Literature DB >> 3201045

Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomization.

F Y Hsieh1.   

Abstract

This paper presents sample size formulae for both continuous and dichotomous endpoints obtained from intervention studies that use the cluster as the unit of randomization. The formulae provide the required number of clusters or the required number of individuals per cluster when the other number is given. The proposed formulae derive from Student's t-test with use of cluster summary measures and a variance that consists of within and between cluster components. Power contours are provided to help in the design of intervention studies that use cluster randomization. Sample size formulae for designs with and without stratification of clusters appear separately.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3201045     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780071113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  22 in total

Review 1.  Methods in health service research. Evaluation of health interventions at area and organisation level.

Authors:  O C Ukoumunne; M C Gulliford; S Chinn; J A Sterne; P G Burney; A Donner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

2.  Power for T-test comparisons of unbalanced cluster exposure studies.

Authors:  Donald R Hoover
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care.

Authors:  Robyn Tamblyn; Allen Huang; Robert Perreault; André Jacques; Denis Roy; James Hanley; Peter McLeod; Réjean Laprise
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Cluster randomization: a trap for the unwary.

Authors:  M Underwood; A Barnett; S Hajioff
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Power and sample size requirements for non-inferiority in studies comparing two matched proportions where the events are correlated.

Authors:  Jun-Mo Nam
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 6.  Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993.

Authors:  J M Simpson; N Klar; A Donnor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Statistical methods for measuring outcomes.

Authors:  G Dunn
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  Sample Sizes Required to Detect Interactions between Two Binary Fixed-Effects in a Mixed-Effects Linear Regression Model.

Authors:  Andrew C Leon; Moonseong Heo
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  IMPROVE trial: a randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled analgesia for sickle cell painful episodes: rationale, design challenges, initial experience, and recommendations for future studies.

Authors:  Carlton D Dampier; Wally R Smith; Carrie G Wager; Hae-Young Kim; Margaret C Bell; Scott T Miller; Debra L Weiner; Caterina P Minniti; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti; Kenneth I Ataga; James R Eckman; Lewis L Hsu; Donna McClish; Sonja M McKinlay; Robert Molokie; Ifeyinwa Osunkwo; Kim Smith-Whitley; Marilyn J Telen
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Allen J Dietrich; Thomas E Oxman; John W Williams; Herbert C Schulberg; Martha L Bruce; Pamela W Lee; Sheila Barry; Patrick J Raue; Jean J Lefever; Moonseong Heo; Kathryn Rost; Kurt Kroenke; Martha Gerrity; Paul A Nutting
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.