Literature DB >> 32010991

A national population-based cohort study to investigate inequalities in maternal mortality in the United Kingdom, 2009-17.

Marian Knight1, Kathryn Bunch1, Sara Kenyon2, Derek Tuffnell3, Jennifer J Kurinczuk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparities have been documented in maternal mortality rates between women from different ethnic, age and socio-economic groups in the UK. It is unclear whether there are differential changes in these rates amongst women from different groups over time. The objectives of this analysis were to describe UK maternal mortality rates in different age, ethnic and socio-economic groups between 2009 and 2017, and to identify whether there were changes in the observed inequalities, or different trends amongst population subgroups.
METHODS: Maternal mortality rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in specific age, deprivation and ethnic groups were calculated using numbers of maternal deaths as numerator and total maternities as denominator. Relative risks (RR) with 95% CI were calculated and compared using ratios of relative risk. Change over time was investigated using non-parametric tests for trend across ordered groups.
RESULTS: Women from black and Asian groups had a higher mortality rate than white women in most time periods, as did women aged 35 and over and women from the most deprived quintile areas of residence. There was evidence of an increasing trend in maternal mortality amongst black women and a decrease in mortality amongst women from the least deprived areas, but no trends over time in any of the other ethnic, age or IMD groups were seen. There was a widening of the disparity between black and white women (RR 2.59 in 2009-11 compared with 5.27 in 2015-17, ratio of the relative risks 2.03, 95% CI 1.11, 3.72).
CONCLUSIONS: The clear differences in the patterns of maternal mortality amongst different ethnic, age and socio-economic groups emphasise the importance of research and policies focussed specifically on women from black and minority ethnic groups, together with other disadvantaged groups, to begin to reduce maternal mortality in the UK.
© 2020 The Authors. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort analysis; ethnic groups; maternal age; maternal mortality; socio-economic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32010991      PMCID: PMC7383891          DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


Study question

Are there differences in maternal mortality rates amongst women from different ethnic, age and socio‐economic groups in the UK and are these differences changing over time?

What is already known

The maternal mortality rate overall has been static in the UK for more than 10 years. There are known differences in mortality rates between women from different ethnic, age and socio‐economic groups in the UK, but changes in mortality rates over time amongst different population subgroups have not been examined.

What this study adds

This study shows that maternal mortality amongst black women in the UK is increasing, with evidence of a widening inequality between black women and white women. Maternal mortality amongst women living in less deprived areas is decreasing.

BACKGROUND

Maternal mortality surveillance has been conducted in the UK since the early 1950s, but the methods and focus of reports have evolved over time. The epidemiology of maternal mortality has almost completely changed from two‐thirds of deaths being due to direct obstetric causes in 1952‐54,1 to almost two‐thirds being due to medical and mental health‐related causes in 2015‐17.2 Enhanced case ascertainment commenced at the turn of this century,3 allowing in particular more robust identification of indirect, medical or mental health related, maternal deaths. Enhanced ascertainment, which is still only carried out in a few countries, thus allows reliable calculation of true maternal mortality rates both for the whole population and amongst different population subgroups. Disparities have subsequently been documented in maternal mortality rates between women from different ethnic, age and socio‐economic groups. Women who were older, or who had more deprived backgrounds, or who were from black or other minority ethnic groups were found to have higher rates of maternal mortality once cases identified through these enhanced processes were included.4 The last of the three‐yearly reports, reporting maternal deaths for 2006‐08, prior to change to annual reporting,4 suggested that maternal mortality rates amongst black women were decreasing at a more rapid rate than those amongst white women, against a background of a statistically significant overall decrease in maternal mortality. No assessment was made in this report for deaths in 2006‐08, however, of whether there were differential changes in the maternal mortality rates amongst women from different age or socio‐economic groups over time. Maternal mortality rates in the UK have largely been static over the period 2009‐17,2 although globally maternal mortality ratios have decreased following the intense focus of the Millennium Development Goals5 and subsequent Sustainable Development Goals.6 Concerns have been raised recently in both the USA7 and Canada8 that maternal mortality rates are potentially increasing, although it has been suggested that the observed trend in the USA simply represents better case identification.9 Nevertheless, marked disparities have also been documented in mortality rates amongst women from different racial backgrounds in the USA.10 Whilst this analysis suggests these disparities did not change in the USA between 2007 and 2016, it is not clear whether disparities are changing with time in other countries. From the 2009‐11 triennium onwards, maternal mortality data have been published on an annual basis in the UK, presented as rolling 3‐year average rates. The report published in 2018, including data for 2014‐16, highlighted the wide disparity in mortality rates between black, Asian and white women.11 The aim of this analysis was to describe maternal mortality rates in different age, ethnic and socio‐economic groups between 2009 and 2017 in the UK, and to identify whether there were any changes in the observed inequalities, or different trends amongst different population subgroups, in order to inform targeted actions to prevent maternal deaths in the future.

