| Literature DB >> 32012766 |
Changyong Li1,2, Pengran Shang1,2, Fenglan Li1,2, Meng Feng2, Shunbo Zhao1,3.
Abstract
With the premise of ensuring workability on a fresh mixture, the volume stability of hardened self-compacting steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) becomes an issue due to the content of cementitious materials increased with the volume fraction of steel fiber. By using the expansive agent to reduce the shrinkage deformation of self-compacting SFRC, the strength reduction of hardened self-compacting SFRC is another issue. To solve these issues, this paper performed an experimental investigation on the workability, shrinkage, and mechanical properties of self-compacting SFRC compared to the self-compacting concrete (SCC) with or without an expansive agent. The calcium-sulfoaluminate expansive agent with content optimized to be 10% mass of binders and the steel fiber with a varying volume fraction from 0.4% to 1.2% were selected as the main parameters. The mix proportion of self-compacting SFRC with expansive agent was designed by the direct absolute volume method, of which the steel fibers are considered to be the distributed coarse aggregates. Results showed that rational high filling and passing ability of fresh self-compacting SFRC was ensured by increasing the binder to coarse-aggregate ratio and the sand ratio in the mix proportions; the autogenous and drying shrinkages of hardened self-compacting SFRC reduced by 22.2% to 3.2% and by 18.5% to 7.3% compared to those of the SCC without expansive agent at a curing age of 180 d, although the expansion effect of expansive agent decreased with the increasing volume fraction of steel fiber; the mechanical properties, including the compressive strength, the splitting tensile strength, and the modulus of elasticity increased with the incorporation of an expansive agent and steel fibers, which met the design requirements.Entities:
Keywords: expansive agent; mechanical properties; mix proportion design; self-compacting SFRC; shrinkage; volume fraction of steel fiber; workability
Year: 2020 PMID: 32012766 PMCID: PMC7040779 DOI: 10.3390/ma13030588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical compositions of binder materials.
| Binder Materials | Chemical Compositions (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | SO3 | Na2O | K2O | LOI | |
| Cement | 20.81 | 3.28 | 5.99 | 60.12 | 2.13 | 2.23 | 0.11 | 0.55 | 3.52 |
| Fly ash | 55.92 | 5.91 | 17.31 | 6.59 | 3.82 | 1.93 | 0.48 | 1.96 | 2.63 |
| Limestone powder | 0.89 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 47.56 | 4.45 | 0.06 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 40.71 |
| Expansive agent | 3.48 | 3.12 | 11.27 | 42.78 | 0.48 | 27.38 | 0.62 | 0.47 | 4.51 |
Physical and mechanical properties of ordinary silicate cement.
| Density (kg/m3) | Fineness (m2/kg) | Setting Time (min) | Flexural Strength (MPa) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | 3d | 28d | 3d | 28d | ||
| 3093 | 360 | 170 | 215 | 5.4 | 8.3 | 27.5 | 55.6 |
Physical and mechanical performances of fly ash and limestone powder.
| Mineral Admixture | Density (kg/m3) | Fineness (m2/kg) | Water Demands Ratio (%) | Water Content (%) | Active Index (28d, %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fly ash | 2342 | 406 | 84 | 0.1 | 73.3 |
| Limestone powder | 2779 | 428 | − | 0.2 | 61.2 |
Figure 1Grading of fine and coarse aggregates.
Figure 2Type and size of steel fiber.
