Literature DB >> 32016780

Retention of Somatic Memory Associated with Cell Identity, Age and Metabolism in Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells Reprogramming.

Tze Sean Khoo1, Rahman Jamal1, Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani2, Hafiza Alauddin3, Noor Hamidah Hussin3, Nor Azian Abdul Murad4.   

Abstract

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells in 2006 marked a major breakthrough in regenerative medicine, enabling reversal of terminally differentiated somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells. The embryonic stem (ES) cells-like pluripotency and unlimited self-renewal capability of iPS cells have granted them enormous potential in many applications, particularly regenerative therapy. Unlike ES cells, however, iPS cells exhibit somatic memories which were carried over from the tissue of origin thus limited its translation in clinical applications. This review provides an updated overview of the retention of various somatic memories associated with the cellular identity, age and metabolism of tissue of origin in iPS cells. The influence of cell types, stage of maturation, age and various other factors on the retention of somatic memory has been discussed. Recent evidence of somatic memory in the form of epigenetic, transcriptomic, metabolic signatures and its functional manifestations in both in vitro and in vivo settings also have been reviewed. The increasing number of studies which had adopted isogenic cell lines for comparisons in recent years had facilitated the identification of genuine somatic memories. These memories functionally affect iPS cells and its derivatives and are potentially tumorigenic thus, raising concerns on their safety in clinical application. Various approaches for memory erasure had since being reported and their efficacies were highlighted in this review.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epigenetic memory; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Metabolic memory; Methylation; Somatic memory

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32016780     DOI: 10.1007/s12015-020-09956-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep        ISSN: 2629-3277            Impact factor:   5.739


  68 in total

Review 1.  Hallmarks of Cellular Senescence.

Authors:  Alejandra Hernandez-Segura; Jamil Nehme; Marco Demaria
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 20.808

2.  Autologous Induced Stem-Cell-Derived Retinal Cells for Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Michiko Mandai; Akira Watanabe; Yasuo Kurimoto; Yasuhiko Hirami; Chikako Morinaga; Takashi Daimon; Masashi Fujihara; Hiroshi Akimaru; Noriko Sakai; Yumiko Shibata; Motoki Terada; Yui Nomiya; Shigeki Tanishima; Masahiro Nakamura; Hiroyuki Kamao; Sunao Sugita; Akishi Onishi; Tomoko Ito; Kanako Fujita; Shin Kawamata; Masahiro J Go; Chikara Shinohara; Ken-Ichiro Hata; Masanori Sawada; Midori Yamamoto; Sachiko Ohta; Yasuo Ohara; Kenichi Yoshida; Junko Kuwahara; Yuko Kitano; Naoki Amano; Masafumi Umekage; Fumiyo Kitaoka; Azusa Tanaka; Chihiro Okada; Naoko Takasu; Seishi Ogawa; Shinya Yamanaka; Masayo Takahashi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Integrative Analyses of Human Reprogramming Reveal Dynamic Nature of Induced Pluripotency.

Authors:  Davide Cacchiarelli; Cole Trapnell; Michael J Ziller; Magali Soumillon; Marcella Cesana; Rahul Karnik; Julie Donaghey; Zachary D Smith; Sutheera Ratanasirintrawoot; Xiaolan Zhang; Shannan J Ho Sui; Zhaoting Wu; Veronika Akopian; Casey A Gifford; John Doench; John L Rinn; George Q Daley; Alexander Meissner; Eric S Lander; Tarjei S Mikkelsen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  5-azacytidine treatment reorganizes genomic histone modification patterns.

Authors:  Vitalina M Komashko; Peggy J Farnham
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.528

5.  Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures.