METHODS

This analysis is based on data extracted from published maternal mortality reports.2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Maternal deaths in the UK were identified through a variety of sources, as described in detail elsewhere.14, 17 In brief, deaths were reported directly to MBRRACE‐UK office by staff in the hospitals where women died, or through pathologists, coroners, procurators fiscal, other hospital staff or members of the public. They were also identified directly through media reports. Additionally, information on deaths of women who were reported to be or have been pregnant and/or have a pregnancy‐related cause of death was obtained from vital registration data from the Office for National Statistics (England and Wales), National Records Scotland or the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency. Data on deaths amongst women of reproductive age were additionally linked to birth records from the previous year to identify deaths of any women who had given birth in the previous year but for whom no recent pregnancy or pregnancy‐specific diagnosis was recorded on their death certificate. All maternal deaths identified were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases—Maternal Mortality (ICD‐MM).18 Details about women's age, self‐reported ethnic group and postcode of residence were extracted from their medical records. Ethnic group was classified according to the UK census classification into white, black, Asian, Chinese/other and mixed.19 The area deprivation score (Index of Multiple Deprivation, IMD) for the super output area of women's postcode of residence was determined using a national look‐up table.20 The IMD is derived from 37 different indicators divided into seven different domains: Income Deprivation; Employment Deprivation; Health Deprivation and Disability; Education, Skills and Training Deprivation; Crime; Barriers to Housing and Services; and Living Environment Deprivation. These scores are used to rank the residential areas in England into five equal groups, or quintiles, from the least deprived 20% (quintile I) to the most deprived 20% (quintile V). Denominator data were obtained from published data from the Office for National Statistics, National Records Scotland, Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Authority, NHS Digital, or from national birth data. Denominator maternities (women giving birth to a liveborn baby or a stillborn baby greater than or equal to 24 weeks' gestation) data classified by ethnic group and by area deprivation score were only available for England, and therefore analyses investigating ethnic group and socio‐economic deprivation were conducted only for England. Additionally, denominator data in the five census classification groups were only available from 2012; therefore, ethnicity data for mixed and Chinese/other groups are only presented from 2012 to 2014 onwards. Maternities for which ethnicity was not stated were included in the “white European” group because the re‐distributed proportions matched with the estimated ethnic profiles in the UK population census.21

Statistical analysis

Maternal mortality rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using numbers of maternal deaths as the numerator and total maternities in each specific group as the denominator. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare maternal death rates between groups of women. A non‐parametric test for trend across ordered groups was used to investigate the change in three‐yearly rolling maternal mortality rates over time.22 Estimated ratios of relative risk (RRR) were calculated to compare maternal death rates in the different age, socio‐economic and ethnic groups.23 Data were analysed in stata version 15 (Statacorp).

Ethics approval

No approval was required for this secondary analysis of published data.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 662 maternal deaths amongst 7 001 210 maternities; an overall maternal mortality rate of 9.46 per 100 000 maternities (95% CI 8.75, 10.20). There was no difference in overall maternal mortality rate in the UK between 2009‐11 and 2015‐17 (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72, 1.04; Figure 1), and no evidence of a trend over time.
Figure 1

Maternal mortality in the UK 2009‐17

Maternal mortality in the UK 2009‐17 In every 3‐year period, the patterns of disparity between the different population groups were similar (Figures 2, 3, 4, Table 1, Table S1, Figures S1‐S3). Women from black and Asian groups had a higher mortality rate than white women in most time periods, as did women aged 35 and over and women from the most deprived quintile areas of residence. There was evidence of an increasing trend in maternal mortality amongst black women (P = .029) and a decrease in mortality amongst women from IMD quintiles I (P = .054) and II (P = .029), but no trends over time in any of the other ethnic, age or IMD groups. There was a widening of the disparity between black and white women (RR 2.59 in 2009‐11 compared with 5.27 in 2015‐17, ratio of the relative risks [RRR] 2.03, 95% CI 1.11, 3.72; Table 1). There was no other evidence of widening disparities between population groups (Table 1).
Figure 2

