Literature DB >> 17879188

Sexual selection and senescence: male size-dimorphic ungulates evolved relatively smaller molars than females.

Juan Carranza1, F Javier Pérez-Barbería.   

Abstract

As a general rule, males of sexually dimorphic ungulate species have evolved larger body size than females but shorter reproductive life spans as elements of their strategy for intrasexual competition for mating opportunities. Evolutionary theories of senescence predict that the durability of somatic structures should relate to the length of reproductive life span. This prediction has recently been tested for red deer (Cervus elaphus): molariform teeth of males are smaller and less durable than those of females, which corresponds with sex differences in reproductive life span. However, general evidence that male teeth are smaller than expected by allometric rules as a consequence of sexual selection for increasing male body mass requires an interspecific comparison between dimorphic and nondimorphic ungulates. Here we investigate the relationship between cheek-teeth size (occlusal surface area; OSA) and body mass in 123 species of extant ungulates. We found lower slopes for dimorphic species compared with nondimorphic ones and smaller OSA, relative to body mass, in males of dimorphic species compared with females of dimorphic species. Rates of evolution of OSA relative to rates of evolution of body mass were greater in females than in males and also greater in nondimorphic than in dimorphic species. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that sexual selection in polygynous male ungulates favors body size more than tooth size, with possible consequences in male senescence via early depletion of male teeth compared to females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879188     DOI: 10.1086/519852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Longevity in bovids is promoted by sociality, but reduced by sexual selection.

Authors:  Jakob Bro-Jørgensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Live fast die young life history in females: evolutionary trade-off between early life mating and lifespan in female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laura M Travers; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  It is lonely at the front: contrasting evolutionary trajectories in male and female invaders.

Authors:  Cameron M Hudson; Gregory P Brown; Richard Shine
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Live fast, don't die young: Survival-reproduction trade-offs in long-lived income breeders.

Authors:  Antica Culina; Danielle Marie Linton; Roger Pradel; Sandra Bouwhuis; David W Macdonald
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  What do rates of deposition of dental cementum tell us? Functional and evolutionary hypotheses in red deer.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Barbería; F E Guinness; M López-Quintanilla; A J García; L Gallego; J Cappelli; M P Serrano; T Landete-Castillejos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sex-specific patterns of senescence in artificial insect populations varying in sex-ratio to manipulate reproductive effort.

Authors:  Charly Jehan; Manon Chogne; Thierry Rigaud; Yannick Moret
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Emigration effects on estimates of age- and sex-specific survival of two sciurids.

Authors:  Matthew J Weldy; Damon B Lesmeister; Clinton W Epps
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Wear Fast, Die Young: More Worn Teeth and Shorter Lives in Iberian Compared to Scottish Red Deer.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Barbería; J Carranza; C Sánchez-Prieto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Social environment modulates investment in sex trait versus lifespan: red deer produce bigger antlers when facing more rivalry.

Authors:  Juan Carranza; Javier Pérez-Barbería; Concha Mateos; Susana Alarcos; Jerónimo Torres-Porras; Javier Pérez-González; Cristina B Sánchez-Prieto; Juliana Valencia; Leticia Castillo; Eva de la Peña; Isabel Barja; José M Seoane; Manuel M Reglero; Antonio Flores; Alberto Membrillo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.