| Literature DB >> 32013878 |
Charly Jehan1, Manon Chogne2, Thierry Rigaud2, Yannick Moret3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The disposable soma theory of ageing assumes that organisms optimally trade-off limited resources between reproduction and longevity to maximize fitness. Early reproduction should especially trade-off against late reproduction and longevity because of reduced investment into somatic protection, including immunity. Moreover, as optimal reproductive strategies of males and females differ, sexually dimorphic patterns of senescence may evolve. In particular, as males gain fitness through mating success, sexual competition should be a major factor accelerating male senescence. In a single experiment, we examined these possibilities by establishing artificial populations of the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor, in which we manipulated the sex-ratio to generate variable levels of investment into reproductive effort and sexual competition in males and females.Entities:
Keywords: Ageing; Cost of reproduction; Disposable soma theory; Immunity; Immuno-senescence; Tenebrio molitor
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32013878 PMCID: PMC6998128 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-020-1586-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Survival of adult females (a) and males (b) of Tenebrio molitor according to sex-ratio condition (Sex-ratio). The “simple” contrast was used for Sex-ratio (survival of males in the 50% of male condition was used as baseline). For females (a), a time-dependent procedure was used to account for the time-dependent effect of Sex-ratio on the risk of mortality (T × Sex-ratio). This procedure was not necessary for males as the effect of Sex-ratio on the risk of mortality was constant over time (b)
| A. Variables | ||||||
| Sex-ratio | 1.61 | 2 | 0.744 | |||
| 9.77 | 2 | |||||
| 75% of males vs 50% of males | 0.12 | 0.04 | 9.28 | 1 | 1.13 | |
| 25% of males vs 50% of males | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.831 | 1.00 |
| 75% of males vs 25% of males | 0.12 | 0.04 | 9.03 | 1 | 1.12 | |
| B. Variables | ||||||
| Sex-ratio | 21.34 | 2 | ||||
| 75% of males vs 50% of males | −0.38 | 0.10 | 15.36 | 1 | 0.70 | |
| 25% of males vs 50% of males | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.82 | 1 | 0.366 | 1.16 |
| 75% of males vs 25% of males | −0.53 | 0.16 | 10.98 | 1 | 0.59 |
ab = regression coefficient of overall survival function for variables
bStandard error of regression coefficient
cWald statistic for variable
dSignificant level for Wald statistic. Values p ≤ 0.005 are given in bold
eOdds ratio of survival for variable relative to control (=exp.(b))
Fig. 1Age-specific survival according to sex-ratio condition. a females; b males
Fertility: generalized linear mixt models (GLMM, Poisson distribution, Log link function) analysing the factors influencing the number of larvae produced by females (a), (n = 638) and males (b), (n = 737)
| A | B | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources | Sources | ||||||
| Female mass | 1 | 82.755 | Female mass | 1 | 243.13 | ||
| Age | 1 | 388.9 | Age | 1 | 94.819 | ||
| Sex-ratio | 2 | 0.7232 | 0.277 | ||||
| Sex-ratio x Age | 2 | 100.44 | |||||
Initial models included Sex-ratio condition, Age (in weeks as a continuous variable), their interaction, male and female body mass (Mass in mg) and replicates as a random factor. The models shown here are those minimizing the AICc, with δAICc > 2. Age was allowed to vary up to 11 and 13 weeks in females and males, respectively. Beyond these values no insects could be assayed anymore in some sex-ratio conditions (see Additional file 1: Figure S2). Values where p ≤ 0.05 are given in bold
Fig. 2Age-specific fertility of females (a) and males (b) according to sex-ratio condition. a the tested females were those coming from the experimental tanks. b the tested females were virgin females mated with males coming from the experimental tanks. Dots are the means (for variation around the means see Additional file 1: Figure S2) and lines are the predictions of the models
Fig. 3Estimated mean reproductive effort. Reproductive effort (RE - mean number of viable offspring produced per individual and per week of survival in the population) of females (left panel) and males (right panel) according to sex-ratio condition. Lines are means, dots are values of single replicates. Values surrounded by different letters were significantly different after Tukey-Kramer HSD post-hoc test (α = 0.05)
Body condition and immune parameters. Mixed linear models or generalized linear model analysing the factors influencing body condition (a), PO activity (b), Total PO activity (c), haemocyte count (d), the proportion of beetles exhibiting antibacterial activity in their haemolymph (e) and the intensity of this antibacterial activity as the size of the zone of inhibition (f) in both females (left) and males (right). Models included sex-ratio condition, Age in weeks (ordinal variable), their interaction, body condition, and replicates as a random factor
| Females | Males | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Body condition# | ||||||||
| Age | 3 | 207.9 | 17.14 | 3 | 215.1 | 6.64 | ||
| Sex-ratio | 2 | 98.2 | 0.95 | 0.39 | 2 | 89.7 | 0.57 | 0.565 |
| Age x Sex-ratio | 6 | 207.6 | 0.72 | 0.637 | 6 | 215.1 | 0.23 | 0.964 |
| B PO activity# | ||||||||
| Age | 3 | 199.8 | 6.76 | 3 | 211.9 | 8.20 | ||
| Sex-ratio | 2 | 86.9 | 0.14 | 0.869 | 2 | 103.3 | 3.69 | |
| Age x Sex-ratio | 6 | 198.3 | 0.75 | 0.606 | 6 | 211.3 | 2.21 | |
| Body condition | 1 | 208.9 | 6.82 | 1 | 222.9 | 2.25 | 0.135 | |
| C Total-PO activity# | ||||||||
| Age | 3 | 189 | 10.90 | 3 | 201.8 | 2.49 | 0.061 | |
| Sex-ratio | 2 | 189 | 0.21 | 0.807 | 2 | 65.7 | 1.91 | 0.155 |
| Age x Sex-ratio | 6 | 189 | 0.40 | 0.877 | 6 | 201.2 | 1.25 | 0.282 |
| Body condition | 1 | 189 | 6.10 | 1 | 210.8 | 0.83 | 0.364 | |
| D Haemocyte# | ||||||||
| Age | 3 | 193.8 | 1.28 | 0.281 | 3 | 208 | 6.90 | |
| Sex ratio | 2 | 11.4 | 0.04 | 0.963 | ||||
| E Antibacterial activity (proportion)§ | ||||||||
| Age | 3 | 42.89 | 3 | 12.879 | ||||
| Body condition | 1 | 1.1902 | 0.275 | 1 | 10.595 | 0.157 | ||
| Age | 3 | 14.391 | ||||||
| Sex-ratio | 2 | 2.2331 | 0.327 | |||||
| F Antibacterial activity (intensity)#1 | ||||||||
| Age | 3 | 2.27 | 0.088 | |||||
| Sex-ratio | 2 | 4.27 | ||||||
The models presented here are those minimizing the AICc, with ΔAICc > 2. Values where p ≤ 0.05 are given in bold. # Linear model, § GLM, distribution: binomial, link function: Logit, 1 because a low number of animals showed antimicrobial activity in some conditions (Fig. 4b, d), data were not available for some replicates, therefore replicates were omitted for these models
Fig. 4Immune parameters in females and males according to individual age and/or sex-ratio condition. a females PO activity; b proportion of females exhibiting antibacterial activity; c male PO activity; d proportion of males exhibiting antibacterial activity; e male intensity of antibacterial activity as the size (in mm) of zones of inhibition; f male haemocyte count. Values are means among replicates ± s. e. m. Number in the bars are sample size