Maternal mortality amongst different ethnic groups in England 2009‐17

Figure 3

Maternal mortality amongst different age groups in the UK 2009‐17

Figure 4

Maternal mortality rates by area deprivation score quintile for women's usual area of residence in England 2009‐17

Table 1

Relative risks of maternal mortality between different groups, and ratios of relative risks over time 2009‐17

 Relative risk (95% confidence interval)Ratio of the relative risks (95% confidence interval)
2009‐112012‐142015‐172012‐14 with 2009‐112015‐17 with 2009‐11
Maternal age (y)
<201.3 (0.65, 2.47)0.84 (0.25, 2.25)2.16 (0.86, 5.00)0.65 (0.18, 2.34)0.60 (0.20, 1.82)
20‐241.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)
25‐291.01 (0.65, 1.59)1.2 (0.72, 2.05)1.53 (0.90, 2.74)1.19 (0.60, 2.36)1.51 (0.97, 2.37)
30‐341.26 (0.83, 1.95)1.32 (0.81, 2.23)1.27 (0.74, 2.27)1.05 (0.54, 2.03)1.01 (0.50, 2.04)
35‐391.95 (1.26, 3.03)2.29 (1.38, 3.89)2.30 (1.33, 4.11)1.17 (0.60, 2.32)1.18 (0.58, 2.41)
≥403.16 (1.79, 5.48)3.00 (1.51, 5.83)4.34 (2.26, 8.43)0.95 (0.39, 2.28)1.37 (0.58, 3.26)
IMD quintiles (England only)
I (least deprived/highest 20%)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)
II1.24 (0.69, 2.26)0.99 (0.48, 2.05)1.00 (0.46, 2.22)0.80 (0.31, 2.04)0.81 (0.31, 2.16)
III1.25 (0.71, 2.24)1.00 (0.50, 2.01)1.39 (0.70, 2.90)0.80 (0.32, 1.97)1.11 (0.45, 2.77)
IV1.65 (0.99, 2.84)1.56 (0.86, 2.93)2.03 (1.09, 4.010.95 (0.42, 2.12)1.23 (0.53, 2.84)
V (most deprived/lowest 20%)1.69 (1.03, 2.87)1.62 (0.92, 2.99)2.23 (1.23, 4.330.96 (0.44, 2.09)1.32 (0.58, 2.97)
Ethnic group (England only)a
White (inc. not known)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)
Asian2.06 (1.45, 2.92)1.36 (0.81, 2.18)1.77 (1.10, 2.74)0.66 (0.36, 1.21)0.85 (0.48, 1.53)
Black2.59 (1.67, 4.02)4.19 (2.69, 6.35)5.27 (3.44, 7.87)1.62 (0.88, 2.99)2.03 (1.11, 3.72)

Abbreviation: IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation.

Denominator data for women of mixed or Chinese/other ethnicity were not available in the same format for 2009‐11, therefore, 2012‐14 and 2015‐17 data could not be compared with 2009‐11.

Maternal mortality amongst different ethnic groups in England 2009‐17 Maternal mortality amongst different age groups in the UK 2009‐17 Maternal mortality rates by area deprivation score quintile for women's usual area of residence in England 2009‐17 Relative risks of maternal mortality between different groups, and ratios of relative risks over time 2009‐17 Abbreviation: IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation. Denominator data for women of mixed or Chinese/other ethnicity were not available in the same format for 2009‐11, therefore, 2012‐14 and 2015‐17 data could not be compared with 2009‐11. Denominator data for women of mixed or Chinese/other ethnicity were not available in the same format for 2009‐11, therefore, 2012‐14 and 2015‐17 data could not be compared with 2009‐11. However, there was some evidence of an increasing disparity in mortality rate comparing mixed ethnicity women with white women between the two later triennia (RRR 7.09, 95% CI 0.39, 128.28 when comparing 2015‐17 with 2012‐14). Note there was no clear evidence of an increasing trend in mortality rate amongst women of mixed ethnicity over the period 2012‐17 (P = .083).

Comment

Principal findings

There has been no overall change in the UK maternal mortality rate over the period 2009‐17. However, this analysis suggests there have been changes in specific population subgroups, with evidence that the maternal mortality rate is increasing amongst black women and decreasing amongst women resident in less deprived areas. There has been a widening of the disparity in mortality rate between black and white women, with black women experiencing a fivefold higher maternal mortality rate in 2015‐17, compared to a 2.5‐fold difference in 2009‐11 when compared to white women. There may also be a widening of the disparity in maternal mortality rate between women of mixed ethnicity and white women, with a threefold higher mortality rate in 2015‐17 compared to no difference in 2012‐14.

Strengths of the study

This study used national data collected over 9 years with enhanced case ascertainment to identify maternal deaths, thus estimates of mortality rates in the whole population and within population subgroups are likely to be robust. Data on women's characteristics were collected from medical records or from published national vital statistics data and therefore have a high level of completeness and validity.

Limitations of the data

Although this analysis uses national data collected over several years, maternal death remains an uncommon event. It is possible that some clinically important differences were not identified due to limited study power. The national confidential enquiry reports estimate denominator ethnicities by inclusion of any women with missing ethnic group information into the white ethnic group, since this most closely approximates the ethnic group distribution seen amongst birth registrations. It is possible therefore that there has been some misclassification of women's ethnicities in the denominator. This misclassification will not occur, however, amongst women who have died, since the information on ethnic group has been extracted from self‐reported ethnic group in women's medical records. Given changes to the ethnic groupings in which denominator data are published, the study was only able to examine trends over a period of 2012‐17 amongst women from mixed, Chinese or other ethnic groups, which further limits the power of the study to identify important trends. Denominator maternities data were not available at an individual level, therefore, an adjusted analysis was not possible.

Interpretation

These findings suggest that there needs to be a particular targeting of research and action to address maternal mortality amongst black women in the UK, which appears to be increasing, and potentially also to address mortality amongst women of mixed ethnicity. In contrast, maternal mortality appears to be decreasing amongst women resident in less deprived areas. In England, a halving of maternal mortality between 2010 and 2030, subsequently revised to 2025, has been a national ambition since 2015.24 This analysis suggests that actions and policies put in place to date have been more successful in some population groups than others. The World Health Organisation has emphasised the importance of Health Equity Impact Assessment of all public policies,25, 26 and perhaps this consideration needs to be further emphasised in Maternal Death Surveillance and Response Programmes. A specific target focussing on ensuring continuity of midwifery care for black and minority ethnic women is one step in this direction.27 Previous studies in the UK have shown that pre‐existing medical co‐morbidities, anaemia during pregnancy, previous pregnancy problems, inadequate use of antenatal care, substance misuse, unemployment and maternal age are all independently associated with maternal death.28 Observed disparities between ethnic groups were attenuated after adjustment for gestational diabetes during the current pregnancy, medical co‐morbidities, previous pregnancy problems and inadequate use of antenatal care, thus it is possible that these factors explain some of the differences we observed amongst women from minority ethnic groups. However, there are a number of potential underlying factors which evaluation of quantitative data alone cannot elucidate, and a confidential enquiry approach,29 together with consideration of both implicit and explicit biases amongst both health systems and health professionals will be required. A qualitative study of the maternity experiences of women with multiple disadvantages giving birth in England, most of whom were from black and minority ethnic groups, highlighted that women brought feelings of powerlessness and low self‐esteem to their maternity appointments, which could be made substantially worse by disrespectful care.30 Several women, particularly those from migrant backgrounds expressed confusion about the system of maternity care and their entitlements, which may explain differential take‐up of antenatal care, reflecting an effective lack of access even if health care is provided freely at the point of access. Other women emphasised the importance of a trusting relationship with their health care professional; respectful maternity care is recognised as a high priority to ensure safe motherhood31 and ensuring that this is provided appropriately to all population groups will be important to reduce inequity. Similar disparities in maternal mortality have been identified in the USA, and addressing structural racism has been emphasised as one of the actions to begin to tackle this.32 Less attention has been given to this issue in the UK, although surveys of women's experiences of maternity care have reported that women from all minority ethnic groups report a poorer experience of care,33 and many women describe staff attitudes in largely negative terms.34 These studies do identify specific instances of structural factors, such as lack of availability of female doctors, which compromised access to care for women from minority ethnic groups.34 Other studies have identified adjustments needed in maternity services for women from other disadvantaged groups, such as those with learning disabilities35; these studies all identified that women who received specialised midwife care felt particularly able to disclose their concerns, allowing for potentially concerning medical complications to be recognised and treated.

