451).

Reviewer #3:

1.Line 7 of the first Paragraph in Section 1: “The impact and pressure of this extensive economic development has (should be have) led to…”. There exists an inappropriate tense.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have rewritten the introduction in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 27-85).

2.Line 1 of the second Paragraph in Section 1: “…, much literature has studied the interaction …”. There exists an inappropriate tense.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have corrected the sentence in the ‘manuscript’ (Lines 46-47).

3. Lines 1, 2 & 3 of the last Paragraph in Section 1: “…, whether the ecological environment can be coordinated with economic and tourism development has become a problem that many scholars and government departments need to study.”. The narrative here should be improved.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have rewritten the introduction in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 27-85).

4. The first Section of the paper does not significantly explain what contributions it has made. It is suggested that the main contributions of the paper be listed in the last Paragraph of Section 1.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We are sorry that the main contributions of the paper have not been clearly expressed the main contributions in the original manuscript. The innovations of the paper includes two parts:1)Previous studies mainly focused on single province in China, the studies based on large scale are lack; 2)there are fewer studies to analyze the spatial changes of China’s coordination development between environment and economy and tourism, and the paper makes up for this gap (Lines 72-85).

5. The entropy weighting results of the three subsystems in Section 2.4 are not the focus of the paper. It is recommended to replace Table 1 with a concise language narrative.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have revised the Section 2.4 and replaced Table 1 with a concise language narrative (Lines 205-207).

6. The results in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 are relatively thorough, but the results expressed in tabular form are worse than the graphical representation. It is recommended to replace Tables 2, 3 and 4 with the corresponding graphical representation.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have converted The Table 2,3, and 4 to the Figure 2,3, and 4 in the ‘Manuscript’(Lines 286-288, 345-347, 401-402) and analyzed the spatial distribution pattern of coupling coordination development for the 31 provinces.

7. The conclusions of Section 4 are too much and too long. It is recommended to reduce the length and express the main conclusions of the paper in a clear and concise language.

Response: Thanks for your suggestions. We have revised the ‘Conclusion and policy recommendations’ in the ‘Manuscript’ (Lines 404-451).

At last, we tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. We really appreciate it that Reviewers help up improve the quality of the research, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Yours Sincerely

Zhizhu Lai and Zheng Wang

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

15 Jan 2020

Coupling coordination between environment, economy and tourism：A case study of China

PONE-D-19-27598R2

Dear Dr. wang,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Bing Xue, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation index system of the ecological environment, the economy and tourism is established, and the coupling degrees and coordination degrees of the three subsystems of 31 provinces in China from 2003 to 2017 are calculated. Overall, the authors have made further improvements accordingly, and I recommend its publication.

Reviewer #3: Thank you for the revisions on the manuscript. I appreciate the thoughtful responses to the reviewers’ comments. In particular, the replacement of tables with graphics makes the manuscript better, and the revised introduction and policy recommendations are more reasonable. Therefore, I suggest that this manuscript be accepted without further modification.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

23 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-27598R2

Coupling coordination between environment, economy and tourism: A case study of China

Dear Dr. wang:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Bing Xue

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE