| Literature DB >> 35213663 |
Ruhe Xie1, Hong Huang1, Yuan Zhang1,2, Peiyun Yu3.
Abstract
This paper builds an evaluation index system, uses the entropy weight method (EWM) to decide the weights and, based on the coupling coordination degree model (CCDM), it systematically studies the coupling relationship between Chinese cold chain logistics and the Chinese economy from 2010 to 2019. It performs a grey relational analysis (GRE) to explore the main factors influencing the coordinated development of the two. The results show that the coupling coordination degree between the two presents a steady upward trend, and their coupling relationship has been upgraded from 'coordination' to 'good coordination'. They also indicate that the added value in the tertiary industry, the per capita gross domestic product (GDP), and household consumption levels are the main factors affecting the development of cold chain logistics, while the per capita cold storage capacity, the turnover of road cold chain freight, and the volume of human-power employed in cold chain logistics are the main factors affecting economic development. This study makes suggestions to support the coordinated development of cold chain logistics and economy, and provides a scientific basis for further research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35213663 PMCID: PMC8880921 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Evaluation index system for cold chain logistics and economic development.
| System | Dimension | Indicator | Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic development | Economic growth level | The per capita GDP (Yuan) | Y1 |
| Total investment in fixed assets (billion Yuan) | Y2 | ||
| The added value in the tertiary industry (billion Yuan) | Y3 | ||
| The per capita retail sales of consumer goods (Yuan) | Y4 | ||
| Foreign trade level | The ratio of total import and export trade to GDP (%) | Y5 | |
| The ratio of direct foreign investment to GDP (%) | Y6 | ||
| Living standards | The per capita main food consumption (Kg) | Y7 | |
| The per capita disposable income gap (Yuan) | Y8 | ||
| The number of Employees (ten thousand) | Y9 | ||
| Household consumption levels (Yuan) | Y10 | ||
| Cold chain logistics | Cold chain logistics development benefits | The ratio of cold chain road transportation revenue to total sector revenue (%) | X1 |
| The ratio of combined revenues of the top 100 cold chain enterprises to total sector revenue (%) | X2 | ||
| Cold chain logistics development and operational capacity | Total value of food transported (billion Yuan) | X3 | |
| The growth rate of cold chain freight transported via road networks (%) | X4 | ||
| The turnover of road cold chain freight (million tons/km) | X5 | ||
| Food cold chain logistics demand (ten thousand tons) | X6 | ||
| Cold chain logistics development foundation | The volume of human-power employed in cold chain logistics (ten thousand) | X7 | |
| The growth rate of expenditure of urban cold chain logistics (%) | X8 | ||
| The per capita cold storage capacity (m3/person) | X9 | ||
| The growth rate of the overall number of refrigerated vehicles (%) | X10 |
Coupling stages and judgment criteria.
| Coupling effect | Low level coupling stage | Antagonistic stage | Fitting in stage | High level coupling stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coupling degree | [0,0.3] | [0.3,0.5] | [0.5,0.8] | [0.8,1] |
Coupling coordination grade and criterion.
| Coordination grade | Coordination degree | Coordination grade | Coordination degree |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extreme imbalance | [0,0.1] | Coordination | [0.5,0.6] |
| Serious imbalance | [0.1,0.2] | Basic coordination | [0.6,0.7] |
| Moderate imbalance | [0.2,0.3] | Moderate coordination | [0.7,0.8] |
| Mild imbalance | [0.3,0.4] | Good coordination | [0.8,0.9] |
| Imbalance | [0.4,0.5] | High quality coordination | [0.9,1] |
Coupling strength and discrimination criteria.
| Coupling effect | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Extremely strong |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation degree | [0,0.35] | [0.35,0.65] | [0.65,0.85] | [0.85,0.1] |
Index weight for cold chain logistics and economy.