CONCLUSIONS

The maternal mortality rate is static in the UK. This analysis has identified clear differences in the patterns of maternal mortality amongst different ethnic, age and socio‐economic groups in the UK. There appears to be no change in the patterns of disparity between most groups over time. However, there is evidence that the maternal mortality rate amongst black women in England is increasing and that the gap between black and white women in terms of their mortality rate is increasing. This emphasises the importance of research and policies focussed specifically on women from black and minority ethnic groups, together with other disadvantaged groups, to begin to reduce maternal mortality in the UK.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest. Click here for additional data file.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; J Martin Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-25

2.  Factors Underlying the Temporal Increase in Maternal Mortality in the United States.

Authors:  K S Joseph; Sarka Lisonkova; Giulia M Muraca; Neda Razaz; Yasser Sabr; Azar Mehrabadi; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Maternal Mortality in the United States: Updates on Trends, Causes, and Solutions.

Authors:  Ai-Ris Y Collier; Rose L Molina
Journal:  Neoreviews       Date:  2019-10

4.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend.

Authors:  J Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1985 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Ethnic minority women's experience of maternity services in England.

Authors:  Julie Jomeen; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kassebaum; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Megan S Coggeshall; Katya A Shackelford; Caitlyn Steiner; Kyle R Heuton; Diego Gonzalez-Medina; Ryan Barber; Chantal Huynh; Daniel Dicker; Tara Templin; Timothy M Wolock; Ayse Abbasoglu Ozgoren; Foad Abd-Allah; Semaw Ferede Abera; Ibrahim Abubakar; Tom Achoki; Ademola Adelekan; Zanfina Ademi; Arsène Kouablan Adou; José C Adsuar; Emilie E Agardh; Dickens Akena; Deena Alasfoor; Zewdie Aderaw Alemu; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Samia Alhabib; Raghib Ali; Mazin J Al Kahbouri; François Alla; Peter J Allen; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ubai Alsharif; Elena Alvarez; Nelson Alvis-Guzmán; Adansi A Amankwaa; Azmeraw T Amare; Hassan Amini; Walid Ammar; Carl A T Antonio; Palwasha Anwari; Johan Arnlöv; Valentina S Arsic Arsenijevic; Ali Artaman; Majed Masoud Asad; Rana J Asghar; Reza Assadi; Lydia S Atkins; Alaa Badawi; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Arindam Basu; Sanjay Basu; Justin Beardsley; Neeraj Bedi; Tolesa Bekele; Michelle L Bell; Eduardo Bernabe; Tariku J Beyene; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Jed D Blore; Berrak Bora Basara; Dipan Bose; Nicholas Breitborde; Rosario Cárdenas; Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela; Ruben Estanislao Castro; Ferrán Catalá-López; Alanur Cavlin; Jung-Chen Chang; Xuan Che; Costas A Christophi; Sumeet S Chugh; Massimo Cirillo; Samantha M Colquhoun; Leslie Trumbull Cooper; Cyrus Cooper; Iuri da Costa Leite; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Adrian Davis; Anand Dayama; Louisa Degenhardt; Diego De Leo; Borja del Pozo-Cruz; Kebede Deribe; Muluken Dessalegn; Gabrielle A deVeber; Samath D Dharmaratne; Uğur Dilmen; Eric L Ding; Rob E Dorrington; Tim R Driscoll; Sergei Petrovich Ermakov; Alireza Esteghamati; Emerito Jose A Faraon; Farshad Farzadfar; Manuela Mendonca Felicio; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Graça Maria Ferreira de Lima; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Elisabeth B França; Lynne Gaffikin; Ketevan Gambashidze; Fortuné Gbètoho Gankpé; Ana C Garcia; Johanna M Geleijnse; Katherine B Gibney; Maurice Giroud; Elizabeth L Glaser; Ketevan Goginashvili; Philimon Gona; Dinorah González-Castell; Atsushi Goto; Hebe N Gouda; Harish Chander Gugnani; Rahul Gupta; Rajeev Gupta; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Randah Ribhi Hamadeh; Mouhanad Hammami; Graeme J Hankey; Hilda L Harb; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon I Hay; Ileana B Heredia Pi; Hans W Hoek; H Dean Hosgood; Damian G Hoy; Abdullatif Husseini; Bulat T Idrisov; Kaire Innos; Manami Inoue; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Eiman