Authors:  Mark H Chin; Mike J Mason; Wei Xie; Stefano Volinia; Mike Singer; Cory Peterson; Gayane Ambartsumyan; Otaren Aimiuwu; Laura Richter; Jin Zhang; Ivan Khvorostov; Vanessa Ott; Michael Grunstein; Neta Lavon; Nissim Benvenisty; Carlo M Croce; Amander T Clark; Tim Baxter; April D Pyle; Mike A Teitell; Matteo Pelegrini; Kathrin Plath; William E Lowry
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Large-Scale Profiling Reveals the Influence of Genetic Variation on Gene Expression in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Christopher DeBoever; He Li; David Jakubosky; Paola Benaglio; Joaquin Reyna; Katrina M Olson; Hui Huang; William Biggs; Efren Sandoval; Matteo D'Antonio; Kristen Jepsen; Hiroko Matsui; Angelo Arias; Bing Ren; Naoki Nariai; Erin N Smith; Agnieszka D'Antonio-Chronowska; Emma K Farley; Kelly A Frazer
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 25.269

7.  Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  K Kim; A Doi; B Wen; K Ng; R Zhao; P Cahan; J Kim; M J Aryee; H Ji; L I R Ehrlich; A Yabuuchi; A Takeuchi; K C Cunniff; H Hongguang; S McKinney-Freeman; O Naveiras; T J Yoon; R A Irizarry; N Jung; J Seita; J Hanna; P Murakami; R Jaenisch; R Weissleder; S H Orkin; I L Weissman; A P Feinberg; G Q Daley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Reprogramming of cell fate: epigenetic memory and the erasure of memories past.

Authors:  Buhe Nashun; Peter W S Hill; Petra Hajkova
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  A balance between elongation and trimming regulates telomere stability in stem cells.

Authors:  Teresa Rivera; Candy Haggblom; Sandro Cosconati; Jan Karlseder
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Lin28 promotes transformation and is associated with advanced human malignancies.

Authors:  Srinivas R Viswanathan; John T Powers; William Einhorn; Yujin Hoshida; Tony L Ng; Sara Toffanin; Maureen O'Sullivan; Jun Lu; Letha A Phillips; Victoria L Lockhart; Samar P Shah; Pradeep S Tanwar; Craig H Mermel; Rameen Beroukhim; Mohammad Azam; Jose Teixeira; Matthew Meyerson; Timothy P Hughes; Josep M Llovet; Jerald Radich; Charles G Mullighan; Todd R Golub; Poul H Sorensen; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR technologies for precise epigenome editing.

Authors:  Muneaki Nakamura; Yuchen Gao; Antonia A Dominguez; Lei S Qi
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Induction of Salivary Gland-Like Tissue by Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Cen Meng; Shengyuan Huang; Taiqi Cheng; Xue Zhang; Xing Yan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.169

3.  Development of a High-Efficacy Reprogramming Method for Generating Human Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells from Pathologic and Senescent Somatic Cells.

Authors:  Naomichi Tanaka; Hidemasa Kato; Hiromi Tsuda; Yasunori Sato; Toshihiro Muramatsu; Atsushi Iguchi; Hiroyuki Nakajima; Akihiro Yoshitake; Takaaki Senbonmatsu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Modeling of endothelial cell dysfunction using human induced pluripotent stem cells derived from patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Kyoung Woon Kim; Yoo Jin Shin; Bo-Mi Kim; Sheng Cui; Eun Jeong Ko; Sun Woo Lim; Chul Woo Yang; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-10-20

Review 5.  Harnessing conserved signaling and metabolic pathways to enhance the maturation of functional engineered tissues.

Authors:  Neal I Callaghan; Lauren J Durland; Ronald G Ireland; J Paul Santerre; Craig A Simmons; Locke Davenport Huyer
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2022-09-03

Review 6.  Organoids and microphysiological systems: Promising models for accelerating AAV gene therapy studies.

Authors:  Ritu Mahesh Ramamurthy; Anthony Atala; Christopher D Porada; Graҫa Almeida-Porada
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 7.  An Overview on Promising Somatic Cell Sources Utilized for the Efficient Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Arnab Ray; Jahnavy Madhukar Joshi; Pradeep Kumar Sundaravadivelu; Khyati Raina; Nibedita Lenka; Vishwas Kaveeshwar; Rajkumar P Thummer
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.739

8.  A PIANO (Proper, Insufficient, Aberrant, and NO Reprogramming) Response to the Yamanaka Factors in the Initial Stages of Human iPSC Reprogramming.

Authors:  Kejin Hu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  "Betwixt Mine Eye and Heart a League Is Took": The Progress of Induced Pluripotent Stem-Cell-Based Models of Dystrophin-Associated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Davide Rovina; Elisa Castiglioni; Francesco Niro; Sara Mallia; Giulio Pompilio; Aoife Gowran
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.