Literature DB >> 32016681

Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep using a Bayesian framework.

Samer A Kharroubi1, Yara S Beyh2, John Brazier3, Yaling Yang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventionally, frequentist approach has been used to model health state valuation data. Recently, researchers started to explore the use of Bayesian methods in this area.
OBJECTIVES: This paper presents an alternative approach to modelling health state valuation data of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep descriptive systems, using a Bayesian framework, and demonstrates its superiority to conventional frequentist methods.
METHODS: The valuation study is composed of 18 EQ-5D-3L health states and 18 EQ-5D-3L + Sleep health states valued by 160 members of the general public in South Yorkshire, UK, using the time tradeo-ff technique. Three different models were developed for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep accordingly using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation methods. Bayesian methods were applied to models fitted included a linear regression, random effect and random effect with covariates. The models are compared based on their predictive performance using mean predictions, root mean squared error (RMSE) and deviance information criterion (DIC). All analyses were performed using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation methods.
RESULTS: The random effects with covariates model performs best under all criterions for the two preference-based measures, with RMSE (0.037) and DIC (637.5) for EQ-5D-3L and RMSE (0.019), DIC (416.4) for EQ-5D + Sleep. Compared with models previously estimated using frequentist approach, the Bayesian models reported in this paper provided better predictions of observed values.
CONCLUSION: Bayesian methods provide a better way to model EQ-5D-3L valuation data with and without a sleep 'bolt-on' and provide a more flexible in characterizing the full range of uncertainty inherent in these estimates.

Keywords:  Bayesian methods; EQ-5D; MCMC; Preference-based health state measures; QALYs; Sleep

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32016681     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02436-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  26 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments.

Authors:  G Hawthorne; J Richardson; N A Day
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

Authors:  David Feeny; William Furlong; George W Torrance; Charles H Goldsmith; Zenglong Zhu; Sonja DePauw; Margaret Denton; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D H Feeny; W J Furlong; R D Barr; Y Zhang; Q Wang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000-2015.

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; László Gulácsi; Michael Drummond; Dominik Golicki; Valentina Prevolnik Rupel; Judit Simon; Elly A Stolk; Valentin Brodszky; Petra Baji; Jakub Závada; Guenka Petrova; Alexandru Rotar; Márta Péntek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  A general health policy model: update and applications.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; J P Anderson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  International Regulations and Recommendations for Utility Data for Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Donna Rowen; Ismail Azzabi Zouraq; Helene Chevrou-Severac; Ben van Hout
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  The Role of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Donna Rowen; John Brazier; Roberta Ara; Ismail Azzabi Zouraq
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Integrating patient preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index.

Authors:  D A Revicki; N K Leidy; F Brennan-Diemer; S Sorensen; A Togias
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).

Authors:  M Herdman; C Gudex; A Lloyd; Mf Janssen; P Kind; D Parkin; G Bonsel; X Badia
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.