Jahangir; Sun Ha Jee; Paul N Jensen; Vivekanand Jha; Guohong Jiang; Jost B Jonas; Knud Juel; Edmond Kato Kabagambe; Haidong Kan; Nadim E Karam; André Karch; Corine Kakizi Karema; Anil Kaul; Norito Kawakami; Konstantin Kazanjan; Dhruv S Kazi; Andrew H Kemp; Andre Pascal Kengne; Maia Kereselidze; Yousef Saleh Khader; Shams Eldin Ali Hassan Khalifa; Ejaz Ahmed Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Luke Knibbs; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Soewarta Kosen; Barthelemy Kuate Defo; Chanda Kulkarni; Veena S Kulkarni; G Anil Kumar; Kaushalendra Kumar; Ravi B Kumar; Gene Kwan; Taavi Lai; Ratilal Lalloo; Hilton Lam; Van C Lansingh; Anders Larsson; Jong-Tae Lee; James Leigh; Mall Leinsalu; Ricky Leung; Xiaohong Li; Yichong Li; Yongmei Li; Juan Liang; Xiaofeng Liang; Stephen S Lim; Hsien-Ho Lin; Steven E Lipshultz; Shiwei Liu; Yang Liu; Belinda K Lloyd; Stephanie J London; Paulo A Lotufo; Jixiang Ma; Stefan Ma; Vasco Manuel Pedro Machado; Nana Kwaku Mainoo; Marek Majdan; Christopher Chabila Mapoma; Wagner Marcenes; Melvin Barrientos Marzan; Amanda J Mason-Jones; Man Mohan Mehndiratta; Fabiola Mejia-Rodriguez; Ziad A Memish; Walter Mendoza; Ted R Miller; Edward J Mills; Ali H Mokdad; Glen Liddell Mola; Lorenzo Monasta; Jonathan de la Cruz Monis; Julio Cesar Montañez Hernandez; Ami R Moore; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Rintaro Mori; Ulrich O Mueller; Mitsuru Mukaigawara; Aliya Naheed; Kovin S Naidoo; Devina Nand; Vinay Nangia; Denis Nash; Chakib Nejjari; Robert G Nelson; Sudan Prasad Neupane; Charles R Newton; Marie Ng; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Muhammad Imran Nisar; Sandra Nolte; Ole F Norheim; Luke Nyakarahuka; In-Hwan Oh; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Bolajoko O Olusanya; Saad B Omer; John Nelson Opio; Orish Ebere Orisakwe; Jeyaraj D Pandian; Christina Papachristou; Jae-Hyun Park; Angel J Paternina Caicedo; Scott B Patten; Vinod K Paul; Boris Igor Pavlin; Neil Pearce; David M Pereira; Konrad Pesudovs; Max Petzold; Dan Poenaru; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; Dan Pope; Farshad Pourmalek; Dima Qato; D Alex Quistberg; Anwar Rafay; Kazem Rahimi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Sajjad ur Rahman; Murugesan Raju; Saleem M Rana; Amany Refaat; Luca Ronfani; Nobhojit Roy; Tania Georgina Sánchez Pimienta; Mohammad Ali Sahraian; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Itamar S Santos; Monika Sawhney; Felix Sayinzoga; Ione J C Schneider; Austin Schumacher; David C Schwebel; Soraya Seedat; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Edson E Servan-Mori; Marina Shakh-Nazarova; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Kenji Shibuya; Hwashin Hyun Shin; Ivy Shiue; Inga Dora Sigfusdottir; Donald H Silberberg; Andrea P Silva; Jasvinder A Singh; Vegard Skirbekk; Karen Sliwa; Sergey S Soshnikov; Luciano A Sposato; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Konstantinos Stroumpoulis; Lela Sturua; Bryan L Sykes; Karen M Tabb; Roberto Tchio Talongwa; Feng Tan; Carolina Maria Teixeira; Eric Yeboah Tenkorang; Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi; Andrew L Thorne-Lyman; David L Tirschwell; Jeffrey A Towbin; Bach X Tran; Miltiadis Tsilimbaris; Uche S Uchendu; Kingsley N Ukwaja; Eduardo A Undurraga; Selen Begüm Uzun; Andrew J Vallely; Coen H van Gool; Tommi J Vasankari; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Salvador Villalpando; Francesco S Violante; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Theo Vos; Stephen Waller; Haidong Wang; Linhong Wang; XiaoRong Wang; Yanping Wang; Scott Weichenthal; Elisabete Weiderpass; Robert G Weintraub; Ronny Westerman; James D Wilkinson; Solomon Meseret Woldeyohannes; John Q Wong; Muluemebet Abera Wordofa; Gelin Xu; Yang C Yang; Yuichiro Yano; Gokalp Kadri Yentur; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Seok-Jun Yoon; Mustafa Z Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Kim Yun Jin; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Yong Zhao; Yingfeng Zheng; Maigeng Zhou; Jun Zhu; Xiao Nong Zou; Alan D Lopez; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher J L Murray; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Experiences with maternal and perinatal death reviews in the UK--the MBRRACE-UK programme.