| System | Dimension | Indicator | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic development | Economic growth level | The per capita GDP (Yuan) | 9.15 |
| Total investment in fixed assets (billion Yuan) | 8.17 | ||
| The added value in the tertiary industry (billion Yuan) | 10.49 | ||
| The per capita retail sales of consumer goods (Yuan) | 9.42 | ||
| Foreign trade level | The ratio of total import and export trade to GDP (%) | 14.58 | |
| The ratio of direct foreign investment to GDP (%) | 14.13 | ||
| Living standards | The per capita main food consumption (Kg) | 8.84 | |
| The per capita disposable income gap (Yuan) | 8.49 | ||
| The number of Employees (ten thousand) | 7.01 | ||
| Household consumption levels (Yuan) | 9.72 | ||
| Cold chain logistics | Cold chain logistics development benefits | The ratio of cold chain road transportation revenue to total sector revenue (%) | 4.07 |
| The ratio of combined revenues of the top 100 cold chain enterprises to total sector revenue (%) | 13.53 | ||
| Cold chain logistics development and operational capacity | Total value of food transported (billion Yuan) | 10.60 | |
| The growth rate of cold chain freight transported via road networks (%) | 14.03 | ||
| The turnover of road cold chain freight (million tons/km) | 9.49 | ||
| Food cold chain logistics demand (ten thousand tons) | 14.86 | ||
| Cold chain logistics development foundation | The volume of human-power employed in cold chain logistics (ten thousand) | 9.97 | |
| The growth rate of expenditure of urban cold chain logistics (%) | 8.34 | ||
| The per capita cold storage capacity (m3/person) | 7.37 | ||
| The growth rate of the overall number of refrigerated vehicles (%) | 7.76 |
Evaluation results for coupling relationship between cold chain logistics and economy.
| Year | Cold chain logistics comprehensive development index | Economic comprehensive development index | Coupling degree | Coupling stages | Coupling coordination degree | Coupling coordination grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0.2033 | 0.3904 | 0.9490 | High level coupling stage | 0.5307 | Coordination |
| 2011 | 0.2881 | 0.3964 | 0.9874 | High level coupling stage | 0.5813 | Coordination |
| 2012 | 0.2405 | 0.3708 | 0.9770 | High level coupling stage | 0.5465 | Coordination |
| 2013 | 0.3642 | 0.4744 | 0.9913 | High level coupling stage | 0.6447 | Basic coordination |
| 2014 | 0.4205 | 0.4840 | 0.9975 | High level coupling stage | 0.6717 | Basic coordination |
| 2015 | 0.4011 | 0.4834 | 0.9957 | High level coupling stage | 0.6636 | Basic coordination |
| 2016 | 0.3481 | 0.5304 | 0.9782 | High level coupling stage | 0.6555 | Basic coordination |
| 2017 | 0.3969 | 0.5582 | 0.9856 | High level coupling stage | 0.6861 | Basic coordination |
| 2018 | 0.5075 | 0.5689 | 0.9984 | High level coupling stage | 0.7330 | Moderate coordination |
| 2019 | 0.7186 | 0.5954 | 0.9956 | High level coupling stage | 0.8088 | Good coordination |
Fig 1Trend in coupling relationship from 2010 to 2019.
Matrix for the coupling effect of cold chain logistics and economy.
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | Avg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.6743 | 0.7236 | 0.8299 | 0.4868 | 0.8961 | 0.7735 | 0.8847 | 0.5657 | 0.9400 | 0.5479 | 0.7322 |
|
| 0.7968 | 0.6165 | 0.6863 | 0.5342 | 0.7268 | 0.6491 | 0.7219 | 0.5197 | 0.7881 | 0.5347 | 0.6574 |
|
| 0.6554 | 0.7511 | 0.8614 | 0.4765 | 0.9326 | 0.7998 | 0.9162 | 0.5516 | 0.9496 | 0.5392 | 0.7433 |
|
| 0.7136 | 0.7020 | 0.7869 | 0.4937 | 0.8387 | 0.7390 | 0.8461 | 0.5312 | 0.9234 | 0.5270 | 0.7102 |
|
| 0.4733 | 0.5976 | 0.4895 | 0.8043 | 0.4743 | 0.5015 | 0.4680 | 0.7903 | 0.4799 | 0.7054 | 0.5784 |
|
| 0.4637 | 0.6575 | 0.5870 | 0.6930 | 0.5585 | 0.5880 | 0.5346 | 0.7851 | 0.5343 | 0.7252 | 0.6127 |
|
| 0.7174 | 0.6310 | 0.7301 | 0.5640 | 0.7484 | 0.7157 | 0.7944 | 0.5113 | 0.776 | 0.5786 | 0.6767 |
|
| 0.5188 | 0.5497 | 0.5275 | 0.7721 | 0.5198 | 0.5166 | 0.5260 | 0.7780 | 0.5362 | 0.6627 | 0.5907 |
|
| 0.8078 | 0.5860 | 0.6444 | 0.5351 | 0.6757 | 0.6156 | 0.6690 | 0.5099 | 0.7209 | 0.5563 | 0.6321 |
|
| 0.6815 | 0.7269 | 0.8254 | 0.4812 | 0.8880 | 0.7697 | 0.8938 | 0.5538 | 0.9570 | 0.5368 | 0.7314 |
|
| 0.6503 | 0.6542 | 0.6968 | 0.5841 | 0.7259 | 0.6669 | 0.7255 | 0.6097 | 0.7605 | 0.5914 | 0.6665 |