Literature DB >> 32014404

Prediction of Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses: Machine Learning-Based CT Texture Analysis.

Cagri Erdim1, Aytul Hande Yardimci2, Ceyda Turan Bektas2, Burak Kocak3, Sevim Baykal Koca4, Hale Demir5, Ozgur Kilickesmez2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether benign and malignant renal solid masses could be distinguished through machine learning (ML)-based computed tomography (CT) texture analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with 84 solid renal masses (21 benign; 63 malignant) from a single center were included in this retrospective study. Malignant masses included common renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes: clear cell RCC, papillary cell RCC, and chromophobe RCC. Benign masses are represented by oncocytomas and fat-poor angiomyolipomas. Following preprocessing steps, a total of 271 texture features were extracted from unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images. Dimension reduction was done with a reliability analysis and then with a feature selection algorithm. A nested-approach was used for feature selection, model optimization, and validation. Eight ML algorithms were used for the classifications: decision tree, locally weighted learning, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine, neural network, and random forest.
RESULTS: The number of features with good reproducibility was 198 for unenhanced CT and 244 for contrast-enhanced CT. Random forest algorithm demonstrated the best predictive performance using five selected contrast-enhanced CT texture features. The accuracy and area under the curve metrics were 90.5% and 0.915, respectively. Having eliminated the highly collinear features from the analysis, the accuracy and area under the curve values slightly increased to 91.7% and 0.916, respectively.
CONCLUSION: ML-based contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis might be a potential method for distinguishing benign and malignant solid renal masses with satisfactory performance.
Copyright © 2020 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Radiomics; Renal mass; Texture analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32014404     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  11 in total

Review 1.  CT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abhishta Bhandari; Muhammad Ibrahim; Chinmay Sharma; Rebecca Liong; Sonja Gustafson; Marita Prior
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-02

2.  Usefulness of computed tomography textural analysis in renal cell carcinoma nuclear grading.

Authors:  Israa Alnazer; Omar Falou; Pascal Bourdon; Thierry Urruty; Rémy Guillevin; Mohamad Khalil; Ahmad Shahin; Christine Fernandez-Maloigne
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-09-13

3.  [A discrimination model for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: based on hierarchical fusion framework of multi-classifier].

Authors:  T Mo; Y Wu; R Yang; X Zhen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-08-20

Review 4.  Machine Learning for Renal Pathologies: An Updated Survey.

Authors:  Roberto Magherini; Elisa Mussi; Yary Volpe; Rocco Furferi; Francesco Buonamici; Michaela Servi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  Radiomics to better characterize small renal masses.

Authors:  Teele Kuusk; Joana B Neves; Maxine Tran; Axel Bex
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Impact of feature selection methods and subgroup factors on prognostic analysis with CT-based radiomics in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuto Sugai; Noriyuki Kadoya; Shohei Tanaka; Shunpei Tanabe; Mariko Umeda; Takaya Yamamoto; Kazuya Takeda; Suguru Dobashi; Haruna Ohashi; Ken Takeda; Keiichi Jingu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  An Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Chunxiang Li; Ge Qiao; Jinghan Li; Lisha Qi; Xueqing Wei; Tan Zhang; Xing Li; Shu Deng; Xi Wei; Wenjuan Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Small Renal Masses without Gross Fat: What Is the Role of Contrast-Enhanced MDCT?

Authors:  Gerta Repeckaite; Kristina Zviniene; Justina Jankauskiene; Algidas Basevicius; Daimantas Milonas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

9.  Use of artificial intelligence to characterize renal tumors.

Authors:  Hokun Kim; Sung-Hoo Hong
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-03

10.  Comparative Analysis for the Distinction of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Oncocytoma in Computed Tomography Imaging Using Machine Learning Radiomics Analysis.

Authors:  Abeer J Alhussaini; J Douglas Steele; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.