Authors:  J J Kurinczuk; E S Draper; D J Field; C Bevan; P Brocklehurst; R Gray; S Kenyon; B N Manktelow; J P Neilson; M Redshaw; J Scott; J Shakespeare; L K Smith; M Knight
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Risk factors and newborn outcomes associated with maternal deaths in the UK from 2009 to 2013: a national case-control study.

Authors:  M Nair; M Knight; J J Kurinczuk
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Implementation assessment in confidential enquiry programmes: A scoping review.

Authors:  Hemali Jayakody; Marian Knight
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy-Related Deaths - United States, 2007-2016.

Authors:  Emily E Petersen; Nicole L Davis; David Goodman; Shanna Cox; Carla Syverson; Kristi Seed; Carrie Shapiro-Mendoza; William M Callaghan; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  9 in total

1.  Ethnic inequalities in mental and physical multimorbidity in women of reproductive age: a data linkage cohort study.

Authors:  Raquel Catalao; Sarah Dorrington; Megan Pritchard; Amelia Jewell; Matthew Broadbent; Mark Ashworth; Stephani Hatch; Louise Howard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: A Shared Commitment for Engagement, Diversity, and Dissemination.

Authors:  Anna M Hood; Staja Q Booker; Calia A Morais; Burel R Goodin; Janelle E Letzen; Lisa C Campbell; Ericka N Merriwether; Edwin N Aroke; Claudia M Campbell; Vani A Mathur; Mary R Janevic
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 5.383

3.  Maternal deaths due to indirect causes: Report from a tertiary care center of a developing country.

Authors:  Nazli Hossain; Zeenat F Shaikh
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2021-08-16

4.  Project20: Does continuity of care and community-based antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; Kathryn Dalrymple; James Harris; Angela Harden; Elidh Parslow; Thomas Georgi; Jane Sandall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A national cohort study and confidential enquiry to investigate ethnic disparities in maternal mortality.

Authors:  Marian Knight; Kathryn Bunch; Nicola Vousden; Anita Banerjee; Philippa Cox; Fiona Cross-Sudworth; Mandish K Dhanjal; Jenny Douglas; Joanna Girling; Sara Kenyon; Rohit Kotnis; Roshni Patel; Judy Shakespeare; Derek Tuffnell; Meg Wilkinson; Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-12-13

6.  The role of social risk factors and engagement with maternity services in ethnic disparities in maternal mortality: A retrospective case note review.

Authors:  Eleanor Cosstick; Rachel Nirmal; Fiona Cross-Sudworth; Marian Knight; Sara Kenyon
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-29

7.  COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a midwifery survey into attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine.

Authors:  Funlayo Odejinmi; Rebecca Mallick; Christina Neophytou; Kade Mondeh; Megan Hall; Claire Scrivener; Katie Tibble; Mary Turay-Olusile; Nandita Deo; Doreen Oforiwaa; Rita Osayimwen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.135

8.  How is physicians' implicit prejudice against the obese and mentally ill moderated by specialty and experience?

Authors:  Chloë FitzGerald; Christian Mumenthaler; Delphine Berner; Mélinée Schindler; Tobias Brosch; Samia Hurst
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.834

9.  A national population-based cohort study to investigate inequalities in maternal mortality in the United Kingdom, 2009-17.

Authors:  Marian Knight; Kathryn Bunch; Sara Kenyon; Derek Tuffnell; Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.980

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.