Mix proportion of SCC and self-compacting SFRC.
| Mixture | SCC | SF0 | SF4 | SF8 | SF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Cement (kg/m3) | 418 | 358 | 380 | 401 | 423 |
| Fly ash (kg/m3) | 60 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 70 |
| Limestone powder (kg/m3) | 119 | 119 | 127 | 134 | 141 |
| Expansive agent (kg/m3) | 0 | 60 | 63 | 67 | 70 |
| Manufactured sand (kg/m3) | 786 | 786 | 785 | 783 | 780 |
| Crushed limestone (kg/m3) | 852 | 852 | 777 | 703 | 631 |
| Steel fiber (kg/m3) | 0 | 0 | 31 | 63 | 94 |
| Water (kg/m3) | 185 | 185 | 196 | 207 | 218 |
| Superplasticizer (kg/m3) | 7.16 | 7.16 | 7.59 | 7.35 | 7.75 |
| Binder materials (kg/m3) | 597 | 597 | 633 | 668 | 704 |
| Sand ratio (%) | 48 | 48 | 49 | 51 | 52 |
| Binder to coarse-aggregate ratio | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.97 |
Workability of self-compacting SFRC.
| Test Method | Index | SCC | SF0 | SF4 | SF8 | SF12 | Target Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slump-flow | 710 | 720 | 710 | 705 | 710 | >600 | |
| 3.8 | 4.2 | 5.5 | 5.8 | 6.4 | <8 | ||
| J-ring | 700 | 700 | 695 | 675 | 680 | − | |
| 10 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 30 | <50 |
Figure 3Sketch of specimens and measuring device for autogenous shrinkage deformation. 1—Cylinder specimen; 2—Dial indicator; 3—Gauge copper rod; 4—Embedded parts.
Figure 4Measuring of drying shrinkage for self-compacting SFRC.
Figure 5Variations of workability indexes with vf: (a) Diameter of slump-flow and J-ring flow; (b) T50.
Autogenous shrinkage of SCC and self-compacting SFRC.
| Mixture | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d | 28 d | 45 d | 60 d | 90 d | 120 d | 150 d | 180 d | |
| SCC | −4 | 43 | 103 | 141 | 185 | 212 | 228 | 247 | 249 | 250 | 252 |
| SF0 | −66 | −84 | −43 | 31.3 | 46 | 61 | 75 | 84 | 90 | 92 | 95 |
| SF4 | −66 | −77 | −34 | 22.6 | 61 | 100 | 127 | 174 | 205 | 229 | 244 |
| SF8 | −55 | −64 | −6 | 65.6 | 100 | 138 | 159 | 183 | 199 | 209 | 219 |
| SF12 | −29 | −35 | 25 | 76 | 121 | 147 | 164 | 178 | 188 | 191 | 196 |
Figure 6Autogenous shrinkage of tested specimens.
Figure 7Changes of expansive deformation with the vf.
Drying shrinkage of SCC and self-compacting SFRC.
| Mixture | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d | 28 d | 45 d | 60 d | 90 d | 120 d | 150 d | 180 d | |
| SCC | 108 | 250 | 437 | 581 | 652 | 719 | 747 | 778 | 792 | 810 | 823 |
| SF0 | 44 | 155 | 259 | 399 | 478 | 544 | 564 | 603 | 626 | 642 | 656 |
| SF4 | 44 | 154 | 241 | 382 | 499 | 542 | 578 | 622 | 642 | 657 | 671 |
| SF8 | 54 | 178 | 249 | 400 | 548 | 605 | 630 | 660 | 687 | 704 | 725 |
| SF12 | 62 | 167 | 268 | 421 | 582 | 632 | 655 | 695 | 725 | 745 | 763 |
Figure 8Drying shrinkage of tested specimens.
Figure 9Compressive strength of tested specimens.
Tested and calculated values of the splitting tensile strength of specimens.
| Mixture | SCC | SF0 | SF4 | SF8 | SF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.26 | 3.15 | 3.28 | 4.16 | 5.24 | |
| − | 3.26 | 3.85 | 4.45 | 5.04 | |
| − | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 1.04 |
Tested and calculated values of the modulus of elasticity of specimens.
| Mixture | SCC | SF0 | SF4 | SF8 | SF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.7 | 36.5 | 35.3 | 39.6 | 41.3 | |
| 35.2 | 34.3 | 34.0 | 34.1 | 34.3 | |
| 1.16 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 1.16 | 1.20 |